[Bug fortran/57553] [F08] Valid use of STORAGE_SIZE rejected, bad error message for invalid use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57553 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sat Jan 26 20:45:55 2019 New Revision: 268303 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268303=gcc=rev Log: 2019-01-26 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/57553 * expr.c

[Bug fortran/83515] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83515 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/85797] ICE in gfc_element_size, at fortran/target-memory.c:126

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85797 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sun Mar 31 18:33:51 2019 New Revision: 270045 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270045=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-31 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/83515 PR

[Bug fortran/83515] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83515 --- Comment #18 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sun Mar 31 19:21:37 2019 New Revision: 270047 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270047=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-31 Harald Anlauf Backport from trunk PR

[Bug fortran/85797] ICE in gfc_element_size, at fortran/target-memory.c:126

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85797 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sun Mar 31 19:21:37 2019 New Revision: 270047 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270047=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-31 Harald Anlauf Backport from trunk PR

[Bug fortran/85797] ICE in gfc_element_size, at fortran/target-memory.c:126

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85797 --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sun Mar 31 19:08:23 2019 New Revision: 270046 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270046=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-31 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/83515 PR

[Bug fortran/83515] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83515 --- Comment #17 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sun Mar 31 19:08:23 2019 New Revision: 270046 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270046=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-31 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/83515 PR

[Bug fortran/85868] Subarray of a pointer array associated with a pointer dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85868 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug fortran/89904] [9 regression] ICE in gfortran starting with r270045

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89904 --- Comment #20 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-04/msg3.html

[Bug fortran/89904] [9 regression] ICE in gfortran starting with r270045

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89904 --- Comment #16 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- I had rejected procedure arguments to TRANSFER in my initial patch, see https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-03/msg00099.html but Thomas persuaded me to be less strict. So shall I resubmit my

[Bug fortran/89904] [9 regression] ICE in gfortran starting with r270045

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89904 --- Comment #19 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #17) > > So shall I resubmit my original patch, or is Steve's comment#11 better? > > I'ld take Steve's conditions, but your wording fo

[Bug d/89004] mtype.c:2329:33: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘size_t’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’} [-Werror=sign-compare]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89004 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Thu Apr 4 20:38:33 2019 New Revision: 270150 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270150=gcc=rev Log: 2019-04-04 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/89004 * check.c

[Bug fortran/89904] [9 regression] ICE in gfortran starting with r270045

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89904 --- Comment #21 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #20) > Patch here: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-04/msg3.html Patch applied to trunk so far. Unfortunately, I had the wrong PR in the

[Bug fortran/83515] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83515 --- Comment #16 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sun Mar 31 18:33:51 2019 New Revision: 270045 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270045=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-31 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/83515 PR

[Bug fortran/88139] ICE in get_c_type_name, at fortran/dump-parse-tree.c:3047

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88139 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/85797] ICE in gfc_element_size, at fortran/target-memory.c:126

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85797 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/83515] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83515 --- Comment #21 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to DIL from comment #20) > Thanks for fixing this bug! Sorry, I have not had time yet to create a > reduced non-trivial test case. Would you still like to add it later if I

[Bug fortran/89904] [9 regression] ICE in gfortran starting with r270045

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89904 --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Can you find out which of the tests in file pr85797.f90 triggers the ICE?

[Bug fortran/89904] [9 regression] ICE in gfortran starting with r270045

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89904 --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to seurer from comment #6) > Actually, it is the opposite. Oh, that is surprising. So if you comment out subroutine f, there's no ICE? And if you keep only subroutine a and subrout

[Bug fortran/89904] [9 regression] ICE in gfortran starting with r270045

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89904 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to seurer from comment #3) > Best I can tell from poking around in gdb is that it is happening at line 32 > > end subroutine s > > that's probably not much help. So

[Bug fortran/89904] [9 regression] ICE in gfortran starting with r270045

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89904 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #4) > and if you keep only those lines (commenting lines 6-22), > there's no ICE? Sorry, I meant there an ICE here on your target.

[Bug fortran/89904] [9 regression] ICE in gfortran starting with r270045

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89904 --- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to seurer from comment #8) > With no f: ICE > > With only subroutine a and subroutine f: no ICE Now it gets really mysterious. If you start from the full testcase, a

[Bug fortran/89904] [9 regression] ICE in gfortran starting with r270045

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89904 --- Comment #22 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sun Apr 7 19:42:05 2019 New Revision: 270192 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270192=gcc=rev Log: 2019-04-07 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/89904

[Bug fortran/87751] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1, at fortran/trans-expr.c:10255

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87751 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING Known to fail

[Bug fortran/84868] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_offset, at fortran/trans-array.c:208

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84868 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/60576] [7/8/9 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_7.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60576 --- Comment #28 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Is this still an issue? On x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and with current trunk, I do only get a memory leak with -fsanitize=address (both -m32 and -m64), which disappears if I deallocate the arrays

[Bug fortran/57553] [F08] Valid use of STORAGE_SIZE rejected, bad error message for invalid use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57553 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/83057] OPEN without a filename and without STATUS='SCRATCH' could produce a warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83057 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/89516] ICE in gfc_calculate_transfer_sizes at gcc/fortran/check.c:5506

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89516 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The ICE is triggered by a code path that is executed only when -Wsurprising is used together with TRANSFER. I'm currently testing the following patch: Index: gcc/fortran/check.c

[Bug fortran/77583] ICE in pp_quoted_string, at pretty-print.c:966

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77583 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/67894] bounds of assumed-rank dummy argument not equal to actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67894 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/84868] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_offset, at fortran/trans-array.c:208

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84868 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #3) > Works also if len_trim is replaced by len. > > I wonder if this is related to PR86249. Sorry, off-by-one, that should have been PR86248. Also

[Bug fortran/88326] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6085

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88326 --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sat Mar 2 16:08:03 2019 New Revision: 269342 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269342=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-02 Harald Anlauf Backport from trunk PR

[Bug fortran/89266] ICE with TRANSFER of len=0 character array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89266 --- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sat Mar 2 16:08:03 2019 New Revision: 269342 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269342=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-02 Harald Anlauf Backport from trunk PR

[Bug fortran/89516] ICE in gfc_calculate_transfer_sizes at gcc/fortran/check.c:5506

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89516 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sat Mar 2 16:08:03 2019 New Revision: 269342 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269342=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-02 Harald Anlauf Backport from trunk PR

[Bug fortran/89492] [9 Regression] Endless compilation of an invalid TRANSFER after r269177

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89492 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sat Mar 2 16:08:03 2019 New Revision: 269342 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269342=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-02 Harald Anlauf Backport from trunk PR

[Bug fortran/89516] ICE in gfc_calculate_transfer_sizes at gcc/fortran/check.c:5506

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89516 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sat Mar 2 15:29:27 2019 New Revision: 269341 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269341=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-02 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/89516 * check.c

[Bug fortran/71203] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:1512 and :1564

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71203 --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Wed Mar 6 21:16:00 2019 New Revision: 269445 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269445=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-06 Harald Anlauf Backport from trunk PR

[Bug fortran/71203] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:1512 and :1564

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71203 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/71203] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:1512 and :1564

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71203 --- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Wed Mar 6 21:06:35 2019 New Revision: 269444 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269444=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-06 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/71203 * expr.c

[Bug fortran/88326] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6085

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88326 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sun Feb 24 20:03:28 2019 New Revision: 269177 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269177=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-24 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/89266 PR

[Bug fortran/89266] ICE with TRANSFER of len=0 character array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89266 --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sun Feb 24 20:03:28 2019 New Revision: 269177 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269177=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-24 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/89266 PR

[Bug fortran/83057] OPEN without a filename and without STATUS='SCRATCH' could produce a warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83057 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Fri Feb 22 20:35:38 2019 New Revision: 269134 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269134=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-22 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/83057 * io.c

[Bug fortran/89516] ICE in gfc_calculate_transfer_sizes at gcc/fortran/check.c:5506

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89516 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The patch turned out to require a small adjustment for scalar MOLD of size 0, so I posted it for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-02/msg00237.html

[Bug fortran/77583] ICE in pp_quoted_string, at pretty-print.c:966

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77583 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sun Mar 3 20:24:53 2019 New Revision: 269353 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269353=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-03 Harald Anlauf Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/77583] ICE in pp_quoted_string, at pretty-print.c:966

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77583 --- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sun Mar 3 20:30:44 2019 New Revision: 269354 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269354=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-03 Harald Anlauf Steven G. Kargl

[Bug fortran/77583] ICE in pp_quoted_string, at pretty-print.c:966

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77583 --- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sun Mar 3 20:36:12 2019 New Revision: 269355 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269355=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-03 Harald Anlauf Steven G. Kargl

[Bug fortran/77583] ICE in pp_quoted_string, at pretty-print.c:966

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77583 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug fortran/88326] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6085

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88326 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #8 from

[Bug fortran/89492] [9 Regression] Endless compilation of an invalid TRANSFER after r269177

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89492 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/89516] ICE in gfc_calculate_transfer_sizes at gcc/fortran/check.c:5506

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89516 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/31237] [meta-bug] TRANSFER intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31237 Bug 31237 depends on bug 89516, which changed state. Bug 89516 Summary: ICE in gfc_calculate_transfer_sizes at gcc/fortran/check.c:5506 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89516 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/31237] [meta-bug] TRANSFER intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31237 Bug 31237 depends on bug 89492, which changed state. Bug 89492 Summary: [9 Regression] Endless compilation of an invalid TRANSFER after r269177 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89492 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/89266] ICE with TRANSFER of len=0 character array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89266 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/89077] ICE using * as len specifier for character parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077 --- Comment #21 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sun Mar 3 22:24:00 2019 New Revision: 269357 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269357=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-03 Harald Anlauf Backport from trunk PR

[Bug fortran/31237] [meta-bug] TRANSFER intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31237 Bug 31237 depends on bug 89077, which changed state. Bug 89077 Summary: ICE using * as len specifier for character parameter https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/89077] ICE using * as len specifier for character parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug fortran/31237] [meta-bug] TRANSFER intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31237 Bug 31237 depends on bug 89266, which changed state. Bug 89266 Summary: ICE with TRANSFER of len=0 character array constructor https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89266 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/19276] [meta-bug] CHARACTER related bugs in gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19276 Bug 19276 depends on bug 89266, which changed state. Bug 89266 Summary: ICE with TRANSFER of len=0 character array constructor https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89266 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/89266] ICE with TRANSFER of len=0 character array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89266 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/89492] [9 Regression] Endless compilation of an invalid TRANSFER after r269177

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89492 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Tue Feb 26 20:03:08 2019 New Revision: 269227 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269227=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-26 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/89492 * check.c

[Bug fortran/87045] pointer to array of character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87045 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/83515] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83515 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #7) The following patch fixes the ICE: Index: trans-types.c === --- trans-types.c (revision

[Bug fortran/83515] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83515 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/83515] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83515 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/87045] pointer to array of character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87045 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Wed Mar 13 21:33:27 2019 New Revision: 269664 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269664=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-13 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/87045 * trans

[Bug fortran/87045] pointer to array of character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87045 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/67740] Wrong association status of allocatable character pointer in derived types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67740 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > The dump-tree looks funny: it appears that in the last test > > print *, "Associated contents?", associated(p1%string, p2%string) &

[Bug fortran/60091] Misleading error messages in rank-2 pointer assignment to rank-1 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60091 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Fri Mar 15 22:20:20 2019 New Revision: 269717 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269717=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-15 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/60091 * expr.c

[Bug fortran/60091] Misleading error messages in rank-2 pointer assignment to rank-1 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60091 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug fortran/85797] ICE in gfc_element_size, at fortran/target-memory.c:126

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85797 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug fortran/89462] [7/8/9 Regression] gfortran loops in code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89462 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/83515] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83515 --- Comment #15 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to DIL from comment #14) > Ok, so you are still looking for a single Fortran source file using this > feature, namely optional dummy procedure pointers, that would do something

[Bug fortran/85797] ICE in gfc_element_size, at fortran/target-memory.c:126

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85797 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/89077] ICE using * as len specifier for character parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077 --- Comment #18 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sun Feb 17 21:14:14 2019 New Revision: 268973 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268973=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-17 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/89077 * decl.c

[Bug fortran/88299] [F18] COMMON in a legacy module produces bogus warnings in dependent code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88299 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sun Feb 17 21:19:20 2019 New Revision: 268974 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268974=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-17 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/88299

[Bug fortran/89077] ICE using * as len specifier for character parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077 --- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sat Feb 9 17:25:23 2019 New Revision: 268726 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268726=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-09 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/89077

[Bug fortran/88248] [F18] Bogus warning about obsolescent feature: Labeled DO statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Thu Feb 14 20:24:54 2019 New Revision: 268895 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268895=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-14 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/88248

[Bug fortran/89077] ICE using * as len specifier for character parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077 --- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sun Feb 10 20:01:15 2019 New Revision: 268752 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268752=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-10 Harald Anlauf Backport from trunk PR

[Bug fortran/89077] ICE using * as len specifier for character parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077 --- Comment #15 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sun Feb 10 20:05:34 2019 New Revision: 268753 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268753=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-10 Harald Anlauf Backport from trunk PR

[Bug fortran/89077] ICE using * as len specifier for character parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077 --- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Mon Feb 4 20:44:22 2019 New Revision: 268525 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268525=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-04 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/89077

[Bug fortran/89904] [9 regression] ICE in gfortran starting with r270045

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89904 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/67123] ICE with source allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67123 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #3 from

[Bug fortran/61261] [OOP] Segfault on source-allocating polymorphic variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61261 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC

[Bug fortran/67740] Wrong association status of allocatable character pointer in derived types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67740 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/90578] Wrong code with LSHIFT and optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90578 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #5) > Compiling > > print *, lshift(1,-1) > end > > gives the following error > > lshift.f90:1:16: > >

[Bug fortran/90578] Wrong code with LSHIFT and optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90578 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/90578] Wrong code with LSHIFT and optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90578 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug middle-end/90577] [9/10 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/lrshift_1.f90 with -O(2|3) and -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90577 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Fri Jun 14 18:41:20 2019 New Revision: 272309 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272309=gcc=rev Log: 2019-06-14 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/90577 PR

[Bug fortran/90578] Wrong code with LSHIFT and optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90578 --- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Fri Jun 14 18:41:20 2019 New Revision: 272309 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272309=gcc=rev Log: 2019-06-14 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/90577 PR

[Bug middle-end/90577] [9/10 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/lrshift_1.f90 with -O(2|3) and -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90577 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC

[Bug fortran/90903] Implement runtime checks for bit manipulation intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90903 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug fortran/90903] New: Implement runtime checks for bit manipulation intrinsics

Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The Fortran standard imposes constraints on some arguments (e.g. SHIFT) on the bit manipulation intrinsics (e.g. SHIFTR/SHIFTL/SHIFTA, ISHFT

[Bug middle-end/90577] [9/10 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/lrshift_1.f90 with -O(2|3) and -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90577 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/90578] Wrong code with LSHIFT and optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90578 --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Tue Jun 18 20:21:47 2019 New Revision: 272437 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272437=gcc=rev Log: 2019-06-18 Harald Anlauf Backport from mainline

[Bug middle-end/90577] [9/10 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/lrshift_1.f90 with -O(2|3) and -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90577 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Tue Jun 18 20:21:47 2019 New Revision: 272437 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272437=gcc=rev Log: 2019-06-18 Harald Anlauf Backport from mainline

[Bug fortran/90578] Wrong code with LSHIFT and optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90578 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-06/msg00077.html

[Bug fortran/90903] Implement runtime checks for bit manipulation intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90903 --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch addressing the bit manipulation functions so far: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-06/msg00138.html

[Bug fortran/89904] [9 regression] ICE in gfortran starting with r270045

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89904 --- Comment #25 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Wed Apr 10 21:02:02 2019 New Revision: 270268 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270268=gcc=rev Log: 2019-04-10 Harald Anlauf Backport from trunk PR

[Bug fortran/89904] [9 regression] ICE in gfortran starting with r270045

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89904 --- Comment #24 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Wed Apr 10 20:26:44 2019 New Revision: 270265 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270265=gcc=rev Log: 2019-04-10 Harald Anlauf Backport from trunk PR

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >