--- Comment #14 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-11 19:02
---
Subject: Bug 23454
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Aug 11 19:02:45 2006
New Revision: 116089
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116089
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/23454
*
--- Comment #15 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-11 19:04
---
Subject: Bug 23454
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Aug 11 19:04:04 2006
New Revision: 116090
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116090
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/23454
--- Comment #16 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-11 19:06
---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00375.html
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-24 15:42
---
> I wonder if this is related to PR 28834 at all.
The ICE stems from a new sanity check in the DWARF-2 back-end and we have
fixed the problem in Gigi.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28591
--- Comment #17 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 14:00
---
Andrew, please remove the superfluous TAB you've added in
+ * tree-inline.c (setup_one_parameter): Strip useless
+ type conversion before adding it to the IR.
on the 4.1 branch at least. T
--- Comment #14 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-04 19:33
---
Subject: Bug 27616
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Sep 4 19:33:24 2006
New Revision: 116683
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116683
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/27616
--- Comment #15 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-04 19:35
---
Subject: Bug 27616
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Sep 4 19:35:09 2006
New Revision: 116684
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116684
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/27616
--- Comment #16 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-04 19:38
---
Fixed everywhere.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-05 07:06
---
Subject: Bug 28386
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Sep 5 07:06:46 2006
New Revision: 116693
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116693
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/28386
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-05 07:08
---
Fixed in upcoming 4.1.2 release.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-06 16:04
---
Confirmed according to the RTL logs.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 20:45
---
The approach looks OK but the fix should use invalidate_any_buried_refs.
Post the revised version to gcc-patches if it works (read the guidelines on
http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html) and I'll formally ap
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-09 22:09
---
> it looks like ifcvt messes up in pass 3 and puts the post-inc in the
> cond-exec block.
It's actually the combiner that wrongly ditches the post-inc, at least with
the last set of options
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 12:12
---
Please provide a testcase as well as the other required bits of info.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 12:26
---
Works with 4.0.4pre so regression on 4.1 branch.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 12:26
---
Investigating.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 21:27
---
Subject: Bug 28636
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Sep 10 21:27:36 2006
New Revision: 116827
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116827
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/28636
* c
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 21:28
---
Subject: Bug 28636
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Sep 10 21:28:03 2006
New Revision: 116828
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116828
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/28636
* c
--- Comment #9 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 21:28
---
Subject: Bug 28636
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Sep 10 21:28:39 2006
New Revision: 116829
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116829
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/28636
* c
--- Comment #10 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 21:34
---
Fixed everywhere.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-11 10:42
---
> Here's another test case, taken from maxdb:
Please do not attach "other" testcases to a PR, the underlying problems are
very
likely unrelated. Only testcases reduced from the original o
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-11 19:28
---
Subject: Bug 28726
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Sep 11 19:28:11 2006
New Revision: 116855
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116855
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/28726
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-11 19:28
---
Subject: Bug 28726
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Sep 11 19:28:41 2006
New Revision: 116856
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116856
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/28726
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-11 19:32
---
Fixed in upcoming 4.1.2 release.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-11 23:01
---
> Thank you for the fix. And for serving the GCC to the community. :)
You're welcome. Thanks for reporting the problem and for the nice testcase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28726
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-12 06:18
---
Investigating.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-12 06:29
---
Confirmed, known problem in the 4.x series of compilers.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
Summary|All error messages produce |[4.0/4.1/4.2
--- Comment #11 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-12 06:35
---
I've never been able to reproduce this. Do you still have the problem with
the 4.x series of compiler?
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29025
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-12 07:20
---
Created an attachment (id=12235)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12235&action=view)
Fix.
Patch against 4.1 branch but should apply to any 4.x trees in the ada/ subdir.
Please use it
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-12 11:43
---
> It looks like this may be fixed on the mainline? At least the C testcase from
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg00198.html no longer shows
> overflowed constants.
Right, the wa
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-12 20:00
---
> The invalid REG_DEAD note triggered an ICE during sched1 with a 4.1.1
> based compiler with ENABLE_CHECKING set, compiling for sh4-elf with -O2
> -fno-exceptions.
>
> I can replicate the invali
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-12 21:48
---
Subject: Bug 28243
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Sep 12 21:48:40 2006
New Revision: 116906
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116906
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/28243
* c
--- Comment #9 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-12 21:49
---
Subject: Bug 28243
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Sep 12 21:49:45 2006
New Revision: 116907
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116907
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/28243
* c
--- Comment #10 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-12 21:54
---
Fixed in upcoming 4.1.2 release.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 06:46
---
Investigating.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 07:57
---
> The removed comment says:
>
> - /* If will do cse, generate all results into pseudo registers
> - since 1) that allows cse to find more things
> - and 2) otherwise cse could prod
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 08:18
---
> There might be problems if no matching set can be found in the current
> basic block. I'll have to think about how to best check for this.
> I'm currently leaning to add a field in struct d
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 08:24
---
Roger, could you comment on Ramana's proposition? Thanks in advance.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #14 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 08:32
---
Please indicate whether it's a regression from earlier versions of GCC.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #13 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 08:37
---
If the ICE has disappeared on both branches, the testcase should be added to
the testsuite and the PR closed.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 08:44
---
Please indicate the version(s) of the compiler, whether it's a regression, etc.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.0/4.1/4.2 regression]|[4.1/4.2 regression]
|procedure doesn't m
--- Comment #15 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 17:37
---
> But the bug still exists, just was covered up by my tree-inline patches for PR
> 28075.
Your patch may simply be the fix. If we have no testcase, we have no bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bu
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 18:09
---
> I have installed the fix and the problem is now resolved.
> I have tested it on a large program and it is OK.
Great, thanks for the feedback.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29025
--- Comment #14 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 18:27
---
Subject: Bug 21952
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Sep 13 18:27:24 2006
New Revision: 116926
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116926
Log:
PR ada/21952
--- Comment #15 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 18:27
---
Subject: Bug 21952
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Sep 13 18:27:46 2006
New Revision: 116927
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116927
Log:
PR ada/21952
--- Comment #16 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 18:29
---
Fixed in upcoming 4.1.2 release.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 18:40
---
Subject: Bug 28591
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Sep 13 18:40:26 2006
New Revision: 116928
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116928
Log:
PR ada/28591
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 18:42
---
Fixed on mainline.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 18:48
---
Subject: Bug 29025
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Sep 13 18:48:21 2006
New Revision: 116929
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116929
Log:
PR ada/29025
*
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 18:48
---
Subject: Bug 29025
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Sep 13 18:48:46 2006
New Revision: 116930
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116930
Log:
PR ada/29025
*
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 18:50
---
Fixed in upcoming 4.1.2 release.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 20:28
---
Same on SPARC/Solaris 8 and 9.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 20:40
---
Please, Andrew, stop overwriting my changes. Thanks.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 20:48
---
> If the bugzilla would allow me to merge the changes, it would be better but it
> does not. Also I loaded the page right before you changed stuff and I had
> changed the summary to include [4.2 Regres
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 21:23
---
Subject: Bug 26507
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Sep 13 21:23:28 2006
New Revision: 116931
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116931
Log:
PR other/23541
PR oth
--- Comment #26 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 21:23
---
Subject: Bug 23541
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Sep 13 21:23:28 2006
New Revision: 116931
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116931
Log:
PR other/23541
PR oth
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 21:24
---
Subject: Bug 26507
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Sep 13 21:23:44 2006
New Revision: 116932
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116932
Log:
PR other/23541
PR oth
--- Comment #27 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 21:24
---
Subject: Bug 23541
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Sep 13 21:23:44 2006
New Revision: 116932
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116932
Log:
PR other/23541
PR oth
--- Comment #28 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 21:24
---
Subject: Bug 23541
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Sep 13 21:24:04 2006
New Revision: 116933
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116933
Log:
PR other/23541
PR oth
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 21:24
---
Subject: Bug 26507
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Sep 13 21:24:04 2006
New Revision: 116933
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116933
Log:
PR other/23541
PR oth
--- Comment #29 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 21:25
---
At last.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL
--- Comment #9 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 21:26
---
At last.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29015
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
Summary|[4.1/4.2 regression] Ada ICE|[4.1/4.2
--- Comment #12 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-15 07:31
---
> > Why not use reg_last->sets?
> >
> AFAICT, reg_last[0].sets is live at that point.
Sorry, I don't understand your answer. I was suggesting to use reg_last->sets
to get the last
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-15 08:59
---
Subject: Bug 18817
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Sep 15 08:59:02 2006
New Revision: 116964
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116964
Log:
PR ada/18817
* utils.c (
--- Comment #9 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-15 09:03
---
Fixed on mainline.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-15 18:32
---
Subject: Bug 15802
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Sep 15 18:32:24 2006
New Revision: 116981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116981
Log:
PR ada/15802
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-15 18:37
---
Fixed on mainline.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 11:36
---
> Hmmm, seems this is a known issue that never got fixed. See this thread:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01558.html
And this one: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg0156
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 13:48
---
> + /* TER is not run at -O0, so our representation of alignment
> + information and its propagation is non-existant. */
> + if (!optimize)
> +return 0;
Perhaps
if (!flag_tree_ter)
--- Comment #14 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 05:49
---
> gcc was built with:
>
> PKG_BUILD_GCC_LANGS=c,c++
> test -d objdir || mkdir objdir
> (cd objdir; ../configure \
> --prefix=/opt/aegis \
> --wi
--- Comment #17 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-20 17:38
---
> Yes, this is a regression.
> It works fine with -O2 with my system compiler (FC5 gcc, based on gcc 4.1).
> It also works fine with -O2 using my gcc 4.1 build.
> It fails with svn head.
Thanks
--- Comment #18 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-20 17:39
---
Investigating.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-20 17:42
---
Thanks for the fix.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #32 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-21 14:05
---
> Note that Ada requires a patch to enable struct-aliasing, as it does
Right, there is some confusion in this PR. The problem does *not* exist with
the pristine mainline sources so I'm recla
--- Comment #15 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-21 14:31
---
> mkdir foo
> cd foo
> ../configure
Beginner error I'm afraid. :-) See http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27823
--- Comment #19 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-21 16:09
---
> Eric, it is not forbidden to put objdir into srcdir. It is not
> unsupported to do so.
Simply amazing... Quoting http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html:
"First, we highly recommend that G
--- Comment #35 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-21 16:53
---
> I suspect the reality is there is some fundamental misunderstanding of
> how aliasing or addressability works on the part of the Ada folks (no
> offense to them, it's just the arguments they kee
--- Comment #22 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-21 17:57
---
> I've followed the mail lists for years while this was debated; I
> don't think it's settled. ("./configure; make" definitely isn't
> supported
--- Comment #37 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-24 18:23
---
> No, really, you don't seem to understand.
> If you respect these DECL_NONADDRESSABLE_P or
> TYPE_NONALIASED_COMPONENT flags, you are going to make them unaliased.
> Your whole bug report is
--- Comment #19 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-29 20:40
---
> I don't think this bug has anything to do with excess precision. Valgrind
> shows that, when compiled at -O2, we are reading from uninitialized memory.
Confirmed:
andl-144(
--- Comment #21 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-30 08:50
---
> This smells like an aliasing issue.
But it's not, it's if-conversion.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #22 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-30 13:31
---
Subject: Bug 28096
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sat Sep 30 13:31:29 2006
New Revision: 117331
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117331
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/28096
*
--- Comment #23 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-30 13:35
---
Should work now.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-02 06:37
---
With mainline:
poog% gcc/xgcc -Bgcc -c pr29314.c -mvis -mcpu=ultrasparc -O2
/usr/ccs/bin/as: "/var/tmp//ccPi3BER.s", line 12: error: invalid (misaligned)
register
/usr/ccs/bin/as: "/var/tmp//ccPi3
--- Comment #40 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 14:13
---
> Agreed. The Ada FE should either change or prove that there is a
> design/implementation flaw in the aliasing machinery.
I think we can prove that there is a discrepancy between the Tree type-based
al
--- Comment #10 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 16:13
---
Investigating.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-11 10:43
---
You need to put 'volatile' on hup_rcvd for this to work.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-11 10:53
---
This
> ../configure --with-mpfr=/logiciels/public/gmp-4.1.4/lib --enable-shared
> --with-gnu-as=/logiciels/public/binutils-2.9/bin/as
> --with-gnu-ld=/logiciels/public/binutils-2.9/bin/ld
and
--- Comment #16 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 20:31
---
> I have found the cause of the problem. It isn't a problem with gcc.
>
> I use the binutils shipped with Solaris10 to strip the binaries and create
> separate debug symbol files. If I do not
--- Comment #10 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 10:59
---
> PA-RISC GNU/Linux is not a primary platform, so I've marked this P5. However,
> PA-RISC HP-UX is a primary platform, so if this bug manifests there, please
> set
> this back to P3 with an ex
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot|
|org
--- Comment #15 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 11:38
---
Also fails on SPARC with -O3 -g.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-18 05:18
---
Right, bootstrap has been broken because of that for ages.
I've pinged the patch many times but to no avail...
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Re
401 - 500 of 2634 matches
Mail list logo
