--- Comment #26 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-18 15:07 ---
Subject: Bug 19505
Author: aph
Date: Tue Jul 18 15:07:48 2006
New Revision: 115554
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=115554
Log:
2006-07-13 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR tree
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28423
--- Comment #23 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 13:14 ---
Subject: Bug 19505
Author: aph
Date: Mon Jul 17 13:14:38 2006
New Revision: 115518
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=115518
Log:
2006-07-13 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR tree
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-12 16:59 ---
I can't duplicate this one.
(gdb) s
gnu.java.lang.MainThread.MainThread(java.lang.Class, java.lang.String[])
([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
at /home/aph/gcc/trunk/libjava/gnu/java
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-26 09:45 ---
Thank you for this patch.
It seems to be a patch for the core constant folding code. Would it not be
more
appropriate to do this in the Java front end's function convert() (in
java/typeck.c) ?
--
http
--- Comment #7 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 11:13 ---
Deferred 'til ecj.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|aph
--- Comment #15 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 17:38 ---
Subject: Bug 27908
Author: aph
Date: Mon Jun 19 17:38:08 2006
New Revision: 114778
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114778
Log:
2006-06-19 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/1305
--- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 17:38 ---
Subject: Bug 1305
Author: aph
Date: Mon Jun 19 17:38:08 2006
New Revision: 114778
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114778
Log:
2006-06-19 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/1305
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-15 11:23 ---
gcj creates all its trampolines on the heap, so exec stack shouldn't be needed.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-13 12:44 ---
Subject: Bug 1305
Author: aph
Date: Tue Jun 13 12:43:56 2006
New Revision: 114609
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114609
Log:
2006-06-09 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/1305
--- Comment #14 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-13 12:44 ---
Subject: Bug 27908
Author: aph
Date: Tue Jun 13 12:43:56 2006
New Revision: 114609
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114609
Log:
2006-06-09 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/1305
--- Comment #8 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-13 12:52 ---
Note that this patch has some problems. In particular, it doesn't work with
BC-compiled code. Also, on x86 it doesn't insert memory barrier instructions,
but this is arguably a bug in __sync_synchronize() rather than
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-26 10:20 ---
I have found the real cause of these weird non-nested variable ranges.
It's because ecj reorganizes for loops in this way:
for (a; b; c)
{
foo;
}
becomes
goto barf;
do
{
foo;
c;
barf:
a;
if (!b)
goto x
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-26 10:23 ---
Err, I mean:
a;
goto barf;
do
{
foo;
c;
barf:
if (!b)
goto x;
} forever;
x:
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27756
--- Comment #7 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-26 13:52 ---
Subject: Bug 27756
Author: aph
Date: Fri May 26 13:52:18 2006
New Revision: 114131
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114131
Log:
2006-05-25 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/27756
--- Comment #8 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-26 13:54 ---
What am I supposed to write here, anyway? It's fixed because I fixed it.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 09:56 ---
.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 10:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=11512)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11512action=view)
Patch
Try this. If it works for you I'll check it in.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27756
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 10:12 ---
This is caused by ecj generating non-nested variable scopes.
In Method name:seekTypesInBinaryPackage:
slot#13: name: i, type: int (pc: 254 length: 82)
slot#15: name: elementName, type: java.lang.String (pc: 240
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 11:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=11503)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11503action=view)
Test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27754
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 14:31 ---
Subject: Bug 27754
Author: aph
Date: Wed May 24 14:31:23 2006
New Revision: 114043
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114043
Log:
2006-05-24 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/27754
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 10:59 ---
I can replicate this problem with gcj 4.1 and gcj svn trunk.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 11:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=11470)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11470action=view)
A simpler testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27590
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 11:21 ---
zorro:~ $ gcj -shared -O -findirect-dispatch StandardServer.class
org/apache/catalina/core/StandardServer.java: In class
'org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer':
org/apache/catalina/core/StandardServer.java: In method
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 11:25 ---
Failed in link_block during finish_eh_generation ():
/* Link block B to chain after AFTER. */
void
link_block (basic_block b, basic_block after)
{
b-next_bb = after-next_bb;
b-prev_bb = after;
after-next_bb = b
--- Comment #7 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 11:51 ---
There is a branch to a deleted label.
The RTL looks like this:
note 1148 1143 1144 237 [bb 372] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
(insn 1144 1148 1145 237 (set (reg:CCZ 17 flags)
(compare:CCZ (reg:DI 408
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-10 17:41 ---
Xref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191211
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12257
--- Comment #11 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-04 13:54 ---
Subject: Bug 26858
Author: aph
Date: Thu May 4 13:54:15 2006
New Revision: 113526
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113526
Log:
2006-05-04 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/26858
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-04 18:45 ---
Subject: Bug 27352
Author: aph
Date: Thu May 4 18:44:53 2006
New Revision: 113532
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113532
Log:
2006-05-04 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* class.c
--- Comment #16 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-03 10:11 ---
I can certainly do that, but it doesn't fail on HEAD. Are you sure you really
want it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26447
--- Comment #18 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-03 10:22 ---
gcj -findirect-dispatch doesn't work with .java files, only with .class files,
so I didn't try it.
class XMLStreamWriter
{
void writeCharacters(String s) {}
}
class XMLStreamException extends Exception {}
public
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-02 10:08 ---
The real reason is that we want the actual caller of
SecurityManager.checkPermission(), but we're walking up the stack to the user
code that called Class.newInstance() Class.getMethod(). This problem is as far
as I'm
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27352
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-28 15:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=11344)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11344action=view)
Test case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27352
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-28 15:18 ---
The output of this test should be something like:
java.lang.Throwable
at MySecurityManager.checkPermission(t.java:33)
at java.lang.Class.getClassLoader(Class.java:580)
at trial.x(trial.java:5
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 11:25 ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html#known
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2839
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-20 09:39 ---
Subject: Bug 25414
Author: aph
Date: Thu Apr 20 09:39:22 2006
New Revision: 113113
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113113
Log:
2006-04-05 Archit Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/25414
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26858
--- Comment #12 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-11 18:10 ---
Not worth backporting to 4.0.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-05 09:53 ---
Subject: Bug 25414
Author: aph
Date: Wed Apr 5 09:53:08 2006
New Revision: 112699
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112699
Log:
2006-04-05 Archit Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/25414
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-05 13:19 ---
I don't think this is a regression.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ~/gcc/install-4.0/bin/gcj -C z.java
z.java: In class 'z':
z.java: In method 'z.main(java.lang.String[])':
z.java:9: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-05 14:12 ---
As far as I can see this bug is in every version of gcj that has ever existed.
There is special code (in merge_string_cste()) to convert an integer constant
to a constant string for concatenation. However, there isn't
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-04 15:08 ---
Subject: Bug 25414
Author: aph
Date: Tue Apr 4 15:08:51 2006
New Revision: 112667
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112667
Log:
2006-04-03 Archit Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/25414
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-04 17:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=11204)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11204action=view)
PR java/27025: ICE on simple initializer
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27025
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-04 18:17 ---
David Daney pointed out the part of the JLS that forbids my solution. I'll
work on another patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27025
--- Comment #8 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-03 14:31 ---
Subject: Bug 26858
Author: aph
Date: Mon Apr 3 14:31:56 2006
New Revision: 112640
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112640
Log:
2006-04-03 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/26858
--- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-03 15:22 ---
Subject: Bug 26858
Author: aph
Date: Mon Apr 3 15:22:21 2006
New Revision: 112641
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112641
Log:
2006-04-03 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/26858
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 11:43 ---
Subject: Bug 26858
Author: aph
Date: Fri Mar 31 11:43:43 2006
New Revision: 112574
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112574
Log:
2006-03-30 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/26858
--- Comment #7 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 13:05 ---
Subject: Bug 26858
Author: aph
Date: Fri Mar 31 13:05:32 2006
New Revision: 112575
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112575
Log:
2006-03-30 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/26858
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 14:24 ---
I'm testing a patch for this.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #28 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-24 17:41 ---
Richard Guenther: should this be posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for discussion?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13212
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-18 14:58 ---
This DECL_ARTIFICIAL for the label -- should it be in the gcj front-end?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21591
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 23:15 ---
Oh yes, definitely. It was just waiting for the branch to be unfrozen.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26138
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-08 14:35 ---
I've started some experimental work on this at
svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcj/gcj-abi-experimental-branch.
Initial improvements in grabage collection time are encouraging, but there are
some problems
--- Comment #10 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-02 10:31 ---
No, that patch doesn't help. Still get the same result at -O2:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] eclipse]$ /home/aph/gcc/install/bin/gcj -c -O2 -g -fPIC
-findirect-dispatch -fjni AbstractCommentParser.class
org/eclipse/jdt/internal
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-27 17:22 ---
I wouldn't expect to see such errors.
Are you sure you used -findirect-dispatch ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26447
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26447
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 16:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=10903)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10903action=view)
File to compile
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26447
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 17:40 ---
.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-14 15:45 ---
A bit more explanation.
The problem is caused by the fact that 9007199254740994.0 + 0.847412109375
is carried out in extended precision, and the result is rounded to
9007199254740995. In double precision
)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: aph at redhat dot com
ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26192
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-09 12:53 ---
Cross-reference https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180418
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-09 14:03 ---
Subject: Bug 26192
Author: aph
Date: Thu Feb 9 14:03:17 2006
New Revision: 110798
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=110798
Log:
2006-02-09 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/26192
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-09 14:05 ---
Subject: Bug 26192
Author: aph
Date: Thu Feb 9 14:05:31 2006
New Revision: 110799
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=110799
Log:
2006-02-09 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/26192
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-07 19:02 ---
Subject: Bug 25535
Author: aph
Date: Tue Feb 7 19:02:39 2006
New Revision: 110710
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=110710
Log:
2006-02-07 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* expr.c
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-02 12:10 ---
See java/lang/reflect/natMethod.cc:
#if USE_LIBFFI
#include ffi.h
#else
#include java/lang/UnsupportedOperationException.h
#endif
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26063
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-01 16:57 ---
Working around the lack of libffi support on ARM is Just Plain Stupid. We
should either fix it or cease to build on ARM. Without libffi libgcj cannot
work in any reasonable way.
The memory leak thing can be fixed
--- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-30 15:40 ---
Subject: Bug 21428
Author: aph
Date: Mon Jan 30 15:40:14 2006
New Revision: 110400
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=110400
Log:
2006-01-30 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/21428
--- Comment #10 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-30 16:25 ---
Subject: Bug 21428
Author: aph
Date: Mon Jan 30 16:25:40 2006
New Revision: 110402
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=110402
Log:
2006-01-30 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/21428
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-16 15:51 ---
Subject: Bug 25535
Author: aph
Date: Mon Jan 16 15:51:42 2006
New Revision: 109748
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=109748
Log:
2006-01-16 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/25535
--- Comment #20 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-09 17:25 ---
This breaks java on s390.
# LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/jre/lib/s390/pr13212.so /bin/echo
/bin/echo: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libgcj.so.7: undefined symbol:
__data_start
This is because pr13212.so
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: ppc64-linux-gnu
http
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 17:16 ---
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(javax.rmi.CORBA.Stub.class);
}
}
This fails with a SEGV on PPC 64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 18:34 ---
Subject: Bug 25535
Author: aph
Date: Thu Dec 22 18:34:01 2005
New Revision: 108961
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=108961
Log:
2005-12-22 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/25535
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-21 14:56 ---
Subject: Bug 25121
Author: aph
Date: Wed Dec 21 14:56:00 2005
New Revision: 108905
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=108905
Log:
2005-12-21 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR middle-end
--- Comment #8 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-21 16:52 ---
Subject: Bug 25121
Author: aph
Date: Wed Dec 21 16:52:13 2005
New Revision: 108914
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=108914
Log:
2005-12-21 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR middle-end
--- Comment #10 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-21 17:27 ---
I'd like to apply this patch to 4.0, but it's too different.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-19 18:30 ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-12/msg00548.html.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25121
--- Comment #7 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 15:54 ---
This should now be fixed on trunk and 4.1 branch.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25429
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 16:30 ---
This is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175569
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25429
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 16:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=10503)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10503action=view)
Patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25429
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 09:41 ---
Subject: Bug 25368
Author: aph
Date: Tue Dec 13 09:41:45 2005
New Revision: 108474
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=108474
Log:
2005-12-13 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/25366
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 09:41 ---
Subject: Bug 25366
Author: aph
Date: Tue Dec 13 09:41:45 2005
New Revision: 108474
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=108474
Log:
2005-12-13 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/25366
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 09:44 ---
Subject: Bug 25368
Author: aph
Date: Tue Dec 13 09:44:35 2005
New Revision: 108475
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=108475
Log:
2005-12-13 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/25366
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 09:44 ---
Subject: Bug 25366
Author: aph
Date: Tue Dec 13 09:44:35 2005
New Revision: 108475
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=108475
Log:
2005-12-13 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/25366
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25366
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 15:44 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ppzz]$ /home/aph/gcc/trunk/obj-i686-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/jc1
org/gnu/atk/AtkObject.java -fuse-boehm-gc -fnon-call-exceptions -O2 -fjni
-fclasspath=.:/usr/share/java/libgcj-4.1.0.jar -fPIC -o x.s
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 15:58 ---
Please try the patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg00861.html.
Let me know if it doesn't work.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 16:38 ---
I just tried it with the patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg00861.html.
Works for me.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-08 14:40 ---
Subject: Bug 25265
Author: aph
Date: Thu Dec 8 14:40:48 2005
New Revision: 108232
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=108232
Log:
2005-12-08 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR libgcj/25265
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-08 14:44 ---
Subject: Bug 25265
Author: aph
Date: Thu Dec 8 14:44:29 2005
New Revision: 108233
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=108233
Log:
2005-12-08 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR libgcj/25265
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-08 15:32 ---
Subject: Bug 25265
Author: aph
Date: Thu Dec 8 15:32:44 2005
New Revision: 108235
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=108235
Log:
2005-12-08 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR libgcj/25265
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
201 - 300 of 440 matches
Mail list logo
