[Bug fortran/65144] Problems printing, reading and accessing substrings of ISO_10646 character variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65144 Bug 65144 depends on bug 65141, which changed state. Bug 65141 Summary: ISO_10646 constant parameters convert kind when used with substring references https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65141 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/67972] Substrings of arrays of unicode strings are of type DEFAULT rather than ISO_10646

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67972 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zbeekman at gmail dot com

[Bug fortran/88488] ICE in gfc_trans_array_constructor_subarray, at fortran/trans-array.c:1646

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88488 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/102787] ICE in new test case gfortran.dg/reshape_shape_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787 --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Slightly improved version of the patch of comment#6: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/array.c b/gcc/fortran/array.c index 6552eaf3b0c..a63a6631f59 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/array.c +++ b/gcc/fortran

[Bug fortran/102787] ICE in new test case gfortran.dg/reshape_shape_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- WIP patch that fixes comment#5 as like comment#0 and regtests cleanly: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/array.c b/gcc/fortran/array.c index 6552eaf3b0c..e1ab2e06fdb 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/array.c

[Bug fortran/102787] [12 regression] ICE in new test case gfortran.dg/reshape_shape_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The wrong locus for comment#1 is fixed by: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/check.c b/gcc/fortran/check.c index cfaf9d26bbc..bfb371b82c9 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/check.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/check.c

[Bug fortran/102685] [12 Regression] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514 since r12-4278-g74ccca380cde5e79

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102685 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/102787] [12 regression] ICE in new test case gfortran.dg/reshape_shape_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787 --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Interesting. Cannot reproduce on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. However, changing the testcase as follows: program p integer, parameter :: a(1) = 2 ! integer, parameter :: b(2) = reshape([3,4

[Bug fortran/65454] Extending both forms of relational operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65454 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2021-09-12 00:00:00 |2021-10-8 Assignee

[Bug fortran/102787] ICE in new test case gfortran.dg/reshape_shape_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Looks like an issue with simplification of array within array constructor: print *, - a print *, - [a] print *, - [[a]] end -fdump-fortran-original produces: code: WRITE UNIT=6

[Bug fortran/102717] ICE in gfc_simplify_reshape, at fortran/simplify.c:6843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102717 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/102717] ICE in gfc_simplify_reshape, at fortran/simplify.c:6843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102717 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/102716] ICE in gfc_validate_kind(): Got bad kind

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102716 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug fortran/102510] Function call has unnecessary stride check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102510 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- It helps to look at the (Fortran) context. As written, the subroutine version is declared with explicit size contiguous arrays. If the caller has a non-contiguous (strided) result array

[Bug fortran/102521] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6240

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102521 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-09-28 Ever

[Bug fortran/102520] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in expand_constructor, at fortran/array.c:1802

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102520 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-09-28 Ever

[Bug fortran/102520] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in expand_constructor, at fortran/array.c:1802

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102520 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Target Milestone

[Bug fortran/102510] Function call has unnecessary stride check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102510 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/102521] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6240

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102521 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/102458] ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458 --- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Corrected patch that addresses the remaining issue (for valid code): https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-September/056599.html

[Bug fortran/102520] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in expand_constructor, at fortran/array.c:1802

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102520 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/98490] Unexpected out of bounds in array constructor with implied do loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98490 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/102043] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/82314] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:6972

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82314 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 Resolution

[Bug fortran/101327] ICE in find_array_element, at fortran/expr.c:1355

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101327 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone

[Bug fortran/102458] ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #3) > Well, it is a pure function. Fortran 2018, page 327, > > All standard intrinsic functions are pure. Of course you are correct. I wanted t

[Bug fortran/102458] ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 51497 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51497=edit Patch Thanks for the research, Steve. The attached patch fixes the PR by excluding the listed functions.

[Bug fortran/102458] ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #51497|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug fortran/102458] ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/99348] ICE in resolve_structure_cons, at fortran/resolve.c:1286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99348 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- This might actually be related to pr102521. The following variant compiles ok: program p type t character(3) :: c end type ! type(t), parameter :: x(1) = t('abc') type(t), parameter

[Bug libfortran/100954] writing to a character opens unit -10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100954 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/102521] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6240

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102521 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Tentative patch: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/decl.c b/gcc/fortran/decl.c index b3c65b7175b..cebc59e4ab5 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/decl.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/decl.c @@ -2228,12 +2228,15

[Bug fortran/102521] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6240

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102521 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/56688] static/saved variables prevent loop vectorization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56688 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|anlauf at gmx dot de |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/102521] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6240

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102521 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The code works if we replace the r.h.s. in the initialization by an array: program p type t integer :: n end type ! type(t), parameter :: a(4) = t(1)! ICE

[Bug fortran/102599] Wrong simplification of inquiry parameters for complex arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102599 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug fortran/102620] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_array_span, at fortran/trans-array.c:865

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC

[Bug fortran/102458] ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.4 Status

[Bug fortran/102582] allocate treats all variables as type CHARACTER after use of CHARACTER(LEN=NNN)::

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102582 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status

[Bug fortran/102595] ICE in var_element, at fortran/decl.c:298

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102595 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/102599] New: Wrong simplification of inquiry parameters for complex arrays

Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Consider: program p implicit none complex, parameter :: x(2) = 1 real,parameter :: r(*) = x%re real,parameter :: i

[Bug fortran/102458] ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458 --- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #9) A tentative patch which fixes the remaining issue is posted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-September/056584.html in the hope to learn

[Bug fortran/102113] parsing error in assigned goto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102113 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/101349] ICE in gfc_get_descriptor_field, at fortran/trans-array.c:140

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101349 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/102685] [12 Regression] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514 since r12-4278-g74ccca380cde5e79

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102685 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 100970 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/100970] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100970 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC

[Bug fortran/102917] [PDT] KIND and LEN type parameters shall not be restricted to default integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102917 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC

[Bug fortran/102917] [PDT] KIND and LEN type parameters shall not be restricted to default integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102917 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/102917] New: [PDT] KIND and LEN type parameters shall not be restricted to default integer

: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Reported by Steve: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-October/056771.html We reject valid code. F2003 has

[Bug fortran/67542] ICE in gfc_emit_parameter_debug_info, at fortran/trans-decl.c:4947 and :4945

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67542 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/102685] [12 Regression] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514 since r12-4278-g74ccca380cde5e79

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102685 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t

[Bug fortran/102900] ICE via gfc_class_data_get with alloc_comp_class_4.f03 or proc_ptr_52.f90 using -fcheck=all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102900 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The ICE is resolved by Jose's patch to PR100136, which was just accepted. It would also need to get backported to 11-branch. However, a runtime error will remain: At line 91 of file gcc

[Bug fortran/103473] [11/12 Regression] ICE in simplify_minmaxloc_nodim, at fortran/simplify.c:5287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103473 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/101565] ICE in gfc_simplify_image_index, at fortran/simplify.c:8234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101565 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103473] [11/12 Regression] ICE in simplify_minmaxloc_nodim, at fortran/simplify.c:5287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103473 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-29 Ever

[Bug fortran/103283] ICE in gfc_trans_array_constructor_subarray, at fortran/trans-array.c:1972

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103283 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/103505] ICE in compare_bound_mpz_t, at fortran/resolve.c:4587 since r8-7594-g078c5aff5ed83e9c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505 --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #10) > On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 09:51:23PM +0000, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > > Submitted as: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/p

[Bug fortran/103588] ICE: Simplification error in gfc_ref_dimen_size, at fortran/array.c:2407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103588 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-06

[Bug fortran/103591] ICE in gfc_compare_string, at fortran/arith.c:1119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103591 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status

[Bug fortran/103588] ICE: Simplification error in gfc_ref_dimen_size, at fortran/array.c:2407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103588 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/101632] NON_RECURSIVE procedure prefix is unsupported. F2018 defaults to recursive procedures.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101632 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-06

[Bug fortran/103588] ICE: Simplification error in gfc_ref_dimen_size, at fortran/array.c:2407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103588 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Untested patch: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/array.c b/gcc/fortran/array.c index 5762c8d92d4..5f9ed17f919 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/array.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/array.c @@ -2403,11 +2403,9

[Bug fortran/103591] ICE in gfc_compare_string, at fortran/arith.c:1119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103591 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Untested fix: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/match.c b/gcc/fortran/match.c index 2bf21434a42..52bc5af7542 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/match.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/match.c @@ -6075,6 +6075,15

[Bug fortran/103591] ICE in gfc_compare_string, at fortran/arith.c:1119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103591 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/103589] ICE in gfc_match_varspec, at fortran/primary.c:2551

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103589 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-06

[Bug fortran/103283] ICE in gfc_trans_array_constructor_subarray, at fortran/trans-array.c:1972

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103283 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- I did get some progress with the attempt: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/expr.c b/gcc/fortran/expr.c index 87089321a3b..d5bbcd493b6 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/expr.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/expr.c @@ -1929,6

[Bug fortran/103473] [11/12 Regression] ICE in simplify_minmaxloc_nodim, at fortran/simplify.c:5287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103473 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug fortran/103757] [F18] compiler rejects import, {none, all, only}, does not recognize the keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103757 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords

[Bug fortran/103588] ICE: Simplification error in gfc_ref_dimen_size, at fortran/array.c:2407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103588 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 Resolution

[Bug fortran/103412] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103412 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/103505] [9 Regression] ICE in compare_bound_mpz_t, at fortran/resolve.c:4587 since r8-7594-g078c5aff5ed83e9c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||12.0 Summary|ICE

[Bug fortran/103260] ICE in gfc_simplify_reshape, at fortran/simplify.c:6857 since r6-4614-g57e596204fceef2e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103260 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103260] ICE in gfc_simplify_reshape, at fortran/simplify.c:6857 since r6-4614-g57e596204fceef2e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103260 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/103610] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.c:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103610 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 103260 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/103610] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.c:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103610 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/103412] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103412 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103418] random_number() does not accept pointer, intent(in) array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug libfortran/103634] Runtime crash with PACK on zero-sized arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103634 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/102332] ICE in select_type_set_tmp, at fortran/match.c:6366

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102332 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103778] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103778 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug fortran/102332] ICE in select_type_set_tmp, at fortran/match.c:6366

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102332 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/103776] ICE in gfc_compare_string, at fortran/arith.c:1118

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103776 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug fortran/101762] ICE with "Every subscript of the target specification must be a constant expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101762 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/77667] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:2588

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77667 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #3) > The following patch seems to work: ... and regtests ok. It is not really pretty, though, and does not help with apparently related PRs, such as PR50410.

[Bug fortran/77667] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:2588

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77667 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103914] -fcheck=do seems not to work with omp parallel do construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103914 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug fortran/103794] ICE in gfc_check_reshape, at fortran/check.c:4727

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103794 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-21

[Bug fortran/103789] ICE when providing kind argument to mask{l,r}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103789 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/78054] gfortran.dg/pr70673.f90 FAILs at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78054 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103898] [12 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103898 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Started most likely with commit r12-3897 by Tobias. Interestingly, the ICE occurs only for a rank-1 array, but not for rank-2 or for assumed-rank.

[Bug fortran/101762] ICE with "Every subscript of the target specification must be a constant expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101762 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/101762] ICE with "Every subscript of the target specification must be a constant expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101762 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 52108 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52108=edit Improved patch The previous patch was too strict. The attached version does a much better job, but ne

[Bug fortran/103776] ICE in gfc_compare_string, at fortran/arith.c:1118

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103776 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC

[Bug fortran/103778] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103778 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-20

[Bug fortran/103777] ICE in gfc_simplify_maskl, at fortran/simplify.c:4918

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103777 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103412] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103412 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/103776] ICE in gfc_compare_string, at fortran/arith.c:1118

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103776 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/103778] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103778 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/103777] ICE in gfc_simplify_maskl, at fortran/simplify.c:4918

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103777 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/103777] ICE in gfc_simplify_maskl, at fortran/simplify.c:4918

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103777 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Minimal fix (for maskl): diff --git a/gcc/fortran/simplify.c b/gcc/fortran/simplify.c index 90067b6bbe6..45080e8b912 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/simplify.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/simplify.c @@ -4909,6

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >