https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107890
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107937
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107935
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107409
--- Comment #9 from Rama Malladi ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> Can you please share perf-profile before and after the revision?
>
> Note I can't see it for Altra aarch64 CPU:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107943
Bug ID: 107943
Summary: gcc -fanalyzer hangs in openssl curve25519.c
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107937
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Another test-case:
$ cat warn.i
int regs, vm_debug_engine_vp_0, vm_debug_engine_vp_2;
void
vm_dispatch_hook();
void
vm_debug_engine() {
int fp;
void *jump_table = &_nop;
l_nop:
if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107937
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18333
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Haha, wow. I just had to look... Yeah, definitely a proper WONTFIX.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27513
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
--- Comment #5 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15532
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26356
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107863
--- Comment #15 from Hongtao.liu ---
Fixed in GCC10.5, GCC11.4,GCC12.3 and GCC13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107863
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac30c91a1002ae4049a4773d07d5da41e7bd3138
commit r10-11105-gac30c91a1002ae4049a4773d07d5da41e7bd3138
Author: liuhongt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16172
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107863
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6d28f7fd4573988b2417a52acd0a27b7ee91681
commit r11-10404-ge6d28f7fd4573988b2417a52acd0a27b7ee91681
Author: liuhongt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107863
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b7306f02da33695bec90f153f6725a51d7c0ac71
commit r12-8954-gb7306f02da33695bec90f153f6725a51d7c0ac71
Author: liuhongt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107863
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cda29c540037fbcf00a377196050953aab1d3d5b
commit r13-4432-gcda29c540037fbcf00a377196050953aab1d3d5b
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18333
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98776
--- Comment #10 from Sebastian Pop ---
Patch for arm64:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/607601.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107928
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106626
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eaaf97b6147095cc19f7efdefaf55c8ebe7a94e8
commit r13-4431-geaaf97b6147095cc19f7efdefaf55c8ebe7a94e8
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106626
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c655699ed51b0c987e5472767db48b19044ae05
commit r13-4427-g7c655699ed51b0c987e5472767db48b19044ae05
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106626
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1d86af242bc4a8e68aebf1f3b8c985f2d17fa791
commit r13-4429-g1d86af242bc4a8e68aebf1f3b8c985f2d17fa791
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106626
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df460cf51b25868564dd2628a399b8c874ef309c
commit r13-4428-gdf460cf51b25868564dd2628a399b8c874ef309c
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106626
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d69a95c12cc91ec10d6a8c78f401bf6720b08fce
commit r13-4426-gd69a95c12cc91ec10d6a8c78f401bf6720b08fce
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107928
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45a75fd3d31265e43aa3ce7a5e851083d534b00b
commit r13-4424-g45a75fd3d31265e43aa3ce7a5e851083d534b00b
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106773
--- Comment #7 from James Hilliard ---
There's also this error during skeleton generation for kfunc_call_test.c:
$ /home/buildroot/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/sbin/bpftool
--debug gen skeleton
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100866
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by HaoChen Gui :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d68cba5eb20442f8075b8f92d1b20a00022852f
commit r13-4423-g9d68cba5eb20442f8075b8f92d1b20a00022852f
Author: Haochen Gui
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95067
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Target Milestone|10.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107934
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> The type of extendbfsf2_1 insn should be sseishft1.
Yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59447
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31230
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
r0-101483-g5c9fae0d6eee58 removed the TYPE_SYMTAB_POINTER part of
type_hash_marked_p .
I have no idea if the rest still applies. Plus stabs debugging has been removed
in GCC 13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46322
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31235
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71058
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47966
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9161
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12869
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56578
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Testcase behaves|Testcase behaves
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53998
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107927
--- Comment #3 from Lars Gullik Bjønnes ---
I cannot send you the unreduced preprocessed code and I have failed at creating
a small
snippet that produces the error.
This is the compiler output though.
Something might be gleaned from that.
In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93738
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107942
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> Oh it is still part of the keyword index too:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Keyword-Index.html#Keyword-Index
>
> Which links to:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107942
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh it is still part of the keyword index too:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Keyword-Index.html#Keyword-Index
Which links to:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106773
--- Comment #6 from James Hilliard ---
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.1-rc7/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_legacy.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107942
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reference to the patch that was sent:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2015-March/414153.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107942
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is the sample program to prove that const is still handled like const
attribute:
```
typedef int voidfn (void);
const voidfn constt;
[[gnu::noipa]]
int constt(void) {return 1;}
int f(void)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106773
--- Comment #5 from James Hilliard ---
(In reply to David Faust from comment #4)
> Created attachment 53993 [details]
> proposed patch
>
> Should fix the remaining issues with 'extern' linkage and the missing
> 'const' modifier (and includes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46542
Bug 46542 depends on bug 46888, which changed state.
Bug 46888 Summary: missed optimization of zero_extract with constant inputs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46888
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46888
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107942
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11/12/13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107942
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.5
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107942
Bug ID: 107942
Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] Documentation of the volatile
style for noreturn is gone
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99576
--- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #13)
> (In reply to Adrian Perl from comment #12)
> > I have sent the patch and tests to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org
>
> As noted there, the patch causes regressions in more
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96425
--- Comment #7 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
If I bisected correctly SIGSEGV disappeared in r11-2735-g634046d1a81b48
commit 634046d1a81b48a48b3564ff2f90974f6b7b087b
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date: Tue Aug 18 06:02:37 2020 -0700
c++: Move
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107940
--- Comment #4 from laurent.alfonsi at linaro dot org ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> (In reply to laurent.alfo...@linaro.org from comment #0)
> > This may be linked to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90787.
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100628
--- Comment #3 from Philip Balister ---
I'd also like to note the problem is resolved in the latest release of
gcc-9.5.x Thanks to whoever fixed it!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107940
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Thanks, Andrew, I hadn't noticed the See Also links. I agree this looks
related.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107940
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> (In reply to laurent.alfo...@linaro.org from comment #0)
> > This may be linked to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90787.
> > But, I confirm my
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107940
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to laurent.alfo...@linaro.org from comment #0)
> This may be linked to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90787.
> But, I confirm my toolchain is based on trunk (13.0), and contains
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107929
--- Comment #3 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Matthias Kretz (Vir) from comment #2)
> std::experimental::simd has always been implemented with GCC's vector
> extension. Also copy_from and copy_to are implemented with __builtin_memcpy.
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106581
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107749
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d13c359a49291f0a1206adbad4065677010b7e4b
commit r13-4421-gd13c359a49291f0a1206adbad4065677010b7e4b
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107172
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80200
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100945
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105659
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100345
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106773
--- Comment #4 from David Faust ---
Created attachment 53993
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53993=edit
proposed patch
Should fix the remaining issues with 'extern' linkage and the missing 'const'
modifier (and includes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100628
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107592
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107592
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3cfcde3d69e2e8d305c4d4d662a26cd25e8398c
commit r10-11103-gf3cfcde3d69e2e8d305c4d4d662a26cd25e8398c
Author: Iain Buclaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55680
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45114
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107592
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7bb5b326796af7d688c9976fba7ba3c2706481a0
commit r11-10402-g7bb5b326796af7d688c9976fba7ba3c2706481a0
Author: Iain Buclaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96425
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107592
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2909464c405b79559c5507cde382df05d2d2fa41
commit r12-8951-g2909464c405b79559c5507cde382df05d2d2fa41
Author: Iain Buclaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105659
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:17d46f069ceb55faa0db80a47c31710c7e6bcb11
commit r12-8950-g17d46f069ceb55faa0db80a47c31710c7e6bcb11
Author: Iain Buclaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65448
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
I was going to suggest to use json diagnostic format
(-fdiagnostics-format=json) with newer GCC but I noticed it does not output the
header include stack (which I filed as PR 107941 ).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107941
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107941
Bug ID: 107941
Summary: json diagnostics format does not include header stack
info
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107940
Bug ID: 107940
Summary: temp_directory_path testcase broken
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91829
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105097
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107929
Matthias Kretz (Vir) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107939
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107939
--- Comment #2 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña ---
Making the expression using the `extern const` variable more complex or
indirect makes it work. With an IILE, for example:
https://compiler-explorer.com/z/EjYYvPvqT.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107939
Bug ID: 107939
Summary: Rejects use of `extern const` variable in a template
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106805
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Summary|Undue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107938
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm, the following slightly modified testcase works in GCC 8.5.0 but started to
ICE in GCC 9.1.0:
```
struct Q {
int n;
constexpr const Q* operator()(int) const { return this; }
};
constexpr Q q{};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107938
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.4
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107181
Cupertino Miranda changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cupertino.miranda at oracle
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107938
Bug ID: 107938
Summary: ICE directly returning `this` of `extern` variable in
template
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107935
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107172
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107937
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #3)
> The bug first seems to appear sometime between git hash 4d08c674b0114622
> from yesterday and d0a3d55ae4a2656f, from today.
Which is in between
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107937
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
The bug first seems to appear sometime between git hash 4d08c674b0114622
from yesterday and d0a3d55ae4a2656f, from today.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107937
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
It might be r13-4408, r13-4407, or r13-4406 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107209
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107937
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
It is working at r13-4401-gf57ff189572575
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
