https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105147
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 5 Apr 2022, segher at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105147
>
> Segher Boessenkool changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105002
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105002
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83b43c74bbbdc6b6903350b220b932c6f774bdfd
commit r12-8010-g83b43c74bbbdc6b6903350b220b932c6f774bdfd
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Tue Apr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105171
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105172
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Are you sure this is not an assembler bug which then you should report to
binutils.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105174
Bug ID: 105174
Summary: [Concepts] Example from temp.func.order-p6 selects
wrong overload
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105133
--- Comment #2 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> (In reply to luoxhu from comment #0)
> >
> > cat hellow.res
> > 3
> > hello.o 2
> > 192 ccb9165e03755470 PREVAILING_DEF main
> > 197
c version 12.0.1 20220405 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105172
Bug ID: 105172
Summary: RV64: gcc generates R_RISCV_ALIGN with a
non-power-of-two value
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104461
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102301
Jiang An changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de34 at live dot cn
--- Comment #8 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105134
--- Comment #6 from piliu at redhat dot com ---
Created attachment 52757
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52757=edit
precompiled code of sha256
compile command:
gcc -E -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss -mcmodel=large -Os
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105134
--- Comment #5 from piliu at redhat dot com ---
Created attachment 52756
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52756=edit
-ftree-vectorize can not produce correct code for kexec-tools
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105134
--- Comment #4 from piliu at redhat dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Can you provide preprocessed source of the TU containing sha256_starts and
> the full compiler command-line used to compile it?
For a single file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105171
--- Comment #4 from Jason A. Donenfeld ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> >local_tick = (unsigned) tv.tv_sec * 1000 + tv.tv_usec / 1000;
>
> The only place where local_tick is used is inside coverage.cc:
> if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105171
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
>toplev.c
You mean toplev.cc right?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105171
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105171
Jason A. Donenfeld changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|plugins |driver
--- Comment #1 from Jason
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105041
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105171
Bug ID: 105171
Summary: `local_tick` can overflow and become -1
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104894
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |bergner at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104303
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
OK, tree-ssa-alias is using:
if (ref_may_access_global_memory_p (ref))
to determine if the access to S9b.6_22 may be used by the call. I expected
this to return true because memory pointed to S9b.6_22 is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105164
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Interestingly, I tried a build of gcc trunk with the new clang-14
and got many cases of this warning.
$ grep "warning:.*Wbitwise-instead-of-logical" mk.out | sort | uniq -c > /tmp/0
$ wc -l /tmp/0
16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105162
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52750|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105160
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
It is indeed missing logic to merge the side_effect and nondeterministic flag
while updating after inlining. I am testing the following
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-modref.cc b/gcc/ipa-modref.cc
index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100608
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||92024
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105170
Bug ID: 105170
Summary: Invalid finalization in intrinsic assignment
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102593
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Macleod ---
We can use the original testcase as the litmus test for basic support if we
compile it with
-O2 -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-dominator-opts
The unroller will unroll the loop and the VRP2 pass will be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105168
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103329
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103329
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 52753
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52753=edit
fix?
I can't reproduce this with the top of either the 11 or 12 branches; if you
can, does this fix it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103035
Bug 103035 depends on bug 105139, which changed state.
Bug 105139 Summary: [12 Regression] GCC produces vmovw instruction with an
incorrect argument for -O3 -march=sapphirerapids since
r12-6215-g708b87dcb6e48cb4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105139
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|uros at gcc dot gnu.org|
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105139
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cbc9dd66484a51d450f78ab748a872b939c90c3f
commit r12-8004-gcbc9dd66484a51d450f78ab748a872b939c90c3f
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I think it's valid to reject this at compile time (rather than just
generating a runtime trap): the "such that the type of a pointer to an
object that has the specified type can be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31178
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Macleod ---
no... we won't process ranges for anything unless it passes supports_type_p ():
(INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) || POINTER_TYPE_P (type)))
oh oh oh.
Never mind. I see. we are generating a range for i_2, and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105167
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-04-05
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105167
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31178
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
INTEGRAL_TYPE_P is only true for scalar integral types (integer, enum and
boolean).
Do you mean ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P instead which is true also for integral vector
and complex types?
Anyway, one can use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31178
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Macleod ---
huh, so even after fixing the testcase, ranger is still tripping over this test
case.
uv1ti ashl_v1ti (uv1ti x, unsigned int i)
{
uv1ti _3;
:
_3 = x_1(D) << i_2(D);
return _3;
we have an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105138
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7,8,9,10,11,12,F95] Bogus |[7,8,9,10,11,F95] Bogus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104210
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104210
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:892c7f03ae63121766a8be48f7e3b672547fd627
commit r12-8003-g892c7f03ae63121766a8be48f7e3b672547fd627
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105138
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d46685b04071a485b56de353d997a866bfc8caba
commit r12-8002-gd46685b04071a485b56de353d997a866bfc8caba
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104812
--- Comment #6 from Mike K. ---
Thanks a lot for the guidance, posted patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105166
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Testcase without warnings:
void
bar (foo, a)
void (**foo) ();
int a;
{
(foo)[1] = bar;
foo[1] (1);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105166
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105169
Bug ID: 105169
Summary: Compiling C++ code with
-fpatchable-function-entry=16,14 results in references
to discarded sections
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105163
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-04-05
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105163
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
#c0 started to ICE with r0-122928-gf6b64c35014ca111711e753be85bb99280a1e115
#c1 as well if you don't omit the argument name.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105162
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop ---
Created attachment 52750
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52750=edit
patch
Fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105162
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Pop ---
Also happens when compiling with LSE: -march=armv8.1-a or later.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103329
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103147
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
Bug 104552 depends on bug 104897, which changed state.
Bug 104897 Summary: wrong plural form in diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104897
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104897
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404
Bug 94404 depends on bug 103852, which changed state.
Bug 103852 Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] Alias template argument deduction is
available in C++17 mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103852
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103852
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103147
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14814e20161d7b6a4e9cac244c7013fa56f71f55
commit r12-8000-g14814e20161d7b6a4e9cac244c7013fa56f71f55
Author: Richard Sandiford
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104897
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e8bc70cc17b0105e2c463a98c9ff76039d03ff60
commit r12-7999-ge8bc70cc17b0105e2c463a98c9ff76039d03ff60
Author: Richard Sandiford
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104812
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105165
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103852
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d583d24200ac33a1cb281b7ddee9aad351151b5
commit r12-7998-g5d583d24200ac33a1cb281b7ddee9aad351151b5
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101677
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1de6612d994ada8edaab18bbc6afd8e9a57413aa
commit r12-7997-g1de6612d994ada8edaab18bbc6afd8e9a57413aa
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105168
Bug ID: 105168
Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in
gfc_maybe_dereference_var, at
fortran/trans-expr.cc:2870
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105167
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105167
Bug ID: 105167
Summary: ICE in gfc_set_default_type, at fortran/symbol.cc:298
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105166
Bug ID: 105166
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in ao_ref_init_from_ptr_and_range,
at tree-ssa-alias.cc:863
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105165
Bug ID: 105165
Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE in
gimple_redirect_edge_and_branch, at tree-cfg.cc:6136
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105163
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105164
Bug ID: 105164
Summary: new warning in clang, missing in gcc:
-Wbitwise-instead-of-logical
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105163
Bug ID: 105163
Summary: ICE: SSA corruption
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105162
Bug ID: 105162
Summary: [AArch64] outline-atomics drops dmb ish barrier on
__sync builtins
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104812
--- Comment #4 from Mike K. ---
Created attachment 52749
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52749=edit
propose to return an error if constuct-name clashes with variable name
> Note, the prohibition in the standard is not a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105147
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105160
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93260
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105161
Bug ID: 105161
Summary: variable constant-folded in its uses appears as
optimized out depending on where it is assigned
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104293
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104073
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105148
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105148
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
- MEM [(int[1][0:D.1996] *)y.1_8][5]{lb: 0 sz: _6 * 4}[i_2]
= 0;
+ MEM [(int[1][0:D.1996] *)y.1_8][5]{lb: 0 sz: <<< error
>>>}[i_2] = 0;
find_interesting_uses_op fails to consider _6 * 4, in fact
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105148
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104071
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105158
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 52748
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52748=edit
patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105158
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105148
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Reduced testcase:
extern void foo (void);
static inline int
bar (int n)
{
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
foo ();
int y[1][i];
y[n][i] = 0;
}
}
int
baz (void)
{
return bar (5);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105158
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104688
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Besides missing AMD response, it isn't fully fixed, because the change is on
the libatomic side only.
So we still pay the cost to call those functions (and often PLT cost too) and
return from them.
For GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104688
--- Comment #8 from Xi Ruoyao ---
Shall I close it as FIXED, or keep it opening waiting for AMD response?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105160
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, we ignore inlined edges during propagation!?
for (cgraph_edge *callee_edge = cur->callees; callee_edge;
callee_edge = callee_edge->next_callee)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105160
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105160
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105160
Bug ID: 105160
Summary: [12 regression] ipa modref marks functions with asm
volatile as const or pure
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw ---
> I think all are covered now.
Yes and no: while the test is now UNSUPPORTED on SPARC, it also became
UNSUPPORTED on x86 (both 32 and 64-bit)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105155
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
-fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow
currently instruments (unlike e.g. the shift or division instrumentation) only
what falls through unfolded from the early passes (generic folding,
gimplification and up to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105159
Bug ID: 105159
Summary: -fipa-reference-addressable causes drop of DWARF
location info at -Og
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mikael at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105158
Bug ID: 105158
Summary: ftree-ccp drops DWARF const value attribute at
-Og/-O1/-O2/-O3
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
