[Bug tree-optimization/95752] Failure to optimize complicated usage of __builtin_ctz with conditionals properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95752 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/95566] x86 instruction selection --- some REX prefixes unnecessary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95566 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-08-20 Severity|normal

[Bug tree-optimization/101993] New: Potential vectorization opportunity when condition checks array address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101993 Bug ID: 101993 Summary: Potential vectorization opportunity when condition checks array address Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/101992] New: new object was created erroneously when co_await on function call that return lvalue reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101992 Bug ID: 101992 Summary: new object was created erroneously when co_await on function call that return lvalue reference Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/101991] New: bit_and or bit_ior with an invariant inside loop is not pulled out of the loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101991 Bug ID: 101991 Summary: bit_and or bit_ior with an invariant inside loop is not pulled out of the loop Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/84322] -fstrong-eval-order violated on assignment with function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84322 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2018-02-14 00:00:00 |2021-8-19 --- Comment #3 from Andrew

[Bug c++/101990] [12 Regression] ICE after parse error with concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101990 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-08-20

[Bug c++/101990] [12 Regression] ICE after parse error with concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101990 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Summary|ICE: tree

[Bug target/101989] Fail to optimize (a & b) | (c & ~b) to vpternlog instruction.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101989 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-08-20

[Bug c++/101990] New: ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101990 Bug ID: 101990 Summary: ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:87 Product: gcc

[Bug target/101989] Fail to optimize (a & b) | (c & ~b) to vpternlog instruction.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101989 --- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu --- Another testcase is from pr91796 __m256d copysign2_pd(__m256d from, __m256d to) { auto a = _mm256_castpd_si256(from); auto avx_signbit =

[Bug target/101989] New: Fail to optimize (a & b) | (c & ~b) to vpternlog instruction.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101989 Bug ID: 101989 Summary: Fail to optimize (a & b) | (c & ~b) to vpternlog instruction. Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug tree-optimization/94945] Missed optimization: Carry chain not recognized in manually unrolled loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94945 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/91796] Sub-optimal YMM register allocation.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91796 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||crazylht at gmail dot com --- Comment #10

[Bug target/91796] Sub-optimal YMM register allocation.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91796 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- In GCC 5-8 we produced: vpcmpeqd%ymm2, %ymm2, %ymm2 vpsllq $63, %ymm2, %ymm2 vandnpd %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 vandpd %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0 vorpd %ymm1, %ymm0,

[Bug tree-optimization/90774] avoid doing vector splat arithmetic where possible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90774 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2019-06-07 00:00:00 |2021-8-19 Blocks|

[Bug debug/101987] gcc 10.3.1 fails to generate debugging information for aarch64 .S files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101987 --- Comment #5 from Dietmar May --- I've confirmed that the issue is present in binutils 2.36.1, but not 2.35.1 ARM / Linaro's aarch64 10.2.1 toolchain uses binutils 2.35.1 Their 10.3.1 toolchain uses binutils 2.36.1 By copying the 'as'

[Bug tree-optimization/90774] avoid doing vector splat arithmetic where possible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90774 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- testcase: typedef int v4si __attribute__ ((vector_size (16))); v4si square(v4si num, int y, int x, int h, int k, int w, int p, int j, int u) { return num + 1 + k / 2 + p * 6234 + 75 * h + j / 3452 + 53 *

[Bug tree-optimization/96234] Sub-optimal register allocation with a signed integer literal.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96234 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #2 from Andrew

[Bug tree-optimization/96563] Failure to optimize loop with condition to simple arithmetic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96563 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2020-08-11 00:00:00 |2021-8-19 --- Comment #2 from Andrew

[Bug tree-optimization/96481] SLP fail to vectorize VEC_COND_EXPR pattern.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96481 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Last

[Bug c++/101988] [12 Regression] Accepts invalid new-expression of array of deduced class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101988 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Maybe related to PR 82110 but there has been other CTAD changes in GCC 12 too.

[Bug c++/101988] [12 Regression] Accepts invalid new-expression of array of deduced class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101988 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > I also noticed, GCC accepts while clang rejects: > template struct A { A(T); }; > auto p = new A[]{A(1),A(1)}; > > While changing it to [2], both GCC and clang

[Bug c++/101988] [12 Regression] Accepts invalid new-expression of array of deduced class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101988 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I also noticed, GCC accepts while clang rejects: template struct A { A(T); }; auto p = new A[]{A(1),A(1)}; While changing it to [2], both GCC and clang accepts it.

[Bug c++/101988] [12 Regression] Accepts invalid new-expression of array of deduced class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101988 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/101849] MMA built-in dies with a verify_gimple failed error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101849 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b0963c4379becafaebd8e52b0b42698ff151c293 commit r12-3034-gb0963c4379becafaebd8e52b0b42698ff151c293 Author: Peter Bergner Date:

[Bug debug/101987] gcc 10.3.1 fails to generate debugging information for aarch64 .S files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101987 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug middle-end/88670] [meta-bug] generic vector extension issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88670 Bug 88670 depends on bug 57601, which changed state. Bug 57601 Summary: Vector lowering could use larger modes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57601 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/57601] Vector lowering could use larger modes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57601 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/61105] [constexpr] accepts-invalid with new-expression in constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61105 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #6) > $ cat xx.cpp && /build/gcc-60760/gcc/xgcc -B /build/gcc-60760/gcc -S -Wall > -Wextra -Wpedantic -o/dev/null xx.cpp > constexpr void *operator new (__SIZE_TYPE__,

[Bug c++/86440] -Wignored-qualifiers diagnostic highlights wrong token with pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86440 --- Comment #2 from nightstrike --- gcc 11.2 changes it somewhat: a.c:1:5: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type [-Wignored-qualifiers] 1 | int const f() { return 0; } | ^ a.c:3:13: warning: type qualifiers

[Bug c++/101988] New: Accepts invalid new-expression of array of deduced class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101988 Bug ID: 101988 Summary: Accepts invalid new-expression of array of deduced class template Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/101987] gcc 10.3.1 fails to generate debugging information for aarch64 .S files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101987 Dietmar May changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Dietmar May

[Bug gcov-profile/89961] When "--intermediate-format" is used "--preserve-paths"/"--hash-filenames" is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89961 --- Comment #23 from xaizek --- > it should be fixed in the updated version of the patch. Yes, it is. > Right now, one can easily detect JSON format with > `gcov --help | grep json-format`, am I right? What type of capability would > you

[Bug debug/101987] gcc 10.3.1 fails to generate debugging information for aarch64 .S files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101987 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITING

[Bug debug/101987] gcc 10.3.1 fails to generate debugging information for aarch64 .S files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101987 --- Comment #2 from Dietmar May --- $ /opt/linaro/10.3.1/bin/aarch64-none-elf-gcc -v -g src/boot.S -c Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/opt/linaro/10.3.1/bin/aarch64-none-elf-gcc Target: aarch64-none-elf Configured with:

[Bug tree-optimization/101977] [12 Regression] array subscript 0 is outside array bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101977 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug tree-optimization/101977] array subscript 0 is outside array bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101977 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/101987] gcc 10.3.1 fails to generate debugging information for aarch64 .S files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101987 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/101987] New: gcc 10.3.1 fails to generate debugging information for aarch64 .S files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101987 Bug ID: 101987 Summary: gcc 10.3.1 fails to generate debugging information for aarch64 .S files Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/101916] SH4 ICE: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101916 Thomas Petazzoni changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thomas.petazzoni@free-elect

[Bug target/101915] Microblaze ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101915 Thomas Petazzoni changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thomas.petazzoni@free-elect

[Bug target/25671] test_bit() compilation does not expand to "bt" instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25671 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- With the fixed testcase we get: movq%rsi, %rax movq%rsi, %rcx shrq$6, %rax andl$63, %ecx movq(%rdi,%rax,8), %rax shrq%cl, %rax

[Bug target/25671] test_bit() compilation does not expand to "bt" instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25671 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- Note there is a bug in the original testcase. It should be: int test_bit(unsigned long *words, int bit) { int wsize = (sizeof *words) * 8; return (words[bit / wsize] & (1ul << (bit % wsize))) != 0;

[Bug target/89360] GCC doesn't emit cmovcc instruction in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89360 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |target --- Comment #2 from Andrew

[Bug target/101952] SH4 ICE: Error: unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101952 Thomas Petazzoni changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thomas.petazzoni@free-elect

[Bug tree-optimization/89360] GCC doesn't emit cmovcc instruction in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89360 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/89081] [x86] suboptimal code generated for condition expression returning negation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89081 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |middle-end Severity|normal

[Bug target/79709] Subobtimal code with -mavx and explicit vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79709 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug go/101986] New: go, sparc64: Segmentation violation during kubernetes build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101986 Bug ID: 101986 Summary: go, sparc64: Segmentation violation during kubernetes build Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/57601] Vector lowering could use larger modes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57601 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- This is fixed in GCC 10+ with the patches do do 64bit vector support in SSE.

[Bug target/86541] Use SSE to emulate __attribute__((vector_size(8)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86541 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #3 from

[Bug rtl-optimization/48037] Missed optimization: unnecessary register moves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48037 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug c++/101982] [7.5]function parameter should not accept auto as placeholder-type-specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101982 --- Comment #3 from qingzhe huang --- Thank you for clarifications!

[Bug middle-end/88670] [meta-bug] generic vector extension issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88670 Bug 88670 depends on bug 53101, which changed state. Bug 53101 Summary: Recognize casts to sub-vectors https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53101 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/53101] Recognize casts to sub-vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53101 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug go/101246] gccgo cross-compiler targeting arm fails to build with gcc 11. Missing structs in runtime.inc. Using uclibc-ng

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101246 --- Comment #6 from Lance Fredrickson --- So I compared runtime.inc in gcc 10.3 and gcc 11.1, and they have quite a bit different. I tried using the runtime.inc file from 10.3 in 11.1, and it does allow it to finish compiling, and I appear to

[Bug go/95389] Kubernetes build fails because of mangled PkgPath

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95389 --- Comment #6 from Ulrich Teichert --- After running out of disk space during stage2 of the gcc build, I now have a gcc 11.2.0 compiled for sparc64: ristkon:~> gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/64322] More optimize opportunity for constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/86723] not optimizing with bswap, that casts to int aftwards

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86723 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug target/87627] GCC generates rube-goldberg machine for trivial tail call on 32-bit x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87627 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2018-10-17 00:00:00 |2021-8-19 --- Comment #7 from Andrew

[Bug fortran/100950] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100950 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d881460deb1f0bdfc3e8fa2d391a03a9763cbff4 commit r12-3033-gd881460deb1f0bdfc3e8fa2d391a03a9763cbff4 Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug other/101984] [12 Regression] gimple-ssa-warn-access memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101984 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug other/101984] [12 Regression] gimple-ssa-warn-access memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101984 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81501087758cb0c32e555858cf367e449a09246e commit r12-3031-g81501087758cb0c32e555858cf367e449a09246e Author: Martin Sebor Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/86723] not optimizing with bswap, that casts to int aftwards

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86723 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2018-07-29 00:00:00 |2021-8-19 --- Comment #4 from Andrew

[Bug tree-optimization/13563] if-conversion not agressive enough

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13563 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcccs at gmx dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug tree-optimization/85971] Really Simple "If" with one function call inside is not optimized efficiently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85971 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/85987] cstore does not work with a store in one of the branches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85987 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- We are now able to handle the testcase in comment #0.

[Bug c/101985] New: vec_cpsgn parameter order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101985 Bug ID: 101985 Summary: vec_cpsgn parameter order Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug target/82582] not quite optimal code for -2*x*y - 3*z: could use one less LEA for smaller code without increasing critical path latency for any input

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82582 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug target/82582] not quite optimal code for -2*x*y - 3*z: could use one less LEA for smaller code without increasing critical path latency for any input

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82582 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/83171] __builtin_popcountl ((unsigned long long)unsigned_var) is not being optimized to __builtin_popcount (unsigned_var)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83171 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-11-26 00:00:00 |2021-8-19 --- Comment #3 from Andrew

[Bug other/101984] [12 Regression] gimple-ssa-warn-access memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101984 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/83247] simplify (int)a_long < 0 when we know a_long fits in int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83247 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/100767] arm: ice when inlining at -flto with different cpu and arch settings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100767 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug sanitizer/101978] thread sanitizer false positive when smart pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101978 --- Comment #1 from pavlick --- Apparently this is due to condition_variable, if it is commented //while (! cv.wait_for(lck, 1s, [_ptr](){ // return sh_ptr->processed == true;}) && true); then there are no

[Bug target/100530] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with -g: in add_dwarf_attr with __seg_gs (Alternative address-space) global variable since r8-4385-ga297ccb52e0c894e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100530 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/100530] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with -g: in add_dwarf_attr with __seg_gs (Alternative address-space) global variable since r8-4385-ga297ccb52e0c894e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100530 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||88094 --- Comment #6 from Andrew

[Bug target/100767] arm: ice when inlining at -flto with different cpu and arch settings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100767 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:255fe52e8ad859f59bb863ad75d00fa84caa88bd commit r9-9682-g255fe52e8ad859f59bb863ad75d00fa84caa88bd Author: Richard

[Bug target/100767] arm: ice when inlining at -flto with different cpu and arch settings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100767 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:59b5e629a7e4544dc7830638bc20f388c14ef7c8 commit r10-10048-g59b5e629a7e4544dc7830638bc20f388c14ef7c8 Author: Richard

[Bug target/100530] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with -g: in add_dwarf_attr with __seg_gs (Alternative address-space) global variable since r8-4385-ga297ccb52e0c894e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100530 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug debug/101975] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with '-g' for x86 named address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101975 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/101979] aarch64: wrong code with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101979 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/101984] [12 Regression] gimple-ssa-warn-access memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101984 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/101984] New: [12 Regression] gimple-ssa-warn-access memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101984 Bug ID: 101984 Summary: [12 Regression] gimple-ssa-warn-access memory leak Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: GC Severity: normal

[Bug analyzer/101983] New: analyzer leak false positives building singly linked list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101983 Bug ID: 101983 Summary: analyzer leak false positives building singly linked list Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ada/101924] /usr/ccs/bin/ld: Unsatisfied symbols: U_get_unwind_entry, U_IS_STUB_OR_CALLX, U_get_shLib_text_addr, U_is_shared_pc, U_init_frame_record, U_prep_frame_rec_for_unwind, U_get_shLib_unw_

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101924 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug ada/101924] /usr/ccs/bin/ld: Unsatisfied symbols: U_get_unwind_entry, U_IS_STUB_OR_CALLX, U_get_shLib_text_addr, U_is_shared_pc, U_init_frame_record, U_prep_frame_rec_for_unwind, U_get_shLib_unw_

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101924 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07b4100683e55023a78576cb8c75d8e40e41f44f commit r12-3028-g07b4100683e55023a78576cb8c75d8e40e41f44f Author: John David Anglin

[Bug c++/101982] [7.5]function parameter should not accept auto as placeholder-type-specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101982 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > GCC 7 has been unsupported for more than two years, Actually slightly less than two years (since November 2019). But it's still unsupported.

[Bug c++/101982] [7.5]function parameter should not accept auto as placeholder-type-specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101982 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/101980] [12 regressions] many test case failures after r12-3002

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101980 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/101982] New: function parameter should not accept auto as placeholder-type-specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101982 Bug ID: 101982 Summary: function parameter should not accept auto as placeholder-type-specifier Product: gcc Version: 7.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/101981] New: GCC10 produces bigger asm for simple switch than GCC7 - cortexM4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101981 Bug ID: 101981 Summary: GCC10 produces bigger asm for simple switch than GCC7 - cortexM4 Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug analyzer/101980] New: [12 regressions] many test case failures after r12-3002

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101980 Bug ID: 101980 Summary: [12 regressions] many test case failures after r12-3002 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/101979] New: aarch64: wrong code with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101979 Bug ID: 101979 Summary: aarch64: wrong code with -O3 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug sanitizer/101978] New: thread sanitizer false positive when smart pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101978 Bug ID: 101978 Summary: thread sanitizer false positive when smart pointers Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/101965] check in charconv is vacuously true

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101965 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.4 Severity|normal

[Bug libstdc++/101960] std::tuple with an array element is rejected as a named return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101960 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed on trunk, but I plan to backport it.

[Bug libstdc++/100139] std::views::{take, drop} don't type erase

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100139 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:321ff3ad38e05096abc4de6d3bb2150cc0f75d91 commit r10-10047-g321ff3ad38e05096abc4de6d3bb2150cc0f75d91 Author: Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/100139] std::views::{take, drop} don't type erase

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100139 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31433e154f5eecb17151d77b259b13d41c0b8e7c commit r11-8886-g31433e154f5eecb17151d77b259b13d41c0b8e7c Author: Jonathan

  1   2   >