https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55522
Mingye Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur200126 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641
--- Comment #13 from Adelson Oliveira ---
Thanks, anlauf
Em sáb., 29 de abr. de 2023 às 16:00, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> escreveu:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641
>
> --- Comment #12 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109676
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Summary|[13/14 regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109676
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> Created attachment 54958 [details]
> small.ii
>
> This took 14.5 hours, but we got there! Smaller reproducer attached.
> Interested in if pinskia's one is going to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109679
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
modules in GCC is still an experimental feature really. And still being
developed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109676
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect it was r13-1607-gc3ed9e0d6e96d8697e4bab994 which might have exposed
this latent issue ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109676
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
102: (value/u:V1TI 24:24 @0x49b13d8/0x49a15f0) is at (mem/c:V1TI (value/u:DI
13:4290 @0x49b1328/0x49a1438) [0 p+0 S16 A128])
102: (reg:V1TI 20 xmm0 [orig:91 p ] [91]) evaluates to (value/u/f:V1TI 24:24
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109676
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #54959|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109676
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-04-29
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109676
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 54959
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54959=edit
Sam's reduced testcase reduced slightly more
Just slightly more reduced ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109676
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 54958
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54958=edit
small.ii
This took 14.5 hours, but we got there! Smaller reproducer attached. Interested
in if pinskia's one is going to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103993
cdfrey at foursquare dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cdfrey at foursquare dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641
--- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Adelson Oliveira from comment #11)
> I'm a linux user and gfortran comes with my distro. I mean, I did not
> compile gcc.
> Is this patch still to be tested? Am I expected to do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103240
--- Comment #5 from frankhb1989 at gmail dot com ---
There are multiple issues.
1. The out-of-line definition and the inline definition of
std::type_info::before do different things. Specifically, only one name is
detected against to '*' in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106784
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109680
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.2
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109681
Bug ID: 109681
Summary: suggested preview switches use DMD
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109680
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 54957
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54957=edit
Full testcase including the include
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109680
Bug ID: 109680
Summary: Regression where `int() const` is considered
convertible to `int(*)()`.
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105525
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83c78cb0d78fffa8791f64ba36146d17c00c1b23
commit r14-348-g83c78cb0d78fffa8791f64ba36146d17c00c1b23
Author: Mikael Pettersson
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706
Sergey Fedorov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vital.had at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103240
frankhb1989 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||frankhb1989 at gmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109678
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-04-29
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109672
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109549
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-*-* |s390
Summary|[14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108362
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108362
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d0cddced0ff101f5f59ceb2a45e7f145ff973ac
commit r12-9496-g7d0cddced0ff101f5f59ceb2a45e7f145ff973ac
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103871
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109646
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Bégou ---
Confirmed that this commit fixes this problem and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109622 report too.
I will check with the full application soon (need to rebuild OpenMPI for GCC
14).
Many
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109622
--- Comment #11 from Patrick Bégou ---
Confirmed that this commit fixes the problem.
I will check with the full application soon (need to rebuild OpenMPI for GCC
14).
Many thanks you for your responsiveness.
Patrick
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109650
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Created attachment 54956
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54956=edit
pr109650-2.c: A simpler C test case without assembly.
Again, this testcase triggers with avr-gcc -Os:
typedef
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109679
Bug ID: 109679
Summary: export using for functions does not work as specified
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109678
Bug ID: 109678
Summary: exponential time behavior on std::variant
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107087
--- Comment #17 from Sam James ---
... yes, it is - I saw one of the patches I'd backported didn't apply, assumed
must've been this one when I saw something in summary about uninitialised.
Anyway, I'll chuck it in now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107087
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #15)
> After chatting with jwakely, this is now on releases/gcc-12 as
> r12-9486-g47880309516fd5
That's a different fix for a different issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108202
Christoph Reiter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||reiter.christoph at gmail dot
com
36 matches
Mail list logo