[Bug fortran/103789] ICE when providing kind argument to mask{l,r}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103789 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/78054] gfortran.dg/pr70673.f90 FAILs at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78054 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/101762] ICE with "Every subscript of the target specification must be a constant expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101762 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/101762] ICE with "Every subscript of the target specification must be a constant expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101762 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 52108 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52108&action=edit Improved patch The previous patch was too strict. The attached version does a much better job, but

[Bug fortran/101762] ICE with "Every subscript of the target specification must be a constant expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101762 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|

[Bug fortran/103898] [12 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103898 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Started most likely with commit r12-3897 by Tobias. Interestingly, the ICE occurs only for a rank-1 array, but not for rank-2 or for assumed-rank.

[Bug fortran/77667] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:2588

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77667 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/77667] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:2588

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77667 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #3) > The following patch seems to work: ... and regtests ok. It is not really pretty, though, and does not help with apparently related PRs, such as PR50410.

[Bug fortran/103914] -fcheck=do seems not to work with omp parallel do construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103914 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Stat

[Bug fortran/103782] [9/10/11/12 Regression] internal error occurs when overloading intrinsic since r9-1566-g87c789f1c0b2df41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103782 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/95879] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_formal_arglist, at fortran/resolve.c:313

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95879 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/103931] Type name "c_ptr" is ambiguous when iso_c_binding is imported both directly and indirectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103931 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 52138 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52138&action=edit Somewhat reduced reproducer The issue can be reproduced with a few less modules

[Bug fortran/103942] [10 Regression] invalid memory reference with allocatable string and class(*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103942 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > Started with r11-6928-g4225af228b5d52e8 and was fixed on master with > r12-1005-gfe03f4fc9548b3fd. Backporting r12-1005 (see pr100551) fixes the segfa

[Bug fortran/103942] [10 Regression] invalid memory reference with allocatable string and class(*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103942 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Build||2022-01-07 0:00 --- Comment

[Bug fortran/83079] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:198

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83079 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/103777] ICE in gfc_simplify_maskl, at fortran/simplify.c:4918

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103777 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Status|ASSI

[Bug fortran/83079] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:198

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83079 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.

[Bug libfortran/103985] segfault in finalize_transfer (fbuf_destroy) on (parallel) writing into character / string function argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103985 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Can you try gcc-11 or gcc-12? There were some fixes for asynchronous I/O (pr100352) touching the locking mechanism.

[Bug fortran/67804] ICE on data initialization of type(character) with wrong data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67804 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/67804] ICE on data initialization of type(character) with wrong data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67804 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.

[Bug fortran/103782] [9/10/11/12 Regression] internal error occurs when overloading intrinsic since r9-1566-g87c789f1c0b2df41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103782 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|

[Bug fortran/102332] ICE in select_type_set_tmp, at fortran/match.c:6366

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102332 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASS

[Bug fortran/99256] ICE in variable_check, at fortran/check.c:1012

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99256 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #3) Even simpler fix, as intrinsics do not accept alternate return specifiers: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c b/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c index a7ecdb401ef..4

[Bug fortran/99256] ICE in variable_check, at fortran/check.c:1012

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99256 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug fortran/77667] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:2588

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77667 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Seems fixed on mainline for gcc-12. Most likely fix: r12-6557 for pr67804.

[Bug fortran/79685] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE on valid code in gfc_match_structur_constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79685 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/85150] internal compiler error for module with illegal non-constant pointer initialization designator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85150 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/85150] internal compiler error for module with illegal non-constant pointer initialization designator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85150 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug fortran/101762] ICE with "Every subscript of the target specification must be a constant expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101762 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||weeks at iastate dot edu ---

[Bug fortran/77667] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:2588

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77667 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|

[Bug fortran/67804] ICE on data initialization of type(character) with wrong data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67804 --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 77667 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/103942] [9 Regression] invalid memory reference with allocatable string and class(*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103942 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10 Regression] invalid |[9 Regression] invalid

[Bug fortran/103692] [11/12 Regression] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:2062

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103692 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Commen

[Bug fortran/103692] [11/12 Regression] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:2062

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103692 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|

[Bug fortran/95372] ICE in find_array_section, at fortran/expr.c:1687

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95372 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #4 from a

[Bug fortran/103475] ICE in gfc_expr_attr, at fortran/primary.c:2782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103475 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #2 from

[Bug fortran/104127] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in get_array_charlen, at fortran/trans-array.c:7244

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104127 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug fortran/104128] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:199

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug fortran/104127] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in get_array_charlen, at fortran/trans-array.c:7244

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104127 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- We die here: (gdb) l 7244 7239case EXPR_ARRAY: 7240 7241 /* This is somewhat brutal. The expression for the first 7242 element of the array is evaluated and assigned

[Bug fortran/104127] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in get_array_charlen, at fortran/trans-array.c:7244

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104127 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Tentative patch: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc b/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc index 3881370d947..366b00c28dd 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc +++ b/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc @@ -8162,7 +8162,

[Bug fortran/104128] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:199

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Tentative, semi-obvious patch: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/target-memory.cc b/gcc/fortran/target-memory.cc index 361907b0e51..7ce7d736629 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/target-memory.cc +++ b/gcc/fortran/

[Bug fortran/104127] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in get_array_charlen, at fortran/trans-array.c:7244

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104127 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|

[Bug fortran/103692] [11/12 Regression] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:2062

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103692 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/104128] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:199

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Keywords|

[Bug fortran/104128] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:199

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #3) > with TRANSFER between different integer kinds. E.g. oops, that should read: character kinds

[Bug fortran/104128] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:199

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The issue in comment#3 is likely unrelated to TRANSFER: program p implicit none ! integer, parameter :: k = 1 integer, parameter :: k = 4 character(kind=k,len=2), parameter :: z = k_"FG"

[Bug fortran/104128] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:199

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The remaining issues in this PR seem to be related to inconsistencies between expr->representation.string and expr->value.character.string that occur for non-default character kind that are create

[Bug fortran/104128] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:199

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/103782] [9/10/11/12 Regression] internal error occurs when overloading intrinsic since r9-1566-g87c789f1c0b2df41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103782 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASS

[Bug fortran/104211] ICE in find_array_section, at fortran/expr.cc:1720

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104211 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/104212] ICE in transformational_result, at fortran/simplify.cc:466

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104212 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/104212] ICE in transformational_result, at fortran/simplify.cc:466

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104212 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/59104] Wrong result with SIZE specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org L

[Bug fortran/100275] ICE in gfc_build_null_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:417

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100275 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/67804] ICE on data initialization of type(character) with wrong data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67804 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gs...@t-online.de --- Comment

[Bug fortran/67804] ICE on data initialization of type(character) with wrong data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67804 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSI

[Bug fortran/33056] [Meta-bug] Data - statement related bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33056 Bug 33056 depends on bug 67804, which changed state. Bug 67804 Summary: ICE on data initialization of type(character) with wrong data https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67804 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/101762] ICE with "Every subscript of the target specification must be a constant expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101762 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.4 Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/104227] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104227 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug fortran/104227] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104227 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/84784] ICEs: verify_gimple failed with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/84784] ICEs: verify_gimple failed with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > Another reduced testcase: > > ! { dg-do run } > ! { dg-options "-fdefault-integer-8" } > ! { dg-require-effective-target fortran_integer_16 } > > if (runt

[Bug fortran/84784] ICEs: verify_gimple failed with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- OK, the following fixes the ICE: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc index fccf0a9b229..d5564f659f8 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc +++ b/gcc/f

[Bug fortran/104212] ICE in transformational_result, at fortran/simplify.cc:466

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104212 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASS

[Bug fortran/104227] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104227 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/84784] ICEs: verify_gimple failed with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-January/057478.html This fixes gfortran.dg/team_change_1.f90 gfortran.dg/team_number_1.f90 gfortran.dg/popcnt_poppar_2.F90 (-m64, not supported w

[Bug fortran/84787] ICEs: in decompose, at wide-int.h:933 with -default-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84787 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/84784] ICEs: verify_gimple failed with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 84787 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/32770] [Meta-bug] -fdefault-integer-8 issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32770 Bug 32770 depends on bug 84787, which changed state. Bug 84787 Summary: ICEs: in decompose, at wide-int.h:933 with -default-integer-8 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84787 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 84787, which changed state. Bug 84787 Summary: ICEs: in decompose, at wide-int.h:933 with -default-integer-8 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84787 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/84784] ICEs: verify_gimple failed with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #8 from a

[Bug fortran/104128] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:199

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASS

[Bug fortran/101135] Load of null pointer when passing absent assumed-shape array argument for an optional dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101135 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/101135] Load of null pointer when passing absent assumed-shape array argument for an optional dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101135 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 52311 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52311&action=edit Patch that regtests ok. The patch suggested by the reporter is rather close to this one. We need t

[Bug fortran/101135] Load of null pointer when passing absent assumed-shape array argument for an optional dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101135 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/83079] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:198

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83079 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|-

[Bug fortran/104127] [9 Regression] ICE in get_array_charlen, at fortran/trans-array.c:7244

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104127 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[9 Regression] ICE in

[Bug fortran/104127] [9 Regression] ICE in get_array_charlen, at fortran/trans-array.c:7244

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104127 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/101135] Load of null pointer when passing absent assumed-shape array argument for an optional dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101135 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #6 from anla

[Bug fortran/104311] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE out of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104311 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-01-31 Statu

[Bug fortran/104309] Elemental character function should not return array of character variables of different lengths.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104309 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/104331] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_simplify_eoshift, at fortran/simplify.cc:2590

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104331 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-02-01 C

[Bug fortran/104331] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_simplify_eoshift, at fortran/simplify.cc:2590

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104331 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|

[Bug fortran/104311] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE out of memory since r9-6321-g4716603bf875ce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104311 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > We could limit the size of the resulting array constructor, using e.g. > flag_max_array_constructor. Sample patch: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc b/g

[Bug fortran/104311] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE out of memory since r9-6321-g4716603bf875ce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104311 --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #6) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > > We could limit the size of the resulting array constructor, using e.g. > > flag_max_array_constructor. > > Sample p

[Bug fortran/104311] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE out of memory since r9-6321-g4716603bf875ce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104311 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/104331] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_simplify_eoshift, at fortran/simplify.cc:2590

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104331 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASS

[Bug fortran/100196] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in reduce_binary_ca, at fortran/arith.c:1364

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100196 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/91728] Accepts array with wrong shape in a structure constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91728 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/100196] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in reduce_binary_ca, at fortran/arith.c:1364

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100196 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug fortran/66193] ICE for initialisation of some non-zero-sized arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66193 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/104311] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE out of memory since r9-6321-g4716603bf875ce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104311 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/66193] ICE for initialisation of some non-zero-sized arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66193 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.

[Bug fortran/104382] Finalization of parent components not compliant with standard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104382 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- crayftn 11 & 12 output: destructor4(complicated) 2*2. destructor5 (simple2) 5 destructor5 (simple2) 6 destructor2(simple) 2*1 destructor4(complicated) 4., 5. destructor5 (simple2) -1 dest

[Bug fortran/93482] ICE in gfc_resolve_character_array_constructor, at fortran/array.c:2096

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93482 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/77693] ICE in rtl_for_decl_init, at dwarf2out.c:17378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77693 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.

[Bug fortran/104211] ICE in find_array_section, at fortran/expr.cc:1720

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104211 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|

[Bug fortran/104573] ICE in resolve_structure_cons, at fortran/resolve.cc:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104573 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/104573] ICE in resolve_structure_cons, at fortran/resolve.cc:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104573 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #3) > I'm not sure. I don't use CLASSes, so only know a bit > about them. If I check F18:7.5.6, I find > > C786 (R753) A final-subroutine-name shall be th

[Bug fortran/104573] ICE in resolve_structure_cons, at fortran/resolve.cc:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104573 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The patch in comment#2 regtests ok. I've been thinking a little to find cases where there should be a difference to the patch in comment#1, but did not succeed so far. At least not with minor va

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >