[Bug fortran/98445] Bogus error: derived type used as an actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98445 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status

[Bug fortran/98454] Apparent wrong initialization in function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98454 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #4) > Should be closed as invalid as the original code contains a number > of issues caused by invalid code. Steve, stop it! My reduced testcase shows that

[Bug fortran/98454] Apparent wrong initialization in function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98454 --- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to martin from comment #9) > Problems with default initialisation of function result were fixed with > PR45489. The relevant testcase added by this PR is initialization_27.f90 &

[Bug fortran/98458] PRINT the array constructed from implied do-loop throw ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98458 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC

[Bug fortran/98454] Apparent wrong initialization in function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98454 --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The following hack fixes the testcase in comment#10, but not the testcase in comment#2: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c index 249f402b8d9..2c9570d4641 100644 --- a/gcc

[Bug fortran/93685] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_constructor_append_expr, at fortran/constructor.c:135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93685 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug fortran/96418] Test coarray_alloc_comp_4.f08 ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96418 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andre Vehreschild from comment #5) > Patch submitted as: > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-August/054943.html > Waiting for review. Hi Andre, any progress her

[Bug fortran/96381] gfc_find_vtab can use a character type typespec as a derived type (causing invalid access)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96381 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The following patch fixes the invalid read: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/class.c b/gcc/fortran/class.c index 5677d920239..783e4c7354b 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/class.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/class.c

[Bug fortran/93794] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.c:2497

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93794 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Paul, > > are you still working on this? Paul, this is still one of yours...

[Bug fortran/96381] gfc_find_vtab can use a character type typespec as a derived type (causing invalid access)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96381 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/93794] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.c:2497

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93794 --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #6) > Hah! I am probably a week or two from getting to it. I have been working my > way through a backlog but have been held up for some days by unl

[Bug fortran/96986] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Explicit interface required: volatile argument for ENTRY subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96986 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- F2018 has: ! 15.4.2.2 Explicit interface ! Within the scope of a procedure identifier, the procedure shall have an ! explicit interface if it is not a statement function and ! (3) the procedure

[Bug fortran/98263] valgrind error in gfc_find_derived_vtab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98263 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status

[Bug fortran/96381] gfc_find_vtab can use a character type typespec as a derived type (causing invalid access)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96381 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com

[Bug fortran/89891] [meta-bug] Accessing memory in rejected statements or expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89891 Bug 89891 depends on bug 98263, which changed state. Bug 98263 Summary: valgrind error in gfc_find_derived_vtab https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98263 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/96986] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Explicit interface required: volatile argument for ENTRY subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96986 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug fortran/96986] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Explicit interface required: volatile argument for ENTRY subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96986 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #5) >If the ENTRY statement is in a subroutine subprogram, an additional >subroutine is defined by that subprogram. The name of the subroutine &

[Bug fortran/96381] gfc_find_vtab can use a character type typespec as a derived type (causing invalid access)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96381 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/78746] charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/78746] charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug libfortran/98507] timezone is incorrect on last day of year for "TZ" hours

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98507 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |libfortran --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/89661] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_61.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89661 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug fortran/92736] [9 Regression] Error when using a variable from a module in a submodule and its parent module.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92736 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/88356] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE with -Werror in reduce_binary_ac, at fortran/arith.c:1318 (and others)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88356 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC

[Bug fortran/98577] Wrong "count_rate" values with int32 and real32 if the "count" argument is int64.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98577 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status

[Bug fortran/78746] charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug other/86656] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86656 Bug 86656 depends on bug 78746, which changed state. Bug 78746 Summary: charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/89891] [meta-bug] Accessing memory in rejected statements or expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89891 Bug 89891 depends on bug 78746, which changed state. Bug 78746 Summary: charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/89661] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_61.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89661 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/89891] [meta-bug] Accessing memory in rejected statements or expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89891 Bug 89891 depends on bug 89661, which changed state. Bug 89661 Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_61.f90 -O (internal compiler error) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89661 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/60576] [8/9/10/11 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_7.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60576 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|WAITING CC

[Bug fortran/66366] [OOP] ICE on invalid with non-allocatable CLASS variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66366 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/66366] [OOP] ICE on invalid with non-allocatable CLASS variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66366 --- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #11) > The error vanishes if the typebound procedure is removed from the type > declaration and the corresponding typebound call. Or renaming the local in

[Bug fortran/93340] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in check_constant_initializer, at fortran/trans-decl.c:5450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93340 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Tentative patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-January/055589.html

[Bug fortran/78746] charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|WAITING --- Comment #28 from

[Bug fortran/78746] charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 --- Comment #30 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #29) > > There's no testcase named "pr78746.f90" in the testsuite. > > Ideed! My prx.f90 are in the tes

[Bug fortran/98661] New: Valgrind errors during error recovery of invalid derived type declarations

: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following invalid code exhibits valgrind issues during error recovery (based on charlen_03.f90 which was removed from the

[Bug fortran/98661] Valgrind errors during error recovery of invalid derived type declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98661 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery

[Bug other/86656] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86656 Bug 86656 depends on bug 78746, which changed state. Bug 78746 Summary: charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/78746] charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/89891] [meta-bug] Accessing memory in rejected statements or expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89891 Bug 89891 depends on bug 78746, which changed state. Bug 78746 Summary: charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/98661] Valgrind errors during error recovery of invalid derived type declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98661 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- This has nothing to do with character at all. Same issue with: program p implicit none type t integer, allocatable :: x(n) ! { dg-error "must have a deferred shape" } end ty

[Bug fortran/98661] Valgrind errors during error recovery of invalid derived type declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98661 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/98686] New: Namelist group objects shall be defined before appearing in namelist for -std=f2018

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following code is silently accepted even with -std=f95 ... -std=2018: implicit none namelist /NML/ x

[Bug fortran/98686] Namelist group objects shall be defined before appearing in namelist for -std=f2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98686 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug fortran/98686] Namelist group objects shall be defined before appearing in namelist for -std=f2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98686 --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- F2018: 8.9 NAMELIST statement (5) A namelist group object shall either be accessed by use or host association or shall have its declared type, kind type parameters of the declared type, and

[Bug fortran/98661] Valgrind errors during error recovery of invalid derived type declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98661 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The commit in comment#4 unfortunately contained debugging stuff that should never have been pushed. Thus reverted and created the new commit in comment#5. Sorry for that.

[Bug fortran/93340] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in check_constant_initializer, at fortran/trans-decl.c:5450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93340 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug libgomp/98699] Reset OMP_NESTED to true if OMP_MAX_ACTIVE_LEVELS is > 1.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98699 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |libgomp Status

[Bug fortran/98661] Valgrind errors during error recovery of invalid derived type declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98661 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug other/86656] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86656 Bug 86656 depends on bug 98661, which changed state. Bug 98661 Summary: Valgrind errors during error recovery of invalid derived type declarations https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98661 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/89891] [meta-bug] Accessing memory in rejected statements or expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89891 Bug 89891 depends on bug 98661, which changed state. Bug 98661 Summary: Valgrind errors during error recovery of invalid derived type declarations https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98661 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/88124] Wrong results with procedure in seperate file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88124 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC

[Bug fortran/91782] Accepts invalid array constructor with character parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91782 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/91640] [9 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed (contiguous expr)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91640 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/85547] Run-time error: character array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85547 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/98129] Failure on reading big chunk of /dev/urandom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98129 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #49687|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug libfortran/98129] Failure on reading big chunk of /dev/urandom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98129 --- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #12) > I had one (random?) failure with append_1.f90 which I am unable to reproduce. Likely origin: parallel make -j4 check-fortran and % grep -il o

[Bug fortran/86470] [8/9/10/11 Regression] [OOP] ICE with OMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86470 --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Untested patch: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans.c b/gcc/fortran/trans.c index a2376917635..7699e98f6ea 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans.c @@ -689,9 +689,14

[Bug fortran/97272] Wrong answer from MAXLOC with character arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97272 --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Bill Long from comment #10) > Still fails with 10.2.0. Can you say which release version will include the > fix? According to https://gcc.gnu.org/, gcc 10.2 was released i

[Bug fortran/70070] ICE on initializing character data beyond min/max bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70070 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/70070] ICE on initializing character data beyond min/max bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70070 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/33056] [Meta-bug] Data - statement related bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33056 Bug 33056 depends on bug 70070, which changed state. Bug 70070 Summary: ICE on initializing character data beyond min/max bound https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70070 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/70913] ICE in gfc_encode_character, at fortran/target-memory.c:227

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70913 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|anlauf at gmx dot de | --- Comment #8 from

[Bug fortran/87568] Gfortran compile fails with bogus error message.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87568 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- I cannot reproduce the error with r11-6901, but I still see it on 10-branch.

[Bug fortran/91862] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2394

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91862 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #5 from

[Bug fortran/86470] [8/9/10/11 Regression] [OOP] ICE with OMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86470 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/86470] [8/9/10/11 Regression] [OOP] ICE with OMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86470 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/95682] [9/10/11 Regression] Default assignment fails with allocatable array of deferred-length strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95682 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Adding some printout after initializing the t1%x(:), do i = 1, size(t1%x) print *, len_trim (t1%x(i)), t1%x(i) end do I get for gcc-8: 5 three 5 three

[Bug fortran/99111] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:7336

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99111 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC

[Bug fortran/99147] Sanitizer detects heap-use-after-free in gfc_add_flavor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99147 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-02-18

[Bug fortran/99147] Sanitizer detects heap-use-after-free in gfc_add_flavor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99147 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/99169] [9/10/11 Regression] Segfault when passing allocatable scalar into intent(out) dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99169 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.4.1 Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/99169] [9/10/11 Regression] Segfault when passing allocatable scalar into intent(out) dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99169 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Note/workaround: the {CLOBBER} disappears if the argument to set_i is declared INOUT instead of OUT.

[Bug fortran/99169] [9/10/11 Regression] Segfault when passing allocatable scalar into intent(out) dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99169 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- A conservative solution simply disables the clobber: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c index 103cb31c664..ce7bfaa89e8 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c +++ b

[Bug fortran/99169] [9/10/11 Regression] Segfault when passing allocatable scalar into intent(out) dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99169 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/99169] [9/10/11 Regression] Segfault when passing allocatable scalar into intent(out) dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99169 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/99147] Sanitizer detects heap-use-after-free in gfc_add_flavor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99147 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug fortran/99204] ICE in fold_read_from_constant_string, at fold-const.c:15441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99204 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC

[Bug fortran/99206] [11 Regression] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:1980

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99206 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status

[Bug fortran/99206] [11 Regression] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:1980

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99206 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- As a sidenote: print *, len (reshape (['a'], [0])) end This prints 0 for gcc-11, and the correct value 1 for 10.2.1. Do we screw up things during simplification?

[Bug fortran/99206] [11 Regression] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:1980

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99206 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/99206] [11 Regression] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:1980

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99206 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/99206] [11 Regression] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:1980

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99206 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/99169] [9/10/11 Regression] Segfault when passing allocatable scalar into intent(out) dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99169 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/99218] matmul on temporary array accesses invalid memory (segfault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99218 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC

[Bug fortran/99218] matmul on temporary array accesses invalid memory (segfault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99218 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Reduced testcase: program play implicit none integer, parameter :: NCON = 1 integer, parameter :: NSTATE = 3 real,parameter :: ZERO = 0.0 real :: G(nCon,nState) = ZERO real

[Bug fortran/99218] matmul on temporary array accesses invalid memory (segfault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99218 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||8.4.1 --- Comment #3 from

[Bug libfortran/99218] [8/9/19/11 Regression] matmul on temporary array accesses invalid memory (segfault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99218 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|matmul on temporary array |[8/9/19/11 Regression

[Bug libfortran/99218] [8/9/19/11 Regression] matmul on temporary array accesses invalid memory (segfault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99218 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug libfortran/99218] [8/9/10/11 Regression] matmul on temporary array accesses invalid memory (segfault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99218 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/19/11 Regression] |[8/9/10/11 Regression

[Bug fortran/99257] ICE in build_field, at fortran/trans-common.c:303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99257 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug fortran/93340] [8 Regression] ICE in check_constant_initializer, at fortran/trans-decl.c:5450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93340 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug fortran/100273] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_create_module_variable, at fortran/trans-decl.c:5352

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100273 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed

[Bug fortran/100273] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_create_module_variable, at fortran/trans-decl.c:5352

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100273 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4 Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/100274] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.c:6131

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100274 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4 Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/100274] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.c:6131

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100274 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The patch in comment#1 would turn the ICE into an accepts-invalid, since we would only get a warning instead of an error. This happens because the character length check in

[Bug fortran/100274] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.c:6131

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100274 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/100218] Allow target of the pointer resulting from the evaluation of function-reference in a variable definition context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100218 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/100154] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.c:6131

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100154 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >