https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111669
--- Comment #5 from Xi Ruoyao ---
And you can tell the compiler some fact about the semantics of the Windoge API
functions if you really need -Werror=nonnull (though I cannot see any reason
you must use -Werror here):
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111669
--- Comment #4 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Zeb Figura from comment #3)
> (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1)
> > > The warning given for the reduced test case is correct because it does not
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111700
Bug ID: 111700
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in needs_read_p (input.cc:598) with
-fdiagnostics-format=sarif-file or
-fdiagnostics-format=sarif-stderr on pre-processed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111699
Bug ID: 111699
Summary: [14 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV: infinite recursion in
fold_build3_loc/fold_ternary_loc/generic_simplify_VEC_
COND_EXPR
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111679
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
```
/* (~a) | (a ^ b) --> (~a) | (~b)
(which might be done into ~(a & b) depending on if ~a is not a cmp) */
(simplify
(bit_ior:c @0 (bit_xor:c @1 @2))
(with { bool wascmp; }
(if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111672
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
The difference between the 2 is the costing of the __printf_chk/puts:
_FORTIFY_SOURCE case:
freq:0.20 size: 3 time:2.43 __printf_chk (1, "Object code generation not
active! Forgot to call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111672
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56046|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111696
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I remember seeing this similar issue before where PRE/FRE/VN decides the two
addresses are the same (they are) but since waccess does not realize other
passes will use the restricted address still and still
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111696
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The vectorizer has not much to do with the warning issue except for the IR
change into FRE.
Before fre5:
_11 = _14(D)->s;
memcpy (_11, , 24);
After:
vectp.7_19 = _13(D)->sD.4831.aD.4827[0];
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98138
--- Comment #12 from Jiangning Liu
---
Hi Richi,
> That said, "failure" to identify the common (vector) load is known
> and I do have experimental patches trying to address that but did
> not yet arrive at a conclusive "best" approach.
It was
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111698
Bug ID: 111698
Summary: Narrow memory access of compare to byte width
Product: gcc
Version: 12.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111693
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111693
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> The easiest way to find documentation for an option is to look at the index
> located at:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.2.0/gcc/Option-Index.html
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111693
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-10-04
Summary|Online
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111693
Jonathan Leffler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111693
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Leffler ---
The link
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.2.0/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.html#index-Wuse-after-free
is to the "Options Controlling C++ Dialect".
I was using the C compiler, not the C++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111693
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Leffler ---
The link
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.2.0/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.html#index-Wuse-after-free
is to the "Options Controlling C++ Dialect".
I was using the C compiler, not the C++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111693
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The easiest way to find documentation for an option is to look at the index
located at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.2.0/gcc/Option-Index.html
And search for the option.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111693
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111693
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Documented here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.2.0/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.html#index-Wuse-after-free
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111697
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111697
Bug ID: 111697
Summary: Sub optimal code gen for initialising vector using
loop
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111694
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111694
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111696
Bug ID: 111696
Summary: [11/12/13/14 Regression] Spurious -Wstringop-overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111695
Jonathan Leffler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56047|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111695
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Leffler ---
Created attachment 56050
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56050=edit
gcc-bug-4.c — Variation 4 (one array — does not generate -Wuse-after-free
warnings)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111695
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Leffler ---
Created attachment 56049
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56049=edit
gcc-bug-3.c — Variation 3 (one array: does not generate -Wuse-after-free
warnings)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111695
Jonathan Leffler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.leffler at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111695
Bug ID: 111695
Summary: Spurious -Wuse-after-free when managing two arrays in
parallel
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111685
--- Comment #10 from Fedor Chelnokov ---
It seems that both libc++ and MS STL implement std::sort without a temporary
object passed to cmp, because they are fine with compiling the following code
in constant expression (where unrelated pointers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111688
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
Yeah, that seems to be it. If I cannot fix this tomorrow I'll revert the patch
from master.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111694
Bug ID: 111694
Summary: Wrong behavior for signbit of negative zero when
optimizing
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111693
Bug ID: 111693
Summary: Online manual mentions -Wuse-after-free but does not
document it further
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111683
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110643
--- Comment #23 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note even though the optimization was in GCC 11+ (r11-2550-gca2b8c082c4f added
it), only GCC 13+ hits it in this case as GCC 13 lowers the vector comparison
and uses the scalar for the one element signed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110701
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:263369b2f7f726a3d4b269678d2c13a9d06a041e
commit r14-4398-g263369b2f7f726a3d4b269678d2c13a9d06a041e
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110643
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110643
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Pinski ---
That is the code in IsInf causes the difference ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110643
--- Comment #20 from Andrew Pinski ---
With -fwrapv:
_87 = _92 * 2;
NativeSet___trans_tmp_3 = { -2 };
_84 = _87 == -2;
Without:
_84 = _92 == -1;
I think that is correct ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110643
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm, adding -fwrapv allows the testcase to pass ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111669
--- Comment #3 from Zeb Figura ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #2)
> (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1)
> > The warning given for the reduced test case is correct because it does not
> > make sense. It should be just rewritten as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111688
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111600
--- Comment #22 from Robin Dapp ---
Ah, then it's not that different, your machine is just faster ;)
callgraph ipa passes : 69.77 ( 11%) 5.97 ( 13%) 76.05 ( 12%)
2409M ( 10%)
integration: 91.95 (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111664
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111690
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109353
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111686
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111686
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That's been failing for a while for me, and I don't think it can possibly be
related to that commit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110643
--- Comment #18 from psykose ---
> Could you please run a regression to identify which commit along GCC-13
> branch introduce the change at least to get the ball rolling ?
note that it might not actually be a regression; it's possible the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111600
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener ---
I have a release checking GCC 13.2 based host compiler, profile ordered similar
to yours is the following where 'integration' is inlining
callgraph ipa passes : 22.94 ( 12%) 2.24 ( 12%)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111688
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
If you need me to try something let me know.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111661
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Bégou ---
With tab an instantiation of an r2tab type described above by Tobias Burnus
this is what I am doing to enlarge the allocatable tab%val attribute to [n,m]
elements with gcc13.2.
!$acc exit data
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111672
--- Comment #8 from Hanke Zhang ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> Add -save-temps and attach the resulting .i (or .ii) file.
Thank you. I have attached it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111672
--- Comment #7 from Hanke Zhang ---
Created attachment 56046
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56046=edit
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111688
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
I made a mistake checking out the correct commit, so please disregard comment
#1, I'm trying again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111664
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:027a94cf32be0b53d163e252e3c9e4800ad8f5f4
commit r14-4395-g027a94cf32be0b53d163e252e3c9e4800ad8f5f4
Author: Kito Cheng
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111682
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-10-04
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111688
--- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor ---
I was not able to reproduce this error on gcc112 on compile farm
(powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111600
--- Comment #20 from Robin Dapp ---
Mhm, why is your profile so different from mine? I'm also on an x86_64 host
with a 13.2.1 host compiler (Fedora).
Is it because of the preprocessed source? Or am I just reading the timing
report wrong?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111600
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener ---
Compiling insn-emit.ii on a x86_64 host with a 13.2 release compiler shows most
time is spent in inlining and CFG cleanup (the latter possibly in functions
with a very large number of conditionals).
For
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111692
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111600
--- Comment #18 from Robin Dapp ---
Just finished an initial timing run, sorted, first 10:
Time variable usr sys wall
GGC
phase opt and generate : 567.60 ( 97%) 38.23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110643
--- Comment #17 from Mathieu Malaterre ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #15)
> That returns a address to a local variable ...
Sorry I am having a hard time driving cvise correctly.
Here is the latest version:
g++-13 -g -o works
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110643
Mathieu Malaterre changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56015|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111692
Bug ID: 111692
Summary: ICE in output_constant at varasm:cc:5267 during RTL
"final" pass
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111655
--- Comment #11 from Alexander Monakov ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> And this conservatively has to apply to all FP divisions where we might infer
> "nonnegative" unless we can also infer !zerop?
Yes, I think the logic in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111616
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 111616, which changed state.
Bug 111616 Summary: On Zen2 7% 519.lbm_r regression between g:1d17d58c284fa8c3
(2023-09-14 02:39) and g:c8e9a75085f9725c (2023-09-18 13:09)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111616
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108178
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104161
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99327
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.0|11.5
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97731
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9eed5712110b63a0021358cbf195d32c5b372638
commit r11-11049-g9eed5712110b63a0021358cbf195d32c5b372638
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108178
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d69407149194e2a7ee20537c76acb1976c8659be
commit r11-11048-gd69407149194e2a7ee20537c76acb1976c8659be
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104161
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e742c6baa92403767b4ba8227f34fc7919db28e0
commit r11-11039-ge742c6baa92403767b4ba8227f34fc7919db28e0
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104161
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e20b1c711f70d8d251d45694c50c02e66a4d9f7b
commit r11-11036-ge20b1c711f70d8d251d45694c50c02e66a4d9f7b
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104161
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e6ce4031ce6eba3ea8b2b75bcacb869b591b92c
commit r11-11037-g5e6ce4031ce6eba3ea8b2b75bcacb869b591b92c
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99327
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6ae7641a3e34dfb79f8538965b48e411d825b90f
commit r11-11034-g6ae7641a3e34dfb79f8538965b48e411d825b90f
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111685
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The sketches above are completely untested (and incorrect) but just
demonstrating the ideas.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111688
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111686
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, testsuite-fail
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111683
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.2.1
--- Comment #2 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111685
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The standard only defines sorting in terms of comparisons on "every iterator i
pointing to the sequence", which seems to preclude using a temporary object on
the stack that is outside the sequence.
That
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111671
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-10-04
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111668
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.0
Target Milestone|14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111666
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Why not delay this "evaluate now" to gimplification time?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111664
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111660
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111655
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.5
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111691
Bug ID: 111691
Summary: [OpenMP][5.2] C/C++ handle 'omp declare
variant([base–name:]variant-name)' - i.e. with
'base-name'
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111653
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
IMHO we should try harder to make -fchecking=2 _not_ generate different code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111652
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |14.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111648
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111643
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106201
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.3
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111600
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111600
>
> --- Comment #16 from Robin Dapp ---
> Confirming that it's the compilation of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 111674, which changed state.
Bug 111674 Summary: [13/14 regression] Failure to finalize an allocatable
subobject of a non-finalizable type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111674
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111674
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111674
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:29cd67f93f00cc7a9b08eae4f3e12e67ed568f19
commit r13-7934-g29cd67f93f00cc7a9b08eae4f3e12e67ed568f19
Author: Paul Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
--- Comment #37 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:29cd67f93f00cc7a9b08eae4f3e12e67ed568f19
commit r13-7934-g29cd67f93f00cc7a9b08eae4f3e12e67ed568f19
Author: Paul Thomas
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
