https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68023
--- Comment #1 from David Barto ---
Created attachment 36544
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36544=edit
Configuration for GCC 5.2
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: barto at cambridgesemantics dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36543
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36543=edit
Configuration for GCC 4.8.4
The following code:
template
inl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68023
--- Comment #3 from David Barto ---
Created attachment 36546
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36546=edit
Compressed gcc 5.2 output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68023
--- Comment #2 from David Barto ---
Created attachment 36545
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36545=edit
compressed gcc 4.8 output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68023
David Barto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: barto at cambridgesemantics dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 38663
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38663=edit
preprocessed file that fails
Seen with the released 5.4.0 build for Linux
Version: GCC
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: barto at cambridgesemantics dot com
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Checking address sanitizer leaks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78028
--- Comment #3 from David Barto ---
If it is restricted to 5.2, then we can close this as "won't fix"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78028
David Barto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81515
--- Comment #5 from David Barto ---
This is about the #ele which I would expect to either generate a parse error or
a warning of some kind.
: preprocessor
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: barto at cambridgesemantics dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The following will parse successfully
#if BADTEST
#include
#ele
#include
#endif
#include
int main(int, char **)
{
exit(0);
}
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: barto at cambridgesemantics dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 42334
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42334=edit
Assembly output from g++ -O3 -funroll-loops -S
In the following code, the fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82505
--- Comment #3 from David Barto ---
I understand that it can't optimize much, my major concern is that the pointer
version of the code is so much worse than the index version of the code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82505
--- Comment #1 from David Barto ---
This is gcc-mp-7 pre-built object from MacPorts.
Should have mentioned that.
14 matches
Mail list logo
