[Bug testsuite/106680] Test gcc.target/powerpc/bswap64-4.c fails on 32-bit BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106680 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/105651] [12/13 Regression] bogus "may overlap" memcpy warning with std::string and operator+ at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651 --- Comment #18 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #17) > There's probably a way to help the optimizer out without the > __builtin_unreachable hammer, as for 98465; suggestions are welcome. ..like

[Bug tree-optimization/105651] [12/13 Regression] bogus "may overlap" memcpy warning with std::string and operator+ at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug testsuite/106516] New test case gcc.dg/pr104992.c fails on power 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106516 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug testsuite/106681] Powerpc test gcc.dg/pr104992.c fails on power10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106681 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/106345] Some ppc64le tests fail with -mcpu=power9 -mtune=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106345 --- Comment #9 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to Michael Meissner from comment #8) > Note, the gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9-.c test fails when the compiler is > configured for either --with-cpu=power9 or --with-cpu=power10. No > --with-tune=

[Bug analyzer/106181] [13 Regression] ICE in capacity_compatible_with_type, at analyzer/region-model.cc:2909

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106181 Tim Lange changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug analyzer/106181] [13 Regression] ICE in capacity_compatible_with_type, at analyzer/region-model.cc:2909

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106181 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/106646] [C++23] P2437R1 - Support for #warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106646 --- Comment #1 from Joseph S. Myers --- Enabled for C2x (i.e. stopped -pedantic diagnosing it) with commit d7c3000147c1d8090f66a2baf4623d2c0dfe8eb6 - C++ will presumably want to adjust the diagnostics as well as enabling for relevant C++

[Bug testsuite/106345] Some ppc64le tests fail with -mcpu=power9 -mtune=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106345 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/106682] New: Powerpc test gcc.target/powerpc/pr86731-fwrapv-longlong.c fails on power8, passes on power9/power10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106682 Bug ID: 106682 Summary: Powerpc test gcc.target/powerpc/pr86731-fwrapv-longlong.c fails on power8, passes on power9/power10 Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug testsuite/106681] New: Powerpc test gcc.dg/pr104992.c fails on power10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106681 Bug ID: 106681 Summary: Powerpc test gcc.dg/pr104992.c fails on power10 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug testsuite/106680] New: Test gcc.target/powerpc/bswap64-4.c fails on 32-bit BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106680 Bug ID: 106680 Summary: Test gcc.target/powerpc/bswap64-4.c fails on 32-bit BE Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug testsuite/101169] [10 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c fails after r10-9880

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101169 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c++/103876] Parameter pack not expanded in lambda within static_assert in a fold-expression of a lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103876 S. Davis Herring changed: What|Removed |Added CC||herring at lanl dot gov --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/106679] [13 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/cmpsf-1.c fails after r13-2098-g5adfb6540db95d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106679 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64-linux-gnu,|

[Bug tree-optimization/106679] [13 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/cmpsf-1.c fails after r13-2098-g5adfb6540db95d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106679 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug other/106679] New: [13 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/cmpsf-1.c fails after r13-2098-g5adfb6540db95d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106679 Bug ID: 106679 Summary: [13 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/cmpsf-1.c fails after r13-2098-g5adfb6540db95d Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/81501] mulitple calls to __tls_get_addr() with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81501 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 53473 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53473=edit A patch This patch uses a single UNSPEC_TLS_LD_BASE in the whole function.

[Bug target/106609] [12/13 Regression] sh3eb-elf cross compiler is being miscompiled since r12-1525-g3155d51bfd1de8b6c4645

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106609 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|sh3eb-elf cross compiler is |[12/13 Regression]

[Bug middle-end/106609] sh3eb-elf cross compiler is being miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106609 --- Comment #9 from Mikael Pettersson --- # first bad commit: [3155d51bfd1de8b6c4645dcb2292248a8d7cc3c9] [PATCH] PR rtl-optimization/46235: Improved use of bt for bit tests on x86_64. Starting with this commit, the host compiler (on

[Bug target/106678] Inefficiency in long integer multiplication

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106678 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- The inner loop for aarch64 on the trunk is: .L5: ldr x7, [x20, x5, lsl 3] ldr x10, [x21, x12, lsl 3] ldr x6, [x11, x5, lsl 3] mul x2, x7, x10 umulh

[Bug rtl-optimization/106678] New: Inefficiency in long integer multiplication

+ mcarry; // {acarry,sum[i+j]} = {sum[i+j]+acarry} + product; } } } still shows some inefficiency after r13-2107. Compiling the function with gcc 13.0.0 20220818, with $ gcc -mcpu=power9 -O3 -c loop.c and disassembling the output (for easier reading) gives (looking only at

[Bug fortran/106557] nesting intrinsics ibset and transfer gives wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106557 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/106677] Abstraction overhead with std::views::join

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106677 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #0) > sum_vec gets relatively nice, short code. sum_array gets something uglier. > > _18 = _5(D)->m_array; > _6 = foo_5(D) + 24; > if (_6 != _18) That is

[Bug tree-optimization/106677] Abstraction overhead with std::views::join

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106677 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug fortran/77652] Invalid rank error in ASSOCIATED when rank is remapped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77652 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID

[Bug tree-optimization/106677] New: Abstraction overhead with std::views::join

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106677 Bug ID: 106677 Summary: Abstraction overhead with std::views::join Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/106676] New: [C++20] Automatic iterator_category detection misbehaves when `::reference` is an rvalue reference, refuses to accept a forward iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106676 Bug ID: 106676 Summary: [C++20] Automatic iterator_category detection misbehaves when `::reference` is an rvalue reference, refuses to accept a forward iterator Product:

[Bug c++/106675] [10/11/12/13 Regression] g++ crashes on funky operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106675 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/106675] [10/11/12/13 Regression] g++ crashes on funky operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106675 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-08-18 Summary|g++

[Bug c++/106675] New: g++ crashes on funky operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106675 Bug ID: 106675 Summary: g++ crashes on funky operators Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug libstdc++/86164] std::regex crashes when matching long lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86164 Maarten L. Hekkelman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maarten at hekkelman dot com ---

[Bug c++/106648] [C++23] P2071 - Named universal character escapes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106648 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/106457] array_at_struct_end_p returns TRUE for a two-dimension array which is not inside any structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106457 qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug analyzer/106181] [13 Regression] ICE in capacity_compatible_with_type, at analyzer/region-model.cc:2909

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106181 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tim Lange : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c83e97317efb87fd5639a9ee9ec55aa1caa5423e commit r13-2115-gc83e97317efb87fd5639a9ee9ec55aa1caa5423e Author: Tim Lange Date: Thu Aug

[Bug tree-optimization/80635] [10 regression] std::optional and bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635 --- Comment #68 from Alec Edgington --- This (or at least a very similar) bug still exists in gcc 11.2.0.

[Bug target/96791] ICE in convert_mode_scalar, at expr.c:412

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96791 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/96791] ICE in convert_mode_scalar, at expr.c:412

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96791 --- Comment #28 from Arseny Solokha --- Yes, I think so.

[Bug target/96791] ICE in convert_mode_scalar, at expr.c:412

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96791 --- Comment #27 from Segher Boessenkool --- So this particular bug is no longer there, and this PR can be closed?

[Bug tree-optimization/106617] [13 Regression] gcc is very slow at ternary expressions since r13-322-g7f04b0d786e13ff5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106617 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/106642] cc1 compiler hangs when cross-compiling ring_buffer.c (from kernel/events) on Aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106642 Bug 106642 depends on bug 106617, which changed state. Bug 106617 Summary: [13 Regression] gcc is very slow at ternary expressions since r13-322-g7f04b0d786e13ff5 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106617 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/106617] [13 Regression] gcc is very slow at ternary expressions since r13-322-g7f04b0d786e13ff5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106617 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac68f904fe31baf80fa53218f1d8ee033bd8c79b commit r13-2113-gac68f904fe31baf80fa53218f1d8ee033bd8c79b Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug gcov-profile/106659] [13 Regression] error: no member named 'fancy_abort' in namespace 'std'; did you mean simply 'fancy_abort'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106659 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #4 from Martin

[Bug gcov-profile/106659] [13 Regression] error: no member named 'fancy_abort' in namespace 'std'; did you mean simply 'fancy_abort'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106659 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:03119249b9cfedb48e910b8df6a832b206cced2b commit r13-2112-g03119249b9cfedb48e910b8df6a832b206cced2b Author: Andrew Pinski Date:

[Bug libstdc++/106669] incorrect definition of viewable_range ("more madness with move-only views")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106669 --- Comment #1 from Hannes Hauswedell --- This affects GCC 10.4 and GCC 11.3 since move-only views were backported. The following part of the draft standard also needs changing: https://eel.is/c++draft/range.all#general-2.1 --->

[Bug target/106671] aarch64: BTI instruction are not inserted for cross-section direct calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106671 --- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw --- (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #5) > (In reply to D Scott Phillips from comment #2) > > th(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > > Shouldn't the linker add the BTI inside the

[Bug target/106671] aarch64: BTI instruction are not inserted for cross-section direct calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106671 --- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw --- (In reply to D Scott Phillips from comment #2) > th(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > Shouldn't the linker add the BTI inside the ___veneer instead? > > The bti instruction has to be placed

[Bug target/96791] ICE in convert_mode_scalar, at expr.c:412

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96791 --- Comment #26 from Arseny Solokha --- Now testcases from comment 8 and the one in the gcc tree from which comment 6 has been reduced both fail the same way as reported in PR96762.

[Bug tree-optimization/106617] [13 Regression] gcc is very slow at ternary expressions since r13-322-g7f04b0d786e13ff5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106617 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Btw, just for reference the original looks like fc_cpu_order = ( __builtin_constant_p(( __builtin_constant_p(nr_cpu_ids) ? ( ((nr_cpu_ids) == 1) ? 1 : (1UL << (( __builtin_constant_p((nr_cpu_ids) - 1) ?

[Bug lto/46273] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46273 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sergei Trofimovich : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d2d38a4686cb0f4cc0a7ce252503dd8090ab322 commit r13-2109-g9d2d38a4686cb0f4cc0a7ce252503dd8090ab322 Author: Sergei Trofimovich

[Bug bootstrap/67102] Parallel build fails in libffi/configure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67102 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sergei Trofimovich : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5dbc94bf13c5ef2f2b777d76d7880fe2153aa37b commit r13-2108-g5dbc94bf13c5ef2f2b777d76d7880fe2153aa37b Author: Sergei Trofimovich

[Bug target/103109] madd not used for multiply add on POWER9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103109 HaoChen Gui changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug target/103109] madd not used for multiply add on POWER9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103109 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by HaoChen Gui : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:defa08a33672d200edbdd7f87ed7afa442249261 commit r13-2107-gdefa08a33672d200edbdd7f87ed7afa442249261 Author: Haochen Gui Date: Thu

[Bug ada/106031] ICE on container map empty aggregate.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106031 David SAUVAGE - AdaLabs changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david.sauvage at adalabs dot

[Bug ada/106037] ICE with Aggregate aspect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106037 David SAUVAGE - AdaLabs changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david.sauvage at adalabs dot

[Bug ada/106168] Errors with empty array aggregate.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106168 David SAUVAGE - AdaLabs changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david.sauvage at adalabs dot

[Bug ada/106169] Error with iterated element association in aggregate.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106169 David SAUVAGE - AdaLabs changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david.sauvage at adalabs dot

[Bug go/85037] SIGSEGV in gotools testsuite affects several tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85037 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug d/90261] FAIL: libphobos.phobos/std/file.d on CentOS 5.11, Linux 2.6.18

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90261 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/101346] ICE: maximum number of generated reload insns per insn achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101346 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.2 Resolution|---

[Bug target/103861] [i386] vectorize v2qi vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103861 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 95201, which changed state. Bug 95201 Summary: Some x86 vector-extend patterns are not exercised. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95201 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/95201] Some x86 vector-extend patterns are not exercised.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95201 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/92658] x86 lacks vector extend / truncate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92658 Bug 92658 depends on bug 95201, which changed state. Bug 95201 Summary: Some x86 vector-extend patterns are not exercised. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95201 What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/106318] ICE when using 'Range in Ada22 Iterated Component Association

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106318 David SAUVAGE - AdaLabs changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david.sauvage at adalabs dot

[Bug libgcc/106674] New: Potential for symbol conflicts between libgcc_s and libunwind

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106674 Bug ID: 106674 Summary: Potential for symbol conflicts between libgcc_s and libunwind Product: gcc Version: 12.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ada/106673] compilation bug on abstract primitive pre'class aspect using for all construct on a string parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106673 --- Comment #1 from David SAUVAGE - AdaLabs --- Created attachment 53470 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53470=edit reproducer

[Bug ada/106673] New: compilation bug on abstract primitive pre'class aspect using for all construct on a string parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106673 Bug ID: 106673 Summary: compilation bug on abstract primitive pre'class aspect using for all construct on a string parameter Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: