https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107826
Bug ID: 107826
Summary: ice during GIMPLE pass: slp
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107734
--- Comment #10 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> Fixed.
Thanks for that.
Would it ok to manually check all uses of sbitmap, to make sure they initialise
bits appropriately, or would it be better to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86426
--- Comment #11 from David Binderman ---
Probably still broken. One for Jason ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108523
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
Seems to run fine in about 0.1 seconds with g:4d08c674b0114622,
dated 20221129.
That seems to be about 533 commits.
I'll have a go at a git bisect.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108523
Bug ID: 108523
Summary: -O1 -fcode-hoisting causes long compilation time ?
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108523
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
Problem seems to start sometime before git hash g:9b111debbfb79a0a,
dated 20221229.
I'll try a build of a month earlier.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108523
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Also won't run to completion with a ulimit of 750 seconds.
Trying 1200 seconds.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108523
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Doesn't complete in 1200 seconds.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108523
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
Current range seems to be g:4d08c674b0114622 .. g:400d9fc1f0433611
which is 133 commits.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108523
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108523
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
Git range now seems to be g:4d08c674b0114622 .. g:b2aa75ded65f8c02
which is a range of 33 commits.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108523
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
Git range now seems to be g:4d08c674b0114622 .. g:36cabc257dfb7dd4
which is 8 commits.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108482
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108482
--- Comment #11 from David Binderman ---
It looks to me like g:af96500eea72c674a5686b35c66202ef2bd9688f
is the culprit.
Over to Richard for their best advice.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108482
--- Comment #9 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #8)
> Current range is about 151 revisions.
After a few more rounds, current range seems to be g:fbad7a74aaaddea3
to g:c16c40808331a029, some 10 commits.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108482
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #5)
> (In reply to David Binderman from comment #0)
> > The bug seems to exist since sometime before g:02c031088ac0bbf7, dated
> > 20221220.
>
> I tried out a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108482
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #0)
> The bug seems to exist since sometime before g:02c031088ac0bbf7, dated
> 20221220.
I tried out a revision from a month earlier, dated 2022-11-20,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108482
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #6)
> (In reply to David Binderman from comment #5)
> > (In reply to David Binderman from comment #0)
> > > The bug seems to exist since sometime before
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102760
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108523
--- Comment #16 from David Binderman ---
cvise produces:
int g_149, g_167, g_481;
main() {
int *l_1478 = _149;
*l_1478 ^= g_167;
lbl_1481:
for (;;) {
g_481 = 1;
for (; g_481; g_481 += 1) {
g_167 ^= *l_1478;
if (g_149)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108523
--- Comment #15 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14)
> Fixed, but I'll see if somebody comes up with a reduced testcase.
I have a reduction running with cvise.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108547
Bug ID: 108547
Summary: ice in decompose, at wide-int.h:984 for -O2 with -Wall
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102760
--- Comment #8 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> (In reply to David Binderman from comment #6)
> > I see very similar for this legal C code:
>
> That seems like a different issue, please file it seperately.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88853
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108596
Bug ID: 108596
Summary: error: EDGE_CROSSING missing across section boundary
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108482
--- Comment #8 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #7)
> (In reply to David Binderman from comment #6)
> > (In reply to David Binderman from comment #5)
> > > (In reply to David Binderman from comment #0)
> > > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108482
Bug ID: 108482
Summary: ice in expand_LOOP_DIST_ALIAS, at internal-fn.cc:2737
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108482
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced code seems to be:
int g_30, g_261, g_263, func_1___trans_tmp_17;
int **g_120;
int *g_530;
void func_1() {
int *l_29 = _30;
*l_29 = 1;
g_263 = 0;
for (; g_263 <= 1; g_263 += 1) {
g_530
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107609
Bug ID: 107609
Summary: ice in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107510
Bug ID: 107510
Summary: gcc/config/gcn/gcn.cc:4930:9: style: Same expression
on both sides of '||'. [duplicateExpression]
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107593
Bug ID: 107593
Summary: ice with -Wduplicated-cond
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107668
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #3)
> Trying git revision 2d5c4a16dd833aa0.
That looks good. Trying 59a63247992eb131.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107668
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #4)
> (In reply to David Binderman from comment #3)
> > Trying git revision 2d5c4a16dd833aa0.
>
> That looks good. Trying 59a63247992eb131.
Looks bad. Trying
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107668
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
Trying git revision 2d5c4a16dd833aa0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107668
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #5)
> (In reply to David Binderman from comment #4)
> > (In reply to David Binderman from comment #3)
> > > Trying git revision 2d5c4a16dd833aa0.
> >
> > That
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107668
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107668
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C++ code seems to be:
--- /home/dcb36/cvise/bug862.cc ---
float dot();
float intersectcylinder_md;
void intersectcylinder(float ) {
float nd = dot();
dist = 0 / nd;
float offset =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108596
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Fixed on the trunk so far.
linux-6.2-rc6 builds fine, when built with -O3.
Thanks for the quick fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109031
--- Comment #9 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> > but then if diff returns 1, the script should return 0 and
> > if diff returns 0, then the script should return 1.
>
> You can take an inspiration here:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109031
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #4)
> Created attachment 54596 [details]
> C source code
>
> After 3 hours further reduction.
I am struggling with further reduction. My bash knowledge is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109031
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 54596
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54596=edit
C source code
After 3 hours further reduction.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109031
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
20220508 is good, so the range is 20220508 to 20220515.
In git hash terms, that's g:a1947c92f7cda5f6cf7b8d8a9a44f6dd45352c03
to g:18547874ee205d830acb31f1e3c1c89fc7725c14.
I will try to reduce the code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109031
--- Comment #11 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #10)
> What about:
>
> /usr/bin/gcc -w -Werror=implicit bug892.c -o one.exe
> && (./one.exe 1 | fgrep "checksum after hashing g_50 :" > 1)
> &&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109031
--- Comment #18 from David Binderman ---
Part way through reduction, the C code seems to be
int crc32_tab_0;
int crc32_context = 0xUL;
void main(int , char []) {
{
int crc;
int i;
i = 0;
for (; i < 256; i++)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109031
--- Comment #13 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #12)
> > perl program converted to 0 is proving to be a challenge.
>
> perl? Please provide a complete script reproducer.
cvise is written in perl, isn't it ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109031
--- Comment #15 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #14)
> > cvise is written in perl, isn't it ? You've got my cvise script.
>
> No, it's written in Python.
Of course. How stupid of me.
> So show me how you run
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109031
--- Comment #17 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #16)
> bash -x qwe.sh bug892.c
That's a really useful tip. Thanks. I've debugged the script some more
and now have:
rm -f 1 2 one.exe two.exe
/usr/bin/gcc -w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Git range seems to be g:d0a3d55ae4a2656f .. g:4f1314f547f69d3a, which is about
533 commits.
Trying a bisect.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087
Bug ID: 109087
Summary: csmith: end of year runtime bug ?
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Git range seems to be g:a996888327c2248b .. g:4f1314f547f69d3a,
which is 134 commits.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
Git range seems to be g:37d8312f560f1e2f .. g:0cb5d7cdbab8e5f8,
which is 9 commits.
No hot candidate yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
First bad commit seems to be:
eef81eefcdc2a58111e50eb2162ea1f5becc8004 is the first bad commit
commit eef81eefcdc2a58111e50eb2162ea1f5becc8004
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Thu Dec 22 10:55:46 2022 +0100
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
Git range now seems to be g:a996888327c2248b .. g:0cb5d7cdbab8e5f8,
which is 33 commits.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087
--- Comment #9 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> Try -fno-tree-vectorize?
I tried that, and it made no difference at all.
I also tried dropping the -march= setting back to znver1 and
that also made no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109093
Bug ID: 109093
Summary: csmith: a February runtime bug ?
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109192
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109192
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Current git range seems to be g:af22b54af53c0f2a .. g:f3b1af49702a3d19,
which is 75 commits.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109192
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Range now downto g:a0c2ea3ee6e47f40 .. g:2db1fd76ebaa6da8, which is 19 commits.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109192
Bug ID: 109192
Summary: timeout with -g -O3 -fno-var-tracking ?
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109208
Bug ID: 109208
Summary: gcc doesn't detect when sizes are booleans
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109219
Bug ID: 109219
Summary: csmith: ice in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations_1, at
tree-vect-slp.cc:5954
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109274
Bug ID: 109274
Summary: ice in in_chain_p, at gimple-range-gori.cc:119
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109093
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Current git range is g:7478278f88ba1753 .. g:fea34ee491104f32
This is 7 commits. 6 of them seem to be libstdc++ and then there is
this one:
commit 866555b170016c49beb869a78cbecdeb07c63135
Author: Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109093
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109093
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 54638
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54638=edit
C source code
This C code seems to fail in the same way. Possible duplicate.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109093
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 54639
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54639=edit
C source code
A third example that fails at the same git hash.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109031
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109031
--- Comment #24 from David Binderman ---
I tried experimenting with the flags that change -O1 into -O2 and got this:
$ for i in ~/gcc/results.202205*/bin/gcc; do echo $i; $i -w
-ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero -O1 -fno-strict-aliasing bug892.c &&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109056
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Which turns on -Wsign-conversion .
-Wsign-conversion seems close, but not quite right. The problem is
in potential overflow, not sign conversion.
-Woverflow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109056
Bug ID: 109056
Summary: cppcheck: no warning for suspicious return type
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109237
Bug ID: 109237
Summary: csmith: another timeout with -g -O3 this time
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109237
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109184
Bug ID: 109184
Summary: csmith: really old bug with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109184
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109184
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 54702
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54702=edit
partially reduced C source code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109184
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
After checking the flags that move -O2 to -O3, flag -floop-interchange
seems to be at fault.
$ ~/gcc/results/bin/gcc -w -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing bug897.c
$ ./a.out 1 > 1
$ ~/gcc/results/bin/gcc -w -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109031
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #1)
> I will try to bisect this one with snapshots. Trying 20220515 first.
This one bad. Trying 20220508.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109031
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
I will try to bisect this one with snapshots. Trying 20220515 first.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109139
Bug ID: 109139
Summary: ice in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.cc:1442
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10
Bug ID: 10
Summary: error: definition in block 26 follows the use
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108944
Bug ID: 108944
Summary: libgm2/libm2pim/sckt.cc:254:3: warning: memset()
called to fill 0 bytes. [memsetZeroBytes]
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108959
Bug ID: 108959
Summary: ice in modify_assignment, at
ipa-param-manipulation.cc:1905
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108959
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
The bug first seems to occur sometime between git hash g:5c43f06c228d169c,
dated 20230202 and g:f0065f207cf19cd9, dated 20230203.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108959
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Reduced code seems to be:
union U2 {
long f0;
int f1
};
g_16;
g_70[];
static func_61(int) {
for (;;)
g_70[g_16] = 4;
}
static func_43(int *p_44) { func_61(*p_44); }
main() {
union U2 l_38 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108959
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
I will have a go at a git bisection.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108959
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
Only one pass at reduction, leaving 14 revisions, but
this commit looks to be a hot candidate:
commit e8109bd87766be88e83fe88a44433dae16358a02
Author: Martin Jambor
Date: Fri Feb 3 13:28:24 2023
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108959
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108959
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
As expected:
$ git bisect bad e8109bd87766be88
e8109bd87766be88e83fe88a44433dae16358a02 is the first bad commit
commit e8109bd87766be88e83fe88a44433dae16358a02
Author: Martin Jambor
Date: Fri Feb 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109025
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C code seems to be:
g_86, g_472, g_1844, func_4_p_8;
func_4() {
int *l_3175 = _86;
for (; g_1844; g_1844 -= 1) {
g_472 = 1;
for (; g_472; g_472 += 1)
if (func_4_p_8)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109025
Bug ID: 109025
Summary: ice in nested_in_vect_loop_p
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109025
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #5)
> (In reply to David Binderman from comment #4)
> > I will have a go at a bisection. 825 git commits in the range.
>
> Current range seems to be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109025
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109025
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Note using &, | or ^ causes the ICE. Using + or - or * does not.
Interesting.
> Here is more simplified testcase:
Thanks for that. I will have a go at a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109025
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #6)
> Range now seems to be g:d699d32f47833cfa .. g:3b54cc9d04c2efb2,
> with 52 commits in the range.
Now downto g:0cbb756fe9c8e13a .. g:7e3ce73849fef8b5, with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109025
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #4)
> I will have a go at a bisection. 825 git commits in the range.
Current range seems to be g:59ad8b684dd67e17 .. g:1191a412bb17a734,
with 206 commits in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109031
Bug ID: 109031
Summary: csmith: possible bad code with -O2
-fno-strict-aliasing
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108825
Bug ID: 108825
Summary: error during GIMPLE pass: unrolljam
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108825
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #2)
> Trying revision 1191a412bb17a734.
Seems bad. Trying 59ad8b684dd67e17.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108825
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108825
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
git range now seems to be g:59ad8b684dd67e17 .. g:3b54cc9d04c2efb2,
which is 103 commits.
701 - 800 of 1078 matches
Mail list logo
