http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55271
Bug #: 55271
Summary: missing warning set-but-unused
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55271
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-11-11
18:42:25 UTC ---
oh, was over-simplified example. Sorry
void f1()
{
char ch;
char *p = ch;
*p = 0;
}
Now 2 variables are 'set-but-unused'?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728
--- Comment #13 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2013-01-02
13:47:43 UTC ---
fix original problem for me too
Thank You
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
gcc-trunk rev.204248
configured as
~/src/gcc_current/configure
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
trunk r205300 Fedora19/x86_64 configured as
~/src/gcc_current/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc_current
--with-multilib-list=m64 --enable-checking=fold
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59260
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 31277
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31277action=edit
proposed patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59260
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59260
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
$ uname -a
Linux dim.cp.ru 3.11.9-200.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Nov 20 21:22:24 UTC 2013
x86_64
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
$ uname -a
Linux dim.cp.ru 3.11.9-200.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Nov 20 21:22:24 UTC 2013
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Fedora 19 x86_64
r205459 PASS
r205527 FAIL
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc_current/libexec/gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
enough --enable-checking=yes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
first FAIL r205461
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
Strange, can't reproduce. You are using --with-arch=native --with=native,
what exactly it expands to?
[dimhen@dim PR59350]$ ~/bin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
--- Comment #8 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
Still can't reproduce.
PASS
/home/dimhen/bin/gcc_205461_yes/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.9.0/cc1plus
-fpreprocessed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 31409
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31409action=edit
valgrind' log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
--- Comment #10 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Dmitry G. Dyachenko from comment #8)
valgrind' messages looks unrelated to ICE.
I rebuild r205461 with memset(set, {0,0x42}, n_bytes) instead of
VALGRIND_DISCARD
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
--- Comment #11 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Ryan Mansfield from comment #9)
Created attachment 31410 [details]
arm-eabi testcase
I haven't been able to reproduce with the inline testcase either. But I can
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
--- Comment #19 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #18)
I cannot reproduce with --enable-checking=yes,rtl. Are you saying that the
ICE depends on whether 'rtl' is present in the checking
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
--- Comment #20 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
may be r205461 trigger latent bug?
There are no ICE with -fno-split-wide-types or without arch/tune=corei7
I can run gdb if it'll usefull
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
--- Comment #22 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #21)
What I don't get in that in comment 8 there is a command line with a PASS
and then FAIL has prev.cmd -march=corei7 -mtune=corei7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
--- Comment #23 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #21)
What I don't get in that in comment 8 there is a command line with a PASS
and then FAIL has prev.cmd -march=corei7 -mtune=corei7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
--- Comment #25 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
After reading http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-12/msg01344.html about
corei7 tuning (Corei7 tuning doesn't set -maccumulate-outgoing-args option by
default)
I check
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
--- Comment #27 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
An other box with Fedora 18 / AMD Athlon I cant reproduce (r205515)
How do you think, what is the right way to go?
[I already tests RAM with memtest]
run 2 GDBs and search
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
--- Comment #34 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #33)
OK, thanks for the testcase, which boils down to:
FAIL for me too
r205459 PASS
r205461, r206013 FAIL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54632
Bug #: 54632
Summary: not supported in LTO streams : tree code '�F ��D�� `
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54632
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-09-20
07:56:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 28226
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28226
lto_output_tree() : print *expr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54632
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-09-23
09:22:20 UTC ---
191649 FAIL
and, sorry, i cant reduce testcase :(
if i run
'g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/home/dimhen/src/CSPbuild/shared/cplib -I../..
-I/usr/local
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54632
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-09-23
09:33:32 UTC ---
new in r191649 is eer.location -- DateTime.cpp:934:1
line 934 is outermost '}' in src file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54632
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-09-23
10:55:08 UTC ---
valgrind show no any appropriate with debug-compiled gcc, only over-optimized
access in parser.
Hmmm, i am under impression that BUILD_CONFIG=bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54689
Bug #: 54689
Summary: sparseset.h:147 Conditional jump or move depends on
uninitialised value(s)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54632
--- Comment #10 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-09-24
09:46:12 UTC ---
for me testcase FAIl with -O2 -flto --param ggc-min-heapsize=0
and OK with -O3 -flto --param ggc-min-expand=0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54689
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-09-24
11:35:56 UTC ---
189310 OK
189563 OK
189602 OK
189648 OK
190510 FAIL
190556 FAIL
190613 FAIL
190868 FAIL
191105 FAIL
191129 FAIL
191244 FAIL
191356 FAIL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54689
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54702
Bug #: 54702
Summary: lto1: internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node
failed
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728
Bug #: 54728
Summary: [4.8 regression] ICE in input_gimple_stmt, at
gimple-streamer-in.c:254
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-09-27
12:27:33 UTC ---
for reduced test case:
$ cp fun1.ii fun2.ii
$ g++...
$ cat fun1.ii
class G;
template typename, typename = G class A;
class B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-01
10:16:50 UTC ---
different (less) testcase
this code must be compiled with '-O1'.
w/o '-O1' or with '-O0' err not triggered
$ cat f1.ii
namespace std
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54794
Bug #: 54794
Summary: [4.8 regression] tree code '�F Hc���' is not supported
in LTO streams
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54794
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-03
14:04:06 UTC ---
i have 23 src-files hence 23 ii-files with about 50Mb code
if i remove any file from build then err not triggered
(at beginning there were 29 files
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54794
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-07
10:26:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Thanks for any help in reducing this (very likely some random BLOCK again) ;)
If you don't end up with a significantly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54794
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-10
15:12:19 UTC ---
creduc'ing it was very slow.
r192289 FAIL
r192295 PASS
probably r192293 fix it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54794
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54898
Bug #: 54898
Summary: [4.8 regression] ICE in uniquify_nodes, at
lto/lto.c:1898
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54898
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-11
10:11:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 28422
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28422
2.cpp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980
Bug #: 54980
Summary: [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected
gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in
gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-18
23:05:38 UTC ---
192502 OK
$ g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc_current_192502/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-18
23:51:33 UTC ---
more reduced
$ cat 1.ii
extern C class A
{
};
template int (*t_parser) () class B
{
virtual int parse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-19
00:08:54 UTC ---
and more
$ cat 1.ii
class A
{
};
template int (*t_parser) () class B
{
virtual int parse ()
{
A a;
t_parser
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-19
10:26:35 UTC ---
192517 OK
192548 FAIL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-20
14:28:28 UTC ---
192529 OK
192538 FAIL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980
--- Comment #8 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-24
09:58:31 UTC ---
i re-check 192757
--enable-checking=release FAIL with
$ bash -x tf.sh
+ g++ -flto -fpreprocessed -c 1.ii -o 1.o
+ g++ -flto -O1 -fpreprocessed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980
--- Comment #9 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-24
10:00:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
This does not seem to reproduce for me. The following patch should however fix
it.
Index: tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980
--- Comment #10 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-24
12:50:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
This does not seem to reproduce for me. The following patch should however fix
it.
Index: tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55055
Bug #: 55055
Summary: [4.8 regression] RTL check: expected code 'reg', have
'subreg' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1123
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55079
Bug #: 55079
Summary: [4.8 regeression] false positive -Warray-bounds
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55085
Bug #: 55085
Summary: [4.8 regression] false positive -Warray-bounds
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55085
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-26
15:56:16 UTC ---
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc_current/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.8.0/lto-wrapper
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55055
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830
Bug #: 56830
Summary: abstract_variables_map
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|abstract_variables_map
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2013-04-03
11:56:35 UTC ---
Fedora 18/x64
$ LANG=C gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc_current/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2013-04-03
12:18:03 UTC ---
197404 FAIL too.
I'll try to reduce testcase
g++ -O0 PASS
g++ -O1 FAIL
I fail select -f... option responsible to FAIL due
after
gcc -c -Q
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2013-04-04
07:40:15 UTC ---
197374 PASS
197375 FAIL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2013-04-04
18:27:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 29806
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29806
ICE with -O1 only
$ g++ -Wall -O1 -fpreprocessed -c 56830.ii
56830.ii
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2013-04-04
18:45:56 UTC ---
strictly speaking this is 'pre-4.8.0' regression
gcc version 4.8.0 20130313 (experimental) [trunk revision 196628] (GCC)
$ /usr/local
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830
--- Comment #8 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2013-04-04
18:50:49 UTC ---
You are right, sounds like PR34949
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949
--- Comment #33 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2013-04-09
10:07:47 UTC ---
*** Bug 56830 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56961
Bug #: 56961
Summary: cycle between do_spec_1() / process_brace_body() /
handle_braces()
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56961
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2013-04-15
08:01:24 UTC ---
gcc-4.7.2 / Fedora 18 FAIL too
gcc version 4.7.2 20121109 (Red Hat 4.7.2-8) (GCC)
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
198366 PASS
198828 FAIL
$ g++ -fpreprocessed -flto -c a.ii -o a.o
$ g++ -fpreprocessed -flto -c b.ii -o b.o
$ g++ -shared a.o b.o -O -flto -flto-partition=none -o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57267
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
198815 FAIL
: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
r199075 FAIL
$ cat x.i
void foo ( int a)
{}
void *a;
void bar ()
{
void **( *b ) ( ) = foo;
a = b ( 0 );
}
$ gcc -fpreprocessed -O3 -c x.i
x.i: In function 'bar':
x.i:7:24: warning
in
int_fits_type_p, at tree.c:8437
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
r199075 FAIL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57331
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
r198354 PASS
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc_current_198354/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.9.0/lto-wrapper
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57330
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
PASS versions from Fedora 18/19
gcc version 4.7.2 20121109 (Red Hat 4.7.2-8) (GCC)
gcc version 4.8.0 20130412 (Red Hat 4.8.0-2) (GCC)
both configured with --enable-checking
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
r199075 FAIL
$ cat main.ii
extern C void soap_call_lcdpanel__AskLCDPanelYesNo ();
main ()
{
soap_call_lcdpanel__AskLCDPanelYesNo ();
}
$ cat a.i
soap_serializeheader
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57267
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
testcase fixed in 198917
is this PR duplicate of lto/57038 ?
and how it's related to lto/47375 ? Sounds like PR number mismatch...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57267
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53848
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-07-04
10:18:03 UTC ---
extern C
{
struct s {
enum {
e = 0
} f;
};
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53848
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-07-04
10:19:37 UTC ---
r189094 OK
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57334
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
gcc-4.8:
PASS:
196672 (pre-4.8.0)
199240 gcc (GCC) 4.8.1 20130523 (prerelease)
gcc-4.9:
PASS 198354
FAIL 199000, 199239
simlified testcase
$ cat a.i
void foo ()
{
}
void bar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57334
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
I've seen this ICE before I think.
else if (code == GIMPLE_LABEL)
gcc_assert (emit_label_in_global_context_p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57334
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE: in input_gimple_stmt, |[4.9
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
$ cat foo.i
void foo()
{
}
$ gcc -fpreprocessed -flto -c foo.i
$ ld -m elf_x86_64 -r -o hidden.o --whole-archive foo.o --no-whole-archive
$ objcopy -G bar hidden.o
$ cp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57613
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
I don't think it works that way, hidden visibility makes it non-exported from
the dynamic object but it's still visible inside
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57613
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
: preprocessor
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
gcc version 4.9.0 20130629 (experimental) [trunk revision 200565] (GCC)
gcc version 4.8.1 20130603 (Red Hat 4.8.1-1) (GCC)
if I uncomment first line in x.ii : // #2064 3
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
rev. 202352
Fedora 19/x86_64
configured as
~/src/gcc_current/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc_current
--with-multilib-list=m64 --enable-checking=release
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
rev.202478 FAIL
rev.202421 OK
Fedora 19/x86_64
configured as
~/src/gcc_current/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc_current
--with-multilib-list=m64 --enable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58386
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
Forget to mention: FAIL from c#1 was with make -j5 / 4 CPU
with -enable-checking=release and 'make' FAIL differ
checking for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc...
/home/dimhen/build
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Created attachment 30838
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30838action=edit
testcase
gcc-4.9 rev.202642
Fedora 19/x86_64
ICE with -O3
PASS with -O2
$ gcc -v
Using built
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc_current/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.9.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: /home/dimhen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58350
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61631
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
r212556 FAIL
r212517 PASS
~/src/gcc_current/configure --enable-checking=fold --disable-multilib
make
[...]
make[3]: Entering
1 - 100 of 354 matches
Mail list logo
