Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27689
--- Comment #2 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2006-05-20
21:32 ---
But for what F and T would FT match fooint::bar ?
In looking for workarounds I found that the same problem occurs when using
partial specialization:
template typename struct S {};
template
at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31518
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33045
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33067
--- Comment #2 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2007-08-14
17:19 ---
I know that, but that's irrelevant from a user interface perspective. The fact
remains that the error message is needlessly messy and would be far clearer and
less surprising to the user if it said 1.1
as being
overloaded
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34524
--- Comment #2 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2007-12-18
20:16 ---
My apologies.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34524
: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35153
.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2007-10-31
00:44 ---
Then perhaps I ought to explain what I'm using -Wfatal-errors for.
I wrote an IRC bot called geordi ( http://www.eelis.net/geordi ) that accepts
lines of C++ code, compiles them with g++, and either
--- Comment #7 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2007-11-13
18:42 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
The bug is that the C++ front end implicitly #defines _GNU_SOURCE.
[..]
Could some libstdc++ guru explain why this define is actually needed?
I am no libstdc++ guru
--- Comment #2 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2009-12-22
15:18 ---
Here's a related snippet that should be rejected but isn't:
namespace NS { class x; } int NS::x;
--
gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net changed:
What|Removed
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42490
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37875
.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35650
org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35678
specialization.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-04-13
21:19 ---
Still fails on GCC 4.4.0 20080413 (experimental).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5786
: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35966
not rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org
function type.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http
if-statement.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41037
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36655
--- Comment #4 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-06-29
12:53 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Fixed for 4.4.0.
Thanks! However, I just noticed that while the problem has been fixed for
function templates, it's still there for class templates. This code:
template
--- Comment #5 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-06-29
12:54 ---
Crap, pasted the wrong code. Here's the code that now triggers the warning:
template typename class S {};
extern template class Sint;
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36655
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36744
--- Comment #1 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-07-06
14:48 ---
Forgot to mention: compile with -std=c++0x.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36744
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36760
Version: 4.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36778
-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36943
dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37047
++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
GCC host triplet: x86_64-pc-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37119
--- Comment #2 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-08-13
21:39 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
so 26bits which is a little over 4 bytes.
I don't follow. 4 bytes is 4*8=32 bits, which is more than 26, no?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37119
--- Comment #9 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-08-13
22:24 ---
Ok, I see. Sorry for wasting your time.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37119
--- Comment #1 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-08-21
11:35 ---
It seems access control for templates is broken at a more basic level than the
reporter's testcase suggests; witness the following simplified testcase:
class A { typedef int X; };
template typename
--- Comment #1 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-08-21
11:43 ---
This report is invalid. By 12.3.2,
A conversion function is never used to convert a
(possibly cv-qualified) object to the (possibly
cv-qualified) same object type (or a reference to it).
Comeau
--- Comment #2 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-08-21
11:53 ---
Most likely related to bug 26693.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36734
--- Comment #1 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-08-21
12:00 ---
Still accepted by 4.4. Comeau concurs with reporter, and rejects saying:
line 15: error: class member designated by a
using-declaration must be visible in a direct base class
--
gcc-bugzilla
--- Comment #4 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-08-21
12:51 ---
Isolated and reproduced with GCC 4.4 on x86_64:
#include iostream
#include stdint.h
struct A
{
uint64_t p;
char m_ac[18];
A() { std::cout default constructed at this '\n
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37204
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37206
--- Comment #4 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-08-23
02:58 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Where is the namespace scope in the example?
From the standard, 3.3.5p3:
The outermost declarative region of a translation unit is
also a namespace, called the global
vector resize does not update capacity
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts
--- Comment #1 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2010-05-18
21:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=20695)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20695action=view)
Trivial patch that fixes the problem.
The problem was just a missing call
--- Comment #3 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2010-05-18
23:38 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I'm going to apply the patch
Great, thanks! :)
could you please provide name and family name for
the ChangeLog entry?
It's Eelis van der Weegen
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2010-06-05
20:12 ---
Looks fixed in 4.4.1.
--
gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
50 matches
Mail list logo
