http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791
--- Comment #22 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13
14:02:48 UTC ---
The patch in PR 33704 makes no changes to libstdc++ or to any GCC , so I have
no idea why you are seeing C++ errors compiling c-lang.c. Something else
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791
--- Comment #24 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-14
14:20:06 UTC ---
I successfully built GCC 4.7 earlier this week.
You may need to use GMP 4.3.2, not GMP 5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53300
--- Comment #19 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15
14:04:10 UTC ---
The problem still is present, but when I asked Honza about the status on IRC,
he seemed to say the work-around patch was the correct fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55384
Bug #: 55384
Summary: [4.8 Regresson] VEC merge AIX bootstrap failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55384
--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-18 22:01:56
UTC ---
Created attachment 28727
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28727
c-lex.c preprocessed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55384
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-18 22:02:44
UTC ---
Created attachment 28728
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28728
tree-dump.c preprocessed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55384
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55384
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55384
--- Comment #4 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-19 00:21:59
UTC ---
AIX /usr/include/stdlib.h includes
#define vec_free free
And vec.h defines two functions named vec_free, which get renamed, causing
ambiguity
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55276
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55276
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-19 16:58:42
UTC ---
Author: dje
Date: Mon Nov 19 16:58:31 2012
New Revision: 193628
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193628
Log:
2012-11-19 Mans
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55384
--- Comment #6 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-19 18:07:35
UTC ---
Author: dje
Date: Mon Nov 19 18:07:21 2012
New Revision: 193629
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193629
Log:
Add PR bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55384
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55276
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52887
--- Comment #25 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-26
02:50:22 UTC ---
The instantiations definitely should be in libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/regex.cc in
the GCC 4.7 release branch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791
--- Comment #28 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-27
20:42:06 UTC ---
Is the executable size due to debugging information? Do the RPMs contain
stripped executables?
I do not know why your build is failing. It looks like
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791
--- Comment #30 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-28
19:35:36 UTC ---
1) how did you install the gcc(you said it works on your aix) ? I mean what
mpfr,gmp, libmpc did you use and how did you install them?
I built gmp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791
--- Comment #33 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-01
21:42:10 UTC ---
You cannot ask legal questions and expect to receive an answer.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55562
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55563
Bug #: 55563
Summary: OpenMP not marking variable as thread-local
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55563
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55594
Bug #: 55594
Summary: [4.8 Regression] -Wa,-nH incorrectly added to compile
line of all targets
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55594
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55594
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-06 19:25:05
UTC ---
AIX as manual:
-n Name
Specifies the name that appears in the header of the assembler
listing. By default, the header
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55636
Bug #: 55636
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Fortran name mangling collides with
user namespace
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55636
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||assemble
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28586
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-aix |powerpc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55562
--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18 17:30:55
UTC ---
I did a quick test on powerpc-ibm-aix and the patch seems to fix the problem.
You should have access to a lot of PPC systems for testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55586
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55865
Bug #: 55865
Summary: [4.8 Regression] vect-outer-fir-big-array.c vectorizer
failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55865
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu |x86_64-pc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
Bug #: 55889
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at
sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns
-fselective-scheduling
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55594
--- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07 16:32:04
UTC ---
I re-ran a patched version of configure on AIX and it correctly does not define
HWCAP_FLAGS as -nH, so the configure patch seems to work as intended
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc*-*-*|powerpc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #4 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-09 02:52:51
UTC ---
Selective scheduling is failing for one of the new AIX TLS instructions when
encountered for that testcase. The necessary options are:
-O -fschedule
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-11 14:37:21
UTC ---
Created attachment 29147
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29147
sched-verbose=6 dump output for failing testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #9 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18 16:49:08
UTC ---
Created attachment 29208
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29208
sched-verbose=9 dump output with debugging patch applied
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #10 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18
16:57:00 UTC ---
Neither insn 24/145 nor insn 28 move through insn 17. The two UNSPEC 44 insn
(LC..2,, LCM..2) are inputs to insn 17. The pseudos are moved into r3 and r4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #14 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21
15:13:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 29237
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29237
auto-host.h for AIX 7.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #15 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21
15:16:04 UTC ---
libbacktrace only supports ELF file format and AIX does not use ELF, so
libbacktrace will not work on AIX.
Also, you patch called libbacktrace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #17 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21
15:37:48 UTC ---
AIX 5.3 does not support TLS, so there are pieces not implemented in
config/rs6000/aix53.h. Jakub's configuration probably will not work.
Also, GNU
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #18 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21
15:41:24 UTC ---
Probably something like
Index: rs6000.c
===
--- rs6000.c(revision 195319
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #22 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-24
02:35:33 UTC ---
I don't understand your analysis. Prior to sched1, the pr50907.c.205r.asmcons
RTL dump looks like:
(insn 15 14 16 2 (set (reg:SI 3 3)
(mem/u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #24 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-24
16:37:23 UTC ---
It does not matter if the scheduler knows that insns 17, 20, 26 and 29 really
are calls. The clobbers express everything important.
insn 15 produces
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47115
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55105
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pedzsan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54601
--- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-30 16:59:13
UTC ---
Created attachment 29307
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29307
cxa_atexit implementation in libgcc
This version of the patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54601
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29307|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54601
--- Comment #9 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-31 04:52:51
UTC ---
This is going to be more difficult because __dso_handle needs to be provided by
a new crt file supplied by GCC, not by the libraries. That is the way
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54601
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29311|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #25 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-31
17:50:07 UTC ---
15: r3 = rhs0
17: r3 = rhs1 (r3, ..., !r65)
20: use(r3)
24: r3 = rhs2
26: r3 = rhs3 (r3, ..., !r65)
29: use(r3)
Insn 24 does not depend on r65
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54601
--- Comment #12 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-01
20:26:37 UTC ---
Author: dje
Date: Fri Feb 1 20:26:24 2013
New Revision: 195675
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195675
Log:
PR target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58816
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
/home/dje/src/src/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/gen-attrs-11.C: In instantiation
of 'struct Oint::I':
/home/dje/src/src/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/gen-attrs-11.C:17:16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58816
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The patch solves the regression in my recent bootstrap (testresults sent to
mailinglist).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58838
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58838
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Index: rs6000.md
===
--- rs6000.md (revision 203930)
+++ rs6000.md (working copy)
@@ -2699,7 +2699,7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58838
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 31071
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31071action=edit
Disable mullw. dot form in 64 bit mode
Revised patch that also disables splitters.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58838
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58838
--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dje
Date: Wed Oct 23 14:32:32 2013
New Revision: 203977
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203977root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/58838
* config/rs6000/rs6000
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58838
--- Comment #6 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dje
Date: Thu Oct 24 12:53:51 2013
New Revision: 204009
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204009root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2013-10-23 David
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58838
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
/nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/libgcc/libgcov.c: In function 'gcov_exit':
/nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/libgcc/libgcov.c:827:1: internal compiler error: in
up
date_costs_from_allocno, at ira-color.c:1334
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58933
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58934
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|cris-axis-elf, |cris-axis-elf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59208
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33704
--- Comment #23 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dje
Date: Sat Nov 23 15:38:07 2013
New Revision: 205309
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205309root=gccview=rev
Log:
libgcc:
PR target/33704
* config/rs6000
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57386
--- Comment #8 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Mike, can you apply the patch to the 4.8 branch?
Thanks, David
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54142
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52890
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54497
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38607
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38607
--- Comment #20 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
23:23:45 UTC ---
Author: dje
Date: Fri Sep 14 23:23:41 2012
New Revision: 191316
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191316
Log:
PR target/38607
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52887
--- Comment #23 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-16
02:36:27 UTC ---
I do not see the extraneous symbols using the example in comment #22 when
compiling with trunk. Also, the example G++ invocation does not enable any
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-03 13:46:44
UTC ---
Constructors are working because they work without your big header. I would
try using divide and conquer techniques to reduce the big header and find out
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54601
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50874
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55067
Bug #: 55067
Summary: [4.8 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure due to lra.c
loc_t
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55067
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55068
Bug #: 55068
Summary: [4.8 Regression] AIX bootstrap in push_reload() after
LRA merge
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55068
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54850
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791
--- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-03 13:48:46
UTC ---
The New York area has experienced a major natural disaster. I am located near
NYC. GCC support is provided by volunteers. Repeatedly resending your
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791
--- Comment #11 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05
18:54:47 UTC ---
I believe that the G++ front end tries to create a unique name from the first
symbol it sees. I do not now if this is related to the constructor name
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791
--- Comment #13 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-06
14:46:34 UTC ---
Because if you have a function declared as inline in a header file that gets
propagated to multiple source files is ok, but in my case that inline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791
--- Comment #16 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07
01:27:00 UTC ---
G++ should create one specially named _GLOBAL__I_N_X function per
constructor. collect2 sorts the constructors based on the N priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||33704
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56228
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-06 18:15:17
UTC ---
The proposed patch LGTM.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53040
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55431
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #31 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-15
16:15:19 UTC ---
With the patch, the testcase no longer ICEs when compiled on powerpc-aix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54100
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38607
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56729
Bug #: 56729
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE in df_insn_delete
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56729
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc
1 - 100 of 1155 matches
Mail list logo