https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106365
Bug ID: 106365
Summary: Miss to handle ifn .LEN_STORE in FRE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
-multiarch
--prefix=/scratch/software/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
// Thread model: posix
// Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
// gcc version 13.0.0 20220719 (experimental) [master -g2180cdd8a] (GCC)
//
// inline_asm_program0_preprocessed.c: In function ‘l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106363
Bug ID: 106363
Summary: [modules] Can't selectively reexport imported
declaration in same namespace
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106345
--- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin ---
Two more failures related to required tuning setting:
PASS->FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/compress-float-ppc.c scan-assembler lfs
PASS->FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/compress-float-ppc-pic.c scan-assembler lfs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106359
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106358
Bug 106358 depends on bug 106359, which changed state.
Bug 106359 Summary: -fanalyzer takes a very long time on Linux kernel:
sound/soc/codecs/cs47l{85,90}.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106359
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106359
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68871a008e686dbe56ff0b502f2864176a140716
commit r13-1761-g68871a008e686dbe56ff0b502f2864176a140716
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||me+gccbugzilla at s5 dot pm
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106350
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106202
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leo at adberg dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106361
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106361
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106202
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
The reduced testcase from PR 106361:
struct foo {
int x;
};
struct bar {
foo f;
friend bool operator==(const bar& a, const bar& b);
};
bool operator==(const bar& a, const bar& b) = default;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106361
--- Comment #4 from Leo Adberg ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Confirmed. Please next time, either put the testcase inline or attach it.
> Having a goldbolt link is not enough.
Will do next time! Sorry, first time here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106202
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.2.0, 12.1.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106361
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The ICE is:
: In function 'int main()':
:13:25: internal compiler error: in move_fn_p, at cp/decl.cc:15025
13 | return bar{} == bar{};
| ^
0x221f229 internal_error(char
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106361
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106361
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 53320
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53320=edit
testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106362
Bug ID: 106362
Summary: -Wc++20-compat should not warn with __extension__
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106361
Bug ID: 106361
Summary: Internal compiler error when creating an out-of-line
operator==() = default
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92434
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.1.1
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101330
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #4)
> (In reply to kargl from comment #1)
...
> > - step = gfc_get_expr ();
> > if (gfc_match (": %e ", ) != MATCH_YES)
> Yeah, this obviously fixes it. Looks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105959
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 105837 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105837
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103590
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103590
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f838d15641d256e21ffc126c3277b290ed743928
commit r13-1757-gf838d15641d256e21ffc126c3277b290ed743928
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106360
Bug ID: 106360
Summary: [13 regression] ICE in many test cases after
r13-1745-g4c323130257744
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101330
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106359
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Dumping the store shows huge numbers of clusters of the form:
cluster for: "RXANCL Input": CONJURED(madera_free_bus_error_irq (_6, i_29);,
"RXANCL Input") (ESCAPED) (TOUCHED)
cluster for: "Route":
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106359
Bug ID: 106359
Summary: -fanalyzer takes a very long time on Linux kernel:
sound/soc/codecs/cs47l{85,90}.c
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106358
Bug ID: 106358
Summary: [meta-bug] tracker bug for building the Linux kernel
with -fanalyzer
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105634
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105634
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:deafa40eb57b39626e116ca6a15d34a34c57c9f6
commit r12-8585-gdeafa40eb57b39626e116ca6a15d34a34c57c9f6
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106353
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For code like
rhogvx=2
where we know that we initialize a full (and here contiguous) array, is
there something the frontend can do, e.g. to annotate that a collapse
of the loop nest is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106342
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Ah, -march=z14 is needed:
$ ./cc1 -quiet -O2 pr104612.c -Iinclude -march=z14 -mtune=z15
pr104612.c: In function ‘foo’:
pr104612.c:15:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
15 | }
| ^
(insn 9 8 10 2 (set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106201
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68f37670eff0b872ce5dfd382c8d8f3206bdfc27
commit r13-1755-g68f37670eff0b872ce5dfd382c8d8f3206bdfc27
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105766
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68f37670eff0b872ce5dfd382c8d8f3206bdfc27
commit r13-1755-g68f37670eff0b872ce5dfd382c8d8f3206bdfc27
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94894
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68f37670eff0b872ce5dfd382c8d8f3206bdfc27
commit r13-1755-g68f37670eff0b872ce5dfd382c8d8f3206bdfc27
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81708
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #15)
> Uroš,
>
> stack-prot-sym.c fails on ia32 with PIC/PIE: the address/value of my_guard
> is loaded from the GOT, instead of appearing as %gs:my_guard.
>
When
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105634
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106357
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This changed intentionally with r12-85-g5f8aed72e76970
c++: Refine enum direct-list-initialization [CWG2374]
This implements the wording changes of CWG2374, which clarifies the
wording of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106357
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I think the testcase is invalid as the enum does not have "fixed underlying
> type"
Scoped enums always have a fixed underlying type.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81708
--- Comment #16 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #15)
> Uroš,
>
> stack-prot-sym.c fails on ia32 with PIC/PIE: the address/value of my_guard
> is loaded from the GOT, instead of appearing as %gs:my_guard.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106357
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106357
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think the testcase is invalid as the enum does not have "fixed underlying
type"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106357
Bug ID: 106357
Summary: [12/13 Regression] direct-list-initialization of enum
class from a variable of another enum class type fails
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81708
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83782
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #8)
> I'm running into some problems that are related with this PR.
>
> First off, on i686-linux-gnu with --enable-default-pie, attr-ifunc-3.c fails
> to link with e.g.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106356
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patches goto gcc-patches@ after read https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106356
Bug ID: 106356
Summary: static-pie for arm not implemented
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106352
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh the non loop based slp, does not add alias checks. And you just enabled
that.
I think this is a won't fix as adding of aliasing checks for non loop based
slp, adds way too much overhead and might (will)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106352
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I have to double check but the testcase might be hard to produce alias checks
too.
Marking the incoming arguments with restrict will also "fix" the code gen.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95454
--- Comment #3 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña ---
> A workaround would be to declare the constructor(s) [[nodiscard]]:
That's generally a [better
recommendation](https://github.com/mpusz/units/issues/136). Though I think
you'd have to `=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106355
Bug ID: 106355
Summary: Linux s390x -O2 argument passing miscompile
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106321
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106354
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96766
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20ab3972240aff596a3fa98e9fb09ddc0658fbb3
commit r13-1749-g20ab3972240aff596a3fa98e9fb09ddc0658fbb3
Author: Marco Falke
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106284
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:434d521d118fc7e7759b2b42bdddfa70caec637b
commit r13-1747-g434d521d118fc7e7759b2b42bdddfa70caec637b
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106321
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c044ff123ee573b7cd63d88f544091b7aeeb8f6
commit r13-1748-g2c044ff123ee573b7cd63d88f544091b7aeeb8f6
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106354
Bug ID: 106354
Summary: Diagnostic could be more user friendly
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106346
--- Comment #2 from manolis.tsamis at vrull dot eu ---
I bisected the changes from GCC 10.3 onwards and the first commit that results
in the "worse" version of the generated code is
9fc9573f9a5e9432e53c7de93985cfbd267f0309:
[2/3] [vect] Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106353
--- Comment #2 from Michael Matz ---
True, but in this case it could also be emitted in a better way by the fortran
frontend.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106352
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106353
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95454
Kyrylo Bohdanenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kyrylo.bohdanenko at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106101
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Krebbel ---
I've tried to change our movstrict backend patterns to use a predicate on the
dest operand which enforces a subreg. However, since reload strips the subreg
away when assigning hard regs we end up with a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106331
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] Whole |[10/11 Regression] Whole
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105969
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.1.1
Known to fail|12.1.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105971
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105965
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] x86: |[10/11 Regression] x86:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105604
Bug 105604 depends on bug 105969, which changed state.
Bug 105969 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in Floating point exception since
r13-750-g10d1986aee47c5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105969
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106331
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a7200da71550e6f92da66f0b328bb20d3bcdf35
commit r12-8584-g1a7200da71550e6f92da66f0b328bb20d3bcdf35
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105946
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106112
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:854ab8be5d9ddfc5b4d57a5c040d1811a89fbe4f
commit r12-8582-g854ab8be5d9ddfc5b4d57a5c040d1811a89fbe4f
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106131
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec9287ba9718871aa64900d6168105802e1ca941
commit r12-8583-gec9287ba9718871aa64900d6168105802e1ca941
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105969
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4f34a9e8d5ffcef99a212180d58718b00bdbb7d2
commit r12-8579-g4f34a9e8d5ffcef99a212180d58718b00bdbb7d2
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105459
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105965
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1fe7321a6ce0dcb05763c8f1850a066824516342
commit r12-8578-g1fe7321a6ce0dcb05763c8f1850a066824516342
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106027
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:71c6baa9abc8c378a1aa913398a8f1a2277946e0
commit r12-8581-g71c6baa9abc8c378a1aa913398a8f1a2277946e0
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105971
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8dd1c404ec77c6d2cdaaf93d219e3250081355c0
commit r12-8580-g8dd1c404ec77c6d2cdaaf93d219e3250081355c0
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105946
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92aa9490315d969d6e7580fb6e8d006415877bd6
commit r12-8577-g92aa9490315d969d6e7580fb6e8d006415877bd6
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105459
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ed850a568e4d27a2df566f13843714ca80d437e
commit r12-8576-g4ed850a568e4d27a2df566f13843714ca80d437e
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106353
Bug ID: 106353
Summary: [suboptimal] Why is a 3D array initialized, use case 2
two-layer loop?
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106347
--- Comment #4 from Roger Sayle ---
No, it's not PR 106278 that this PR is similar to (which concerned REG_EQUAL
notes and is now fixed), but PR 106303 (which concerns STV converting some
mentions of a TImode register/memory, and not others,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106342
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Hm, can you see it with a cross compiler (me now)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106347
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|[13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106351
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106341
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93383
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lissheidr.spam at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106352
Bug ID: 106352
Summary: SLP seems to need temporary variables
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106334
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106331
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.2|10.5
Known to work|11.3.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106331
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e4ff11a8f2e80adb8ada69bf35ee6a1ab18a9c85
commit r13-1743-ge4ff11a8f2e80adb8ada69bf35ee6a1ab18a9c85
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106334
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f129766fdb687394f0eea04f69268b5cc034cda
commit r13-1742-g0f129766fdb687394f0eea04f69268b5cc034cda
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106187
--- Comment #30 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #29)
> Thanks for having a look, yes, I was at a loss to understand how that change
> (which is before the problematic hunk would be the cause of the problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106187
--- Comment #29 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Thanks for having a look, yes, I was at a loss to understand how that change
(which is before the problematic hunk would be the cause of the problem. It
looks like we can rule that change out as a real
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106350
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106322
--- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Mathieu Malaterre from comment #9)
> Technically I can also execute the `uint16` portion of the unit test and
> produce a failure (so this seems to be consistent behavior with signed
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106231
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106347
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #1)
> It looks like a dup of PR106278
and It seems PR106278 is not fully fixed.
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
