[Bug c/46480] [trans-mem] Uninstrumented code path is missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46480 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/55401] New: uninstrumented path in TM clones are still instrumented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55401 Bug #: 55401 Summary: uninstrumented path in TM clones are still instrumented Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/55401] uninstrumented path in TM clones are still instrumented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55401 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/55350] [4.8 Regression] verify_gimple failed with invalid (pointer) operands to plus/minus

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55350 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug tree-optimization/55350] [4.8 Regression] verify_gimple failed with invalid (pointer) operands to plus/minus

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55350 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 18:28:30 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Tue Nov 20 18:28:09 2012 New Revision: 193672 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193672 Log: PR tree

[Bug tree-optimization/55350] [4.8 Regression] verify_gimple failed with invalid (pointer) operands to plus/minus

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55350 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/55264] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: in ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target, at ipa-prop.c:2141 with -O2 -fno-early-inlining -fno-weak

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh

[Bug tree-optimization/55264] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: in ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target, at ipa-prop.c:2141 with -O2 -fno-early-inlining -fno-weak

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug middle-end/53992] Combining -fopenmp and -fgnu-tm results in segfault or misbehaving binaries

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53992 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/55264] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: in ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target, at ipa-prop.c:2141 with -O2 -fno-early-inlining -fno-weak

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka

[Bug middle-end/52173] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed possibly caused by itm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/52173] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed possibly caused by itm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug middle-end/55401] uninstrumented path in TM clones are still instrumented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55401 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh

[Bug rtl-optimization/51771] trans-mem: abnormal edges get lost or corrupted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51771 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh

[Bug middle-end/55401] uninstrumented path in TM clones are still instrumented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55401 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03 16:11:33 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Mon Dec 3 16:11:21 2012 New Revision: 194099 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194099 Log: PR middle

[Bug rtl-optimization/51771] trans-mem: abnormal edges get lost or corrupted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51771 --- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03 18:43:14 UTC --- Created attachment 28862 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28862 patch to revert the returns twice patch

[Bug rtl-optimization/51771] trans-mem: abnormal edges get lost or corrupted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51771 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug middle-end/55401] uninstrumented path in TM clones are still instrumented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55401 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/54160] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc should not define __OBJC2__ when lang is not set to ObjC (gcc 4.6 and later)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54160 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh

[Bug target/54160] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc should not define __OBJC2__ when lang is not set to ObjC (gcc 4.6 and later)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54160 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-04 22:28:54 UTC --- Proposed patch. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg00261.html

[Bug libstdc++/55594] [4.8 Regression] -Wa,-nH incorrectly added to compile line of all targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55594 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh

[Bug c++/55513] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect snprintf folding when building with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55513 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh

[Bug rtl-optimization/55604] New: ICE while dumping in remove_some_program_points_and_update_live_ranges

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55604 Bug #: 55604 Summary: ICE while dumping in remove_some_program_points_and_update_live_ranges Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/55604] ICE while dumping in remove_some_program_points_and_update_live_ranges

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55604 --- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-05 18:08:24 UTC --- Created attachment 28884 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28884 proposed patch

[Bug rtl-optimization/55604] ICE while dumping in remove_some_program_points_and_update_live_ranges

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55604 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh

[Bug rtl-optimization/55604] ICE while dumping in remove_some_program_points_and_update_live_ranges

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55604 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug target/54160] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc should not define __OBJC2__ when lang is not set to ObjC (gcc 4.6 and later)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54160 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-05 21:10:25 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Wed Dec 5 21:10:18 2012 New Revision: 194227 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194227 Log: PR target

[Bug target/54160] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc should not define __OBJC2__ when lang is not set to ObjC (gcc 4.6 and later)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54160 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/55513] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect snprintf folding when building with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55513 --- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-06 21:06:29 UTC --- After Jason's patch here (trunk@177066): PR c++/49813 * semantics.c (potential_constant_expression_1): Allow any builtin

[Bug c++/55513] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect snprintf folding when building with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55513 --- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-08 01:20:33 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Sat Dec 8 01:19:13 2012 New Revision: 194316 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194316 Log: PR c

[Bug c++/55513] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect snprintf folding when building with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55513 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug other/54324] [4.8 Regression] GCC install document does not list minimum required g++ version

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh

[Bug other/54324] [4.8 Regression] GCC install document does not list minimum required g++ version

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-10 19:40:17 UTC --- I was successfully able to bootstrap trunk with a freshly built 3.4.0 compiler: houston:/build/trunk$ gcc -v Reading specs from /home/build/old-gccs

[Bug other/54324] [4.8 Regression] GCC install document does not list minimum required g++ version

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324 --- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-12 05:09:09 UTC --- Another proposed patch. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg00766.html

[Bug other/54324] [4.8 Regression] GCC install document does not list minimum required g++ version

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324 --- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18 15:19:55 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Tue Dec 18 15:19:43 2012 New Revision: 194583 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194583 Log: PR other

[Bug other/54324] [4.8 Regression] GCC install document does not list minimum required g++ version

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324 --- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18 15:26:50 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Tue Dec 18 15:26:27 2012 New Revision: 194584 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194584 Log: PR other

[Bug gcov-profile/55734] New: gcov-io.c uses builtins not available in non-GCC compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 Bug #: 55734 Summary: gcov-io.c uses builtins not available in non-GCC compilers Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug gcov-profile/55734] [4.8 Regression] gcov-io.c uses builtins not available in non-GCC compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18 15:45:17 UTC --- I have a proposed patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg00766.html ...which was deemed not sexy at all. So perhaps Richard

[Bug gcov-profile/55734] [4.8 Regression] gcov-io.c uses builtins not available in non-GCC compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 --- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18 16:19:33 UTC --- Created attachment 28999 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28999 proposed patch Oh, I didn't realize we always had the HWI variants

[Bug other/54324] [4.8 Regression] GCC install document does not list minimum required g++ version

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324 --- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18 16:22:11 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Tue Dec 18 16:21:57 2012 New Revision: 194586 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194586 Log: PR other

[Bug gcov-profile/55734] [4.8 Regression] gcov-io.c uses builtins not available in non-GCC compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28999|0 |1

[Bug gcov-profile/55734] [4.8 Regression] gcov-io.c uses builtins not available in non-GCC compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 --- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18 22:41:13 UTC --- Teresa, I think this is what you were referring to, and the reason for my original patch: houston:/build/trunkboot$ ./install/bin/gcc a.c -fprofile

[Bug rtl-optimization/55719] [4.8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55719 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh

[Bug rtl-optimization/55719] [4.8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55719 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo

[Bug target/55565] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-mov-1.c scan-assembler-not fmr [0-9]+,[0-9]+

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55565 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh

[Bug target/55565] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-mov-1.c scan-assembler-not fmr [0-9]+,[0-9]+

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55565 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-10 17:46:39 UTC --- I compared the code generated by trunk with the generated code in rev 190339 which broke the test. The trunk code is more optimal than when the test

[Bug testsuite/54139] [4.8 regression] some ARM Thumb-2 tests appear to be run on ARMv5TE hardware causing unhandled exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh

[Bug target/55565] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-mov-1.c scan-assembler-not fmr [0-9]+,[0-9]+

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55565 --- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-10 20:28:33 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Thu Jan 10 20:28:26 2013 New Revision: 195097 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195097 Log: PR target

[Bug target/55565] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-mov-1.c scan-assembler-not fmr [0-9]+,[0-9]+

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55565 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/54139] [4.8 regression] some ARM Thumb-2 tests appear to be run on ARMv5TE hardware causing unhandled exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-11 18:01:57 UTC --- I have built a cross cc1/cc1plus with: blah/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --target=armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi but I get a totally

[Bug testsuite/54139] [4.8 regression] some ARM Thumb-2 tests appear to be run on ARMv5TE hardware causing unhandled exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 15:49:04 UTC --- Perhaps this is a duplicate of PR55780? If it is, there is already a proposed patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01339.html

[Bug testsuite/55780] effective targets arm_arch_v*_multilib are not strict enough

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55780 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh

[Bug testsuite/54139] [4.8 regression] some ARM Thumb-2 tests appear to be run on ARMv5TE hardware causing unhandled exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139 --- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 16:51:54 UTC --- Oh Janis, and when you do, please reference the new PR here so we can close this PR in deference to those 3 individual PRs. Thanks.

[Bug testsuite/54139] [4.8 regression] some ARM Thumb-2 tests appear to be run on ARMv5TE hardware causing unhandled exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libitm/55693] [4.8 Regression] libitm.c++/eh-1.C execution test fails on darwin from r193271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh

[Bug libitm/55693] [4.8 Regression] libitm.c++/eh-1.C execution test fails on darwin from r193271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||echristo

[Bug libitm/55693] [4.8 Regression] libitm.c++/eh-1.C execution test fails on darwin from r193271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693 --- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-17 18:43:45 UTC --- BTW, the reason this works when forcing the instrumented path as Torvald suggested (comment #7) is because when f1() is instrumented, the call

[Bug libitm/55693] [4.8 Regression] libitm.c++/eh-1.C execution test fails on darwin from r193271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/52911] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc 4.7.0 (ppc32 e500mc) when compile a c file, after a lot of time, gcc failed and internal compiler error occurs.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug target/55939] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] gcc miscompiles gmp-5.0.5 on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh

[Bug target/52911] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc 4.7.0 (ppc32 e500mc) when compile a c file, after a lot of time, gcc failed and internal compiler error occurs.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug libitm/55693] [4.8 Regression] libitm.c++/eh-1.C execution test fails on darwin from r193271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug target/55939] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] gcc miscompiles gmp-5.0.5 on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939 --- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29 13:23:37 UTC --- Confirmed with testcase in comment #5, compiling with: [guest@aranym2 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ a.c -O2 [guest@aranym2 gcc]$ ./a.out Aborted

[Bug target/55939] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] gcc miscompiles gmp-5.0.5 on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/55939] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] gcc miscompiles gmp-5.0.5 on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939 --- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29 17:26:46 UTC --- In adding debugging printfs throughout a locally reduced testcase, I ran into something peculiar, that may or may not be related to this PR. Perhaps

[Bug target/55939] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] gcc miscompiles gmp-5.0.5 on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939 --- Comment #17 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29 21:20:53 UTC --- Both -fexcess-precision=standard and -ffloat-store fix the testcase. This is perhaps a duplicate of PR323. Although, Jakub mentions that according

[Bug debug/54410] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] doubled DW_TAG_template_type_param

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54410 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh

[Bug tree-optimization/55022] [4.8 Regression] air.f90 is miscompliled with -m64 -O2 -fgraphite-identity after revision 190619

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55022 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh

[Bug tree-optimization/55022] [4.8 Regression] air.f90 is miscompliled with -m64 -O2 -fgraphite-identity after revision 190619

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55022 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/59131] Compiler segfaults while generating code to save local variables in transactional section

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59131 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/59131] Compiler segfaults while generating code to save local variables in transactional section

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59131 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- FWIW, also works on 4.8.

[Bug c/56573] GCC generates non-optimal transactional code when inlining nested transaction.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56573 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/56572] GCC generates non-optimal transactional code when inlining nested transaction.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56572 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 56573 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/56572] GCC generates non-optimal transactional code when inlining nested transaction.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56572 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/56572] GCC generates non-optimal transactional code when inlining nested transaction.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56572 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/56572] GCC generates non-optimal transactional code when inlining nested transaction.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56572 --- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Well, we could tweak the inliner cost model, thus causing the early inliner to inline the nested transactions earlier. With the attached patch, f() gets inlined into g() early enough

[Bug tree-optimization/59149] diagnose_tm_1 calls flags_from_decl_or_type on an ADDR_EXPR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59149 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/59149] diagnose_tm_1 calls flags_from_decl_or_type on an ADDR_EXPR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59149 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: aldyh Date: Fri Dec 13 17:50:18 2013 New Revision: 205967 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205967root=gccview=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/59149 * calls.c

[Bug tree-optimization/59149] diagnose_tm_1 calls flags_from_decl_or_type on an ADDR_EXPR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59149 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/54184] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/pr52558-1.c failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54184 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-21 17:46:26 UTC --- My bad... I'm on this.

[Bug testsuite/54184] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/pr52558-1.c failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54184 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot

[Bug testsuite/54184] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/pr52558-1.c failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54184 --- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 22:43:03 UTC --- Created attachment 28137 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28137 proposed patch Proposed patch using the simulate-thread harness.

[Bug testsuite/54184] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/pr52558-1.c failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54184 --- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-07 16:00:18 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Fri Sep 7 16:00:07 2012 New Revision: 191079 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191079 Log: PR testsuite/54184

[Bug testsuite/54184] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/pr52558-1.c failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54184 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c/54149] write introduction incorrect wrt the C11 memory model

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54149 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/54149] write introduction incorrect wrt the C11 memory model

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54149 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-11 12:28:11 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Tue Sep 11 12:28:02 2012 New Revision: 191179 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191179 Log: PR middle-end/54149

[Bug middle-end/54149] write introduction incorrect wrt the C11 memory model

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54149 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/52173] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed possibly caused by itm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173 --- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-12 19:52:55 UTC --- I'll take a look.

[Bug middle-end/52173] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed possibly caused by itm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173 --- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-12 19:52:55 UTC --- I'll take a look. --- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-12 19:53:30 UTC --- I'll take a look.

[Bug middle-end/52173] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed possibly caused by itm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173 --- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14 21:20:23 UTC --- Created attachment 28195 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28195 reduced testcase Further reduced testcase that triggers on either C/C++.

[Bug middle-end/52173] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed possibly caused by itm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod

[Bug middle-end/53850] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in expand_call_tm, at trans-mem.c:2289 with -fgnu-tm -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53850 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug middle-end/53850] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in expand_call_tm, at trans-mem.c:2289 with -fgnu-tm -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53850 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-21 20:12:55 UTC --- Created attachment 28245 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28245 proposed patch being tested

[Bug middle-end/53850] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in expand_call_tm, at trans-mem.c:2289 with -fgnu-tm -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53850 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-25 18:47:40 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Tue Sep 25 18:47:35 2012 New Revision: 191742 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191742 Log: PR middle

[Bug middle-end/53850] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in expand_call_tm, at trans-mem.c:2289 with -fgnu-tm -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53850 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c/46480] [trans-mem] Uninstrumented code path is missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46480 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/54893] unable to access volatile variable within relaxed transaction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54893 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pmarlier

[Bug c++/54893] unable to access volatile variable within relaxed transaction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54893 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/54900] write introduction incorrect wrt the C11 memory model (2)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54900 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-14 12:51:15 UTC --- Created attachment 28444 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28444 reduced testcase

[Bug tree-optimization/54900] write introduction incorrect wrt the C11 memory model (2)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54900 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >