https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102550
--- Comment #4 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> How did you configure and invoke make?
> Was newlib installed already or you building a combined tree?
of course it is installed. no it is completely separate. Even
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102550
--- Comment #3 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 51527
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51527=edit
config file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102550
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102544
miko at predsci dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||miko at predsci dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102550
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
libc is newlib-cygwin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102550
Bug ID: 102550
Summary: libssp cannot find size_t. they do not include
stddef.h
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102539
--- Comment #4 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Ah, that's very clever! Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71520
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35501
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |c
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52611
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102546
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Summary|Missed Dead
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102548
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 102539, which changed state.
Bug 102539 Summary: [11/12 regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized false positive,
invalid location
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102539
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102539
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102385
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 101580 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101580
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102385
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 102387 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102387
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102385
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102387
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||suochenyao at 163 dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102385
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102387
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 101897 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101897
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102542
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #2)
> I think this is a problem elsewhere.
Right which is why I said this is most likely the same issue as reported on the
earlier bug 102385 (and its many dups).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102548
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
reduced almost all the way:
typedef decltype(sizeof(0)) size_t;
struct tm;
extern "C"
size_t __attribute__((__cdecl__)) strftime(char * __restrict__ _Buf,size_t
_SizeInBytes,const char * __restrict__
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102548
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-30
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102548
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
apinski@xeond:~/src$ ~/upstream-gcc/bin/gcc cmTimestamp.ii -m32 -S
E:/Programming/Source/msys2/MINGW-packages/mingw-w64-cmake/src/cmake-3.21.2/Source/cmTimestamp.cxx:
In lambda function:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102285
--- Comment #12 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
with the following change, I can resolve the ICE:
[opc@qinzhao-ol8u3-x86 gcc]$ git diff
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c
index 70ce6a4d5b8d..b07026165075 100644
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102535
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9845c52db38f15740861435f38f7e5ad8a8de2ec
commit r12-3997-g9845c52db38f15740861435f38f7e5ad8a8de2ec
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95567
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6bca2e631b54f992c058ca8e445b45e9816690b
commit r12-3995-gb6bca2e631b54f992c058ca8e445b45e9816690b
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102534
--- Comment #4 from Ben Woodard ---
There continues to be an instruction after the completion of the inlining, the
next instruction in the sequence, At the time when the inlining occurs why
can’t the .loc 1 6 1 be placed there as part of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102547
--- Comment #4 from Bob Steagall ---
I have applied this tentative change to line 23436 of gcc/cp/pt.c from the
gcc-11.2.0 source tarball, and can confirm that the test case compiles for me.
The code I was working on also compiles, links, and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102285
--- Comment #11 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to qinzhao from comment #10)
> 2734 /* The heuristic of fold_builtin_alloca_with_align differs
git blame says:
13e49da934e9 (Tom de Vries 2011-10-07 12:49:49 + 2732)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102549
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102051
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102285
--- Comment #10 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
commented the following transformation in tree-ssa-ccp.c:
2733 #if 0
2734 /* The heuristic of fold_builtin_alloca_with_align differs before
and
2735after inlining, so we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98056
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||victor.burckel at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101144
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102547
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99575
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99575
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102547
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.3.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102547
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|ppalka at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93320
Luke Dalessandro changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ldalessandro at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102285
--- Comment #9 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
the direct cause of the ICE is because:
MEM[(int[0:D.1993] *)] = .DEFERRED_INIT (16, 2, 1);
in the above, the fb.3 is in REG instead MEM:
8451 gcc_assert (MEM_P (result));
(gdb)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101327
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101327
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e3ad4c45d128c1f4a69f86116a36312aa593554c
commit r9-9751-ge3ad4c45d128c1f4a69f86116a36312aa593554c
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102549
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note also from the docs:
This option is experimental and does not currently guarantee to disable all GCC
optimizations that affect signaling NaN behavior.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59769
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-30
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102549
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think you need -fsignaling-nans
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102547
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99710
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe ---
#include
struct task {
struct promise_type {
std::suspend_always initial_suspend();
std::suspend_always final_suspend() noexcept;
task get_return_object();
void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99710
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-30
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98490
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98490
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:97a5a41dbfef1722fdaf4dc979e8b9c274b4404d
commit r9-9750-g97a5a41dbfef1722fdaf4dc979e8b9c274b4404d
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82314
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82314
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a70195d7da49fe793ce3eb0e839b9ceea96c97a
commit r9-9749-g3a70195d7da49fe793ce3eb0e839b9ceea96c97a
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82314
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:39b948a8f404aa0bfb632d7b26bb0692b18f60c9
commit r10-10156-g39b948a8f404aa0bfb632d7b26bb0692b18f60c9
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102549
Bug ID: 102549
Summary: Incorrect optimization if argument is SNAN
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b19bbfb1482505367dd19ae4ab1ea19e36802b6a
commit r12-3993-gb19bbfb1482505367dd19ae4ab1ea19e36802b6a
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102548
Bug ID: 102548
Summary: gcc segmentation fault in cc1plus (with repro case)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102520
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102520
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f653f612a95ab9d54e005fba7ac6bb40ec14ffb9
commit r10-10155-gf653f612a95ab9d54e005fba7ac6bb40ec14ffb9
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102520
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0212bcfc31a938d4b2f247dc42f75b1d523bb1ef
commit r11-9047-g0212bcfc31a938d4b2f247dc42f75b1d523bb1ef
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102546
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> What I fail to see is how "a" got removed entirely from the IL, making this
> scenario possible:
>
> if (!(a >= d || f))
> foo();
What I meant to say is that I don't understand how "a"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102540
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez ---
To elide the foo(), _2 must be non-zero on the 2->3 edge dominating the call.
Interestingly, a.0_1 is non-zero on the 2->3 edge, and we have:
_2 = (unsigned int) a.0_1
but somehow we have no knowledge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89954
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89954
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6f4459c478b1c09e4b5e7d629fbf46d2a4fe4560
commit r12-3991-g6f4459c478b1c09e4b5e7d629fbf46d2a4fe4560
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102546
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71703
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:643e8f4ee3a2a59a9b96fbcd1ffa8bacbda5b383
commit r12-3990-g643e8f4ee3a2a59a9b96fbcd1ffa8bacbda5b383
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84007
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:643e8f4ee3a2a59a9b96fbcd1ffa8bacbda5b383
commit r12-3990-g643e8f4ee3a2a59a9b96fbcd1ffa8bacbda5b383
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102476
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102476
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d46a29d919058fb383d19fe35c234fab58286f71
commit r12-3985-gd46a29d919058fb383d19fe35c234fab58286f71
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102547
Bug ID: 102547
Summary: g++ 11. ICE with NTTPs and partial specialization
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102542
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96517
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102363
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-30
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93642
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94033
Bug 94033 depends on bug 94197, which changed state.
Bug 94197 Summary: __is_constructible gives an access error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94197
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94197
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101355
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102535
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101355
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102545
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102545
--- Comment #1 from Emily Leyland ---
Good question, there seems to be some debate. From
en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/constexpr, A constexpr specifier used in a
function or static data member (since C++17) declaration implies inline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102546
--- Comment #1 from Theodoros Theodoridis ---
It bisects to 2e96b5f14e4025691b57d2301d71aa6092ed44bc
ilt-in specs.
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --disable-multilib --disable-bootstrap
--enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20210930 (experimental) (GCC)
gcc-trunk -O3 -S missed_case.c
main:
.LFB0:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102518
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102530
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102540
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102104
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102544
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Stubbs ---
Please set "export GCN_DEBUG=1", try it again, and post the output.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102509
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102509
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c3d11a1e9528b6140c65a66d47225a0b6a8814e0
commit r12-3982-gc3d11a1e9528b6140c65a66d47225a0b6a8814e0
Author: Martin Liska
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102474
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102537
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102527
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102545
Bug ID: 102545
Summary: inlining constexpr is required yet it should not be.
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102527
--- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #11)
>> This looks mighty suspicious ;-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vrp.c b/gcc/tree-vrp.c
>>
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
