[Bug fortran/59654] New: Broken function table with complex OO use case

2013-12-31 Thread Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov
: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov Created attachment 31553 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31553action=edit Reproducer - single file. I have an application (pFUnit) which makes very heavy use of OO fortran

[Bug fortran/59654] Broken function table with complex OO use case

2013-12-31 Thread Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654 tlcclt Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Thomas.L.Clune

[Bug fortran/59654] Broken function table with complex OO use case

2013-12-31 Thread Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654 --- Comment #3 from tlcclt Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov --- I have testend under OS X (10.8.5) with gfortran 4.8.1 and 4.8.2. I've also tested under Linux (not sure which flavor) with 4.9.0. Command line is: % gfortran allinone.F90 % ./a.out

[Bug fortran/59654] Broken function table with complex OO use case

2013-12-31 Thread Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654 --- Comment #4 from tlcclt Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov --- OK - had a bit of time waiting for the New Year countdown … so read up a bit on valgrind. A vanilla run under Linux with 4.9.0 gave the following, which seems encouraging, albeit

[Bug fortran/59654] Broken function table with complex OO use case

2013-12-31 Thread Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654 --- Comment #5 from tlcclt Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov --- Ignore that output from Valgind. I was logged out between building and running, and failed to reload the appropriate environment. With the correct environment, I get a clean run from

[Bug fortran/59654] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case

2014-01-01 Thread Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654 tlcclt Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #31554|0 |1

[Bug fortran/59654] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case

2014-01-02 Thread Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654 --- Comment #18 from tlcclt Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov --- Hello Janus, I usually just use mac port these days, but I will try this weekend to build gfortran from the current trunk. (If I fail, then I have the luxury of assigning another

[Bug fortran/59654] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case

2014-01-04 Thread Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654 --- Comment #22 from tlcclt Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov --- Success! I had to manually edit the configure file for the latest gcc to build on my Mac. (a few -Werror=…) were blocking the compilation. Looks like that should be off by default

[Bug fortran/60322] New: Incorrect bounds on polymorphic dummy array

2014-02-22 Thread Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov
: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov Created attachment 32202 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32202action=edit Simple complete program should print that the lower bound is 0, but reports 1. The attached

[Bug fortran/60853] New: Failure to disambiguate generic with unlimited polymorphic

2014-04-15 Thread Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov
Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov Created attachment 32609 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32609action=edit F90 reproducer The attached reproducer shows the compiler failing

[Bug fortran/60952] New: Problem using end as a type bound procedure and contained procedures

2014-04-24 Thread Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov
Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov Created attachment 32675 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32675action=edit Compile with: gfortran -c methodCalledEnd.F90

[Bug fortran/44232] function result with pointer to strided component of argument

2010-12-29 Thread Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44232 --- Comment #14 from tlcclt Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov 2010-12-29 16:30:31 UTC --- Sorry - yes. This bug report can be closed.I did eventually install a more recent version of the compiler and verified that the problem