[Bug fortran/104311] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE out of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104311 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-01-31

[Bug fortran/104309] Elemental character function should not return array of character variables of different lengths.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104309 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/104382] Finalization of parent components not compliant with standard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104382 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- crayftn 11 & 12 output: destructor4(complicated) 2*2. destructor5 (simple2) 5 destructor5 (simple2) 6 destructor2(simple) 2*1 destructor4(complicated) 4., 5. destructor5 (simple2) -1

[Bug fortran/93482] ICE in gfc_resolve_character_array_constructor, at fortran/array.c:2096

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93482 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/77693] ICE in rtl_for_decl_init, at dwarf2out.c:17378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77693 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/104211] ICE in find_array_section, at fortran/expr.cc:1720

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104211 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/66193] ICE for initialisation of some non-zero-sized arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66193 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/101135] Load of null pointer when passing absent assumed-shape array argument for an optional dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101135 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 52311 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52311=edit Patch that regtests ok. The patch suggested by the reporter is rather close to this one. We need to

[Bug fortran/77667] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:2588

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77667 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Seems fixed on mainline for gcc-12. Most likely fix: r12-6557 for pr67804.

[Bug fortran/99256] ICE in variable_check, at fortran/check.c:1012

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99256 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/85150] internal compiler error for module with illegal non-constant pointer initialization designator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85150 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/79685] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE on valid code in gfc_match_structur_constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79685 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103475] ICE in gfc_expr_attr, at fortran/primary.c:2782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103475 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #2 from

[Bug fortran/95372] ICE in find_array_section, at fortran/expr.c:1687

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95372 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #4 from

[Bug fortran/103692] [11/12 Regression] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:2062

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103692 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/104127] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in get_array_charlen, at fortran/trans-array.c:7244

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104127 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/104128] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:199

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #3) > with TRANSFER between different integer kinds. E.g. oops, that should read: character kinds

[Bug fortran/104128] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:199

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Keywords|

[Bug fortran/104128] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:199

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The issue in comment#3 is likely unrelated to TRANSFER: program p implicit none ! integer, parameter :: k = 1 integer, parameter :: k = 4 character(kind=k,len=2), parameter :: z = k_"FG"

[Bug fortran/103931] Type name "c_ptr" is ambiguous when iso_c_binding is imported both directly and indirectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103931 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 52138 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52138=edit Somewhat reduced reproducer The issue can be reproduced with a few less modules

[Bug fortran/83079] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:198

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83079 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/104128] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:199

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug fortran/104127] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in get_array_charlen, at fortran/trans-array.c:7244

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104127 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- We die here: (gdb) l 7244 7239case EXPR_ARRAY: 7240 7241 /* This is somewhat brutal. The expression for the first 7242 element of the array is evaluated and assigned

[Bug fortran/104127] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in get_array_charlen, at fortran/trans-array.c:7244

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104127 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug fortran/104127] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in get_array_charlen, at fortran/trans-array.c:7244

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104127 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Tentative patch: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc b/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc index 3881370d947..366b00c28dd 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc +++ b/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc @@ -8162,7

[Bug fortran/104128] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:199

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Tentative, semi-obvious patch: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/target-memory.cc b/gcc/fortran/target-memory.cc index 361907b0e51..7ce7d736629 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/target-memory.cc +++

[Bug fortran/104128] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:199

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The remaining issues in this PR seem to be related to inconsistencies between expr->representation.string and expr->value.character.string that occur for non-default character kind that are

[Bug fortran/104128] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:199

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/103782] [9/10/11/12 Regression] internal error occurs when overloading intrinsic since r9-1566-g87c789f1c0b2df41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103782 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/104212] ICE in transformational_result, at fortran/simplify.cc:466

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104212 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/104212] ICE in transformational_result, at fortran/simplify.cc:466

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104212 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/104211] ICE in find_array_section, at fortran/expr.cc:1720

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104211 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/59104] Wrong result with SIZE specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/67804] ICE on data initialization of type(character) with wrong data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67804 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gs...@t-online.de ---

[Bug fortran/100275] ICE in gfc_build_null_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:417

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100275 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/67804] ICE on data initialization of type(character) with wrong data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67804 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/33056] [Meta-bug] Data - statement related bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33056 Bug 33056 depends on bug 67804, which changed state. Bug 67804 Summary: ICE on data initialization of type(character) with wrong data https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67804 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/101762] ICE with "Every subscript of the target specification must be a constant expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101762 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.4 Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/104227] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104227 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug fortran/104227] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104227 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/84784] ICEs: verify_gimple failed with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-January/057478.html This fixes gfortran.dg/team_change_1.f90 gfortran.dg/team_number_1.f90 gfortran.dg/popcnt_poppar_2.F90 (-m64, not supported

[Bug fortran/84787] ICEs: in decompose, at wide-int.h:933 with -default-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84787 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/84784] ICEs: verify_gimple failed with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 84787 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/32770] [Meta-bug] -fdefault-integer-8 issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32770 Bug 32770 depends on bug 84787, which changed state. Bug 84787 Summary: ICEs: in decompose, at wide-int.h:933 with -default-integer-8 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84787 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 84787, which changed state. Bug 84787 Summary: ICEs: in decompose, at wide-int.h:933 with -default-integer-8 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84787 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/104212] ICE in transformational_result, at fortran/simplify.cc:466

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104212 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/104227] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104227 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/67804] ICE on data initialization of type(character) with wrong data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67804 --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 77667 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/77667] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:2588

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77667 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/84784] ICEs: verify_gimple failed with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/84784] ICEs: verify_gimple failed with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > Another reduced testcase: > > ! { dg-do run } > ! { dg-options "-fdefault-integer-8" } > ! { dg-require-effective-target fortran_integer_16 } > > if

[Bug fortran/84784] ICEs: verify_gimple failed with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- OK, the following fixes the ICE: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc index fccf0a9b229..d5564f659f8 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc +++

[Bug fortran/105168] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_maybe_dereference_var, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:2870

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105168 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/104210] [11 Regression] ICE in gfc_zero_size_array, at fortran/arith.cc:1685 since r11-1814-gcc9a9229285a26ac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104210 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/105182] [11/12 Regression] compiling NJOY21 causes a ICE segmentation fault: 11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105182 --- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #11) > Remove myself from CC list. I do not have 11.x source tree. Minimum > example that should have been supplied by someone else. What options are needed to

[Bug fortran/105182] [11/12 Regression] compiling NJOY21 causes a ICE segmentation fault: 11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105182 --- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- I found a machine with 11.2 where I get the ICE. Likely a duplicate of pr103609 which has been fixed. If you agree, you may close this one as a duplicate.

[Bug fortran/105184] ICE in gfc_array_init_size, at fortran/trans-array.cc:5841

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105184 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/105184] ICE in gfc_array_init_size, at fortran/trans-array.cc:5841

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105184 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug fortran/105184] ICE in gfc_array_init_size, at fortran/trans-array.cc:5841

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105184 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/111341] Elemental operator on zero-sized array seg-faults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111341 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug fortran/37802] Improve wording for matmul bound checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37802 Bug 37802 depends on bug 30802, which changed state. Bug 30802 Summary: out of bounds error array I/O not picked up with -fbounds-check https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/30802] out of bounds error array I/O not picked up with -fbounds-check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anthony.debeus at gmail dot

[Bug fortran/97039] -fbounds-check misses violation with slice of array but not an element

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97039 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/27766] [meta-bug] -fbounds-check related bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27766 Bug 27766 depends on bug 30802, which changed state. Bug 30802 Summary: out of bounds error array I/O not picked up with -fbounds-check https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/30802] out of bounds error array I/O not picked up with -fbounds-check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/93485] ICE in gfc_trans_array_ctor_element, at fortran/trans-array.c:1682

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93485 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Known to work|

[Bug fortran/31059] bounds-check does not detect nonconforming assignment arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31059 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/102417] Wrong error message about character length with -std=f2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102417 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/31059] bounds-check does not detect nonconforming assignment arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31059 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #55821|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/109948] [13/14 Regression] ICE(segfault) in gfc_expression_rank() from gfc_op_rank_conformable()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexandre.poux at coria dot

[Bug fortran/111321] Segmentation fault with associate construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111321 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/109948] [13/14 Regression] ICE(segfault) in gfc_expression_rank() from gfc_op_rank_conformable()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.2|13.3 --- Comment #23 from

[Bug fortran/108957] Fortran FE memleak with interfaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108957 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Mikael, are you still onto it?

[Bug fortran/97122] Spurious FINAL ... must be in the specification part of a MODULE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug fortran/111339] bounds-check does not detect nonconforming functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111339 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug fortran/111218] Conflict in BIND(C) INTERFACEs in two Modules leads to ICE.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111218 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code

[Bug fortran/111218] Conflict in BIND(C) INTERFACEs in two Modules leads to ICE.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111218 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- A workaround is to add a 'private' statement to any of the first two modules.

[Bug fortran/31059] bounds-check does not detect nonconforming assignment arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31059 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/30802] out of bounds error array I/O not picked up with -fbounds-check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/30802] out of bounds error array I/O not picked up with -fbounds-check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802 --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2023-September/059756.html

[Bug libfortran/111022] ES0.0E0 format gave ES0.dE0 output with d too high.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111022 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/85547] Run-time error: character array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85547 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mailling-lists-bd at posteo

[Bug fortran/111304] Problem when passing implicit arrays of characters to functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111304 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/104351] ICE in gfc_generate_initializer, at fortran/expr.cc:5140

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104351 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/111837] [8/9/10/11/12/13/14 Regression] Out of bounds access with optimization inside io-implied-do-control

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111837 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/111837] [8/9/10/11/12/13/14 Regression] Out of bounds access with optimization inside io-implied-do-control

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111837 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Lightly tested, probably obvious patch: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.cc b/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.cc index 136a292807d..536884b13f0 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.cc

[Bug fortran/111837] [8/9/10/11/12/13/14 Regression] Out of bounds access with optimization inside io-implied-do-control

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111837 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/104625] ICE in fixup_array_ref, at fortran/resolve.cc:9275 since r10-2912-g70570ec192745095

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104625 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Steve Lionel of Intel confirmed that the code is valid, and that if X is polymorphic, so is (X):

[Bug fortran/104649] ICE in gfc_match_formal_arglist, at fortran/decl.cc:6733 since r6-1958-g4668d6f9c00d4767

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104649 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/104555] ICE in gfc_compare_derived_types, at fortran/interface.cc:628 since r10-2912-g70570ec192745095

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104555 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/111291] ASAN error: heap-use-after-free gcc/fortran/parse.cc:359 in decode_statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111291 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Last

[Bug fortran/92887] [F2008] Passing nullified/disassociated pointer or unalloc allocatable to OPTIONAL + VALUE dummy fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92887 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/92887] [F2008] Passing nullified/disassociated pointer or unalloc allocatable to OPTIONAL + VALUE dummy fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92887 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/97245] ASSOCIATED intrinsic does not recognize a pointer variable the second time it is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97245 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ASSOCIATE intrinsic does|ASSOCIATED intrinsic does

[Bug fortran/97245] ASSOCIATED intrinsic does not recognize a pointer variable the second time it is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97245 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Potential fix: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/match.cc b/gcc/fortran/match.cc index f848e52be4c..9e3571d3dbe 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/match.cc +++ b/gcc/fortran/match.cc @@ -5064,6 +5064,7 @@

[Bug fortran/97245] ASSOCIATED intrinsic does not recognize a pointer variable the second time it is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97245 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/97245] ASSOCIATED intrinsic does not recognize a pointer variable the second time it is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97245 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.3 Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/97045] A wrong column is selected when addressing individual elements of unlimited polymorphic dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97045 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.5.0 Known to work|

[Bug fortran/104131] ICE in gfc_conv_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3810

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104131 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The coarray cases in comment#2 will be rejected with: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/openmp.cc b/gcc/fortran/openmp.cc index 1cc65d7fa49..08081dacde4 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/openmp.cc +++

[Bug fortran/104625] ICE in fixup_array_ref, at fortran/resolve.cc:9275 since r10-2912-g70570ec192745095

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104625 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >