[Bug c++/90428] -Wredundant-move could warn for more cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90428 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/106276] Missing -Wpessimizing-move warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106276 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/90428] -Wredundant-move could warn for more cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90428 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug middle-end/85620] Missing ENDBR after swapcontext

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85620 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2582080f19e8fe9c1204dfb6fecf744311f00777 commit r13-1717-g2582080f19e8fe9c1204dfb6fecf744311f00777 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu Jul 14

[Bug analyzer/106321] New: False positives from -Wanalyzer-tainted-array-index with switch with ranged cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106321 Bug ID: 106321 Summary: False positives from -Wanalyzer-tainted-array-index with switch with ranged cases Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/106294] GCC accepts the undefined behavior operation in a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106294 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- All compilers I tried (GCC, clang and MSVC) all accept this. There might be a defect report in this area too.

[Bug target/106273] [13 Regression] wrong code with -Og -march=cascadelake (due to ANDN?) since r13-1379-ge8a46e5cdab500ea

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106273 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fd3d25d6df1cbd385d2834ff3059dfb6905dd75c commit r13-1716-gfd3d25d6df1cbd385d2834ff3059dfb6905dd75c Author: Roger Sayle Date: Fri

[Bug c++/106320] New: [10 regression] build failure (due to view requirement changes?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106320 Bug ID: 106320 Summary: [10 regression] build failure (due to view requirement changes?) Product: gcc Version: 10.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug jit/106312] jit tests fail on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106312 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- I still get the same failures.

[Bug jit/106312] jit tests fail on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106312 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Ah, I have quite old versions of the prerequisite libs: lrwxrwxrwx. 1 jwakely jwakely 12 Feb 17 2017 gmp -> ./gmp-6.1.0/ lrwxrwxrwx. 1 jwakely jwakely 12 Feb 17 2017 mpc -> ./mpc-1.0.3/ lrwxrwxrwx. 1

[Bug jit/106312] jit tests fail on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106312 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Valgrind shows: ==29655== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV): dumping core ==29655== Bad permissions for mapped region at address 0x64322A8 ==29655==at 0x5D061A4:

[Bug jit/106312] jit tests fail on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106312 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Created attachment 53304 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53304=edit gcc/config.log (gzip compressed)

[Bug jit/106312] jit tests fail on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106312 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Created attachment 53303 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53303=edit top-level config.log (gzip compressed) Odd, I'm using gcc112 as well. Full configure command is:

[Bug tree-optimization/106237] [13 regression] serveral tests begin ICEing starting with r13-1575-gcf3a120084e946

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106237 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- gcc.target/powerpc/pr56605.c was actually reported in PR105267.

[Bug fortran/104313] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE verify_gimple failed with -ff2c since r10-2279-ge0af8f52b10385d8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104313 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:517fb1a78102df43f052c6934c27dd51d786aff7 commit r13-1715-g517fb1a78102df43f052c6934c27dd51d786aff7 Author: Steve Kargl Date:

[Bug jit/106312] jit tests fail on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106312 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Seems to work for me (on gcc112); is there a particular machine you tried this on?

[Bug analyzer/106319] New: False positives from -Wanalyzer-va-arg-type-mismatch on int promotion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106319 Bug ID: 106319 Summary: False positives from -Wanalyzer-va-arg-type-mismatch on int promotion Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/106210] [10/11/12/13 Regression] missing shrink wrap for simple case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106210 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug ipa/105682] [12/13 Regression] Both `-Wsuggest-attribute=pure` and `-Wsuggest-attribute=const` on same function since r10-3542-g0b92cf305dcf3438

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105682 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > > Started with r10-3542-g0b92cf305dcf3438. > > I think that is when the warning for pure attribute missing started

[Bug ipa/105682] [12/13 Regression] Both `-Wsuggest-attribute=pure` and `-Wsuggest-attribute=const` on same function since r10-3542-g0b92cf305dcf3438

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105682 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #3 from

[Bug tree-optimization/104276] memset is not elimited when followed by a store loop writing to that memory location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104276 --- Comment #8 from Darrell Wright --- What about something like a __builtin_overwrite( ptr, size_t ) that tells the compiler that the range specified will be written. It forms a contract to do so with the compiler and would allow the memset

[Bug fortran/104313] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE verify_gimple failed with -ff2c since r10-2279-ge0af8f52b10385d8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104313 --- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #7) > (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #6) > > The patch in comment 2 fixes the issue. It was submitted > > 13 hours after the initial report. > > Steve, if

[Bug ada/106318] New: ICE when using 'Range in Ada22 Iterated Component Association

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106318 Bug ID: 106318 Summary: ICE when using 'Range in Ada22 Iterated Component Association Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/106314] GTY fails on virtual int but not virtual void

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106314 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez --- The upcoming floating point ranges (frange) are small enough (one or two words) that I thought we could get away with streaming them as is to GC for global ranges (SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO). We have a

[Bug middle-end/106314] GTY fails on virtual int but not virtual void

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106314 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Why do you need these structures to be in GC memory anyways?

[Bug target/105960] [12/13 Regression] Crash in 32-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105960 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/104313] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE verify_gimple failed with -ff2c since r10-2279-ge0af8f52b10385d8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104313 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/100400] ICE in visit_loops_in_gang_single_region

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100400 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/106317] New: deferred-length character array pointer in derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106317 Bug ID: 106317 Summary: deferred-length character array pointer in derived type Product: gcc Version: 11.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/105746] vector::resize causes Warray-bounds when optimizer uses __builtin_memcpy or __builtin_memmove since r12-2793-g81d6cdd335ffc60c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105746 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |middle-end --- Comment #2 from Martin

[Bug analyzer/106284] False positives from -Wanalyzer-tainted-array-index with optimized conditionals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106284 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/98940] Implement C++23 language features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98940 Bug 98940 depends on bug 104477, which changed state. Bug 104477 Summary: [C++23] Implement P2255R2, type trait to detect reference binding to temporary https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104477 What|Removed

[Bug c++/104477] [C++23] Implement P2255R2, type trait to detect reference binding to temporary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104477 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/106316] New: [OpenMP] Auto "declare target" should honor 'declare variant' kind(nohost)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106316 Bug ID: 106316 Summary: [OpenMP] Auto "declare target" should honor 'declare variant' kind(nohost) Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/104477] [C++23] Implement P2255R2, type trait to detect reference binding to temporary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104477 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a15d3beace26d68561cb3481b70b0bbcb122ca5 commit r13-1714-g9a15d3beace26d68561cb3481b70b0bbcb122ca5 Author: Marek Polacek Date:

[Bug analyzer/106284] False positives from -Wanalyzer-tainted-array-index with optimized conditionals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106284 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a8edfbd37d399d1103d86e134ba0a92f8c873c3 commit r13-1713-g0a8edfbd37d399d1103d86e134ba0a92f8c873c3 Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug target/106303] [13 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with -fno-inline-small-functions on x86_64-linux-gnu: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 since r13-1607-gc3ed9e0d6e96d869

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106303 --- Comment #3 from Roger Sayle --- I think the solution may be similar/related to Richard Biener's fix for PR target/91522.

[Bug c++/94894] avoidable instantiation of conversion function template during overload resolution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94894 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/106315] New: 7.8% increased codesize on specfp 507.cactuBSSN_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106315 Bug ID: 106315 Summary: 7.8% increased codesize on specfp 507.cactuBSSN_r Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/106303] [13 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with -fno-inline-small-functions on x86_64-linux-gnu: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 since r13-1607-gc3ed9e0d6e96d869

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106303 --- Comment #2 from Roger Sayle --- Grr... This problem is at (currently just beyond) the limits of my abilities. The TImode STV pass uses data flow to split conversion opportunities up into chains, effectively performing live range splitting,

[Bug libstdc++/106183] std::atomic::wait might fail to be unblocked by notify_one/all on platforms without platform_wait()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106183 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Ted_lion from comment #1) > The subprocedure of comparison > with old value and waiting for the notification should not be interrupted by > an operation on same atomic object. I'm not sure

[Bug other/106314] New: GTY fails on virtual int but not virtual void

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106314 Bug ID: 106314 Summary: GTY fails on virtual int but not virtual void Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/106278] [13 Regression] ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: in ix86_output_ssemov, at config/i386/i386.cc:5555 since r13-1607-gc3ed9e0d6e96d869

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106278 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2fd215b03e88baae4e047dcb8dac5daa145dc3b4 commit r13-1707-g2fd215b03e88baae4e047dcb8dac5daa145dc3b4 Author: Roger Sayle Date: Fri

[Bug libstdc++/106183] std::atomic::wait might fail to be unblocked by notify_one/all on platforms without platform_wait()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106183 Ted_lion changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tedlion_tang at foxmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/106309] ICE: error reporting routines re-entered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106309 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Created attachment 53302 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53302=edit x.ii.xz Where I got so far.

[Bug c++/106313] GCC incorrectly compiles code involving concept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106313 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-07-15

[Bug c++/106309] ICE: error reporting routines re-entered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106309 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-reduction

[Bug c++/105946] [12 Regression] ICE in maybe_warn_pass_by_reference, at tree-ssa-uninit.cc:843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105946 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/106313] New: GCC incorrectly compiles code involving concept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106313 Bug ID: 106313 Summary: GCC incorrectly compiles code involving concept Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug jit/106312] New: jit tests fail on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106312 Bug ID: 106312 Summary: jit tests fail on powerpc64le Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: testsuite-fail Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/104543] [10/11 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104543 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug fortran/105558] simple 8-bit integer calculation fails with -O3 / march=core-avx2 on some gfortran 8/9/10 versions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105558 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ipa/105676] [12/13 Regression] Bogus `-Wsuggest-attribute=pure` on function marked `__attribute__((const))` since r12-5437-g09a4ffb72aa2f513

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105676 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13 Regression] Bogus|[12/13 Regression] Bogus

[Bug ipa/105682] [12/13 Regression] Both `-Wsuggest-attribute=pure` and `-Wsuggest-attribute=const` on same function since r10-3542-g0b92cf305dcf3438

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105682 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | Summary|[12/13 Regression]

[Bug libstdc++/63400] [C++11]precision of std::chrono::high_resolution_clock

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63400 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to frankhb1989 from comment #4) > For CLOCK_REALTIME, the Windows API GetSystemTimeAsFileTime is used. > GetSystemTimePreciseAsFileTime is an improved version which provide "the > highest

[Bug ipa/105685] [10/11/12 Regression] Bogus `-Wsuggest-attribute=cold` on function already marked as `__attribute__((cold))`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105685 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/105746] vector::resize causes Warray-bounds when optimizer uses __builtin_memcpy or __builtin_memmove since r12-2793-g81d6cdd335ffc60c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105746 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/105960] [12/13 Regression] Crash in 32-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105960 --- Comment #11 from Martin Liška --- Can we close it now?

[Bug c/105969] [12 Regression] ICE in Floating point exception since r13-750-g10d1986aee47c5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105969 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug rtl-optimization/106210] [10/11/12/13 Regression] missing shrink wrap for simple case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106210 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/106264] [10/11/12/13 Regression] spurious -Wunused-value on a folded frexp, modf, and remquo calls with unused result since r9-1295-g781ff3d80e88d7d0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106264 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/106309] ICE: error reporting routines re-entered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106309 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/106297] [12/13 Regression] stringop-overflow misbehaviour on atomic since r12-4725-g88b504b7a8c5affb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106297 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 53301 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53301=edit Unreduced test-case

[Bug tree-optimization/106297] [12/13 Regression] stringop-overflow misbehaviour on atomic since r12-4725-g88b504b7a8c5affb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106297 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug c++/106310] [12/13 Regregression] lookup after this-> seems wrong for dependent lookup since r12-6754-g30f2c22def739211

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106310 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Summary|[12/13

[Bug c++/106309] ICE: error reporting routines re-entered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106309 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/106303] [13 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with -fno-inline-small-functions on x86_64-linux-gnu: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 since r13-1607-gc3ed9e0d6e96d869

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106303 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-07-15 CC|

[Bug c++/84695] Missed opportunity to issue warning about override [-Winconsistent-missing-override]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84695 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment