[Bug c++/29596] New: overloaded function not found

2006-10-25 Thread again at gmx dot de
Product: gcc Version: 4.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: again at gmx dot de GCC build triplet: i686-pc-gnu-linux GCC host triplet: i686

[Bug c++/29596] overloaded function not found

2006-10-25 Thread again at gmx dot de
--- Comment #1 from again at gmx dot de 2006-10-25 21:45 --- Created an attachment (id=12493) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12493action=view) test.cpp (sample program that does not compile) This program does not compile (commandline g++ test.cpp -o test

[Bug c++/29596] overloaded function not found

2006-10-25 Thread again at gmx dot de
--- Comment #3 from again at gmx dot de 2006-10-25 21:50 --- Created an attachment (id=12494) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12494action=view) output of g++ test.cpp -o test -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29596

[Bug c++/29596] overloaded function not found

2006-10-25 Thread again at gmx dot de
--- Comment #4 from again at gmx dot de 2006-10-25 21:51 --- Created an attachment (id=12495) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12495action=view) output of Visual C++ .NET 2003 plus output of compiled program -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29596

[Bug c++/29596] overloaded function not found

2006-10-25 Thread again at gmx dot de
--- Comment #5 from again at gmx dot de 2006-10-25 21:53 --- test.ii produced by `g++ -v -save-temps test.cpp -o test' is to bug for bugzilla -- you can find it here: http://schlotter.org/pub/test.ii (1.2MB) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29596

[Bug c++/29596] overloaded function not found

2006-10-25 Thread again at gmx dot de
--- Comment #6 from again at gmx dot de 2006-10-25 21:57 --- Remark to test.cpp:23: std::cout boost::lambda::_1 '\n' This should find the overloaded operator defined in boost/tuple_io.hpp. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29596

[Bug c++/29596] overloaded function not found

2006-10-27 Thread again at gmx dot de
--- Comment #7 from again at gmx dot de 2006-10-27 09:04 --- Created an attachment (id=12500) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12500action=view) test2.cpp (sample program that does not compile) I managed to simplify the program. -- again at gmx dot de changed

[Bug c++/29596] overloaded function not found

2006-10-27 Thread again at gmx dot de
--- Comment #8 from again at gmx dot de 2006-10-27 09:05 --- Created an attachment (id=12501) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12501action=view) output of 'g++ test2.cpp -o test2' -- again at gmx dot de changed: What|Removed

[Bug c++/29596] overloaded function not found

2006-10-27 Thread again at gmx dot de
--- Comment #9 from again at gmx dot de 2006-10-27 09:06 --- Created an attachment (id=12502) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12502action=view) output of compiler shipped with MS Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition and program output -- again at gmx dot de changed

[Bug c++/29596] overloaded function not found

2006-10-27 Thread again at gmx dot de
--- Comment #10 from again at gmx dot de 2006-10-27 09:06 --- test2.ii produced by `g++ -v -save-temps test2.cpp -o test2' is to big for bugzilla -- you can find it here: http://schlotter.org/pub/test2.ii (1.1MB) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29596

[Bug c++/29596] overloaded function not found

2006-10-30 Thread again at gmx dot de
--- Comment #13 from again at gmx dot de 2006-10-30 17:12 --- (In reply to comment #11) I believe the testcase is invalid. You're right, therefore I'm closing this bug. The author of the Boost.Lambda library, Jaakko Järvi, kindly pointed my to a section of the library documentation

[Bug c++/29596] overloaded function not found

2006-10-30 Thread again at gmx dot de
--- Comment #14 from again at gmx dot de 2006-10-30 17:26 --- However, my initial testcase (attachment #12493) does still not compile, so it seems I have simplified it wrongly. I will check this back and reopen the bug accordingly. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id