[Bug fortran/96320] gfortran 8-10 shape mismatch in assumed-length dummy argument character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres --- With the attached patch I get several ICEs: (lldb) run /opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/asan/pointer_assign_16.f90 Process 88073 launched: '/opt/gcc/gcc11w/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin19.5.

[Bug fortran/95397] [Fortran/OpenACC] Wrong results with 'loop vector' inside 'routine'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95397 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > :-| Hmm, strange. What GPU hardware and CUDA version is that? AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, hence no CUDA AFAIK. I also don't know what I should with AMD.

[Bug fortran/96320] gfortran 8-10 shape mismatch in assumed-length dummy argument character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/96320] gfortran 8-10 shape mismatch in assumed-length dummy argument character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Fortran 2008 added module subroutine interface bodies specifically to allow > interface bodies in the same scope a the corresponding procedure definitions. > In order to avoid duplication, the standa

[Bug fortran/96320] gfortran 8-10 shape mismatch in assumed-length dummy argument character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-26 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/94327] Bind(c) argument attributes are incorrectly set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94327 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/82018] -Wextra should imply -Wconversion-extra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82018 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/92122] [coarrays, polymophism] Error 'must be a scalar of type LOCK_TYPE'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92122 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-25 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/95397] [Fortran/OpenACC] Wrong results with 'loop vector' inside 'routine'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95397 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-25 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libfortran/93592] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with EN descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/93567] G edit descriptor uses E instead of F editing in rounding mode UP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/94958] gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:9797: possible typo ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94958 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||damian at sourceryinstitute dot o

[Bug fortran/56675] I/O: Check edit descriptors with READ/WRITE used in FORMAT statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56675 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/28397] Check format mismatches at compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28397 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 56675 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug sanitizer/96318] New: FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/strncpy-overflow-1.c * output pattern test with C on Darwin

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, iains at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/88080] Add warning if IMPLICIT NONE is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88080 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/96312] [10/11 Regression] Reallocation on assignment uses undefined variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96312 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/93733] F2008: G0.d output editing for integer/logical/character data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93733 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres --- There are two issues: (1) The standard is not diagnosed at run time. (2) The standard is not diagnosed at compile time when possible. This is pr28397.

[Bug fortran/94738] C descriptor passed to Fortran from C apepars to have wrong type information.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94738 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug libfortran/93567] G edit descriptor uses E instead of F editing in rounding mode UP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 48922 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48922&action=edit Patch adjusted for GCC8 and 9

[Bug libfortran/93592] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with EN descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The patch applies and regtest cleanly down to GCC8. IMO this is nasty wrong code and it should be fixed on all the active branches.

[Bug fortran/92006] storage_size() returns incorrect value on unlimited polymorphic variable (CLASS(*)) when passed a CHARACTER variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92006 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- My draft of the standard says: the argument A shall be a data object of any type. If it is polymorphic it shall not be an undefined pointer. If it is unlimited polymorphic or has any deferred type par

[Bug fortran/94331] Bind(C) corrupts array descriptors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-23 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/93091] [OOP] Apparent bugs in "sizeof" and "transfer" intrinsic functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93091 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/92006] storage_size() returns incorrect value on unlimited polymorphic variable (CLASS(*)) when passed a CHARACTER variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92006 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/93690] Type Bound Generic Assignment Bug Using Intrinsic Assignments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93690 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/94048] ICE and other problems using rank intrinsic to set array size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94048 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/94536] result keyword not working within module function interface in combination with a module procedure body

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94536 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/94738] C descriptor passed to Fortran from C apepars to have wrong type information.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94738 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-23 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/96224] -fdump-tree-original could use more sophisticated or mangled procedure names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96224 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/96294] Compile error for pointer function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96294 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- See https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranStandards.

[Bug fortran/96294] Compile error for pointer function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96294 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONF

[Bug fortran/93733] F2008: G0.d output editing for integer/logical/character data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93733 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The problem is deeper than expected. Consider ! { dg-options "-std=f2008" } program g0d_ilc character(4) :: fmt="(g0)" character(6) :: fmt2="(g0.2)" !F2008: write(*, fmt) 23 write(*, fmt) .t

[Bug fortran/92091] Inconsistent diagnostics for INCLUDE vs. #include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92091 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libfortran/93567] G edit descriptor uses E instead of F editing in rounding mode UP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- patch submitted at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-July/054770.html.

[Bug libfortran/93592] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with EN descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Patch submitted at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-July/054769.html.

[Bug libfortran/93567] G edit descriptor uses E instead of F editing in rounding mode UP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Simpler patch with comments --- ../_clean/libgfortran/io/write_float.def2020-06-13 03:11:55.0 +0200 +++ libgfortran/io/write_float.def 2020-07-21 23:03:08.0 +0200 @@ -987,16 +

[Bug libfortran/93592] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with EN descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 --- Comment #7 from Dominique

[Bug libfortran/93592] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with EN descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 48910 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48910&action=edit Extensive test with RN and EN

[Bug libfortran/93592] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with EN descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 48909 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48909&action=edit Extensive test with RZ and EN

[Bug fortran/94070] Assumed-rank arrays – bounds mishandled, SIZE/SHAPE/UBOUND/LBOUND

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94070 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-21 Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/96255] [F2018] Implement optional type spec for index in DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/94599] Invalid constructor for derived types with recursive allocatable components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94599 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-21 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/88080] Add warning if IMPLICIT NONE is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88080 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-21 Status|UNC

[Bug libfortran/93567] G edit descriptor uses E instead of F editing in rounding mode UP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > It gets complicated quickly with all the corner cases. I tried to simplify, but I did find anything simpler and working. > Last line of the added logic needs a space before the 0 Yes. I have lea

[Bug libfortran/93567] G edit descriptor uses E instead of F editing in rounding mode UP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Test case --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/round_3.f08 2020-06-13 03:11:54.0 +0200 +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/round_3.f08 2020-07-21 01:14:56.0 +0200 @@ -110,6 +110

[Bug libfortran/93567] G edit descriptor uses E instead of F editing in rounding mode UP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The patch in comment 3 broke gfortran.dg/round_3.f08. The following should work --- ../_clean/libgfortran/io/write_float.def2020-06-13 03:11:55.0 +0200 +++ libgfortran/io/write_float.def

[Bug fortran/92643] ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 failure on i586-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92643 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > As of svn reversion r280157, the issue is not fixed. Do you know the git equivalent?

[Bug libfortran/93567] G edit descriptor uses E instead of F editing in rounding mode UP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- With --- ../_clean/libgfortran/io/write_float.def2020-06-13 03:11:55.0 +0200 +++ libgfortran/io/write_float.def 2020-07-20 18:17:41.0 +0200 @@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ determine_en_pr

[Bug fortran/93336] BIND(C) and CHARACTER arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93336 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-20 Status|UNC

[Bug libfortran/91543] [10/11 Regression] nf failure ( Handling stack overflow more sensibly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91543 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-20 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/94931] request: print include path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94931 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Severity|normal

[Bug fortran/93289] array constructor of different length: Missing diagnostic when PARAMETER is in list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93289 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/92643] ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 failure on i586-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92643 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-20 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libfortran/94586] trigd_lib.inc:84:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'fmaf'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94586 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-20 Priority|P3

[Bug libfortran/93567] G edit descriptor uses E instead of F editing in rounding mode UP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/94958] gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:9797: possible typo ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94958 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/93592] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with EN descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle2 at outlook dot com T

[Bug libfortran/93592] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with EN descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 48895 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48895&action=edit Extensive test with RD and EN It would be nice to check that I did not make any mistake.

[Bug libfortran/93592] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with EN descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 48894 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48894&action=edit Extensive test with RU and EN

[Bug libfortran/93592] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with EN descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- --- ../_clean/libgfortran/io/write_float.def2020-06-13 03:11:55.0 +0200 +++ libgfortran/io/write_float.def 2020-07-19 22:46:57.0 +0200 @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ build_float_string (s

[Bug testsuite/95538] Unfinished cleanup in the test suite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95538 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/93733] F2008: G0.d output editing for integer/logical/character data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93733 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Please explain, what valid code according to Fortran 2008 does -std=f2008 > reject? FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_g0_4.f08 -O (test for excess errors)

[Bug fortran/93733] F2008: G0.d output editing for integer/logical/character data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93733 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Agreed, that should fix the bug. But reject valid too! AFAIU this cannot captured ay the format level.

[Bug fortran/93733] F2008: G0.d output editing for integer/logical/character data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93733 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- With --- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/io.c 2020-07-01 18:25:56.0 +0200 +++ gcc/fortran/io.c2020-07-14 11:06:50.0 +0200 @@ -894,7 +894,13 @@ data_desc: &for

[Bug libfortran/93550] Implement control of leading zero in formatted numeric output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93550 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/86268] [9.0] Error on correct code with PDTs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86268 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/85942] ICE with PDTs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85942 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/86148] parameterized type compile time error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86148 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/91022] A suspicious code in fortran/decl.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91022 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/69654] ICE in gfc_trans_structure_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69654 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/64120] [F03] Wrong handling of allocatable character string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64120 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libfortran/92836] segfault with inquire()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92836 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/92959] ICE in gfc_conv_associated, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:8634

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92959 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/88632] [F08] function contained in module invisible to submodule unless declared public

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88632 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/94324] [10/11 regression] gfortran.dg/default_format_1.f90 etc. FAIL on 32-bit Solaris/x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94324 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > Is it a fortran bug or a bug in a Solaris lib? > > The latter, I suspect (or rather: the Studio compiler used to build > them). However, I'd like

[Bug fortran/94324] [10/11 regression] gfortran.dg/default_format_1.f90 etc. FAIL on 32-bit Solaris/x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94324 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-13 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/37336] [F03] Finish derived-type finalization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/92976] [8 Regression][OOP] ICE in trans_associate_var, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:1963

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92976 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/88247] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in get_array_ctor_var_strlen, at fortran/trans-array.c:2068

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88247 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/94246] [9 Regression] valgrind error for ./gfortran.dg/bessel_5.f90 since r9-1566-g87c789f1c0b2df41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/93794] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.c:2497

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93794 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/93833] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in trans_array_constructor, at fortran/trans-array.c:2566

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93833 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/93701] ICE on associate of wrongly accessed array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93701 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/31593] Invariant DO loop variables and subroutines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31593 --- Comment #47 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The assignee is Tobias Schlüter, but the PR is not marked as assigned. Is Tobias still interested? If no, the PR should be unassigned.

[Bug fortran/93736] Add .f18 and .F18 file suffixes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93736 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/93736] Add .f18 and .F18 file suffixes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93736 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/93567] G edit descriptor uses E instead of F editing in rounding mode UP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/93733] F2008: G0.d output editing for integer/logical/character data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93733 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libfortran/93727] Fortran 2018: EX edit descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93727 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-12 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/93948] Surprising option processing of -fdec and -fdec-math in combination with -std

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93948 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-12 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/95998] gfc_typename use of static memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95998 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > If we ever have three occurences of gfc_typename in a function list, > like > > foo (gfc_typename(a), gfc_typename(b), gfc_typename(c)); > > we will get the wrong result for the third one. We will

[Bug fortran/94408] Spurious error: ‘rw_nl_grid’ must be a module procedure or an external procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94408 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/93671] gfortran 8-10 ICE on intrinsic assignment to allocatable derived-type component of coarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93671 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/93592] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with EN descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-11 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/96122] Segfault when using finalizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96122 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-08 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug preprocessor/96069] -ffile-prefix-map does not affect print in gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96069 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- If you need to get the gfortran developers attention, you must submit your patch to fort...@gcc.gnu.org.

[Bug preprocessor/96069] -ffile-prefix-map does not affect print in gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96069 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Also note that I've already submitted patches to fix this though > I haven't got a reply yet. Where did you submit the patches?

[Bug preprocessor/96069] -ffile-prefix-map does not affect print in gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96069 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |preprocessor --- Comment #3 from

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >