[Bug c++/19144] SPARC backend bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 01:55 --- Created an attachment (id=7815) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7815action=view) .ii file using the original workaround patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug c++/19144] SPARC backend bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 01:56 --- Created an attachment (id=7816) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7816action=view) .s file using the original workaround patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug c++/19144] SPARC backend bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
-- What|Removed |Added Attachment #7815|text/plain |application/octet-stream mime type|| Attachment #7815 is|1

[Bug target/19144] SPARC back-end bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 01:58 --- Created an attachment (id=7817) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7817action=view) .ii file using patch in comment #1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19144

[Bug target/19144] SPARC back-end bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 01:59 --- Created an attachment (id=7818) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7818action=view) .s file using patch in comment #1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19144

[Bug target/19144] SPARC back-end bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 02:03 --- Ok, I ran diff on both .s files (id #7816 v id #7818) and found the following: @@ -199,8 +199,8 @@ cmp %g1, 0 bne .LL9 nop - add %fp, -80, %g1

[Bug target/19144] SPARC back-end bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 02:04 --- Comment #7 should confirm this is a GCC bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19144

[Bug target/19144] SPARC back-end bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 02:59 --- I looked at the .s files more closely and comment #7 might be off. Offsets seem to differ by either 4 or 8 not only 8 like I originally thought. I generated the .s files on HP-UX and it had the same

[Bug target/19144] miscompilation KDE 3.3.2

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 07:00 --- Created an attachment (id=7820) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7820action=view) Original pre-processed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19144

[Bug target/19144] miscompilation KDE 3.3.2

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 07:00 --- Created an attachment (id=7821) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7821action=view) Original pre-processed .s file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19144

[Bug target/19144] miscompilation KDE 3.3.2

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 07:06 --- Created an attachment (id=7822) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7822action=view) Pre-processed source with fix (add int i;) Note: If the 'int i;' is placed after the 'struct

[Bug target/19144] miscompilation KDE 3.3.2

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 07:07 --- Created an attachment (id=7823) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7823action=view) Pre-processed .s of kurlcompletion.ii with fix (int i; added) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug other/18720] New: collect2 uses wrong search order if -brtl specified

2004-11-29 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
ReportedBy: bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 GCC host triplet: powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 GCC target triplet: powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18720

[Bug other/18720] collect2 uses wrong search order if -brtl specified

2004-11-29 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-11-29 16:53 --- Created an attachment (id=7634) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7634action=view) Patch for gcc-3.3.2 to make collect2 honor -brtl Patch reorders the library search path if -brtl

[Bug other/18720] collect2 uses wrong search order if -brtl specified

2004-11-29 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-11-29 16:54 --- Created an attachment (id=7635) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7635action=view) Forward-ported patch for gcc-3.4.3 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18720

[Bug other/18720] collect2 uses wrong search order if -brtl specified

2004-11-29 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-11-29 17:01 --- I'll try and get to it soonish. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18720

<    1   2   3