[Bug target/112801] [14] RISC-V vector: failure to mask top bits during type conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112801 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #2 from

[Bug tree-optimization/112793] [14 regression] ICE when building stellarium (internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_node, at tree-vect-slp.cc:9062)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/112793] [14 regression] ICE when building stellarium (internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_node, at tree-vect-slp.cc:9062)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793 --- Comment #11 from Sam James --- Created attachment 56747 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56747=edit another cvised testcase

[Bug tree-optimization/112788] [14 regression] ICEs in fold_range, at range-op.cc:206 after r14-5972-gea19de921b01a6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112788 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug target/112787] Codegen regression of large GCC vector extensions when enabling SVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112787 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- I think you should make sure to not use VLA vectors in lowering since lowering doesn't really support using those (much similar to BB SLP).

[Bug testsuite/112786] [14 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c scev-4.c and scev-5.c XPASSing on most ilp32 targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112786 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 --- Comment #2 from Richard

[Bug target/112753] [14 Regression] unrecognizable insn building glibc for s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112753 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andreas Krebbel : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a2e428591dc97d573cf5c1789c84c8a3884b364 commit r14-6040-g8a2e428591dc97d573cf5c1789c84c8a3884b364 Author: Juergen Christ Date:

[Bug c/108476] Please turn -Wreturn-type on by default for C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108476 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug target/112725] [14 Regression] powerpc64le-linux-gnu: 'c-c++-common/builtin-classify-type-1.c:113:3: error: AltiVec argument passed to unprototyped function'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112725 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/112725] [14 Regression] powerpc64le-linux-gnu: 'c-c++-common/builtin-classify-type-1.c:113:3: error: AltiVec argument passed to unprototyped function'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112725 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:28944a016bb5eef9a99691b3c55b124882375180 commit r14-6039-g28944a016bb5eef9a99691b3c55b124882375180 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug c/96284] Outdated C features should be made errors with newer standards

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96284 Bug 96284 depends on bug 91093, which changed state. Bug 91093 Summary: Error on implicit int by default https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91093 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/91093] Error on implicit int by default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91093 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c/91092] Error on implicit function declarations by default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91092 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/96284] Outdated C features should be made errors with newer standards

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96284 Bug 96284 depends on bug 106416, which changed state. Bug 106416 Summary: -Wint-conversion should be an error, not a pedwarn https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106416 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/106416] -Wint-conversion should be an error, not a pedwarn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106416 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c/96284] Outdated C features should be made errors with newer standards

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96284 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ecfa6c4a9df19b364cbdf6d9de5f0b98c22bd8f commit r14-6036-g4ecfa6c4a9df19b364cbdf6d9de5f0b98c22bd8f Author: Florian Weimer Date:

[Bug other/44209] [meta-bug] Some warnings are not linked to diagnostics options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff9efa3fc48baa1dee7ed376c25ecfcfbc28d35c commit r14-6038-gff9efa3fc48baa1dee7ed376c25ecfcfbc28d35c Author: Florian Weimer Date:

[Bug c/96284] Outdated C features should be made errors with newer standards

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96284 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9715c545d33b3a32ddc1ae817ba9356ade1fb9df commit r14-6037-g9715c545d33b3a32ddc1ae817ba9356ade1fb9df Author: Florian Weimer Date:

[Bug c/91093] Error on implicit int by default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91093 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ee2aca7ca098cc6e622a9a41e63224af37e6532 commit r14-6034-g4ee2aca7ca098cc6e622a9a41e63224af37e6532 Author: Florian Weimer Date:

[Bug c/96284] Outdated C features should be made errors with newer standards

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96284 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:55e94561e97ed0bce4774aa1c6b5d5d82209a379 commit r14-6033-g55e94561e97ed0bce4774aa1c6b5d5d82209a379 Author: Florian Weimer Date:

[Bug c/96284] Outdated C features should be made errors with newer standards

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96284 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ee2aca7ca098cc6e622a9a41e63224af37e6532 commit r14-6034-g4ee2aca7ca098cc6e622a9a41e63224af37e6532 Author: Florian Weimer Date:

[Bug c/91092] Error on implicit function declarations by default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91092 --- Comment #22 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:55e94561e97ed0bce4774aa1c6b5d5d82209a379 commit r14-6033-g55e94561e97ed0bce4774aa1c6b5d5d82209a379 Author: Florian Weimer Date:

[Bug c/96284] Outdated C features should be made errors with newer standards

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96284 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c3db94d9fd07681f8806dae93d555779ff4dfb1 commit r14-6032-g2c3db94d9fd07681f8806dae93d555779ff4dfb1 Author: Florian Weimer Date:

[Bug c/106416] -Wint-conversion should be an error, not a pedwarn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106416 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c3db94d9fd07681f8806dae93d555779ff4dfb1 commit r14-6032-g2c3db94d9fd07681f8806dae93d555779ff4dfb1 Author: Florian Weimer Date:

[Bug c++/112789] Missing clang __builtin_ctzs for short

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112789 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/110734] Attributes cannot be applied to asm declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/112776] RISC-V Regression: Missed optimization of VSETVL PASS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112776 JuzheZhong changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/112776] RISC-V Regression: Missed optimization of VSETVL PASS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112776 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Lehua Ding : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:923a67f17badcbe6e2b2e5d3570a265443258c8e commit r14-6027-g923a67f17badcbe6e2b2e5d3570a265443258c8e Author: Juzhe-Zhong Date: Fri

[Bug target/112778] ICE in ppc64-linux-gnu crosscompiler in store_by_pieces since r14-5946-g1ff6d9f7428b06

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112778 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/112793] [14 regression] ICE when building stellarium (internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_node, at tree-vect-slp.cc:9062)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 56746 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56746=edit Delta reduced testcase This one is slightly less reduced than the other one but this is a delta based reduced

[Bug c++/110734] Attributes cannot be applied to asm declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734 --- Comment #18 from Julian Waters --- Oops, I meant warning: 'no_reorder' attribute ignored [-Wattributes] in my above comment

[Bug c++/110734] Attributes cannot be applied to asm declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734 --- Comment #17 from Julian Waters --- Looking at the source of the C++ parser it doesn't seem like asm (""); is considered a statement but rather is correctly parsed as a declaration, see cp_parser_block_declaration and

[Bug c++/110734] Attributes cannot be applied to asm declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734 --- Comment #16 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #15) > Alright, this is a C++ issue and I mistakenly assumed it was C. Note that in C++ we have some inconsistency with the standard. In the standard asm(...) are

[Bug c++/110734] Attributes cannot be applied to asm declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Attributes cannot be|Attributes cannot be

[Bug c++/110734] Attributes cannot be applied to asm statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #14 from Xi Ruoyao

[Bug c++/110734] Attributes cannot be applied to asm statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Attributes cannot be|Attributes cannot be

[Bug fortran/112764] Associating entity does not have target attribute if selector has pointer attribute in associate block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112764 --- Comment #10 from martin --- Thanks for the speedy fix! I just thought about a variation, which should now with the fix work as well (was not yet able to compile current dev branch, so cannot check myself): program assoc_ptr_in implicit

[Bug libstdc++/105118] Why is unexpected::value() named error() in libstdc++?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105118 康桓瑋 changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|SUSPENDED

[Bug ipa/112783] core dump on libxo when function is inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112783 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://github.com/Juniper/

[Bug libstdc++/112803] New: : to(Args&&... args) is missing Mandates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112803 Bug ID: 112803 Summary: : to(Args&&... args) is missing Mandates Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/110734] Attributes cannot be applied to asm declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734 --- Comment #12 from Julian Waters --- Will do, will save the new attribute for gcc 15 and just fix the attribute specifier sequence here

[Bug target/59874] Missing builtin (__builtin_clzs) when compiling with g++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org See

[Bug tree-optimization/112793] [14 regression] ICE when building stellarium (internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_node, at tree-vect-slp.cc:9062)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-12-01 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/112793] [14 regression] ICE when building stellarium (internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_node, at tree-vect-slp.cc:9062)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #56744|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug testsuite/112786] [14 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c scev-4.c and scev-5.c XPASSing on most ilp32 targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112786 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1 from

[Bug libstdc++/112802] New: : _ToClosure::operator() has no constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112802 Bug ID: 112802 Summary: : _ToClosure::operator() has no constraints Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/112793] [14 regression] ICE when building stellarium (internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_node, at tree-vect-slp.cc:9062)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- e.g. r[8 * 2] is r[16] and 16 >= 16 :).

[Bug tree-optimization/112793] [14 regression] ICE when building stellarium (internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_node, at tree-vect-slp.cc:9062)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #5) > Created attachment 56744 [details] > reduced.ii Note this reduced testcase has undefined code in it ...

[Bug tree-optimization/112793] [14 regression] ICE when building stellarium (internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_node, at tree-vect-slp.cc:9062)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793 --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- Created attachment 56744 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56744=edit reduced.ii

[Bug target/112801] [14] RISC-V vector: failure to mask top bits during type conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112801 --- Comment #1 from JuzheZhong --- Known issue for a long time. I realized that 2 years ago: https://github.com/riscv-collab/riscv-gnu-toolchain/issues/1075 when I developed the first version of RVV GCC (rvv-next). I don't think it is

[Bug target/112801] New: [14] RISC-V vector: failure to mask top bits during type conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112801 Bug ID: 112801 Summary: [14] RISC-V vector: failure to mask top bits during type conversion Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/112773] [14 Regression] RISC-V ICE: in force_align_down_and_div, at poly-int.h:1828 on rv32gcv_zvl256b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112773 --- Comment #7 from JuzheZhong --- Here is the compiler explorer for reference and easily see the issue: https://godbolt.org/z/8v1dsKG3f

[Bug target/112773] [14 Regression] RISC-V ICE: in force_align_down_and_div, at poly-int.h:1828 on rv32gcv_zvl256b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112773 --- Comment #6 from Patrick O'Neill --- (In reply to JuzheZhong from comment #3) > I see. I didn't reproduce the ICE since I didn't enable gcc_assert_checking. > > Could you tell me how to enable it ? I didn't explicitly enable checking. The

[Bug target/112773] [14 Regression] RISC-V ICE: in force_align_down_and_div, at poly-int.h:1828 on rv32gcv_zvl256b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112773 --- Comment #5 from JuzheZhong --- Besides, the mask type is: vector([4,4])

[Bug target/112773] [14 Regression] RISC-V ICE: in force_align_down_and_div, at poly-int.h:1828 on rv32gcv_zvl256b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112773 --- Comment #4 from JuzheZhong --- After reproducing the ICE. I confirm the root cause is because we enable vec_extract for mask: ;; - ;; This extracts a bit (via QImode)

[Bug target/112773] [14 Regression] RISC-V ICE: in force_align_down_and_div, at poly-int.h:1828 on rv32gcv_zvl256b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112773 --- Comment #3 from JuzheZhong --- I see. I didn't reproduce the ICE since I didn't enable gcc_assert_checking. Could you tell me how to enable it ? I hack the codes as follows: diff --git a/gcc/poly-int.h b/gcc/poly-int.h index

[Bug target/112640] [14 regression] Failed profiledbootstrap on arm64 (libgcc/config/libbid/bid128_fma.c:3569:1: internal compiler error: in extract_base_offset_in_addr, at config/aarch64/aarch64.cc:2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112640 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/112798] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zve32f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112798 --- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill --- See also: rv64gcv_zve64d: pr112797 rv64gcv_zve32f: pr112798 rv32gcv_zve64d: pr112799 rv32gcv_zve32f: pr112800

[Bug testsuite/112799] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv32gcv_zve64d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112799 --- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill --- See also: rv64gcv_zve64d: pr112797 rv64gcv_zve32f: pr112798 rv32gcv_zve64d: pr112799 rv32gcv_zve32f: pr112800

[Bug testsuite/112800] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv32gcv_zve32f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112800 --- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill --- See also: rv64gcv_zve64d: pr112797 rv64gcv_zve32f: pr112798 rv32gcv_zve64d: pr112799 rv32gcv_zve32f: pr112800

[Bug target/112797] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zve64d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112797 --- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill --- See also: rv64gcv_zve64d: pr112797 rv64gcv_zve32f: pr112798 rv32gcv_zve64d: pr112799 rv32gcv_zve32f: pr112800

[Bug testsuite/112800] New: RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv32gcv_zve32f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112800 Bug ID: 112800 Summary: RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv32gcv_zve32f Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug testsuite/112799] New: RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv32gcv_zve64d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112799 Bug ID: 112799 Summary: RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv32gcv_zve64d Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/112798] New: RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zve32f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112798 Bug ID: 112798 Summary: RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zve32f Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/112797] New: RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zve64d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112797 Bug ID: 112797 Summary: RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zve64d Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/112795] [C++>=14] ICE pragma GCC unroll (n) cxx_eval_constant_expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112795 --- Comment #1 from Magnus Hokland Hegdahl --- Full output: // Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu // Configured with: /build/gcc/src/gcc/configure --enable-languages=ada,c,c++,d,fortran,go,lto,objc,obj-c++ --enable-bootstrap --prefix=/usr

[Bug libstdc++/112796] New: header implicitly includes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112796 Bug ID: 112796 Summary: header implicitly includes Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 URL: https://godbolt.org/z/Pra17xczj Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/112795] New: [C++>=14] ICE pragma GCC unroll (n) cxx_eval_constant_expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112795 Bug ID: 112795 Summary: [C++>=14] ICE pragma GCC unroll (n) cxx_eval_constant_expression Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/112794] New: [contracts] modifying return value fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112794 Bug ID: 112794 Summary: [contracts] modifying return value fails Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/112793] [14 regression] ICE when building stellarium (internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_node, at tree-vect-slp.cc:9062)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- With s/__builtin_ctzs/__builtin_ctzg/ and `-O3 -march=skylake-avx512`, I can reproduce it with an unmodified trunk GCC.

[Bug tree-optimization/112793] [14 regression] ICE when building stellarium (internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_node, at tree-vect-slp.cc:9062)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793 --- Comment #3 from Sam James --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Does gentoo has a patch which adds __builtin_ctzs ? No, nothing like that. Here's what this one was built with:

[Bug tree-optimization/112793] [14 regression] ICE when building stellarium (internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_node, at tree-vect-slp.cc:9062)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Does gentoo has a patch which adds __builtin_ctzs ?

[Bug tree-optimization/112793] [14 regression] ICE when building stellarium (internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_node, at tree-vect-slp.cc:9062)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Hmm __builtin_ctzs

[Bug c++/112793] New: [14 regression] ICE when building stellarium (internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_node, at tree-vect-slp.cc:9062)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793 Bug ID: 112793 Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building stellarium (internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_node, at tree-vect-slp.cc:9062) Product: gcc

[Bug middle-end/112740] [14 Regression] wrong code with vector compare on riscv64 at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112740 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ams at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug middle-end/112572] [14 regression] LLVM miscompiled since r14-5355-g3cd3a09b3f91a1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112572 --- Comment #30 from Sam James --- afaik the best we have so far is https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112613#c0

[Bug middle-end/112740] [14 Regression] wrong code with vector compare on riscv64 at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112740 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- Note this was exposed by r14-3350-g47b833a9abe19d which changed the original IR From: _4 = VEC_COND_EXPR <_3, { -1 }, { 0 }>; _5 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(_4); _6 = _5 == { 0 }; _7 = VEC_COND_EXPR <_6, {

[Bug middle-end/112740] [14 Regression] wrong code with vector compare on riscv64 at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112740 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|pinskia at gcc

[Bug middle-end/112740] [14 Regression] wrong code with vector compare on riscv64 at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112740 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |middle-end --- Comment #7 from Andrew

[Bug target/112740] [14 Regression] wrong code with vector compare on riscv64 at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112740 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Veclower -O0 produces c.0_6 = c_5(D); _2 = (__int128 unsigned) c.0_6; _1 = {_2}; _10 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<__int128 unsigned>(v_7(D)); _11 = _10 >= _2; // 1 true _12 = (int128_t) _11; // 1 _13 =

[Bug c++/112744] Nested name specifier wrongly produces ambiguity in accessing static field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112744 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/112744] Nested name specifier wrongly produces ambiguity in accessing static field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112744 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:725c68c54c265fe7f6fc7babff7139f3161bdfa6 commit r14-6024-g725c68c54c265fe7f6fc7babff7139f3161bdfa6 Author: Marek Polacek Date:

[Bug analyzer/112792] New: -Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds seen on Linux kernel with certain unions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112792 Bug ID: 112792 Summary: -Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds seen on Linux kernel with certain unions Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/97323] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE 'verify_type' failed on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97323 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/112791] error: 'TYPE_CANONICAL' is not compatible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112791 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug c/112791] error: 'TYPE_CANONICAL' is not compatible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112791 Martin Uecker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||muecker at gwdg dot de --- Comment #1

[Bug target/112698] gcc r14-5617-gb8592186611 introduces regressions in bfloat16_vector_typecheck_1.c for cortex-m0 and cortex-m3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112698 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) --- OK, I can follow that reasoning. It's still a breaking change for everyone that was using int up to this point. I guess the argument is that using int was wrong in the first place and it just

[Bug fortran/112764] Associating entity does not have target attribute if selector has pointer attribute in associate block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112764 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target

[Bug c/112791] New: error: 'TYPE_CANONICAL' is not compatible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112791 Bug ID: 112791 Summary: error: 'TYPE_CANONICAL' is not compatible Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug fortran/111880] [11/12/13/14] False positive warning of obsolescent COMMON block with Fortran submodule

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111880 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff96ddf43bcfe5c37a85118a68dcac87ce33c8d9 commit r13-8111-gff96ddf43bcfe5c37a85118a68dcac87ce33c8d9 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/112764] Associating entity does not have target attribute if selector has pointer attribute in associate block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112764 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dd5d399fc16ebe7a1a2b13ae8cb888d619af695c commit r13-8110-gdd5d399fc16ebe7a1a2b13ae8cb888d619af695c Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug c++/112789] Missing clang __builtin_ctzs for short

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112789 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- So just for future reference __builtin_c[lt]zs is for short. But with GCC 14 (trunk) added __builtin_ct[lt]g, there is no need to add __builtin_c[lt]zs to GCC. You could just do: #if

[Bug analyzer/112790] -Wanalyzer-deref-before-check false positives seen in Linux kernel due to inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112790 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-11-30 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug analyzer/112790] New: -Wanalyzer-deref-before-check false positives seen in Linux kernel due to inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112790 Bug ID: 112790 Summary: -Wanalyzer-deref-before-check false positives seen in Linux kernel due to inlining Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/112572] [14 regression] LLVM miscompiled since r14-5355-g3cd3a09b3f91a1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112572 --- Comment #29 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #28) > So, what is the state here? Andrew, are you going to post the #c18 patch? > Do we have a reduced testcase? I was hoping someone else would take over since

[Bug middle-end/112572] [14 regression] LLVM miscompiled since r14-5355-g3cd3a09b3f91a1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112572 --- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, what is the state here? Andrew, are you going to post the #c18 patch? Do we have a reduced testcase?

[Bug c++/112789] Missing clang __builtin_ctzs for short

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112789 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Also clang does not even document __builtin_ctzs anywhere ...

[Bug fortran/112772] Some issues with OPTIONAL, ALLOCATABLE dummy arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112772 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug c++/112789] Missing clang __builtin_ctzs for short

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112789 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/112753] [14 Regression] unrecognizable insn building glibc for s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112753 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Last

  1   2   >