|trivial
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
||a/show_bug.cgi?id=79618
Blocks||40883
CC||egallager at gcc dot
||easyhack
Blocks||40883
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
[Bug 40883] [meta-bug] Translation breakage with trivial fixes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90179
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Roland Illig from comment #2)
> Thanks for the explanation. I think it might make sense to have a static
> analysi
||40883
Keywords||diagnostic, easyhack
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
[Bug 40883] [meta-bug] Translation breakage with trivial
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity|normal |trivial
Keywords||easyhack
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
[Bug 40883] [meta-bug] Translation breakage with trivial fixes
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity|normal |trivial
Blocks||40883
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
[Bug 40883] [meta-bug] Translation breakage with trivial fixes
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywords||diagnostic, easyhack
Blocks||40883, 81930
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Frederic Marchal from comment #4)
> French translation has b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
Bug 40883 depends on bug 93759, which changed state.
Bug 93759 Summary: Invalid % in param
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93759
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93759
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
Status|NEW
||40883
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywords||easyhack
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
[Bug 40883] [meta-bug] Translation breakage with trivial fixes
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywords||easyhack
Severity|normal |trivial
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
[Bug 40883] [meta-bug] Translation breakage with trivial fixes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90148
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||trivial_translation_nits
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58798
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102968
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
Oh wait it's been pushed to trunk now:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-October/582716.html
So, is that good, or should we leave open for backports?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102968
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100721
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-27
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100721
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92212
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95445
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403
Bug 87403 depends on bug 94112, which changed state.
Bug 94112 Summary: Please add a warning for potentially throwing code in
noexcept function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94112
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61372
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rafael at espindo dot la
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94112
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89700
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61372
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16358
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
||[-Wunreachable-code-break]
Blocks||87403
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Basically PR 46
,
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
||gcc-bugs at engestrom dot ch,
||marc.mutz at kdab dot com,
||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54720
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
The GNU Coding Standards contain an example of a simple way to do this:
https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Standard-Targets.html#Standard-Targets
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18907
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102657
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
The GNU Coding Standards has a list of targets all Makefiles should have:
https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Standard-Targets.html#Standard-Targets
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92435
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102663
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31573
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager ---
This is an instance of bug 44209
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209
[Bug 44209] [meta-bug] Some warnings are not linked to diagnostics options
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90690
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to sandra from comment #2)
> I think this has been fixed? In a recent-ish trunk build, I see gcc -Q
> --help-warning prints
>
> -Werror-implicit-function-declaration
> -Werror=implicit-f
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: jit
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Build: darwin
Running `make pdf` fails in gcc
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager ---
Is this still relevant now that gcc no longer ships with java?
|ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg0 |il/gcc-patches/2021-October
|0380.html |/581960.html
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |egallager at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4
||diagnostic
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
Is this related to and/or a dup of bug 80635?
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
[Bug 24639] [meta-bug] bug to track
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102665
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102663
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> I would install the patch for now.
OK, I'll need to regenerate it and re-test it first...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102657
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
it's missing a TAGS target, too, but I can handle that as part of this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-October/581485.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102700
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56604
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402
--- Comment #44 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #43)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #42)
> > Is this just about parallelism bottlenecks for the main build target (e.g.
> > just `make` or `make all`), or do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56604
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
Pushed to my GitHub mirror while I'm still trying to get my ssh keys sorted
out:
https://github.com/cooljeanius/gcc/commit/19caef57e59207d8131bf2db59519ac45fdab6aa
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
assuming that since this is from gdal, it's an ice-on-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87447
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102665
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Specifically, --enable-gnu-unique-object and --enable-secureplt are
ELF-specific configure flags, and
ormal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Specifically, in ask(), it does:
echo -n $question "["$default"]? "
which results in the "-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21549
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Confirmed, --with-pic being documented would be very nice even though it is
> a generic libtool
> configure option, it is most used with libstdc++ as shown by th
-ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg0
0380.html
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation, patch
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: egallager at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102657
--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager ---
It looks like it's also missing a dvi target:
Doing dvi in libcody
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `dvi'. Stop.
make[1]: *** [dvi-libcody] Error 1
make: *** [do-dvi] Error 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402
--- Comment #42 from Eric Gallager ---
Is this just about parallelism bottlenecks for the main build target (e.g. just
`make` or `make all`), or does it apply to other Makefile targets, too? (e.g.
the testsuite via `make check`, or docs via `make
: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Doing `make mostlyclean` in a build directory fails in libcody saying:
Doing mostlyclean in libcody
make[2]: *** No rule
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93644
--- Comment #18 from Eric Gallager ---
This affects musl's getcwd implementation, btw:
https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/unistd/getcwd.c?id=v1.2.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90698
--- Comment #13 from Eric Gallager ---
For the purposes of clarifying the "lacks support" wording, where exactly does
the failure occur if one tries to enable it? That is, in which step?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84898
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
,
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
||kuq03132 at qoika dot com
--- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #3)
> (In reply to Tim Ruehsen from comment #2)
> > Maybe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102103
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12277
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
,
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #24 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #22)
> Perhaps the only solution is to not pretty-print the candidates, which is
> exactly what clang does:
>
> pr99.cc:8:10: error: ca
,
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102530
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32562
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102049
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102442
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91092
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Comment #23 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #22)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #20)
> > (In reply to m...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #19)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92435
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3)
> See also the following question:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2021-September/237281.html
> It would be helpful to document the GCC specific directives som
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85335
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
,
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
cc-ing libvtv maintainer
,
||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
||roland.illig at gmx dot de
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
cc-ing relevant people
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102223
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102196
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95127
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> All 4 compilers (GCC, ICC, clang and MSVC) I have access to reject this code.
Could you post their error messages for comparison?
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager ---
alias cxxfriends
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71934
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20110
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86172
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #6)
> Thanks for the information Eric.
>
> Will it help if the option is split into -Wnull-dereference and
> -Wmaybe-null-dereference (as suggested before)?
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86177
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51545
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
,
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
||jonathan.creekmore@synapse-
||wireless.com,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56604
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2)
> I can probably do this; taking
While I do still intend to do this, I've transitioned between computers since I
last wrote this and am not sure I have my committi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81141
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101862
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84633
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
,
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywords||build
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
cc-ing libvtv maintainer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84257
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager ---
the MacPorts project applies the following patch to work around this issue:
https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/0641e588e989b7b3e5049ca79e354339ccb403ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71003
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
The issue of __extension__ not working with the preprocessor came up again
here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-July/575414.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101616
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
--- Comment #41 from Eric Gallager ---
Would this package help at all? https://github.com/blacktop/go-macho
||documentation
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
Also brought up on the mailing lists here
601 - 700 of 3728 matches
Mail list logo
