https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67303
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67219
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53852
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2013-02-03 00:00:00 |2015-8-28
CC|
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
Target Milestone: ---
For 4.9 and earlier a gfortran compiled binary would print a clear error
message if an allocate would fail like in:
> cat test.f90
INTEGER, POINTER, DIMENS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53379
--- Comment #21 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Janne Blomqvist from comment #11)
> Looking at the frontend, calls to runtime_error_at are generated from
> gfc_trans_runtime_check() and gfc_trans_runtime_error(). I went through
> calls
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
Target Milestone: ---
overnight trunk regression:
> cat bug.f90
MODULE gauss_colloc
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: dp=8
CONTAINS
SUBROUT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69601
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2016-06-26 00:00:00 |2016-7-1
--- Comment #4 from Joost
: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
Target Milestone: ---
The following started regressing roughly July 7th/8th:
> cat bug.f90
MODULE d3_poly
INTEGER, PUBLIC, PARAMETER :: max_grad2=5
INTEGER, PUB
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71898
--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> Created attachment 38939 [details]
> Candidate patch
Since this is a graphite fix, it might also fix PR71351 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71961
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71961
--- Comment #10 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #9)
> With a test case, it would be OK with me if somebody reverted the
> patch. I can then rework it to take care of that particular bug.
A revert would be goo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71961
--- Comment #11 from Joost VandeVondele
---
This even gives wrong results at -O0 ...
> cat test.f90
INTEGER, DIMENSION(:,:), POINTER :: a
INTEGER, DIMENSION(:,:), ALLOCATABLE :: b
ALLOCATE(a(4,4),b(4,2))
a=1 ; b=2
a(:,1:2)=MATMUL(a(:,1:4),b(:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50259
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
701 - 713 of 713 matches
Mail list logo