[Bug fortran/104625] ICE in fixup_array_ref, at fortran/resolve.cc:9275 since r10-2912-g70570ec192745095

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104625 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #4) > Created attachment 56192 [details] > Fix for this PR I was thinking of something along these lines, but was wondering: a) there could be multiple

[Bug fortran/104131] ICE in gfc_conv_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3810

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104131 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/104649] ICE in gfc_match_formal_arglist, at fortran/decl.cc:6733 since r6-1958-g4668d6f9c00d4767

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104649 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/104819] Reject NULL without MOLD as actual to an assumed-rank dummy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104819 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-11-06

[Bug fortran/104819] Reject NULL without MOLD as actual to an assumed-rank dummy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104819 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 56519 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56519=edit Partial patch This patch adjusts the checking so that nested NULL()s are accepted, tries to implement

[Bug fortran/104649] ICE in gfc_match_formal_arglist, at fortran/decl.cc:6733 since r6-1958-g4668d6f9c00d4767

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104649 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/51820] [doc] underscoring documentation incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51820 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Severity|normal

[Bug fortran/107716] Getting negative values with NINT when using doubleprecision values in range on i386

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107716 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID

[Bug fortran/96809] Duplicated module name in Fortran test cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96809 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/70231] Runtime error: Different CHARACTER lengths in array constructor with allocatable array and -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70231 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/95215] [OMP] internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14079

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95215 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.4.1, 12.3.1 --- Comment

[Bug fortran/109873] internal compiler error: gfc_get_symbol_decl 内、位置 fortran/trans-decl.c:1587 0x6b4c13 gfc_get_symbol_decl(gfc_symbol*) ../../gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:1587 0x6b7157 generate_local_

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109873 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/95710] ICE in gfc_type_is_extensible, at fortran/resolve.c:8848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95710 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/95710] ICE in gfc_type_is_extensible, at fortran/resolve.c:8848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95710 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/70231] Runtime error: Different CHARACTER lengths in array constructor with allocatable array and -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70231 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from

[Bug fortran/70231] Runtime error: Different CHARACTER lengths in array constructor with allocatable array and -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70231 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/59298] ICE when initialising PARAMETER array of derived-type (containing an array) using array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59298 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/84693] scalar DT not broadcast across an array in an initialization expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84693 Bug 84693 depends on bug 59298, which changed state. Bug 59298 Summary: ICE when initialising PARAMETER array of derived-type (containing an array) using array constructor https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59298 What

[Bug fortran/67740] Wrong association status of allocatable character pointer in derived types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67740 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #6

[Bug fortran/111618] ICE in associate construction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111618 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/109948] [13/14 Regression] ICE(segfault) in gfc_expression_rank() from gfc_op_rank_conformable()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||antoine.lemoine@bordeaux-in

[Bug fortran/67740] Wrong association status of allocatable character pointer in derived types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67740 --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The following snippet in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment looks suspicious: if (expr1->ts.type == BT_CHARACTER && expr1->symtree->n.sym->ts.deferred &&

[Bug fortran/111674] [13/14 regression] Failure to finalize an allocatable subobject of a non-finalizable type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111674 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/58146] Array slice bounds checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58146 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #10 from

[Bug fortran/111503] New: Issues with POINTER, OPTIONAL, CONTIGUOUS dummy arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111503 Bug ID: 111503 Summary: Issues with POINTER, OPTIONAL, CONTIGUOUS dummy arguments Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/67740] Wrong association status of allocatable character pointer in derived types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67740 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/67740] Wrong association status of allocatable character pointer in derived types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67740 --- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #8) > Created attachment 56073 [details] > "Fix" for this PR > > Hi Harald, > > You are touching the right place. However, this should be happening in >

[Bug fortran/111783] 'exit' intrinsic should be marked as noreturn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111783 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > This leaves ABORT and EXIT to deal with. Speaking to myself: subroutine s1() call exit(1) stop 98 end subroutine s2() call abort stop 99 end

[Bug fortran/111783] 'exit' intrinsic should be marked as noreturn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111783 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/83282] missing comma in format changes output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83282 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-12-05 00:00:00 |2023-10-12

[Bug fortran/86120] ICE caused by unassociated pointer in SIZE intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86120 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/66969] Internal compiler error, segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66969 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simon.kluepfel at gmail dot

[Bug fortran/110957] -ffpe-trap and -ffpe-summary options issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110957 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 56071 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56071=edit Patch to fix mixed up parsing of fpe options The attached patch fixes the mixup and adds the possibility

[Bug fortran/111851] f951: Segmentation fault at gfc_delete_symtree

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111851 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug fortran/67740] Wrong association status of allocatable character pointer in derived types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67740 --- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #9) Addendum: > I was suspecting gfc_conv_variable as a possibly further place for a fix: > it has a loop over ref's that looks incomplete for REF_COMPONENT. I

[Bug fortran/104351] ICE in gfc_generate_initializer, at fortran/expr.cc:5140

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104351 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug fortran/111837] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Out of bounds access with optimization inside io-implied-do-control

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111837 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/30409] [fortran] missed optimization with pure function arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30409 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The suggested optimization needs to take into account that the evaluation of the temporary expression might trap, or that allocatable variables are not allocated, etc. The trap etc. would not

[Bug fortran/66969] Internal compiler error, segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66969 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/104131] ICE in gfc_conv_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3810

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104131 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||12.1.0 Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/30409] [fortran] missed optimization with pure function arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30409 --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #10) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #8) > I'm not sure what you are worried about here. If one has > >do i = 1, n > ... = expression1(..., 1/y) >

[Bug fortran/104351] ICE in gfc_generate_initializer, at fortran/expr.cc:5140

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104351 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/77517] ICE in conv_intrinsic_move_alloc, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:9517

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77517 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug fortran/110995] segfault for function in declaration of module function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110995 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug fortran/49588] DATA statement with vector sections rejected (ICE: TODO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49588 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/49588] DATA statement with vector sections rejected (ICE: TODO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49588 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/102620] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_array_span, at fortran/trans-array.c:865 since r12-1233-gd514626ee2566c68

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #7 from

[Bug fortran/32986] Improve diagnostic message for COMMON with automatic object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32986 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/32986] Improve diagnostic message for COMMON with automatic object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32986 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/32986] Improve diagnostic message for COMMON with automatic object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32986 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/110360] ABI issue with character,value dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110360 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target

[Bug fortran/110825] TYPE(*) dummy argument to generate an unused hidden argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110825 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/25095] Disallowed intrinsic in initialization statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25095 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Severity|normal

[Bug fortran/68152] ICE on declaring array result for function and entry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68152 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING Known to fail|

[Bug libfortran/111022] ES0.0E0 format gave ES0.dE0 output with d too high.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111022 --- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #9) > I am using this: > > program teste0es0en0 > integer,parameter::p1 = kind(1e0), p2 = kind(1d0), & >p3 =

[Bug fortran/110595] Documentation: typo in the docs for -Wmissing-include-dirs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110595 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/110720] [13 Regression] Internal compiler error (segmentation fault) in gfc_expression_rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110720 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/99585] ICE with SIZE intrinsic on nested derived type components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99585 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Known to work|

[Bug fortran/35095] DATA with implied-do: Improve bounds checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35095 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/33056] [Meta-bug] Data - statement related bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33056 Bug 33056 depends on bug 35095, which changed state. Bug 35095 Summary: DATA with implied-do: Improve bounds checking https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35095 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/35095] DATA with implied-do: Improve bounds checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35095 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/110360] ABI issue with character,value dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110360 --- Comment #41 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #40) > Harald, I have just closed the followup PR110419. > I think this PR can be closed as well, or is there something left to be done? It is pretty much

[Bug libfortran/111022] ES0.0E0 format gave ES0.dE0 output with d too high.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111022 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/78054] gfortran.dg/pr70673.f90 FAILs at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78054 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/33056] [Meta-bug] Data - statement related bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33056 Bug 33056 depends on bug 49588, which changed state. Bug 49588 Summary: DATA statement with vector sections rejected (ICE: TODO) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49588 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/49588] DATA statement with vector sections rejected (ICE: TODO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49588 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/25095] Disallowed intrinsic in initialization statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25095 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug fortran/93256] Assumed-shape unlimited polymorphic variable passes values incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93256 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/92785] expressions passed as real arguments to a dummy polymorphic argument fail with indexing error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92785 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jman012345 at gmail dot com

[Bug fortran/99982] INTERFACE selects wrong module procedure involving C_PTR and C_FUNPTR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99982 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/105381] [12 Regression] Memory-hog since r12-8230

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105381 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog Target

[Bug fortran/105381] New: [12 Regression] Memory-hog since r12-8230

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105381 Bug ID: 105381 Summary: [12 Regression] Memory-hog since r12-8230 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/105184] ICE in gfc_array_init_size, at fortran/trans-array.cc:5841

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105184 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/105138] [7,8,9,10,F95] Bogus error when function name does not shadow an intrinsic when RESULT clause is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105138 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7,8,9,10,11,F95] Bogus |[7,8,9,10,F95] Bogus error

[Bug fortran/104819] Reject NULL without MOLD as actual to an assumed-rank dummy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104819 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #56519|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/112460] ICE with parameterized derived types (incorrect code, should be rejected)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112460 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|

[Bug fortran/105243] ICE in next_char, at fortran/io.cc:160

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243 --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #6) > > I quoted the F2018 standard constraint. > > > > C708 An entity declared with the CLASS keyword shall be a dummy > > argument or have the

[Bug fortran/105674] Wrong bounds for assumed rank pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105674 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug fortran/105674] Wrong bounds for assumed rank pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105674 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Reduced testcase, rank 1, no pointer or target needed: program test implicit none integer, dimension(4) :: dim_1 = 42 print*, 'lbound', lbound(dim_1), 'ubound', ubound(dim_1) print*, ''

[Bug fortran/91300] Wrong runtime error message with allocate and errmsg=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91300 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/105759] is_contiguous(zero_size_array(2:0)) wrongly returns .true.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105759 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- JFTR: Cray and NAG also print T, so I guess this confirms Steve's analysis.

[Bug fortran/105582] ICE on procedure pointer assignment inside block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105582 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/91300] Wrong runtime error message with allocate and errmsg=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91300 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/105243] ICE in next_char, at fortran/io.cc:160

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #2) > This fixes the problem. Someone that regularly use git will need to commit > it. Are you sure this is the right solution? Consider: program p type t

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834 Bug 32834 depends on bug 47359, which changed state. Bug 47359 Summary: Recursive functions of intrinsic names generates invalid assembler https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47359 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/47359] Recursive functions of intrinsic names generates invalid assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47359 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/105138] [7,8,9,10,F95] Bogus error when function name does not shadow an intrinsic when RESULT clause is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105138 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rofirrim at gmail dot com

[Bug fortran/105243] ICE in next_char, at fortran/io.cc:160

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #3) > F2018 has: > > C850 An entity with the PARAMETER attribute shall not be a variable, a > coarray, or a procedure. Or we see here an disagreement between

[Bug fortran/105138] [7,8,9,10,F95] Bogus error when function name does not shadow an intrinsic when RESULT clause is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105138 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/105230] [9/10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in find_array_section, at fortran/expr.cc:1634

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105230 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/105691] Incorrect calculation of INDEX(str1,str2) at compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105691 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Submitted version: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-June/057940.html

[Bug fortran/105691] Incorrect calculation of INDEX(str1,str2) at compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105691 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/105813] ICE in gfc_simplify_unpack, at fortran/simplify.cc:8490

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105813 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/106049] ICE in gfc_simplify_pack, at fortran/simplify.cc:6481

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106049 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/106049] ICE in gfc_simplify_pack, at fortran/simplify.cc:6481

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106049 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #1) > Maybe there is a better solution. Here's an alternative, probably more general approach that modifies is_constant_array_expr: when the array size - as

[Bug fortran/106121] ICE in gfc_simplify_extends_type_of, at fortran/simplify.cc:3109

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106121 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.5

[Bug fortran/103137] [12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_simplify_transpose, at fortran/simplify.c:8181 since r12-4967-gbcf3728abe848888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103137 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target

[Bug fortran/103138] [12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_simplify_cshift, at fortran/simplify.c:2139 since r12-4967-gbcf3728abe848888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103138 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target

[Bug fortran/103693] [12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_array_dimen_size(): Bad EXPR_ARRAY expr since r12-4967-gbcf3728abe848888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103693 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.2|10.5 Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/105243] ICE in next_char, at fortran/io.cc:160

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >