https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18af26fc375398f0a7cd7bae5aabebd447f8c899
commit r13-4737-g18af26fc375398f0a7cd7bae5aabebd447f8c899
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108139
Bug ID: 108139
Summary: wrong code with "-O1 -ftree-vrp" on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056
--- Comment #16 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Haochen Jiang from comment #15)
> My script shows that this commit cause testcase fail following:
> (It is still running and you might get a email from gcc-regression
> afterwards)
> FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108138
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108138
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
GCC 12 looks faster than GCC 8 even:
Time variable usr sys wall
GGC
phase setup: 0.00 ( 0%) 0.01 ( 25%) 0.02 (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108138
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056
Haochen Jiang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haochen.jiang at intel dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108138
--- Comment #1 from Peter Hurley ---
Created attachment 54108
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54108=edit
testcase header file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108138
Bug ID: 108138
Summary: g++ 9+ takes 7-10x longer compiling constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108090
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102104
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108090
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e79d51963378b10ab90544a7d8eeb6266e9a57f6
commit r13-4734-ge79d51963378b10ab90544a7d8eeb6266e9a57f6
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102104
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e79d51963378b10ab90544a7d8eeb6266e9a57f6
commit r13-4734-ge79d51963378b10ab90544a7d8eeb6266e9a57f6
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107612
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe ---
I did a little more poking - some of the missing symbols are in
m2/gm2-libs-boot/libgm2.a
adding that to the failing link line results in some more missing symbols,
these look mainly like wrappers around
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108106
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #54104|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96172
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note for aarch64 GCC produces decent code already (since GCC 9):
f1(unsigned int):
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
ubfxx0, x0, 16, 3
ret
But the gimple level is missed ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96172
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108137
--- Comment #2 from ucko at ncbi dot nlm.nih.gov ---
Thanks for looking into this report promptly, and sorry for getting the
component wrong; I wasn't sure what would be the best fit here. Also, please
note that the reported line number is the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108116
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108106
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Comment on attachment 54104
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54104
A patch
I'm confirming the checking to work for the case reported;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108137
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108137
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 Regression] ICE:|[12/13 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108131
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Possibly caused by the fix for pr103505 (commit r12-5779).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106740
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka ---
Backporting the second patch r13-1018-ge8ed26c2ac38ab from PR105852 seems to
fix the regression on the 12 branch at least.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68849
simon at pushface dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon at pushface dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107188
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:147e276b580b674a46bc3b9c461ae7837fd48aba
commit r13-4731-g147e276b580b674a46bc3b9c461ae7837fd48aba
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100295
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.3
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107579
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100295
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18499b9f848707aee42d810e99ac0a4c9788433c
commit r13-4730-g18499b9f848707aee42d810e99ac0a4c9788433c
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107579
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18499b9f848707aee42d810e99ac0a4c9788433c
commit r13-4730-g18499b9f848707aee42d810e99ac0a4c9788433c
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105518
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105518
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:be124477b38a71ba8ba0b24d859ae764bb44a4eb
commit r13-4729-gbe124477b38a71ba8ba0b24d859ae764bb44a4eb
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108104
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.3
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108104
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:38304846d18d6bb14b0fd6c627c5c6d43a814d01
commit r13-4728-g38304846d18d6bb14b0fd6c627c5c6d43a814d01
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108137
Bug ID: 108137
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE: segfault during GIMPLE pass:
warn-printf
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108111
--- Comment #3 from Marc Poulhiès ---
Thanks Jonathan for the suggestion.
The lexer code still need some refactor because the Source type (2nd template
argument to buffered_queue) is expected to have a next() method and is used
with both a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108136
Bug ID: 108136
Summary: Modula2 meets cppcheck
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: modula2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108132
--- Comment #7 from Qing Zhao ---
> On Dec 15, 2022, at 2:33 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
> wrote:
>
>
> There is a patch in PR 57067 even which you could try to port to a newer
> compiler version and fix up.
Okay, will check that patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57067
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 108132 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108132
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108132
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-15
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108135
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-15
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108135
Bug ID: 108135
Summary: Modula2 meets clang
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: modula2
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90706
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:12abd5a7d13209f79664ea603b3f3517f71b8c4f
commit r13-4727-g12abd5a7d13209f79664ea603b3f3517f71b8c4f
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108134
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108134
Bug ID: 108134
Summary: A description bug for Extended Asm document
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108133
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108133
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108133
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57067
--- Comment #9 from Alexander Monakov ---
*** Bug 108117 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108117
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #15 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108117
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |FIXED
--- Comment #14 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108133
Bug ID: 108133
Summary: Failure to merge conditional bit clears
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108117
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #12)
> Shouldn't there be another bug for the sched1 issue specifically? In absence
> of abnormal control flow, extending lifetimes of pseudos across calls is
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107065
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b775b4c48a3cc4ef5c50e56144aea02da2e9cc6
commit r13-4726-g8b775b4c48a3cc4ef5c50e56144aea02da2e9cc6
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108117
--- Comment #12 from Alexander Monakov ---
Shouldn't there be another bug for the sched1 issue specifically? In absence of
abnormal control flow, extending lifetimes of pseudos across calls is still
likely to be a pessimization.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108132
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
>From the duplicated bug: "In this case the RTL scheduler pass generates broken
code due to the missing control flow info."
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108117
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
>From the duplicated bug: "In this case the RTL scheduler pass generates broken
code due to the missing control flow info."
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106751
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> Created attachment 54103 [details]
> gcc13-pr106751.patch
>
> This seems to work on the testcase.
looks reasonable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57067
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxue at os dot
amperecomputing.com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108117
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108106
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 54104
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54104=edit
A patch
Please try this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57067
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108132
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108129
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #0)
> match.pd has multi-pattern matcher 'nop_atomic_bit_test_and_p'.
>
> It expands to ~38 KLOC in gimple-match.cc and ~350 KB in the compiled binary.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108132
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108132
--- Comment #1 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
As we checked the assembly and the IR, the wrong transformation is something
like the following at source code level: (inside function "main")
from :
a=f(a);
b=true;
to:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70090
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Siddhesh Poyarekar
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7283380a5829150cc820ab3b25c4d91cad372eec
commit r13-4724-g7283380a5829150cc820ab3b25c4d91cad372eec
Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar
l/latest
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 13.0.0 20221215 (experimental) (GCC)
[opc@qinzhao-aarch64-ol8]$ /home/opc/Install/latest/bin/gcc -O2 t.c
[opc@qinzhao-aarch64-ol8]$ ./a.out
a : 2
Got Exception!
b is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108127
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>From the new documentation:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Instrumentation-Options.html#index-fsanitize_003dundefined
"Note that sanitizers tend to increase the rate of false positive warnings,
most
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108131
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.5
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108086
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d49b2a3a1dbbe3ac9ae134bc5742be7fdb417d32
commit r13-4723-gd49b2a3a1dbbe3ac9ae134bc5742be7fdb417d32
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108131
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108129
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This might improve the build time of GCC ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108131
Bug ID: 108131
Summary: Incorrect bound calculation when bound intrinsic used
in size expression
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106751
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108106
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78147
--- Comment #7 from Paul Smith ---
I don't really think this change is related to -Wunused-private-field: at least
I don't see any relationship.
My personal preference would be to not even bother to create an option for
this; I think that GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108075
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108075
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f101e32e2fb616633722fb552779f537e9a9891
commit r13-4722-g3f101e32e2fb616633722fb552779f537e9a9891
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106751
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108130
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108130
Bug ID: 108130
Summary: [13 Regression] LTO compile time hog seen on
bootstrap-lto config since r13-4684-g7450b25566b7a7
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95130
--- Comment #13 from Tomas Kalibera ---
Another instance of this problem is %z (to print size_t). It is supported by
UCRT, but the GCC's Microsoft format warns, because it wasn't supported with
MSVCRT (seen with GCC 12.2).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98776
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98776
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Sebastian Pop
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7525c9d7e72ac3818e08fe7aa98396bd41e4ec8c
commit r12-8987-g7525c9d7e72ac3818e08fe7aa98396bd41e4ec8c
Author: Sebastian Pop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108129
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98776
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Sebastian Pop
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:50f7161448a19c4fa355c7c652e26b47ceb36cc4
commit r11-10422-g50f7161448a19c4fa355c7c652e26b47ceb36cc4
Author: Sebastian Pop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98776
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Sebastian Pop
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:59bba6f9dc6dcfefe96e6fad677614f39928564e
commit r10-11122-g59bba6f9dc6dcfefe96e6fad677614f39928564e
Author: Sebastian Pop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108129
Bug ID: 108129
Summary: nop_atomic_bit_test_and_p is too bloated
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107607
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108128
--- Comment #1 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
Well, with -pedantic, GCC also warns on "enum { A = 1 << 31 };".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108128
Bug ID: 108128
Summary: missing -Wshift-overflow warning
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106751
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107612
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
same result on x86_64 darwin21 - under rosetta 2.
BTW: this seems a bit odd to me I see the plugin specified like this:
plugin/m2rte$(exeext)$(soext) (.so without Rainer's patch).
Why $(exeext)?
Won't you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108117
--- Comment #9 from Alexander Monakov ---
(In reply to Feng Xue from comment #8)
> In another angle, because gcc already model control flow and SSA web for
> setjmp/longjmp, explicit volatile specification is not really needed.
That covers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107612
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
hmm .. some odd things.
With Rainer's patch actually the plugin build succeeded on x86_64-darwin19
(Catalina)
so then the plugin fails to load because it is missing the libstdc++ version
needed (since that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108127
Bug ID: 108127
Summary: FP due to combination of -Warray-bounds and UBSAN
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108123
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108126
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-15
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
