[Bug libgcj/15430] Cannot interrupt blocking I/O calls with close()

2005-11-09 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 17:46 --- Created an attachment (id=10189) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10189action=view) Program that demonstrates how shutdown can solve the problem. Compile socktest.c thusly: gcc -g -o soctest

[Bug libgcj/15430] Cannot interrupt blocking I/O calls with close()

2005-11-09 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 19:24 --- Here is the first version of my patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q4/msg00176.html -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/15430] Cannot interrupt blocking I/O calls with close()

2005-11-09 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-10 00:34 --- New patch at: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q4/msg00179.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15430

[Bug java/24825] New: Standard runtime methods that are known to not return null should not trigger null checks.

2005-11-12 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org BugsThisDependsOn: 20318 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24825

[Bug middle-end/20218] Can't use __attribute__ ((visibility (hidden))) to hide a symbol

2006-12-12 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #47 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 07:39 --- This is probably (I have not checked yet as I am still bootstrapping) still a problem on MIPS because my fix for the bootstrap breakage caused by H.J.'s patch removes the generic fix in elfos.h. -- daney at gcc

[Bug java/30591] New: Cross build fails because native gcj needed to build ecjx

2007-01-25 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
ecjx Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: java AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc

[Bug java/30591] Cross build fails because native gcj needed to build ecjx

2007-01-25 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-25 23:12 --- This is actually contains the error from the build output this time: i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcj -o ecjx -findirect-dispatch --main=org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.batch.GCCMain ../../../trunk/libjava/.././libjava

[Bug java/5178] Method call on qualified static field doesn't initialize its class

2007-01-29 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-30 01:33 --- The testcase no longer fails as of 4.3.0 -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/20312] No warning on bad method

2007-01-29 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-30 01:53 --- In 4.3.0 this is correctly flagged as an error. With the testcase in comment #1 we get: $ gcj -o t --main=t t.java t.java:3: error: Exception IOException is not compatible with throws clause in Object.toString

[Bug libgcj/30606] [4.3 Regression] natVMURLConnection.cc:21: error: 'magic_t' does not name a type

2007-02-02 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-02 23:23 --- (In reply to comment #6) Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] natVMURLConnection.cc:21: error: 'magic_t' does not name a type This is just a random guess, but do you have this patch (gcc/java): 2007-01-29 Andrew

[Bug tree-optimization/31169] Bootstrap comparison error at revision 122821

2007-03-14 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-14 22:34 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-03/msg00521.html may be the same problem. I will try to test on both sides of 122821 to try to confirm. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug libgcj/31228] New: Race condition between setting close-on-exec and Runtime.exec()

2007-03-16 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcj AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC host triplet: *-*-* http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31228

[Bug tree-optimization/31169] Bootstrap comparison error at revision 122821

2007-03-17 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #23 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-18 01:55 --- Reverting the hunk mentioned in comment #15 also allows mipsel-linux to bootstrap. I bootstrapped R122924 which failed in the stage2 stage3 compare. I then reverted said hunk, and re-bootstrapped successfully

[Bug libgcj/31228] Race condition between setting close-on-exec and Runtime.exec()

2007-03-19 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-19 07:09 --- Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2007-q1/msg00693.html -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/31228] Race condition between setting close-on-exec and Runtime.exec()

2007-03-22 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-23 00:06 --- Subject: Bug 31228 Author: daney Date: Fri Mar 23 00:06:41 2007 New Revision: 123138 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123138 Log: PR libgcj/31228 * configure.ac: Add checks

[Bug libgcj/31228] Race condition between setting close-on-exec and Runtime.exec()

2007-03-22 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-23 00:17 --- The committed patch fixes the race. Too bad it had to come to this. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/31228] Race condition between setting close-on-exec and Runtime.exec()

2007-03-22 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31228

[Bug libgcj/31228] Race condition between setting close-on-exec and Runtime.exec()

2007-03-25 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-26 07:07 --- Subject: Bug 31228 Author: daney Date: Mon Mar 26 07:07:13 2007 New Revision: 123208 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123208 Log: PR libgcj/31228 * configure.ac: Add checks

[Bug libgcj/31228] Race condition between setting close-on-exec and Runtime.exec()

2007-03-25 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-26 07:13 --- Committed to the 4.2 branch as well. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/31169] Bootstrap comparison error at revision 122821

2007-04-01 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #47 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-01 08:29 --- With RTH's alternate patch applied, I can now bootstrap mipsel-linux The test results are here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-04/msg00036.html And are substancially similar to what I was getting before

[Bug libgcj/23758] java::lang::ConcreteProcess::nativeSpawn unsafe

2007-04-06 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |daney at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug libgcj/23758] java::lang::ConcreteProcess::nativeSpawn unsafe

2007-04-09 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-09 18:40 --- Subject: Bug 23758 Author: daney Date: Mon Apr 9 18:40:20 2007 New Revision: 123676 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123676 Log: PR libgcj/23758 * java/lang/natPosixProcess.cc

[Bug libgcj/23758] java::lang::ConcreteProcess::nativeSpawn unsafe

2007-04-09 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-09 18:49 --- Fixed on the trunk. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug libstdc++/31807] New: bootstrap failure in 4.2.0 RC3. const_point_iterator.hpp not found

2007-05-03 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: mipsel

[Bug libstdc++/31807] bootstrap failure in 4.2.0 RC3. const_point_iterator.hpp not found

2007-05-03 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-03 23:02 --- I am investigating why ext/pb_ds/detail/unordered_iterator/const_point_iterator.hpp is missing from my source directory when it appears to be in the tarball. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31807

[Bug libstdc++/31807] bootstrap failure in 4.2.0 RC3. const_point_iterator.hpp not found

2007-05-03 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-03 23:09 --- Dang. I am using busybox tar. It seems to have failed while unpacking the tarfile. I am building gnu tar now. Perhaps that will solve this problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31807

[Bug libstdc++/31807] bootstrap failure in 4.2.0 RC3. const_point_iterator.hpp not found

2007-05-03 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-04 00:01 --- Sorry for the noise. After unpacking the tarball with gnu tar, the bootstrap proceeds past the previous point of failure. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug java/31842] New: r124338 causes java Divide_1 and pr6388 to fail

2007-05-05 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: java AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-pc-linux

[Bug java/31842] [4.2/4.3 Regression] r124338 causes java Divide_1 and pr6388 to fail

2007-05-06 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-07 04:23 --- I just finished bootstrapping and testing r124337 and r124338 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (FC6). Not surprisingly, this verifies that r124338 causes the regression. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31842

[Bug libgcj/29324] add wait handling hook

2007-05-12 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-12 18:38 --- Subject: Bug 29324 Author: daney Date: Sat May 12 17:37:55 2007 New Revision: 124638 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=124638 Log: PR libgcj/29324 * include/posix-threads.h

[Bug libgcj/29324] add wait handling hook

2007-05-12 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-12 19:52 --- I think the patch solves the problem. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/30591] Cross build fails because native gcj needed to build ecjx

2007-05-16 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-16 21:10 --- Marking as FIXED as it now works for me *if* I use a current native GCC to build the cross compiler. I am prepering a documentation patch that explains my interpretation of the requirements. -- daney at gcc dot

[Bug target/31975] [4.3 Regression] segfault in try_split on mips during bootstrap

2007-05-18 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-18 17:31 --- Currently building mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu. # cat LAST_UPDATED Wed May 16 12:35:18 PDT 2007 Wed May 16 19:35:18 UTC 2007 (revision 124776) libstdc++-v3 was built without ICEing (currently building in libjava

[Bug libgcj/29604] Race condition in ServerSocket.accept()

2007-05-19 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-19 18:12 --- UNIX/Linux sucks. There are likely races with read/write and close all over libgcj: = Thread 1 Thread 2 Thread 3 load

[Bug libgcj/29604] Race condition in ServerSocket.accept()

2007-05-19 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-19 18:20 --- That didn't come out quite right :(. The close part would be: int t = dup(fileDes) dup2(global_always_error_fd, fileDes); synchronized { cleanupFD = fileDes; } close (t); synchronized

[Bug target/31975] [4.3 Regression] segfault in try_split on mips during bootstrap

2007-05-20 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-20 07:11 --- (In reply to comment #5) With: /home/tbm/scratch/gcc/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror mipsel-linux-gnu I get the same segfault in gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/fstream-inst.cc Can you

[Bug target/31975] [4.3 Regression] segfault in try_split on mips during bootstrap

2007-05-21 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-22 05:38 --- Confirmed on a cross compiler configured: ../t1/configure --target=mipsel-linux --with-sysroot=/usr/local/mipsel-linux-test --prefix=/usr/local/mipsel-linux-test --with-arch=mips32 --with-float=soft --disable-java

[Bug target/31975] [4.3 Regression] segfault in try_split on mips during bootstrap

2007-05-22 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-22 16:21 --- This bug was triggered on the trunk by: $ svn log -r 124258 r124258 | hubicka | 2007-04-28 01:20:08 -0700 (Sat, 28 Apr 2007) | 50 lines

[Bug target/31975] [4.3 Regression] segfault in try_split on mips during bootstrap

2007-05-23 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-24 06:06 --- Reduced testcase: g++.dg/abi/thunk3.C -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31975

[Bug target/31975] [4.3 Regression] segfault in try_split on mips during bootstrap

2007-05-23 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-24 06:08 --- Fails with: -mno-shared OK with: -mshared -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31975

[Bug target/31975] [4.3 Regression] segfault in try_split on mips during bootstrap

2007-05-25 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-25 08:16 --- Created an attachment (id=13610) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13610action=view) Proposed patch. I will bootstrap and test the attached patch. It allows my cross build to complete. -- daney

[Bug tree-optimization/38789] New: __builtin_constant_p appears to eveluate to true for non-constant arguments.

2009-01-09 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64

[Bug tree-optimization/38789] [4.4 Regression] __builtin_constant_p appears to eveluate to true for non-constant arguments.

2009-01-09 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-09 21:55 --- Good, this code comes from the Linux kernel: mm/backing-dev.c (set_bdi_congested()) Is the kernel at fault? If so I am sure Linus would like to hear about it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug tree-optimization/38789] [4.4 Regression] __builtin_constant_p appears to eveluate to true for non-constant arguments.

2009-01-09 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-09 22:00 --- You have to be able to do one of the original test case or this: $ cat foo1.c void baz(int v) { unsigned a; a = (v == 1) ? 1 : 2; if (__builtin_constant_p(a)) { asm volatile

[Bug driver/38864] New: Incorrect interaction between --with-arch=native and -mARCH

2009-01-15 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
: P3 Component: driver AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: mips64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: mips64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: mips64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug target/39079] New: MIPS: __builtin___clear_cache() broken on SMP ISA_HAS_SYNCI systems.

2009-02-02 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: mips64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: mips64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: mips64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39079

[Bug target/39090] New: MIPS: wrong-code with 64-bit values and register asm constraints with o32 ABI.

2009-02-03 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: mips64

[Bug target/39090] MIPS: wrong-code with 64-bit values and register asm constraints with o32 ABI.

2009-02-03 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-03 21:32 --- I guess you are right. I thought I had a failing testcase, but I can't make it fail any more. Marking as invalid. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/31975] [4.3 Regression] segfault in try_split on mips during bootstrap

2007-05-29 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-30 04:21 --- Subject: Bug 31975 Author: daney Date: Wed May 30 04:21:24 2007 New Revision: 125178 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=125178 Log: PR gcc/31975 * config/mips/mips.c

[Bug target/31975] [4.3 Regression] segfault in try_split on mips during bootstrap

2007-05-29 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-30 04:38 --- Fix committed to the trunk. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/32313] New: [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap failure running gengtype in stage 2.

2007-06-12 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: mipsel-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: mipsel-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: mipsel-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32313

[Bug target/32313] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap failure running gengtype in stage 2.

2007-06-12 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-13 00:03 --- Created an attachment (id=13695) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13695action=view) .i for gengtype Compiling like this causes the bad code (the configure line is even in there): # /home/build/gcc

[Bug target/32313] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap failure running gengtype in stage 2.

2007-06-12 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-13 05:58 --- I have a prototype patch that I think fixes this problem. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/32313] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap failure running gengtype in stage 2.

2007-06-13 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-13 06:26 --- Created an attachment (id=13696) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13696action=view) Proposed fix. I will try to bootstrap the Proposed fix tomorrow. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Bug target/32313] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap failure running gengtype in stage 2.

2007-06-13 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-13 19:44 --- Unfortunatly the patch causes an ICE compiling crtstuff.c. I will have to adjust it a bit... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32313

[Bug target/32313] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap failure running gengtype in stage 2.

2007-06-13 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-13 20:39 --- Created an attachment (id=13700) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13700action=view) Revised patch. I don't know what I was thinking with the first version of the patch :-( The new version I think

[Bug target/32313] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap failure running gengtype in stage 2.

2007-06-16 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-17 05:05 --- Good news and bad news. My 32313-v2.patch allows c,c++,java to bootstrap except for at the very end of the libjava build gcj-dbtool gets stuck in an endless loop. Luckily killing it allows the build to complete

[Bug target/32313] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap failure running gengtype in stage 2.

2007-06-18 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-18 17:36 --- Subject: Bug 32313 Author: daney Date: Mon Jun 18 17:36:42 2007 New Revision: 125818 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=125818 Log: PR target/32313 * config/mips/mips.c

[Bug target/32313] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap failure running gengtype in stage 2.

2007-06-18 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-18 17:41 --- The ability to bootstrap is fixed by the patch. There are other dataflow regressions that will be fixed by follow up patches. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug target/32313] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap failure running gengtype in stage 2.

2007-06-18 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-18 19:35 --- Subject: Bug 32313 Author: daney Date: Mon Jun 18 19:35:05 2007 New Revision: 125824 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=125824 Log: Revert: 2007-06-18 David Daney [EMAIL

[Bug target/32313] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap failure running gengtype in stage 2.

2007-06-18 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-18 19:35 --- That fix was incorrect. Sorry. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/32313] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap failure running gengtype in stage 2.

2007-06-18 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-18 19:39 --- This is the same problem as: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-06/msg01165.html I am currently bootstrapping the patch in that e-mail thread and will probably commit that version. -- http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug target/32313] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap failure running gengtype in stage 2.

2007-06-19 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-19 16:36 --- Subject: Bug 32313 Author: daney Date: Tue Jun 19 16:36:42 2007 New Revision: 125852 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=125852 Log: PR target/32313 * config/mips/mips.md (cprestore

[Bug target/32313] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap failure running gengtype in stage 2.

2007-06-19 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-19 16:43 --- The second time is the charm. There are still regressions caused by the dataflow merge, but at least we can bootstrap now. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug target/32406] New: [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in nestfunc-6.c at -O3

2007-06-19 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: mipsel-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: mipsel-linux-gnu GCC target

[Bug target/32406] [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in nestfunc-6.c at -O3

2007-06-20 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 07:11 --- Created an attachment (id=13739) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13739action=view) First patch attempt. I think this patch fixes this bug. The test case looks better from my cross-compiler. I

[Bug target/32437] New: [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in gcc.dg/cleanup-[8|9|10|11].c

2007-06-20 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: mipsel-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: mipsel

[Bug target/32437] [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in gcc.dg/cleanup-[8|9|10|11].c

2007-06-21 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 09:15 --- Created an attachment (id=13754) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13754action=view) Proposed patch. This is a problem with __builtin_eh_return(). At -O0 the new return address is being stored

[Bug target/32437] [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in gcc.dg/cleanup-[8|9|10|11].c

2007-06-21 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 20:52 --- I haven't yet looked in detail at the RTL dumps, but in the assembly output the store of the new return value was missing. It didn't seem to be in the wrong place, but missing entirely. I just hacked up the patch

[Bug fortran/32046] [4.3 Regression] wrong code with -O2 for gfortran.dg/interface_12.f90 result_in_spec_1.f90

2007-06-21 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-22 04:46 --- Subject: Bug 32046 Author: daney Date: Fri Jun 22 04:46:08 2007 New Revision: 125941 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=125941 Log: PR target/32046 * config/mips/mips.md

[Bug target/32406] [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in nestfunc-6.c at -O3

2007-06-21 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-22 04:55 --- Fixed by this patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revrevision=125941 Unfortunately I botched the PR number in the ChangeLog with my first commit, so the magic patch description did not show up here. -- daney

[Bug target/32437] [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in gcc.dg/cleanup-[8|9|10|11].c

2007-06-22 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-22 08:38 --- Looking at the rtl dumps of unwind-dw2.c compiled with -O1 I find: In unwind-dw2.c.135r.subreg (_Unwind_Resume): . . . (insn 72 71 73 6 ../../../trunk/libgcc/../gcc/unwind.inc:216 (parallel [ (unspec

[Bug target/32437] [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in gcc.dg/cleanup-[8|9|10|11].c

2007-06-23 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-23 16:47 --- Thanks for the patch. I just started a mipsel-linux bootstrap. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32437

[Bug target/32437] [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in gcc.dg/cleanup-[8|9|10|11].c

2007-06-26 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-26 17:14 --- mipsel-linux test results are here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-06/msg01158.html The offending gcc.dg/cleanup-[8|9|10|11].c tests now pass as do almost all C++ and libstdc++ tests. -- daney

[Bug tree-optimization/32653] New: [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap failure with excessive memory consumption in tree-ssa-pre compiling libjava/interperter.c

2007-07-06 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: mipsel

[Bug target/32853] [4.3 regression] failing libjava testcases

2007-07-27 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-28 00:01 --- Java just uses the unwinder in libgcc_s. The same one that C++ and C use. If it is a problem with the unwinder one might expect to see it in those languages as well. However, it would seem to be somewhat system

[Bug tree-optimization/32653] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap failure with excessive memory consumption in tree-ssa-pre compiling libjava/interperter.c

2007-08-01 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-02 00:38 --- Still happens in: revision 127079 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32653

[Bug libffi/28313] libffi has not been ported to mips64-linux-gnu

2007-08-09 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 17:06 --- I will commit n32/n64 support shortly. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libffi/28313] libffi has not been ported to mips64-linux-gnu

2007-08-10 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 15:36 --- Subject: Bug 28313 Author: daney Date: Fri Aug 10 15:35:55 2007 New Revision: 127336 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=127336 Log: PR libffi/28313 * configure.ac: Don't treat mips64

[Bug libffi/23718] ffitarget.h include problem

2007-08-10 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 08:17 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 23935 *** -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libffi/23935] $PREFIX/include/ffi.h needs to go to a target- and -version-dependent location

2007-08-10 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 08:17 --- *** Bug 23718 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libffi/28313] libffi has not been ported to mips64-linux-gnu

2007-08-10 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 15:42 --- It should be working now. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/34281] New: [arm] varargs broken with 64bit parameters.

2007-11-28 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: armv5tl-none

[Bug target/34409] New: MIPS: Non-optimal DWARF frame data

2007-12-09 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: mips*-*-linux* http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34409

[Bug target/34415] [4.3 Regression] Possible miscompilation on MIPS

2007-12-09 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-10 05:15 --- Perhaps we could get a URL to a version of mawk that is failing. Also details about how you configured gcc and which svn revision number you tested, and how mawk was configured. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug rtl-optimization/34415] [4.3 Regression] Possible miscompilation on MIPS

2007-12-11 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34415

[Bug target/34281] [4.3 Regression] ARM: varargs broken with 64bit parameters.

2007-12-11 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-11 23:20 --- Verified that it works on MontaVista build 3.4.3. Still failing on: armv5tl-montavista-linuxeabi-g++ (GCC) 4.3.0 20071211 (experimental) [trunk revision 130777] -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed

[Bug bootstrap/34144] [4.3 Regression] Revision 130005 causes bootstrap failure with --disable-checking

2007-12-12 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-13 01:12 --- Andrew proposed a patch (which was then approved) here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg01511.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34144

[Bug bootstrap/34144] [4.3 Regression] Revision 130005 causes bootstrap failure with --disable-checking

2007-12-12 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-13 05:28 --- Currently testing on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. I will commit if all OK. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/34144] [4.3 Regression] Revision 130005 causes bootstrap failure with --disable-checking

2007-12-13 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-13 19:19 --- Subject: Bug 34144 Author: daney Date: Thu Dec 13 19:19:17 2007 New Revision: 130908 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=130908 Log: 2007-12-13 Andrew Pinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] David

[Bug bootstrap/34144] [4.3 Regression] Revision 130005 causes bootstrap failure with --disable-checking

2007-12-13 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-13 19:32 --- Fixed by the patch. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/34456] MIPS: Flaw in branch delay optimization (patch included).

2007-12-13 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-14 07:36 --- Kaz: A test case would be useful. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/34831] [4.3 Regression] ICE on gcc.dg/pr34233.c for MIPS

2008-01-17 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||3.4.3 Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http

[Bug c++/34829] [4.3 Regression] placement new with primitive Java types rejected

2008-01-17 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-17 17:44 --- I wonder what would happen (but not enough to actually test it) if these: typedef __java_byte jbyte; typedef __java_short jshort; typedef __java_int jint; typedef __java_long jlong; typedef __java_float

[Bug target/34831] New: [4.3 Regression] ICE on gcc.dg/pr34233.c for MIPS

2008-01-17 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: mipsel-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: mipsel-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: mipsel-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34831

[Bug target/34831] [4.3 Regression] ICE on gcc.dg/pr34233.c for MIPS

2008-01-17 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-17 21:19 --- (In reply to comment #1) What ICE? As noted in the original comments, the ICE in this testsuite run: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg00204.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug target/34831] [4.3 Regression] ICE on gcc.dg/pr34233.c for MIPS

2008-01-18 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-18 18:15 --- It is a regression, this works: $ mipsel-linux-gcc -march=sb1 -ffast-math -c pr34233.c $ mipsel-linux-gcc --version mipsel-linux-gcc (GCC) 3.4.3 This doesn't: $ gcc -march=sb1 -ffast-math -c pr34233.c pr34233.c

[Bug target/35032] New: MIPS ICE in gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-2.c

2008-01-30 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
/20040709-2.c Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot

[Bug target/35032] MIPS ICE in gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-2.c

2008-01-30 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-31 06:55 --- confirmed with cross-compiler mips64-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.3.0 20080127 (experimental) [trunk revision 131882] $ mips64-linux-gcc -w -O2 -fno-show-column -lm -mabi=64 -march=r5000 -o j /home/daney/gccsvn/trunk/gcc

[Bug target/35032] MIPS ICE in gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-2.c

2008-01-30 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35032

<    1   2   3   4   >