[Bug ada/55243] STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |ada

[Bug target/54222] [avr] Implement fixed-point support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222 --- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-22 10:00:24 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Thu Nov 22 10:00:13 2012 New Revision: 193721 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193721 Log: libgcc

[Bug testsuite/52641] Test cases fail for 16-bit int targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-23 10:08:54 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Fri Nov 23 10:08:49 2012 New Revision: 193749 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193749 Log: PR testsuite

[Bug lto/52650] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr51106-2.c * (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650 --- Comment #14 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-26 09:47:18 UTC --- A milestone of 3.0.x???

[Bug testsuite/52641] Test cases fail for 16-bit int targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641 --- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-26 18:46:25 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Nov 26 18:46:12 2012 New Revision: 193826 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193826 Log: PR testsuite

[Bug ada/55243] STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gjl

[Bug ada/55243] STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243 --- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03 13:37:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) OK, but the question is why this rule is invoked during the gnattools build? Moreover, why does s-avr-mlib need

[Bug other/54814] [4.8 Regression] ICE: unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REG'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54814 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-07 13:34:36 UTC --- rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: spill in class 'R0_REG' Spilling is a bug in the register allocator, or am I missing something. Besides

[Bug other/54814] [4.8 Regression] ICE: unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REG'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54814 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth

[Bug other/54814] [4.8 Regression] ICE: unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REG'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54814 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-08 10:28:07 UTC --- Many thanks for your help! Mike Stein stopped posting test results quite some time ago. Dunno why, he does not respond to email. avr.h defines

[Bug other/54814] [4.8 Regression] ICE: unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REG'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54814 --- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-10 14:33:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) Created attachment 28900 [details] Candidate patch Try this. It works. There are no more spill in class 'R0_REG

[Bug ada/55243] STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243 --- Comment #11 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-10 17:00:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) I don't know anything about the gnat build system and when I build avr-gcc I configure for C/C++. What's odd

[Bug ada/55243] STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243 --- Comment #14 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-10 18:25:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) So t-multilib is autogenerated in the source tree during the build??? Jepp. Top $(srcdir)/gcc/config/avr/t-multilib

[Bug ada/55243] STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243 --- Comment #15 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-10 18:36:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) Created attachment 28916 [details] Tentative fix for gnatls issue To be applied in the ada/ source directory

[Bug ada/55243] STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243 --- Comment #18 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-10 20:41:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) So t-multilib is autogenerated in the source tree during the build??? Jepp. Top $(srcdir)/gcc/config/avr/t-multilib

[Bug ada/55243] STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243 --- Comment #20 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-10 22:57:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) It works with read-only sources, provided everything is consistent. Or are you saying that a t-snip must not use $(STAMP

[Bug ada/55243] STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243 --- Comment #22 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11 12:18:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #21) What I don't understand is what is bad with Rolf's proposal of defining STAMP? Stamping is not that unusual in the build

[Bug ada/55243] STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243 --- Comment #25 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-14 18:26:07 UTC --- Created attachment 28960 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28960 Don't use STAMP to please Ada (In reply to comment #24) What I

[Bug other/54814] [4.8 Regression] ICE: unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REG'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54814 --- Comment #11 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-14 18:56:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) Created attachment 28900 [details] Candidate patch Try this. Bernd, do you intend to apply this, or should I post

[Bug target/55243] STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243 --- Comment #29 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-17 22:53:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #24) What I don't understand is what is bad with Rolf's proposal of defining STAMP? We simply don't need to stamp anything

[Bug other/54814] [4.8 Regression] ICE: unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REG'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54814 --- Comment #13 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18 22:33:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) Created attachment 28990 [details] Better patch Sorry for doing this, but here's a slightly improved version

[Bug target/55243] STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243 --- Comment #31 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07 13:12:18 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Jan 7 13:12:10 2013 New Revision: 194970 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194970 Log: Backport from

[Bug target/55243] STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug target/55897] New: [avr] Allocate __memx data to .progmemx.data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55897 Bug #: 55897 Summary: [avr] Allocate __memx data to .progmemx.data Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/54461] [avr] add configure option for better AVR-Libc integration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54461 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07 16:23:13 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Jan 7 16:22:59 2013 New Revision: 194981 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194981 Log: Backport from

[Bug target/55897] [avr] Allocate __memx data to .progmemx.data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55897 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07 18:34:50 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Jan 7 18:34:40 2013 New Revision: 194991 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194991 Log: PR target

[Bug target/55897] [avr] Allocate __memx data to .progmemx.data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55897 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07 18:37:57 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Jan 7 18:37:47 2013 New Revision: 194992 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194992 Log: PR target

[Bug target/55897] [avr] Allocate __memx data to .progmemx.data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55897 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07 18:51:38 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Jan 7 18:51:33 2013 New Revision: 194993 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194993 Log: Backport from

[Bug target/55897] [avr] Allocate __memx data to .progmemx.data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55897 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||addr

[Bug target/55974] New: [avr] Wrong suffix for built-in defines __INT24_MAX__ and __UINT24_MAX__ with -mint8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55974 Bug #: 55974 Summary: [avr] Wrong suffix for built-in defines __INT24_MAX__ and __UINT24_MAX__ with -mint8 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug target/55974] [avr] Wrong suffix for built-in defines __INT24_MAX__ and __UINT24_MAX__ with -mint8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55974 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-14 18:28:37 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Jan 14 18:28:24 2013 New Revision: 195169 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195169 Log: PR target

[Bug target/55974] [avr] Wrong suffix for built-in defines __INT24_MAX__ and __UINT24_MAX__ with -mint8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55974 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-14 18:32:19 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Jan 14 18:32:05 2013 New Revision: 195170 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195170 Log: Backport from

[Bug target/55974] [avr] Wrong suffix for built-in defines __INT24_MAX__ and __UINT24_MAX__ with -mint8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55974 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug tree-optimization/56064] New: Optimize VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR with FIXED_CST

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56064 Bug #: 56064 Summary: Optimize VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR with FIXED_CST Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug target/41076] [avr] pessimal code for logical OR of 8-bit fields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41076 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug target/54222] [avr] Implement fixed-point support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222 --- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-23 15:13:56 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Jan 23 15:13:51 2013 New Revision: 195407 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195407 Log: PR target

[Bug target/54222] [avr] Implement fixed-point support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222 --- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25 09:28:14 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Fri Jan 25 09:28:09 2013 New Revision: 195464 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195464 Log: gcc/ PR

[Bug other/54814] [4.8 Regression] ICE: unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REG'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54814 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch

[Bug pending/55996] [meta-bug] GCC 4.9 pending patches

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55996 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||meta-bug

[Bug other/54814] [4.8 Regression] ICE: unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REG'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54814 --- Comment #15 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-28 20:03:34 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Jan 28 20:03:26 2013 New Revision: 195515 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195515 Log: PR other

[Bug other/54814] [4.8 Regression] ICE: unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REG'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54814 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/54222] [avr] Implement fixed-point support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222 --- Comment #11 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29 10:33:24 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Jan 29 10:33:18 2013 New Revision: 195532 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195532 Log: PR target

[Bug tree-optimization/56064] Optimize VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR with FIXED_CST

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56064 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-30 11:04:35 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Jan 30 11:04:30 2013 New Revision: 195574 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195574 Log: gcc/ PR tree

[Bug tree-optimization/56064] Optimize VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR with FIXED_CST

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56064 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/56164] avr-gcc 4.7.2 fail with __flash keyword

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56164 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug c/56164] avr-gcc 4.7.2 fail with __flash keyword

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56164 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-31 20:25:20 UTC --- Created attachment 29322 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29322 Small an valis test case Output with avr-gcc 4.7.2: avr-gcc -S

[Bug target/56164] [avr] ICE: spill fail with __flash keyword

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56164 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr

[Bug target/54888] GCC with -Os is faster than -O3 on some AVR code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54888 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug target/49017] [avr] -ffunction-sections causes linker to fail

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49017 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug other/56183] New: [meta-bug][avr] Problems with register allocation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56183 Bug #: 56183 Summary: [meta-bug][avr] Problems with register allocation Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug other/56183] [meta-bug][avr] Problems with register allocation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56183 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug middle-end/57503] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Expand uses wrong multiply routine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/57503] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Expand uses wrong multiply routine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.7.2, 4.8.1

[Bug target/58655] New: [avr] -mfract-convert-truncate not documented

Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org Target: avr avr specific command option -mfract-convert-truncate should be documented in the users guide (gcc/doc/invoke.texi) and in the release notes (http

[Bug target/58655] [avr] -mfract-convert-truncate not documented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58655 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug tree-optimization/50417] regression: memcpy with known alignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed

[Bug target/59174] [avr] Suboptimal multiplication when indexing an array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59174 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr

[Bug target/59396] New: [avr] Wrong warning with ISR() and -flto

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org Created attachment 31387 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31387action=edit isr.c: The C source Following source will throw a warning if compiled, e.g., $ avr-gcc isr.c -mmcu=atmega8 -flto

[Bug target/59396] [avr] Wrong warning with ISR() and -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59396 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug middle-end/59559] New: ICE: invalid RTX sharing in expmed.c:expand_divmod

: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org In expmed.c:expand_divmod() we have the following code: t1 = expmed_mult_highpart (compute_mode, op0, gen_int_mode (ml, compute_mode), NULL_RTX, 1, max_cost

[Bug c++/59394] Unused code generated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59394 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #31385|0 |1

[Bug c++/59394] Unused code generated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59394 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|AVR

[Bug c++/59394] Unused code generated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59394 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Some more notes: If you don't want that small functions are being inlined, consider -fno-inline-small-functions. If a function is being inlined then it's body is still implemented

[Bug other/53615] Buffer overflow in the compiler?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53615 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking

[Bug target/54222] New: [avr] Implement fixed-point support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222 Bug #: 54222 Summary: [avr] Implement fixed-point support Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug target/54222] [avr] Implement fixed-point support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug target/54222] [avr] Implement fixed-point support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-10 14:24:24 UTC --- Created attachment 27984 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27984 Tentative patch against 4.8 libgcc/ * config/avr/lib1funcs-fixed.S: New

[Bug target/54222] [avr] Implement fixed-point support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27984|0 |1

[Bug target/54222] [avr] Implement fixed-point support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch

[Bug other/54330] New: Wrong optimization for code from fixed-bit.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54330 Bug #: 54330 Summary: Wrong optimization for code from fixed-bit.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug other/54330] Wrong optimization for code from fixed-bit.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54330 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-20 14:11:30 UTC --- Created attachment 28057 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28057 fixed-bit-bug.c.150r.expand: Correct code if DI used instead of DQ/DA

[Bug other/54330] Wrong optimization for code from fixed-bit.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54330 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-20 14:15:51 UTC --- Created attachment 28058 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28058 fixed-bit-bug.c.150r.expand: Wrong code

[Bug other/54330] Wrong optimization for code from fixed-bit.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54330 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-20 14:22:46 UTC --- FYI, there is the fixed-point configuration output from ... -E -dM | egrep '(DQ)|(DA)|([^L]LACC)|(LLFRA)' | sort DImode (long long) is 64 bits #define

[Bug target/54222] [avr] Implement fixed-point support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-24 12:42:53 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Fri Aug 24 12:42:48 2012 New Revision: 190644 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190644 Log: libgcc/ PR target/54222

[Bug target/54222] [avr] Implement fixed-point support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-24 13:01:58 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Fri Aug 24 13:01:54 2012 New Revision: 190646 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190646 Log: PR target/54222

[Bug target/54378] New: code bloat for long shifts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54378 Bug #: 54378 Summary: code bloat for long shifts Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization

[Bug target/54378] code bloat for long shifts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54378 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/54461] New: [avr] add configure option for better AVR-Libc integration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54461 Bug #: 54461 Summary: [avr] add configure option for better AVR-Libc integration Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/54461] [avr] add configure option for better AVR-Libc integration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54461 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug target/54220] [avr] Potential stack corruption in naked functions at -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54220 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04 09:08:54 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Sep 4 09:08:50 2012 New Revision: 190914 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190914 Log: PR target/54220

[Bug target/54220] [avr] Potential stack corruption in naked functions at -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54220 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04 09:14:40 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Sep 4 09:14:36 2012 New Revision: 190916 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190916 Log: Backport from 2012-09-04

[Bug target/54220] [avr] Potential stack corruption in naked functions at -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54220 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04 09:21:24 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Sep 4 09:21:20 2012 New Revision: 190917 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190917 Log: Backport from 2012-09-04

[Bug target/54220] [avr] Potential stack corruption in naked functions at -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54220 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|AVR |avr

[Bug target/54476] Passing -1 to __builtin_avr_delay_cycles causes cc1 memory usage to explode on x86_64 host

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54476 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04 09:37:11 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Sep 4 09:37:08 2012 New Revision: 190920 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190920 Log: PR target/54476

[Bug target/54476] Passing -1 to __builtin_avr_delay_cycles causes cc1 memory usage to explode on x86_64 host

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54476 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04 09:38:48 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Sep 4 09:38:42 2012 New Revision: 190921 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190921 Log: Backport from 2012-09-04

[Bug target/54476] [avr] __builtin_avr_delay_cycles (-1ul) causes memory usage to explode on x86_64 host

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54476 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|AVR |avr

[Bug target/54461] [avr] add configure option for better AVR-Libc integration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54461 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 08:48:00 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Sep 5 08:47:50 2012 New Revision: 190967 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190967 Log: PR target/54461

[Bug other/54490] New: ICE: Spill failure in newlib build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54490 Bug #: 54490 Summary: ICE: Spill failure in newlib build Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, ra

[Bug other/54490] [4.7 Regression] ICE: Spill failure in newlib build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54490 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/54461] [avr] add configure option for better AVR-Libc integration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54461 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 12:19:54 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Sep 5 12:19:47 2012 New Revision: 190973 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190973 Log: Backport from 2012-09-05

[Bug target/54461] [avr] add configure option for better AVR-Libc integration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54461 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug driver/28718] Call to -lgcc added prior to user libraries

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28718 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/54461] [avr] add configure option for better AVR-Libc integration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54461 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j at uriah dot

[Bug other/54490] [4.7 Regression] ICE: Spill failure in newlib build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54490 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 21:24:40 UTC --- I see hundreds of spill fails riunning the test suite -- with AVR-Libc. Some months ago, 2 or 3 pathological test cases failes with spill fails. Now

[Bug driver/28718] Call to -lgcc added prior to user libraries

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28718 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/54386] Unaligned mem load wrongly generated for inlined inline/static function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54386 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gjl at gcc dot

[Bug target/54536] [avr]: incorrect crt with -mmcu=at90usb1287

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54536 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-10 10:43:25 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Sep 10 10:43:20 2012 New Revision: 191132 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191132 Log: PR target/54536

[Bug target/54536] [avr]: incorrect crt with -mmcu=at90usb1287

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54536 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-10 10:46:31 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Sep 10 10:46:27 2012 New Revision: 191133 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191133 Log: Backport from 2012-09-10

[Bug target/54536] [avr]: incorrect crt with -mmcu=at90usb1287

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54536 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-10 10:51:21 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Sep 10 10:51:13 2012 New Revision: 191134 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191134 Log: Backport from 2012-09-10

[Bug target/54536] [avr]: incorrect crt with -mmcu=at90usb1287

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54536 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >