: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gang.chen at asianux dot com
Created attachment 30477
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30477action=edit
Related disassemble code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57856
Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gang.chen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57856
--- Comment #3 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com ---
Created attachment 30479
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30479action=edit
The related warnings, not find uninitailized warning for lru.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57856
--- Comment #4 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com ---
Created attachment 30480
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30480action=edit
This attachment is for gcc 4.9.0 from compiling source code (sorry, the
original
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57856
--- Comment #5 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
I think this is a dup of another bug.
Firstly, thank you reply as soon as possible.
Could you provide the related Bug number ?
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57856
Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
--- Comment #64 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez)
Firstly, thank you very much for keeping tracing this bug almost 10 years, and
provided your suggestions as much as possible.
What you have done
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gang.chen at asianux dot com
[root@dhcp122 linux-next]# /usr/local/bin/h8300-gchen-elf-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/local/bin/h8300-gchen-elf-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58256
--- Comment #1 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com ---
It is for Linux kernel next-20130828 version.
and for the latest Linux kernel, h8/300 has been removed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58256
--- Comment #2 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com ---
it is not found in gcc-4.8.0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58256
--- Comment #3 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com ---
The related command line:
/usr/local/bin/h8300-gchen-elf-gcc -Wp,-MD,fs/.namei.o.d -nostdinc -isystem
/usr/local/lib/gcc/h8300-gchen-elf/4.9.0/include
-I/root/linux-next/arch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58256
Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gang.chen
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gang.chen at asianux dot com
For Linux kernel next-20130828 version:
The command line:
/usr/local/bin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400
--- Comment #1 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com ---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c:1459:1: internal compiler error: in
reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:411
0x8e0a95 _fatal_insn(char const*, rtx_def const*, char const*, int, char
const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400
--- Comment #2 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com ---
For gcc-4.8.0 and gcc-4.7.4, it has this issue too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400
--- Comment #3 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com ---
If no opitimization (without -Os), it will be OK.
'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gang.chen at asianux dot com
For Linux kernel next-20130828 version
The related command
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58401
Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gang.chen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58401
--- Comment #2 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com ---
Alos for fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
/usr/local/bin/h8300-gchen-elf-gcc -Wp,-MD,fs/ocfs2/dlm/.dlmrecovery.o.d
-nostdinc -isystem /usr/local/lib/gcc/h8300-gchen-elf/4.9.0/include
-I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58401
--- Comment #3 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com ---
It has too many same issues (maybe they are duplicating), if necessary, I will
list them too (non-reply means not need list them).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58401
--- Comment #4 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com ---
Created attachment 30810
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30810action=edit
the .i file for fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c (bzip2 compressed)
I put the related .i files
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58401
--- Comment #5 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com ---
Created attachment 30811
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30811action=edit
the .i file for fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c (bzip2 compressed)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400
--- Comment #4 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com ---
Created attachment 30812
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30812action=edit
the .i file for fs/ext4/mballoc.c (bzip2 compressed)
I put .i file in attachment which
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58256
--- Comment #5 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com ---
Created attachment 30813
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30813action=edit
the .i file for fs/namei.c (bzip2 compressed)
I put .i file for fs/namei.c which need
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58256
--- Comment #7 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com ---
Created attachment 30821
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30821action=edit
some simple modification based on the reduced .c file.
After learning from what you have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58256
--- Comment #8 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com ---
For gcc-4.9.0, I got summary trace for it (call stack for cc1, how many the
related loopings during calling flow), hope it may be a little useful. (I will
do the same thing for gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58256
--- Comment #9 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com ---
Created attachment 30825
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30825action=edit
Issue is within xgcc, can exclude cc1 by comparing the summary log between
gcc-4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58256
--- Comment #10 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com ---
Created attachment 30826
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30826action=edit
(sorry, it is cc1 issue) It is the related command line for cc1 and the summary
work flow
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58256
--- Comment #11 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com ---
It seems, I am really really a newbie !!
1. after append -gstabs+, can let gdb work well.
2. can use the internal dump_file (dump_start/dump_end) to analyze all
information
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58256
--- Comment #12 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com ---
I am just comparing the issue code demo and the other 3 correct code demo (the
demostrations which del one param, or add one param, or add two params are all
correct).
I find
30 matches
Mail list logo