https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105235
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka ---
A slightly different testcase fails elsewhere:
$ cat testcase.c
int i, j;
void
foo (double d)
{
i = __builtin_ilogbl (d);
j = __builtin_sinl (d);
}
$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O
linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r12-8090-20220411190659-g1774ab84863-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-pr105211-pr105214-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.1 20220411 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105223
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0899b22d9329c1e8fc12d6f0deee0f87dcc0163a
commit r12-8099-g0899b22d9329c1e8fc12d6f0deee0f87dcc0163a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92918
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4195fced8a13422db94e179404588d9d887a036a
commit r12-8098-g4195fced8a13422db94e179404588d9d887a036a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105223
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4195fced8a13422db94e179404588d9d887a036a
commit r12-8098-g4195fced8a13422db94e179404588d9d887a036a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105216
--- Comment #10 from Hongtao.liu ---
Probably related to below 3 cancelled jump thread which affects pre.
2076Threading through latch before loop opts would create non-empty latch:
2077 Cancelling jump thread: (15, 16) incoming edge; (16,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105234
--- Comment #3 from Khem Raj ---
Second sample works when I do not use _FORTIFY_SOURCES=2, so perhaps gcc-12
needs to adjust some glibc headers ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105234
--- Comment #2 from Khem Raj ---
Created attachment 52787
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52787=edit
test case 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105234
--- Comment #1 from Khem Raj ---
here is another testcase from gnupg on mips with gcc12 failing
$ mips-yoe-linux-gcc dirmngr.i
In file included from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105234
Bug ID: 105234
Summary: nlining failed in call to 'always_inline'
'fmt::v8::basic_format_string::basic_format_string(const S&)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103623
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105233
Bug ID: 105233
Summary: Incorrect "alignment not an integer constant" error in
alignas with template parameter dependent argument
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105207
--- Comment #4 from Pavel M ---
To: Andrew Pinski
At the 1st glance I expected to see that -E produces the output after splicing
is done (i.e. xxx #error). However, the "preprocessing only" is out of scope of
the C11. As stackoverflow.com user
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104894
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d74c4c6a1b4956b5cd9b2a770bb7261836fa1289
commit r12-8095-gd74c4c6a1b4956b5cd9b2a770bb7261836fa1289
Author: Peter Bergner
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105223
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98249
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d087b59527a658a4de13febbb593edbf03339e93
commit r12-8093-gd087b59527a658a4de13febbb593edbf03339e93
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105213
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0508f0b810985f4a8543ce44701ec7330ef29796
commit r12-8091-g0508f0b810985f4a8543ce44701ec7330ef29796
Author: Segher Boessenkool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103623
--- Comment #32 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0508f0b810985f4a8543ce44701ec7330ef29796
commit r12-8091-g0508f0b810985f4a8543ce44701ec7330ef29796
Author: Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105232
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
Summary|ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105232
Bug ID: 105232
Summary: ICE in tree_to_poly_int64, at tree.cc:3224
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105226
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89125
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45592|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105231
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105206
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105206
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 02:45:22PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> This might be related to PR89125. The patch I attached to that PR has never
> found its way into the repository. I'll do some
ng-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-pr105211-pr105214-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.1 20220411 (experimental) (GCC)
Both vanilla gcc r12-8090 and with pr105211 and pr105214 patches applies ICE
the same way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105227
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105230
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105227
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105223
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
FWIW, the problematic hunk from r12-7714 appears to be:
--- a/gcc/cp/class.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/class.cc
...
@@ -7700,14 +7723,17 @@ finish_struct (tree t, tree attributes)
lookup not to fail or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104253
--- Comment #24 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ebf64eaf264e1dcb4e72b77f67308fe58d993f8
commit r10-10530-g3ebf64eaf264e1dcb4e72b77f67308fe58d993f8
Author: Alexandre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105223
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ---
The implicitly declared ServiceReference::operator= members lack a
TEMPLATE_INFO, but filter_memfn_lookup expects it (along with all other
non-template member functions from the instantiated class) to have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104253
--- Comment #23 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20bde90da2ac415d4a06e7a8b2ba770d50385208
commit r11-9810-g20bde90da2ac415d4a06e7a8b2ba770d50385208
Author: Alexandre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105229
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105218
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105218
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1774ab84863202f5db694914b67e3aef8c6dd807
commit r12-8090-g1774ab84863202f5db694914b67e3aef8c6dd807
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98249
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105031
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105031
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:73da9ec55609efa532b9ac85ac2dbe121c134e18
commit r12-8089-g73da9ec55609efa532b9ac85ac2dbe121c134e18
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105230
Bug ID: 105230
Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in find_array_section, at
fortran/expr.cc:1634
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105228
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105229
Bug ID: 105229
Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE in lookup_template_class_1, at
cp/pt.cc:10111
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105228
Bug ID: 105228
Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree
that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have
'error_mark' in decl_anon_ns_mem_p, at cp/tree.cc:3826
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105227
Bug ID: 105227
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in type_in_anonymous_namespace_p,
at ipa-utils.h:233
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105226
Bug ID: 105226
Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gimple_split_edge, at
tree-cfg.cc:2960
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105225
Bug ID: 105225
Summary: build failure with musl libc 1.2.3 due to sysinfo.go
error: redefinition of 'SYS_SECCOMP'
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105223
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105222
--- Comment #4 from 康桓瑋 ---
maybe dup of PR99546.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105224
Bug ID: 105224
Summary: [modules] g++.dg/modules/virt-2_a.C: inline key
methods: c++ modules and arm aapcs clash
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
URL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105219
--- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Alex Coplan from comment #3)
> (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #1)
> > Smaller reproducer getting rid of the loop nest and simplify the inner
> > condition.
>
> Hmm, I can't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105223
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105223
Bug ID: 105223
Summary: [12 Regression] filter_memfn_lookup internal compiler
error
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105219
--- Comment #3 from Alex Coplan ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #1)
> Smaller reproducer getting rid of the loop nest and simplify the inner
> condition.
Hmm, I can't reproduce the issue with this locally (with or without the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104853
--- Comment #13 from Kito Cheng ---
Hi rvalue:
Pushed the fix to trunk and GCC 11 branch for fixing both arch-canonicalize and
multilib-generator script.
Tested GCC 11/trunk with --with-isa-spec=2.2/20191213.
Could you try that to make sure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104853
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa21fcfb67587837c1704703a710496999393c1d
commit r11-9809-gfa21fcfb67587837c1704703a710496999393c1d
Author: Kito Cheng
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105219
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103818
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105217
--- Comment #2 from Siddhesh Poyarekar ---
OK, taking a closer look, it looks like clang simply fails to fortify fread
(probably due to https://reviews.llvm.org/D109967 or something similar).
Modifying the code to use __fread_chk directly:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105219
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102772
--- Comment #48 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #47)
> Sorry for the delay: I haven't been well lately.
I'm sorry to hear that.
Anyway, I'm out of ideas and unfortunately Solaris/x86 is not on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104253
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab0f04e4df1b7b312a4c9fa9b4d675778a0bae86
commit r12-8087-gab0f04e4df1b7b312a4c9fa9b4d675778a0bae86
Author: Alexandre Oliva
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105220
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104853
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4132f6ba9583e128a00d55961ae8c8e7245b2223
commit r12-8084-g4132f6ba9583e128a00d55961ae8c8e7245b2223
Author: Kito Cheng
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105222
--- Comment #3 from 康桓瑋 ---
(In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #2)
> And gcc accepts the following invalid syntax:
>
> int main() {
> auto b = requires { true ? [] : [] {}; };
> }
>
> https://godbolt.org/z/xeE1oYs1Y
It seems like the single []
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105206
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Hm, it works for me on linux with glibc, can you be more specific as to what
> OS/libc (version) you are using?
>
> foof:
> .LFB0:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105222
--- Comment #2 from 康桓瑋 ---
And gcc accepts the following invalid syntax:
int main() {
auto b = requires { true ? [] : [] {}; };
}
https://godbolt.org/z/xeE1oYs1Y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105222
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
gcc rejects this valid syntax with
source>:2:32: error: expected ':' before '{' token
2 | auto b = requires { true ? [] {} : [] {}; };
|^~
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105222
Bug ID: 105222
Summary: gcc rejects valid syntax of ternary operator for
lambda in requires clause
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105218
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 52783
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52783=edit
gcc12-pr105218.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105221
Bug ID: 105221
Summary: gcc rejects true ? [](auto) noexcept {} : [](int) {}
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105197
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105210
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105103
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102772
--- Comment #47 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #45 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> I'd like to ping the #c44 question. Thanks.
Sorry for the delay: I haven't been well lately.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102772
--- Comment #46 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #44 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Rainer, for pr80334.C, have you been able to test the #c43 patch?
I did: the test FAILs (SEGV) at -m32 -O0 only, same as for unmodified
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105197
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:78c718490bc2843d4dadcef8a0ae14aed1d15a32
commit r12-8080-g78c718490bc2843d4dadcef8a0ae14aed1d15a32
Author: Tamar Christina
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105218
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105220
Bug ID: 105220
Summary: Incorrect concept evaluation when friend class is
involved
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105218
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Actually, I've managed to reproduce even on x86_64-linux.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105217
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Likely wrong code with |Likely wrong code with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105218
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105219
Bug ID: 105219
Summary: [12 Regression] SVE: Wrong code with -O3
-msve-vector-bits=128 -mtune=thunderx
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105214
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105217
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |siddhesh at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105218
Bug ID: 105218
Summary: [12 regression] bootstrap build error in mpc in stage3
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-09-03 00:00:00 |2022-4-11
--- Comment #31 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105217
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-04-11
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105217
Bug ID: 105217
Summary: Likely wrong code with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50486
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Clang warns:
:16:18: warning: implicit conversion changes signedness: 'int' to
'enum e' [-Wsign-conversion]
return a(-1);
~ ^~
Not sure why gcc doesn't but it should.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100370
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:790b02af6a1fcfa07dba6129909b3578a55a51fa
commit r12-8079-g790b02af6a1fcfa07dba6129909b3578a55a51fa
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104301
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97841
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.3|11.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105216
--- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #8)
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #7)
> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2022, crazylht at gmail dot com wrote:
> >
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105214
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|sanitizer |target
--- Comment #4 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105214
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
possibly started earlier if you also add -fexceptions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105214
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105216
--- Comment #8 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #7)
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2022, crazylht at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105216
> >
> > --- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu ---
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
