[Bug target/103750] [i386] GCC schedules KMOV instructions that destroys performance in loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103750 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #52031|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ipa/103669] [12 Regression] wrong code with -O --param=modref-max-depth=1 since r12-4976-g4898e958a92d45db

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103669 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/103669] [12 Regression] wrong code with -O --param=modref-max-depth=1 since r12-4976-g4898e958a92d45db

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103669 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d1e342b4afbad77cb92f8057cf6d1e996bfb077 commit r12-6072-g8d1e342b4afbad77cb92f8057cf6d1e996bfb077 Author: Jan Hubicka Date: Mon

[Bug c++/65642] [C++11] GCC rejects valid constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65642 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug ipa/81277] assert() in multiversioned functions causes compilation error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81277 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/81761] assembler error on __func__ et al. on attribute target overloads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81761 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/81761] assembler error on __func__ et al. on attribute target overloads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81761 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.1.0 Keywords|

[Bug c++/91780] Discrepancy between gcc 7.4, through 9.2, compared to clang.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91780 --- Comment #13 from Mikael Persson --- Ah right lifetime On Sun, 19 Dec 2021, 16:02 Mikael Persson, wrote: > Looking at it now, not sure why i didnt. > > On Sun, 19 Dec 2021, 14:00 redi at gcc dot gnu.org, < > gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org>

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 102644, which changed state. Bug 102644 Summary: deduction failure when having default non-type template parameters that are lambdas https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102644 What|Removed

[Bug c++/93595] [c++20] function call, substitution failure of template paramter with a lambda default in template context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93595 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/102644] deduction failure when having default non-type template parameters that are lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102644 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952 --- Comment #13 from HaoChen Gui --- Issue for fusion-p10-ldcmpi.c was fixed by r12-1655. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-cvs/2021-June/349357.html

[Bug c++/80488] Erroneous error "lambda-expression in template argument"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80488 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/93595] [c++20] Substitution failure of "auto = []{}" in template parameter list in nested template context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93595 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug pch/38013] Option to turn off usage of any precompiled header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38013 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/93595] [c++20] Substitution failure of "auto = []{}" in template parameter list in nested template context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93595 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lutztonineubert at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/97610] [10/11] template argument deduction fails for function with defaulted lambda as non-type-template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97610 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/97610] [10/11] template argument deduction fails for function with defaulted lambda as non-type-template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97610 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fchelnokov at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/101921] G++ cannot find a template function with lambda as default template argument inside a template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101921 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/97610] [10/11] template argument deduction fails for function with defaulted lambda as non-type-template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97610 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bastien.penavayre at epitech dot e

[Bug c++/96908] [c++20] substitution failure if lambda in default template param

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96908 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug driver/91244] gcc-ar prepends --plugin option thus triggers binutils getopt_long bug 13256

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91244 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- >From https://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html: > Note binutils 2.35 or newer is required for LTO to work correctly with GNU > libtool that includes doing a bootstrap with LTO enabled. (I added that

[Bug driver/91244] gcc-ar prepends --plugin option thus triggers binutils getopt_long bug 13256

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91244 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW See Also|

[Bug target/93459] ix86_fold_builtin should handle __builtin_ia32_pcmpeqd128_mask and similar builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93459 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug target/103627] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2769 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103627 --- Comment #4 from Kewen Lin --- For test.c, even we are on ppc64le P9, it can also get ICE: extern float *dest; extern __vector_quad src; int foo () { __builtin_mma_disassemble_acc (dest, ); return 0; } $ gcc test.c -mcpu=power10

[Bug target/103750] [i386] GCC schedules KMOV instructions that destroys performance in loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103750 --- Comment #13 from Hongtao.liu --- Created attachment 52031 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52031=edit untested patch. Attached patch can optimize #c0 to vmovdqu (%rdi), %ymm1 vmovdqu16 32(%rdi),

[Bug target/103627] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2769 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103627 --- Comment #3 from Kewen Lin --- Also failed with r12-0. I looked into the ICE with -mcpu=power6 -m32 on BE, the direct reason is that we turn off VSX flag but still leave MMA, when it wants to emit one move for V16QI it has to use multiple

[Bug tree-optimization/91198] GCC not generating AVX-512 compress/expand instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91198 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/91198] GCC not generating AVX-512 compress/expand instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91198 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- void compress(float const * __restrict__ input, float * __restrict__ output, int size) { float const threshold = 0.5; int o = 0; for (int i = 0; i < size;

[Bug tree-optimization/95792] Failure to optimize assignment of struct members to memset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95792 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Last

[Bug tree-optimization/93334] -O3 generates useless code checking for overlapping memset ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93334 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug c++/83258] Rejecting function pointer non-type template parameter without linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83258 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug middle-end/92937] missing warning on a store with index >= malloc size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92937 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Severity|normal

[Bug c++/85589] Non type template parameter should allow object with no linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85589 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/92823] Is that possible to optimize C++ exception??????????? I always do not like 2 phases of exception unwind since it does not call destructors.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92823 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug target/55610] cc1 is calling munmap() on part of itself on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55610 --- Comment #12 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #11) > The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:22a982409323feb203401d345488a5a9c18e6733 > > commit

[Bug lto/92600] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE: symtab_node::verify failed, building 523.xalancbmk_r with -flto -fno-inline since r267359

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92600 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c/90699] typo: "taget" should be "target"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90699 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/103750] [i386] GCC schedules KMOV instructions that destroys performance in loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103750 --- Comment #12 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #11) > (In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #6) > > It got worse. Now I'm seeing: > > > > .L807: > > vmovdqu16 (%rsi), %ymm2 > > vmovdqu16

[Bug target/90524] [10/11/12 Regression] attribute name and argument mixed up in an error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90524 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > aarch64 error message is good: > :2:1: error: pragma or attribute 'target("foobar")' is not valid > 2 | __attribute__ ((target ("foobar"))) void foo () { } >

[Bug target/90524] [10/11/12 Regression] attribute name and argument mixed up in an error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90524 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu --- Comment #3 from

[Bug target/90524] [10/11/12 Regression] attribute name and argument mixed up in an error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90524 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|attribute name and argument |[10/11/12 Regression]

[Bug target/103750] [i386] GCC schedules KMOV instructions that destroys performance in loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103750 --- Comment #11 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #6) > It got worse. Now I'm seeing: > > .L807: > vmovdqu16 (%rsi), %ymm2 > vmovdqu16 32(%rsi), %ymm3 > vpcmpuw $6, %ymm0, %ymm2,

[Bug c/90760] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE on attributes section and alias in set_section, at symtab.c:1573

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90760 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||guillaume.bertholon@hotmail

[Bug middle-end/90470] internal compiler error after multiple declaration of alias in a custom section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90470 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug target/90487] optimize SSE & AVX char compares with subsequent movmskb [negation]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90487 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug testsuite/90368] gdc testsuite uses "ln -s . gdc.test", which doesn't work on msys2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90368 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think this was fixed in GCC 11 by r11-7878-gbe080b17271cfbe

[Bug c/88874] support FMA on vector types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88874 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug target/98648] Failure to optimize out no-op vector operation using andnot

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98648 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/101017] ICE: Segmentation fault, convert_memory_address_addr_space_1 with vector_size(32) and target_clone arch=core-avx2/default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101017 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||6.1.0, 7.1.0, 8.1.0, 9.1.0 Last

[Bug target/98468] [9 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/rlwimi-2.c fails starting with r9-3594

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98468 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||crazylht at gmail dot com --- Comment #6

[Bug target/98648] Failure to optimize out no-op vector operation using andnot

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98648 --- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu --- Fixed by r12-6071-g19dcecd963295b02b96c8cac57933657dbe3234a

[Bug tree-optimization/86710] 3 missing logarithm optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86710 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug target/103750] [i386] GCC schedules KMOV instructions that destroys performance in loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103750 --- Comment #10 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #9) > (In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #0) > > Testcase: > ... > > The assembly for this produces: > > > > vmovdqu16 (%rdi), %ymm1 > >

[Bug target/86267] detect conversions between bitmasks and vector masks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86267 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Last

[Bug c++/86488] malloc attribute when pointer is returned as part of a struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86488 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug target/98468] [9 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/rlwimi-2.c fails starting with r9-3594

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98468 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19dcecd963295b02b96c8cac57933657dbe3234a commit r12-6071-g19dcecd963295b02b96c8cac57933657dbe3234a Author: liuhongt Date: Wed Dec

[Bug lto/68384] LTO error for global register variables in PHP 7 compiling on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68384 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug lto/86442] Wrong error: global register variable follows a function definition when using LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86442 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug middle-end/86437] runtime segfault on Fortran code with large array and -Ofast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86437 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|WAITING

[Bug middle-end/86437] runtime segfault on Fortran code with large array and -Ofast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86437 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- I tried "-Ofast -fmax-stack-var-size=2096" and I get: _38 = __builtin_malloc (848); Without the max-stack-var-size option, I get: real(kind=8) A.22[106]; Even with " -fmax-stack-var-size=2096

[Bug testsuite/86016] New tests for r260978 report excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86016 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0 Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/86345] Likely false warning with -Wstringop-overflow and memset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86345 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #3 from

[Bug tree-optimization/100801] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Aggressive loop optimizations cause incorrect warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100801 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Aggressive loop |[9/10/11/12 Regression]

[Bug driver/69471] "-march=native" unintentionally breaks further -march/-mtune flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69471 --- Comment #21 from H.J. Lu --- *** Bug 42444 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/42444] "-march=i386 -march=native -mfpmath=sse" problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42444 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/36748] scev const-prop pass adds bad line numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36748 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.7.1 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug tree-optimization/103194] [12 Regression] ice in optimize_atomic_bit_test_and with __sync_fetch_and_and since r12-5102-gfb161782545224f5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103194 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/69690] -pg -fomit-frame-pointer fails with error even if -pg does not depend on frame pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69690 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- The handling of the incompatible of pg and fomit-frame-pointer should be moved to opts.c out of the spec really.

[Bug libstdc++/103629] [11/12 Regression] Possible miscompilation visible using pthread + exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103629 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Possible miscompilation |[11/12 Regression] Possible

[Bug libstdc++/103629] Possible miscompilation visible using pthread + exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103629 --- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski --- Could Visibility not being applied correctly to lambdas but does that matter?

[Bug ipa/103766] [12 Regression] Initialization of variable passed via static chain is lost.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103766 --- Comment #12 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz --- > Even trying to find a Fortran testsuite friendly version is hard because the > issue can only happen with print, I tried even doing internal write to a > string > it is passing without

[Bug ipa/103669] [12 Regression] wrong code with -O --param=modref-max-depth=1 since r12-4976-g4898e958a92d45db

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103669 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- Created attachment 52030 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52030=edit Patch in testing The problem here is a mixup with do_dataflow flag which prevents the name from being analyzed. I am

[Bug preprocessor/84864] Issues with large line numbers >= 2^31

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84864 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- >From my notes of the duplicated bug: clang does not use negative line numbers: :2147483648:9: warning: A1 [-W#pragma-messages] But MSVC does: (-2147483648): warning C4081: expected '('; found 'string'

[Bug preprocessor/84864] Issues with large line numbers >= 2^31

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84864 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jg at jguk dot org --- Comment #7 from

[Bug preprocessor/90477] can negative line numbers be avoided

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90477 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug ipa/103766] [12 Regression] Initialization of variable passed via static chain is lost.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103766 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #7) > (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6) > > > I would welcome a testuite friendly version of the fortran testcase > > Both Andrew and I failed to make a C

[Bug ipa/103766] [12 Regression] Initialization of variable passed via static chain is lost.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103766 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/103766] [12 Regression] Initialization of variable passed via static chain is lost.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103766 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fcbf94a5be9e0c1ecad92da773a6632b86b7f70a commit r12-6067-gfcbf94a5be9e0c1ecad92da773a6632b86b7f70a Author: Jan Hubicka Date: Sun

[Bug ipa/103766] [12 Regression] Initialization of variable passed via static chain is lost.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103766 --- Comment #8 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz --- > > I would welcome a testuite friendly version of the fortran testcase > > Both Andrew and I failed to make a C reproducer - what about just taking the > -fdump-tree-gimple, as input would

[Bug ipa/103766] [12 Regression] Initialization of variable passed via static chain is lost.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103766 --- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6) > I would welcome a testuite friendly version of the fortran testcase Both Andrew and I failed to make a C reproducer - what about just taking the

[Bug fortran/103418] random_number() does not accept pointer, intent(in) array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57b51b8bae4c2ecec3281929f57e4a6a0e6f9ea0 commit r11-9404-g57b51b8bae4c2ecec3281929f57e4a6a0e6f9ea0 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug middle-end/103770] [11 Regression] ICE related to VLA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103770 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE related to VLA |[11 Regression] ICE related

[Bug demangler/99188] cxxfilt may exist a uaf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99188 Pavel Mayorov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pmayorov at cloudlinux dot com ---

[Bug fortran/103505] [9 Regression] ICE in compare_bound_mpz_t, at fortran/resolve.c:4587 since r8-7594-g078c5aff5ed83e9c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||12.0 Summary|ICE

[Bug fortran/103588] ICE: Simplification error in gfc_ref_dimen_size, at fortran/array.c:2407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103588 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/103766] [12 Regression] Initialization of variable passed via static chain is lost.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103766 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- This is yet another stupid early exit in the propagation code (next stage1 i guess I will want to go through them and make it more systematic - those originate from quite early versions of modref when it was

[Bug fortran/103588] ICE: Simplification error in gfc_ref_dimen_size, at fortran/array.c:2407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103588 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c38611aabf4022323b7c44d0dcb3f6b076836de0 commit r9-9878-gc38611aabf4022323b7c44d0dcb3f6b076836de0 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/103588] ICE: Simplification error in gfc_ref_dimen_size, at fortran/array.c:2407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103588 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:650ac4b25121e48a64a021b0d21738ea08be3511 commit r10-10351-g650ac4b25121e48a64a021b0d21738ea08be3511 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/103505] ICE in compare_bound_mpz_t, at fortran/resolve.c:4587 since r8-7594-g078c5aff5ed83e9c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e301a0a8a0f6287ff04e74893265e40dff256301 commit r10-10350-ge301a0a8a0f6287ff04e74893265e40dff256301 Author: Harald

[Bug libfortran/103634] Runtime crash with PACK on zero-sized arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103634 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05640d5ca8a20929f30eef41baee3e4a8d85c898 commit r11-9403-g05640d5ca8a20929f30eef41baee3e4a8d85c898 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/103412] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103412 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/103412] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103412 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7ba46cc7867e0f7fc4b28f70f407067cfdd78112 commit r10-10349-g7ba46cc7867e0f7fc4b28f70f407067cfdd78112 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug target/103762] [12 Regression] glibc master branch is miscompiled by r12-897

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103762 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug fortran/103412] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103412 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4f9ad140c6c2ca51b591f44f7579cc3b81356291 commit r11-9402-g4f9ad140c6c2ca51b591f44f7579cc3b81356291 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug c++/53431] C++ preprocessor ignores #pragma GCC diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431 --- Comment #46 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Lewis Hyatt from comment #44) > I hope this looks workable, happy to adjust the patch as needed. If you don't get much attention to the patch, it may be worth pinging it. But before

[Bug c++/94376] When nested inside a lambda body, [=] captures by const value instead of by value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94376 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89cf57ea35d1e0a0b818997c737ac70b7310d9d9 commit r12-6065-g89cf57ea35d1e0a0b818997c737ac70b7310d9d9 Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug c++/12944] [meta-bug] C++ name-lookup problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12944 Bug 12944 depends on bug 103714, which changed state. Bug 103714 Summary: [11/12 Regression] name lookup in requires-clause finds wrong thing https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103714 What|Removed

[Bug c++/103714] [11/12 Regression] name lookup in requires-clause finds wrong thing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103714 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/103714] [11/12 Regression] name lookup in requires-clause finds wrong thing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103714 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75d95f5f0151247c39f0beb01376485806d0fd47 commit r11-9401-g75d95f5f0151247c39f0beb01376485806d0fd47 Author: Patrick Palka

  1   2   >