[Bug fortran/109641] New: Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-04-26 Thread adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 Bug ID: 109641 Summary: Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones. Product: gcc Version: og10 (devel/omp/gcc-10)

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-04-27 Thread adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 --- Comment #8 from Adelson Oliveira --- Then I should have defined the operations with double precision as well?

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-04-27 Thread adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 --- Comment #5 from Adelson Oliveira --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > Replacing the first argument of > > FUNCTION MULTc4(v,m) > REAL,INTENT(IN) :: v(:) > > by > > complex, INTENT(IN) :: v(:) > > makes the code

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-04-27 Thread adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 --- Comment #7 from Adelson Oliveira --- (In reply to kargl from comment #6) > (In reply to Adelson Oliveira from comment #5) > > (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > > > Replacing the first argument of > > > > > > FUNCTION MULTc4(v,m) > >

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-04-28 Thread adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 --- Comment #11 from Adelson Oliveira --- I'm a linux user and gfortran comes with my distro. I mean, I did not compile gcc. Is this patch still to be tested? Am I expected to do something to test it? Or I just wait until a new gfortran version

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-04-29 Thread adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 --- Comment #13 from Adelson Oliveira --- Thanks, anlauf Em sáb., 29 de abr. de 2023 às 16:00, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> escreveu: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 > > --- Comment #12 from

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-04-30 Thread adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 --- Comment #14 from Adelson Oliveira --- Ok, thanks. Em sáb., 29 de abr. de 2023 11:55 PM, escreveu: > Attachments with a MIME type of "text/html" are not allowed on this > installation. > > Adelson Oliveira wrote: > > Thanks, anlauf > > >

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-05-18 Thread adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 --- Comment #19 from Adelson Oliveira --- Thank you all Em qui., 18 de mai. de 2023 às 14:01, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> escreveu: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 > > anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org