--- Comment #2 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-08-25 04:10
---
possibly PR 28358 and/or PR 28116
--
fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-08-27 07:45
---
Looks recently fixed by patch for PR 28659.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28863
--- Comment #3 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-08-29 23:23
---
Hi, see PR 21498.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28895
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-09-13 03:00
---
As you've written it, class C doesn't have any non-static members. Struct C::s
hasn't been declared as a member object of C. const int i is a member of C::s,
not C, so C() without member initializers should
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-09-18 23:38
---
Motion to dupe as PR 21498.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29123
--- Comment #10 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-09-25 03:46
---
Subject: Re: variadic template support
| For the record, personally and for what is worth my personal opinion
| in the compiler area, I have nothing against adding to the compiler
| -std=c++0x
We should
--- Comment #2 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-10-18 20:25
---
That would be PR 21498.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29503
--- Comment #3 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-10-19 18:03
---
ping? ice-on-valid in boost
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28358
--- Comment #12 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-10-23 03:34
---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Internal compiler error on
boost mpl test/apply.cpp
There were PRs that showed that this extension (for those who don't
remember: we allowed to match templates with trailing
--- Comment #10 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-10-26 16:57
---
This is also exactly what I see happening on a G4 build of the same 4.2
snapshot. It tries to build a multilib for fortran.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26814
--- Comment #14 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-10-27 18:14
---
Perhaps other directories need regen., according to Mike, the following are
outdated (as of 4.2-20061024):
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-10/msg00578.html
libdecnumber/aclocal.m4
zlib/aclocal.m4
intl/aclocal.m4
--- Comment #5 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-11-03 07:28
---
There is no argument against the ISO standard, but to a non C/C++ programmer
it seems a waist of time to reallocate the array and initialize it when one
wants to add something to an array. Some other
--- Comment #4 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-11-08 19:32
---
If you want to reject extern templates (and enforce more standard-conformance
in general), add -ansi -pedantic-errors to your CXXFLAGS.
--
fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed:
What
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-11-09 23:37
---
If you want bounds checking on std::vector, use the at() member function in
place of operator[].
Otherwise, the overloaded operator[] is unchecked and just does a plain
indexed-array reference.
(If it is out
--- Additional Comments From fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2005-02-27
06:25 ---
1) Has anyone figured out a workaround to this yet? I suppose I could remove
some using
namespace declarations and prefix type names with namespaces... I'll keep
tinkering around.
2) New
--- Additional Comments From fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2005-02-27
06:53 ---
Workaround discovered (shortly after I asked for one, fancy that!)
Declaring:
using util::persistent_object_manager;
inside the 'memory' namespace before the first friend declaration (after line
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu
dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21227
--- Additional Comments From fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2005-04-25
23:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=8739)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8739action=view)
test-case causing ICE
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21227
--- Additional Comments From fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2005-04-26
00:04 ---
Damn, you guys are fast! I just checked for this bug on bugzilla *yesterday*,
and it didn't show up then. In the 'sliver' of time between when I discovered
it, and when I submitted a prepared report
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
GCC host triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26385
--- Comment #2 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-02-20 19:37
---
Subject: Re: 4.1 RC1 build failure on nm -P command
(darwin7)
You don't have the correct nm in your path so this is
not a bug. GCC requires a full install of cctools 590.12 to be
install and accessible
--- Comment #8 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-03-11 22:10
---
Housekeeping: re-classify as invalid?
I wasn't able to find an accepts-invalid version of this bug in the database
for reference.
That bug would've been fixed sometime between 4.0.1 and 4.0.2.
--
http
Version: 3.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
GCC host triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin7
http
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-03-13 07:25
---
Created an attachment (id=11037)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11037action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26662
--- Comment #2 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-03-13 08:47
---
forgot to add: works with i686-suse-linux g++-3.3.3
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26662
--- Comment #5 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-03-13 20:51
---
Filed to Apple. For the record, this is Bug #4476031 on the Radar, for those
who might have access.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26662
--- Comment #4 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-03-13 20:21
---
(In reply to comment #3)
You should report this to apple, because as 4.0 and 4.1 are not affected and
both the 3.3 and the 3.4 branch are now closed, this PR will be just closed as
fixed.
Ok, I accept
--- Comment #2 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-03-16 21:39
---
Looks like my problem from PR 26385, but I was trying to use odcctools' nm.
Is GNU binutils' nm also suitable?
--
fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-04-16 18:41
---
Hi, see first bullet under http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.2/changes.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27178
--- Comment #2 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-04-16 18:51
---
I meant first bullet under C++, of course.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27178
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-05-09 18:34
---
With the following reduced case:
//-8 snip 8-
class TPoints {
public:
~TPoints();
};
class TPoligon: public TPoints {
public:
~TPoligon();
};
TPoints::~TPoligon() { }
TPoints::~TPoints
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-05-13 21:01
---
Very reminiscent of PR 25357.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27591
--- Comment #8 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-05-25 03:39
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] friend const member function
specialization fails to compile
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:31
---
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1
--- Comment #4 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-06-21 20:32
---
My heart skipped a beat when you said G6! *sigh*
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28124
--- Comment #6 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-06-21 20:49
---
Subject: Re: Cannot build gcc on OSX 10.4 G6
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 20:33
---
(In reply to comment #4)
My heart skipped a beat when you said G6! *sigh
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28211
--- Comment #3 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-07-01 01:06
---
Tripped over this bug while testing some code against ICPC... almost filed a
dupe!
Using the test case from PR 23385, still reproducible (accepts-invalid) on
mainline g++ 4.2.0-20060610.
I'd like to understand
--- Comment #7 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-07-02 17:37
---
Subject: Re: clause 7.1.5.3/2 of the c++ is not enforced
Would it be appropriate to prefix [DR 68] to the subject?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21498
--- Comment #4 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-07-13 22:06
---
Subject: Re: error: ' error: 'MyClass::MyClass(const MyClass)'
is private error: within this context
--- Comment #3 from kk at microfocus dot com 2006-07-13 21:49 ---
(In reply to comment #2
--- Comment #2 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-07-17 02:56
---
known to work: 4.0.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28025
--- Comment #5 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2005-12-20 16:27
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Forward explicit
intantiation declaration doesn't mix well with static integral member
--- Comment #3 from nicos at maunakeatech dot com 2005-12-20 09:20
---
I
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19948
ReportedBy: fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: *
GCC host triplet: *
GCC target triplet: *
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17981
--- Additional Comments From fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2004-10-13 21:14
---
Subject: Re: parse error on template method of template class
Thank you for the feedback. How come when I searched for the keywords
parse error template method on bugzilla, I get the infamous
`Zarro
-3.3 -fast causes bus error
Product: gcc
Version: 3.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
--- Additional Comments From fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2004-11-19
16:52 ---
Subject: Re: apple's gcc-3.3 -fast causes bus error
Thanks, found their bug-site, I'll pass it on to them.
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-19
14:29
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot
||edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot
||edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot
||edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot
||edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23849
--- Additional Comments From fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2005-09-13
07:57 ---
correction: g++ 3.3.3 (FSF, i386-linux) *rejects* the test case with the same
error message.
That should narrow down the search to somewhere in the 3.3 series.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot
||edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
to function call,
const-sensitive
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: fang at csl dot
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2005-10-06 19:22
---
Created an attachment (id=9912)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9912action=view)
test case triggering bug
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24243
--- Comment #3 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2005-10-06 20:30
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] lookup fails to match to function
call, const-sensitive
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-06 19:48
---
Here is the reduced testcase:
template
--- Comment #4 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2005-10-06 21:28
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] lookup fails to match to function
call, const-sensitive
Something else puzzling to me, that I noticed from your reduction:
Why is the compiler always matching the non-const version
--- Comment #6 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2005-10-06 21:47
---
I now second your opinions that this is invalid.
Upon closer examination, what I *should've* written to make this code valid is
the following:
template class R, template class class P, class T, class A
inline
--- Comment #7 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2005-10-06 23:38
---
Created an attachment (id=9913)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9913action=view)
corrected header file
Just as a follow-up, here's what the new valid header file looks like, with all
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24667
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2005-11-04 07:47
---
also known to work: 3.4.0
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24667
--- Comment #3 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2005-11-04 17:56
---
Am I correct in expecting that const_cast... should pass -Wcast-qual without
warning? That's the way I use it (in the few and rare cases that demand it)
and it's met my expectations thus far. I'm kind
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-11-22 15:07
---
There was some (suspended) discussion about support for rvalue references in PR
24803. Is there a plan for them somewhere in the pipeline?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29939
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-11-27 20:49
---
Is this related to the standard requirement that a source file must end with a
newline character? (and thus cannot be empty?)
--
fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-11-27 20:52
---
Funny, I was thinking the same thing, but you snooze, you lose...
--
fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-11-29 19:00
---
Subject: Re: Add rvalue references (C++0x)
On 29 Nov 2006, hhinnant at apple dot com wrote:
--- Comment #3 from hhinnant at apple dot com 2006-11-29 18:36 ---
Recent work:
http://mndfck.org
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-12-18 17:07
---
ARM-style friend-injection of names into the parent namespaces has been removed
since gcc-4.1, as noted in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.1/changes.html
You should add a forward declaration class Bar; before
--- Comment #6 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-01-01 16:42
---
You can confirm the lifetime of B() by printing something during its
destruction, and during the constructor of C. You'll be left with a dangling
reference to a temporary whose vptr has been invalidated, hence
--- Comment #3 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-01-05 20:11
---
I've checked out the latest aspell-0.60.5 and found the same thing using a 4.2
prerelease with -O3. This is not gcc's problem, as this can (and should) be
easily fixed in their source with an additional explicit
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-01-17 20:39
---
The problem with passing -E -o ... is that gcc has to assume the default output
object as the target, which strips the directory from the name, since -o is
used for the resulting .i file. That is what -MT
--- Comment #2 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-01-20 22:00
---
In sys/resource.h (Darwin), near the beginning, you'll see some ifndef
business for struct timeval (the type of ru_utime and ru_stime). It looks to
be protected by the _TIMEVAL macro. Somehow that is evaluating
--- Comment #3 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-01-20 22:05
---
Subject: Re: failed to build libgfortran in gcc-4.3-20070119
on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #2 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-01-20 22:00
---
In sys/resource.h (Darwin), near the beginning
--- Comment #5 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-01-20 23:11
---
Subject: Re: failed to build libgfortran in gcc-4.3-20070119
on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-01-20 22:52
---
Subject: Re: failed to build libgfortran in gcc
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-02-07 00:32
---
Ahh, exploding recursive templates...
For future reference, you could limit the recursion depth explicitly, using
-ftemplate-depth-n
from a gcc-3.4.0 man page:
Set the maximum instantiation depth for template
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-02-07 05:04
---
Workaround:
if (A().operator()()) { }
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30725
--- Comment #2 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-02-07 05:05
---
looks familiar: PR 29234
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30725
--- Comment #14 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-02-12 17:31
---
I'm seeing some failures with 4.1.2-RC2 on test case pr23237.c on
powerpc7400-apple-darwin8, posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-02/msg00475.html
Are these known/expected/new?
--
fang at csl
--- Comment #6 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-02-21 20:26
---
Subject: Re: Add rvalue references (C++0x)
--- Comment #5 from hhinnant at apple dot com 2007-02-21 20:17 ---
Russell Yanofsky has submitted a patch implementing N2118:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc
--- Comment #5 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-03-08 21:49
---
Ouch, this one seems particularly nasty to me... seeings as this isn't a
regression (at least from 2.95), I don't expect this to be fixed for 4.2. Is
there any chance of this getting attention on the (4.3
--- Comment #6 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-03-08 22:58
---
Subject: Re: Overloaded operator delete[] doesn't get called
This following test case is 'interesting':
8 snip 8-
#include iostream
using std::cout;
class one_array_only
--- Comment #7 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-03-08 23:41
---
Subject: Re: Overloaded operator delete[] doesn't get called
Above, in operator new[], If WTF is false, returning NULL, I reproduce the
same error (missing call to class operator delete []). If WTF is true
--- Comment #9 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-03-11 03:47
---
In fact, I'm having trouble reproducing the problem when operator delete []
returns anything BUT NULL. It's as if, the actual call to operator delete []
is guarded by a NULL check. Now, if I'm RTHS (reading
--- Comment #14 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-03-12 06:22
---
For reference, is this the latest draft of the variadic template proposal?
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2006/n2080.pdf
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20599
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-03-12 21:56
---
See PR 25950 and PR 12226 (dup).
The resolution is that you need an accessible copy-constructor, regardless of
whether or not the compiler elides it during temporary creation.
--
fang at csl dot cornell dot
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-03-14 18:14
---
Interesting. Do the attributes apply to derived classes automatically?
struct B __attribute__((reorder)) {
char a;
int b;
};
struct D : public B {
char c, d, e;
};
Is D also allowed to reorder members
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-03-15 04:35
---
Subject: Re: preprocessor doubles up digits in token
pasting
With your example, g++ -E -
gives me:
stdin:2:1: error: pasting foo2 and 2.2 does not give a valid
preprocessing token
foo22.2
with versions 4.0.1
--- Comment #6 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-03-19 18:51
---
Subject: Re: std::valarray should be annotated with
OpenMP directives
bangerth at dealii dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| (In reply to comment #3)
| I suspect that parallelizing for SSE/Altivec might
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-03-24 00:26
---
PR 27102 dup?
using template parameter as a class name of member function.
--
fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-03-27 08:52
---
Poor vectorbool, being disrespected as a second-class container once again...
:P
--
fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-03-31 00:43
---
Do you mean -Woverloaded-virtual? (see man page)
The diagostic reports when a derived class's method 'hides' the base class's.
--
fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-04-01 15:38
---
Aside, it looks to me as if operator () returns a reference (const) to a
temporary, which is undefined, no?
--
fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-04-01 16:57
---
Subject: Re: template user defined conversion operator
instantiated for conversion to self
There is no operator() in the code. And there is no undefined
behavior is the reference is not used. But that's
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-04-03 19:45
---
Funny you mention this, I've done exactly this in my own utility headers:
create forward-declaration-only headers of STL containers and algorithms.
STL/allocator_fwd.h:
namespace std {
template class T
class
--- Comment #2 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-04-05 06:11
---
PR 2708 dup?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30734
--- Comment #2 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-04-05 06:46
---
same as recent c++ issue PR 31453 tripped in testsuite?
--
fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-04-13 02:40
---
Note: PR 30734 is a dupe of this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2708
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-04-14 20:27
---
That begs the question: what's *not* covered by -W -Wall -Wextra [-ansi
-pedantic-errors -Werror]?
There are also some warning flags that are parameterized (-Wstrict-aliasing=#,
-Wformat=#), should those be maxed
--- Comment #3 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-04-14 22:24
---
Subject: Re: -Wall-all to enable all warnings
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 21:18
---
Actually more than that, there are new warnings options each release so really
--- Comment #2 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-05-04 03:40
---
adding to personal favorite list :)
--
fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
