[Bug rtl-optimization/111267] [14 Regression] Codegen regression from i386 argument passing changes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111267 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/111267] [14 Regression] Codegen regression from i386 argument passing changes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111267 Maxim Kuvyrkov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/113576] [14 regression] 502.gcc_r hangs r14-8223-g1c1853a70f9422169190e65e568dcccbce02d95c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:578c7b91f418ebbef1bf169117815409e06f5197 commit r14-8413-g578c7b91f418ebbef1bf169117815409e06f5197 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug ipa/113520] ICE with mismatched types with LTO (tree check: expected array_type, have integer_type in array_ref_low_bound)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113520 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #8) > I think the ipa-cp summaries should be used only when types match. At least > Martin added type streaming for all the jump functions. So we are missing > some

[Bug tree-optimization/113576] [14 regression] 502.gcc_r hangs r14-8223-g1c1853a70f9422169190e65e568dcccbce02d95c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576 --- Comment #8 from Hongtao Liu --- maybe diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.cc b/gcc/fold-const.cc index 1fd957288d4..6d321f9baef 100644 --- a/gcc/fold-const.cc +++ b/gcc/fold-const.cc @@ -8035,6 +8035,9 @@ native_encode_vector_part (const_tree

[Bug target/113570] RISC-V: SPEC2017 549 fotonik3d miscompilation in autovec VLS 256 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113570 --- Comment #5 from JuzheZhong --- It seems that we don't have any bugs in current SPEC 2017 testing. So I strongly suggest "full coverage" testing on SPEC 2017 which I mentioned in PR: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113087

[Bug tree-optimization/113588] [14 Regression] The vectorizer is introducing out-of-bounds memory access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113588 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/113576] [14 regression] 502.gcc_r hangs r14-8223-g1c1853a70f9422169190e65e568dcccbce02d95c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576 --- Comment #7 from Hongtao Liu --- diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.cc b/gcc/fold-const.cc index 1fd957288d4..33a8d539b4d 100644 --- a/gcc/fold-const.cc +++ b/gcc/fold-const.cc @@ -8032,7 +8032,7 @@ native_encode_vector_part (const_tree expr,

[Bug target/110934] m68k: ICE with -fzero-call-used-regs=all compiling openssh 9.3p2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110934 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug tree-optimization/113583] Main loop in 519.lbm not vectorized.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113583 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/113592] missed partial sum optimization in vectorizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113592 --- Comment #3 from Hongtao Liu --- This testcase is probably not a good example for typical partail sum which relies on unroll loops. double foo (double* p, int n) { double sum = 0; for (int i = 0; i != n; i++) sum += p[i] *

[Bug tree-optimization/113592] missed partial sum optimization in vectorizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113592 --- Comment #2 from Hongtao Liu --- *** Bug 113594 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/113594] Missing partial sum optimziation in the vectorizer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113594 Hongtao Liu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/113592] missed partial sum optimization in vectorizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113592 --- Comment #1 from Hongtao Liu --- *** Bug 113593 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/113593] missed partial sum optimization in vectorizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113593 Hongtao Liu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/113594] New: Missing partial sum optimziation in the vectorizer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113594 Bug ID: 113594 Summary: Missing partial sum optimziation in the vectorizer. Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/113593] New: missed partial sum optimization in vectorizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113593 Bug ID: 113593 Summary: missed partial sum optimization in vectorizer Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/113592] New: missed partial sum optimization in vectorizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113592 Bug ID: 113592 Summary: missed partial sum optimization in vectorizer Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/113405] Can't access member type alias of concept-constrained class template specialization in global module fragment via alias template in different module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113405 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6ff54cc0be8dfa9d9bd5922ec65e86c9eb644711 commit r14-8408-g6ff54cc0be8dfa9d9bd5922ec65e86c9eb644711 Author: Nathaniel Shead

[Bug c++/100707] [modules] ICE on nested namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100707 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b433a6f5a0617dcbb28f2462b31198f86aadecaa commit r14-8407-gb433a6f5a0617dcbb28f2462b31198f86aadecaa Author: Nathaniel Shead

[Bug tree-optimization/113583] Main loop in 519.lbm not vectorized.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113583 --- Comment #5 from JuzheZhong --- Both ICC and Clang X86 can vectorize SPEC 2017 lbm: https://godbolt.org/z/MjbTbYf1G But I am not sure X86 ICC is better or X86 Clang is better.

[Bug tree-optimization/113583] Main loop in 519.lbm not vectorized.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113583 --- Comment #4 from JuzheZhong --- OK. Confirm on X86 GCC failed to vectorize it, wheras Clang X86 can vectorize it. https://godbolt.org/z/EaTjGbPGW X86 Clang and RISC-V Clang IR are same: %12 = tail call <8 x double>

[Bug c++/113591] New: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-ice15.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113591 Bug ID: 113591 Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-ice15.C Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c/80036] Source line not printed for diagnostic if expanded from a macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80036 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/70730] Inconsistent column number in "error: attempt to take address of bit-field structure member"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70730 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/113590] New: The vectorizer introduces signed overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113590 Bug ID: 113590 Summary: The vectorizer introduces signed overflow Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/113576] [14 regression] 502.gcc_r hangs r14-8223-g1c1853a70f9422169190e65e568dcccbce02d95c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576 --- Comment #6 from Hongtao Liu --- Another potential buggy place is 240 vexit_reduc_67 = mask_patt_43.28_62 & mask_patt_43.28_63; 241 if (vexit_reduc_67 == { -1, -1, -1, -1 }) 242goto ; [94.50%] 243 else is expanded to 319(insn

[Bug testsuite/113548] gcc.dg/vect/vect-ifcvt-19.c ICEs on LLP64 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113548 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug libstdc++/106127] experimental::filesystem::path("//") should be a root-directory not a root-name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106127 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nightstrike at gmail dot com ---

[Bug libstdc++/106127] experimental::filesystem::path("//") should be a root-directory not a root-name (experimental/filesystem/operations/absolute.cc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106127 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|experimental::filesystem::p |experimental::filesystem::p

[Bug libstdc++/113589] FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/absolute.cc on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113589 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/112755] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv32gcv_zvl256b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112755 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/112754] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv32gcv_zvl128b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112754 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/112798] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zve32f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112798 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/112757] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv32gcv_zvl1024b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112757 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/113589] FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/absolute.cc on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113589 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I actually think this is a dup of bug 106127.

[Bug target/112756] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv32gcv_zvl512b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112756 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/112598] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl512b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112598 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/112583] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl128b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/112597] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl256b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112597 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/112599] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl1024b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112599 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/112799] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv32gcv_zve64d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112799 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/112800] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv32gcv_zve32f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112800 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/112797] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zve64d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112797 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/113589] New: FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/absolute.cc on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113589 Bug ID: 113589 Summary: FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/absolute.cc on Windows Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/88950] stack_protect_prologue can be reordered by sched1 around memory accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88950 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|11.1.0 | --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---

[Bug tree-optimization/113588] [14 Regression] The vectorizer is introducing out-of-bounds memory access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113588 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/113588] New: The vectorizer is introducing out-of-bounds memory access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113588 Bug ID: 113588 Summary: The vectorizer is introducing out-of-bounds memory access Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/113582] incorrect warning about unused label with `pragma GCC diagnostic` around the unused label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113582 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- The reason I'm not doing simply TREE_USED (label) = TREE_USED (decl); in the pt.cc/LABEL_EXPR hunk is that I think we still want the warning in the second function, what with the goto being a discarded

[Bug c++/113582] incorrect warning about unused label with `pragma GCC diagnostic` around the unused label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113582 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libstdc++/79193] libstdc++ configure incorrectly decides linking works for cross-compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79193 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/105275] 525.x264_r and 538.imagick_r regressed on x86_64 at -O2 with PGO after r12-7319-g90d693bdc9d718

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105275 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor --- I have re-checked this year again (using master revision r14-7200-g95440171d0e615) but this time on a high-frequency Zen3 CPU (EPYC 75F3). Run-time of 525.x264_r built with master with PGO and -O2 improved

[Bug bootstrap/105688] GCC breaks build process if bootstrapping a downgraded GCC (was "GCC 11.3 doesn't build with the GNU gold linker (version 2.37-27.fc36) 1.16: libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105688 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/100204] aarch64: UB evaluating J constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100204 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug target/100212] UB (shift by -1) in aarch64_classify_index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100212 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/113087] [14] RISC-V rv64gcv vector: Runtime mismatch with rv64gc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113087 --- Comment #44 from JuzheZhong --- (In reply to Patrick O'Neill from comment #43) > (In reply to Patrick O'Neill from comment #42) > > I kicked off a run roughly 10 hours ago with your memory-hog fix patch > > applied to

[Bug analyzer/112969] -Wanalyzer-exposure-through-uninit-copy false positive seen on Linux kernel's drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112969 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/113529] Incorrect result of requires-expression in case of function call ambiguity and `operator<=>`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113529 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fecb45a936d62ca24dd8b4985ea0555c28edefa8 commit r14-8402-gfecb45a936d62ca24dd8b4985ea0555c28edefa8 Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug target/113010] [RISCV] sign-extension lost in comparison with constant embedded in comma-op expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113010 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Patrick O'Neill from comment #8) > From the CI run here: > https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/patch/20240116221914.267015-1- > g...@rivosinc.com/ > > It looks like this issue also

[Bug target/113087] [14] RISC-V rv64gcv vector: Runtime mismatch with rv64gc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113087 --- Comment #43 from Patrick O'Neill --- (In reply to Patrick O'Neill from comment #42) > I kicked off a run roughly 10 hours ago with your memory-hog fix patch > applied to a1b2953924c451ce90a3fdce6841b63bf05f335f. I'll post the results > here

[Bug libstdc++/113309] [C++23] Implement P2165R4, Compatibility between tuple and tuple-like objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113309 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug target/113010] [RISCV] sign-extension lost in comparison with constant embedded in comma-op expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113010 --- Comment #8 from Patrick O'Neill --- >From the CI run here: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/patch/20240116221914.267015-1-...@rivosinc.com/ It looks like this issue also affects ARM since the testcase fails.

[Bug c++/113582] incorrect warning about unused label with `pragma GCC diagnostic` around the unused label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113582 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|incorrect warning about |incorrect warning about

[Bug c++/113582] incorrect warning about unused label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113582 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-01-24 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/113281] [14 Regression] Wrong code due to vectorization of shift reduction and missing promotions since r14-3027

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281 Richard Sandiford changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/113572] [14 Regression] aarch64: internal compiler error in aarch64_sve::vector_cst_all_same

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113572 Richard Sandiford changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/113579] GCC leaks memory inside when using statement expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113579 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/113572] [14 Regression] aarch64: internal compiler error in aarch64_sve::vector_cst_all_same

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113572 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/113088] [12/13 Regression] Segmentation fault with empty try/catch following try/catch with returns + noexcept destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113088 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/103185] [11/12/13 Regression] ind[arr] is rejected when arr is an array prvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103185 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/103185] [11/12/13 Regression] ind[arr] is rejected when arr is an array prvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103185 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89e4f3304ad45d2251bfaf66d2a355cebf87310b commit r11-11208-g89e4f3304ad45d2251bfaf66d2a355cebf87310b Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/113347] [12/13 Regression] ICE during gimplification building TVM since r13-8079-gd237e7b291ff52

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113347 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/113347] [12/13 Regression] ICE during gimplification building TVM since r13-8079-gd237e7b291ff52

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113347 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aedfdd340cbb4a97a8f6d432720a4df374c1e467 commit r14-8401-gaedfdd340cbb4a97a8f6d432720a4df374c1e467 Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug c++/113347] [12/13 Regression] ICE during gimplification building TVM since r13-8079-gd237e7b291ff52

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113347 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:050fc885a6e324a03a6397d86134ab4b68aac944 commit r12-10112-g050fc885a6e324a03a6397d86134ab4b68aac944 Author: Jason

[Bug c++/103185] [11/12/13 Regression] ind[arr] is rejected when arr is an array prvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103185 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0da4402bd4b350691b2301003de62268f865d91c commit r12-10111-g0da4402bd4b350691b2301003de62268f865d91c Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/33799] Return value's destructor not executed when a local variable's destructor throws

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33799 --- Comment #30 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b0605cd4a12e9162cc56abc69ca1048947c72689 commit r12-10110-gb0605cd4a12e9162cc56abc69ca1048947c72689 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/92407] Destruction of objects returned from functions skipped by goto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92407 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:193321d2649a818c3b322c8db79a2805cfdd7095 commit r12-10109-g193321d2649a818c3b322c8db79a2805cfdd7095 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/113088] [12/13 Regression] Segmentation fault with empty try/catch following try/catch with returns + noexcept destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113088 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b0605cd4a12e9162cc56abc69ca1048947c72689 commit r12-10110-gb0605cd4a12e9162cc56abc69ca1048947c72689 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/113347] [12/13 Regression] ICE during gimplification building TVM since r13-8079-gd237e7b291ff52

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113347 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:713fbaff8b17a01d3b72110f89112851ed43a90a commit r13-8249-g713fbaff8b17a01d3b72110f89112851ed43a90a Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/103185] [11/12/13 Regression] ind[arr] is rejected when arr is an array prvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103185 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fcc06cf83a9571a0745fcde83d955eb7d7f16910 commit r13-8248-gfcc06cf83a9571a0745fcde83d955eb7d7f16910 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/33799] Return value's destructor not executed when a local variable's destructor throws

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33799 --- Comment #29 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:60bfd373a1891ae2349dc67313d104079ce8c706 commit r13-8247-g60bfd373a1891ae2349dc67313d104079ce8c706 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/113088] [12/13 Regression] Segmentation fault with empty try/catch following try/catch with returns + noexcept destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113088 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:60bfd373a1891ae2349dc67313d104079ce8c706 commit r13-8247-g60bfd373a1891ae2349dc67313d104079ce8c706 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug tree-optimization/110422] asm goto vs SRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110422 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b7204c52392c1c0da9c91a5feae0c44018a6f37 commit r13-8246-g2b7204c52392c1c0da9c91a5feae0c44018a6f37 Author: Martin Jambor

[Bug other/113575] [14 Regression] memory hog building insn-opinit.o (i686-linux-gnu -> riscv64-linux-gnu)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113575 --- Comment #12 from Robin Dapp --- Created attachment 57209 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57209=edit Tentative I tested the attached "fix". On my machine with 13.2 host compiler it reduced the build time for

[Bug fortran/113377] Wrong code passing optional dummy argument to elemental procedure with optional dummy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113377 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:186ae6d2cb93ad2e07117cff7e11def21fe285ae commit r14-8400-g186ae6d2cb93ad2e07117cff7e11def21fe285ae Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug bootstrap/105688] GCC breaks build process if bootstrapping a downgraded GCC (was "GCC 11.3 doesn't build with the GNU gold linker (version 2.37-27.fc36) 1.16: libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105688 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug ipa/112616] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code at -O{s, 2, 3} on x86_64-linux-gnu since r10-3311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112616 --- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor --- Fixed on trunk. I did not want to backport this but because this variant does not require disabling DCE, I will probably do after a few weeks on master, if there are no issues.

[Bug ipa/108007] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above with "-fno-dce -fno-tree-dce" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r10-3311-gff6686d2e5f797

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108007 --- Comment #22 from Martin Jambor --- Fixed on trunk. I did not want to backport this but because of PR 112616 I will probably do after a few weeks on master, if there are no issues.

[Bug libstdc++/90276] PSTL tests fail in Debug Mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90276 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2019-04-29 00:00:00 |2024-1-24 --- Comment #3 from

[Bug analyzer/106358] [meta-bug] tracker bug for building the Linux kernel with -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106358 Bug 106358 depends on bug 112977, which changed state. Bug 112977 Summary: -Wanalyzer-tainted-offset false positive seen on Linux kernel's drivers/scsi/aacraid/aachba.c https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112977 What

[Bug analyzer/106358] [meta-bug] tracker bug for building the Linux kernel with -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106358 Bug 106358 depends on bug 112927, which changed state. Bug 112927 Summary: -Wanalyzer-tainted-size false positive seen in Linux kernel's drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_devintf.c https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112927 What

[Bug analyzer/112927] -Wanalyzer-tainted-size false positive seen in Linux kernel's drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_devintf.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112927 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/112977] -Wanalyzer-tainted-offset false positive seen on Linux kernel's drivers/scsi/aacraid/aachba.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112977 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/104908] [11/12/13/14 Regression] incorrect Fortran out-of-bound runtime error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104908 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 100942, which changed state. Bug 100942 Summary: ccmp is not used if the value is used later https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100942 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/100942] ccmp is not used if the value is used later

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100942 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug testsuite/109705] [14 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c fails after r14-333-g6d4b59a9356ac4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109705 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6fbc3cc786a74a098352868348e187877bfbc8b commit r14-8399-ge6fbc3cc786a74a098352868348e187877bfbc8b Author: Andrew Pinski Date:

[Bug testsuite/109705] [14 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c fails after r14-333-g6d4b59a9356ac4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109705 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Also aarch64 as reported by Christophe. We need vect_long_mult for the > scatter but the effective target looks incomplete. I think the only thing left is

[Bug ipa/108007] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above with "-fno-dce -fno-tree-dce" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r10-3311-gff6686d2e5f797

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108007 --- Comment #21 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a9a8426e534760b8d3a250e9bd3cff4db131a2be commit r14-8398-ga9a8426e534760b8d3a250e9bd3cff4db131a2be Author: Martin Jambor Date:

[Bug ipa/112616] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code at -O{s, 2, 3} on x86_64-linux-gnu since r10-3311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112616 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a9a8426e534760b8d3a250e9bd3cff4db131a2be commit r14-8398-ga9a8426e534760b8d3a250e9bd3cff4db131a2be Author: Martin Jambor Date:

  1   2   3   >