[Bug sanitizer/94139] GCC9.2.0 build GCC8.2.0 break

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94139 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/94139] GCC9.2.0 build GCC8.2.0 break

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94139 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- We can't retroactively fix already released versions. For bugfixes we have release branches from which we periodically create new releases.

[Bug tree-optimization/94130] [8/9/10 Regression] Unintended result with optimization option when assigning two structures, memset and 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94130 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/94130] [8/9/10 Regression] Unintended result with optimization option when assigning two structures, memset and 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94130 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Slightly reduced testcase: struct A { char a[6]; void *b; }; struct B { unsigned int c, d; }; static void __attribute__((noipa)) foo (struct A *x) { struct B *b = (struct B *) x->b; if (b->c != 1234 || b

[Bug tree-optimization/94130] [8/9/10 Regression] Unintended result with optimization option when assigning two structures, memset and 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94130 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- And the b.d = 0; store isn't needed either.

[Bug tree-optimization/94130] [8/9/10 Regression] Unintended result with optimization option when assigning two structures, memset and 0

at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Even simpler testcase: int main () { int a[8]; char *b = __builtin_memset (a, 0, sizeof (a)); a[0] = 1; a[1] = 2; a[2] = 3; if (b != (char *) a) __builtin_abort (); else asm volatile

[Bug tree-optimization/94130] [8/9/10 Regression] Unintended result with optimization option when assigning two structures, memset and 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94130 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 48018 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48018&action=edit gcc10-pr94130.patch Untested fix.

[Bug target/94134] pdp11-aout puts initial variable into .text section rather than .data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94134 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/94134] pdp11-aout puts initial variable into .text section rather than .data

|1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 48020 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48020&acti

[Bug bootstrap/93962] bootstrap fails with gcc/value-prof.c:268:28 : error: format '%lld' expects argument of type 'long long int', but argument 3 hastype 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93962 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/94131] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have plus_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5927 since r10-2814-g22fca489eaf98f26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94131 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/49813] [C++0x] sinh vs asinh vs constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813 --- Comment #61 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #60) > There's no wiggle room, we're definitely non-conforming. > > Maybe the changes could be limited to -std=gnu++NN modes only, although > Paolo argued strongly

[Bug tree-optimization/94131] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have plus_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5927 since r10-2814-g22fca489eaf98f26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94131 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug target/94134] pdp11-aout puts initial variable into .text section rather than .data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94134 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- commit r10-7129-gd42ff1d3b62521829d90e5b972baba2a0339e2bf Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Wed Mar 11 18:35:13 2020 +0100 pdp11: Fix handling of common (local and global) vars [PR94134] As mentioned i

[Bug middle-end/94146] [10 Regression] Merging functions with same bodies stopped working

|--- |10.0 CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org, ||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, ||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/94146] [10 Regression] Merging functions with same bodies stopped working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94146 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- My guess is that ICF works fine but then inliner inlines it back into the thunk, which it didn't before.

[Bug middle-end/94146] [10 Regression] Merging functions with same bodies stopped working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94146 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- If not already marked clearly as an ICF created thunk, I'd say it should be and then inliner should take it into account (and only inline if the function became very small or not at all).

[Bug middle-end/94146] [10 Regression] Merging functions with same bodies stopped working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94146 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > > If not already marked clearly as an ICF created thunk, I'd say it should be > > and then inliner should take it i

[Bug tree-optimization/94130] [8/9 Regression] Unintended result with optimization option when assigning two structures, memset and 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94130 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.0 Summary|[8/9/10 Regressi

[Bug c++/91678] [9 Regression] decltype returns wrong type under certain conditions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91678 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/53281] poor error message for calling a non-const method from a const object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53281 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/92422] [9 Regression] Warning with character and optimisation flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92422 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug tree-optimization/87034] [9/10 Regression] missing -Wformat-overflow on a sprintf %s with a wide string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87034 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug other/85716] No easy way for end-user to tell what GCC is doing when compilation is slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85716 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/91914] [9 Regression] Invalid strlen optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91914 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug fortran/91862] [9/10 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2394

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91862 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug fortran/89925] [9/10 Regression] Wrong array bounds from ALLOCATE with SOURCE or MOLD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89925 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug fortran/93814] [9/10 Regression] ICE in build_entry_thunks, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2898

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93814 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug target/83868] i386: Clean up thunk function generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83868 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug target/90178] [9 Regression] Missed optimization: duplicated terminal basic block with -mavx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90178 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/49129] confusing diagnostic for missing semi-colon after member template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49129 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug gcov-profile/85337] [GCOV] inconsistent coverage in switch-case statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85337 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug fortran/86277] Presence of optional arguments not recognized for zero length arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86277 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug libstdc++/83938] Speed up inplace_merge() algorithm & fix inefficient logic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83938 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug driver/83193] Help for invalid -march= options from cc1 omits -march=native on x86-64, arm. aarch64, output also inconsistent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83193 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/90992] [9/10 Regression] -Wnoexcept produce false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90992 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug preprocessor/81419] GCC wrongly suggests function-like macro as fixit hint for undefined object-like macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81419 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug c++/56084] poor error recovery for missing ";"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56084 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/70924] Wrong position for "warning: missing braces around initializer [-Wmissing-braces]"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70924 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug rtl-optimization/77499] [8/9/10 Regression] Regression after code-hoisting, due to combine pass failing to evaluate known value range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77499 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/93579] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_substring_expr, at fortran/trans-expr.c:8587

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93579 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug rtl-optimization/88596] [9/10 Regression] ICE: Maximum number of LRA assignment passes is achieved (30)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88596 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/91807] [9/10 Regression] std::variant with multiple identical types assignment fail to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91807 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug middle-end/91858] [9/10 Regression] Compile time hog w/ complex float trigonometric functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91858 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug testsuite/94019] [9 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-17.c fails starting with g:370c2ebe8fa20e0812cd2d533d4ed38ee2d37c85, r9-1590

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94019 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug fortran/93686] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_data, at fortran/decl.c:702

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93686 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug gcov-profile/93401] [9/10 regression] It is no longer possible to use -fprofile-generate= on setups with different instrumentation and feedback directories

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93401 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug ipa/89584] [9/10 Regression] CPU2000 degradations with r268448 (172.mgrid -22%, 252.eon -8%)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89584 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug target/91735] [9/10 Regression] Runtime regression for SPEC2000 177.mesa on Haswell around the end of August 2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91735 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/94043] [9/10 Regression] ICE in superloop_at_depth, at cfgloop.c:78

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94043 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug gcov-profile/85276] [GCOV] A comparative statement with '=', '&&' , '||', and '==' operators is wrongly marked as executed twice in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85276 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug fortran/85839] [F2018] warn for obsolescent features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85839 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug c++/88826] ICE (segfault) when compiling invalid C++ code with -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88826 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug rtl-optimization/90378] [9/10 regression] -Os -flto miscompiles 454.calculix after r266385 on Arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90378 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug tree-optimization/57534] [8/9/10 Regression]: Performance regression versus 4.7.3, 4.8.1 is ~15% slower

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #37 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/89760] [9/10 Regression] libstdc++ experimental testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89760 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug ipa/57218] [8/9/10 Regression] Excessive inlining even at -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57218 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/93808] [9 Regression] [SH] Ruby crashes with 'Illegal Instruction' with -fcrossjumping

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93808 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/88494] [9/10 Regression] polyhedron 10% mdbx runtime regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88494 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug gcov-profile/85179] [GCOV] A label followed with a blank statement is wrongly marked as not executed in Gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85179 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug preprocessor/84864] Issues with large line numbers >= 2^31

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84864 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug fortran/93581] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_dataptr_offset, at fortran/trans-array.c:6951

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93581 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug gcov-profile/85351] [GCOV] Wrong coverage with exit() executed in a if statement within a called function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85351 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug ada/86916] Constraint_Error erroneous memory access instead of error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86916 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug rtl-optimization/87763] [9/10 Regression] aarch64 target testcases fail after r265398

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87763 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #67 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/82013] better error message for missing semicolon in prototype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82013 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug target/93800] [9 Regression] GCC adds unwanted nops to align loops on powerpc 8xx since r9-1623

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93800 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug gcov-profile/85349] [GCOV] struct varaible definition in while(1) will cause incorrect coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85349 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug d/90136] [d] Merge UDAs between function prototype and definitions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90136 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug middle-end/89270] [9/10 regression] AVR ICE: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89270 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug d/89254] std.net.curl and std.parallelism unittests hang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89254 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug target/91710] [9/10 Regression] unexpected ABI change note since r9-5650

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91710 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug libstdc++/93244] std::filesystem::path::generic_string doesn't convert the first slash on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93244 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug gcov-profile/85336] [GCOV] wrong coverage for builtin functions and "||" logic operators in return statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85336 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug target/93877] [9/10 Regression] [SH] webkit2gtk fails to build with "internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2211"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93877 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/91846] [9/10 Regression] ICE in use_thunk, at cp/method.c:316

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91846 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug rtl-optimization/90007] [9 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2223

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90007 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/91648] [9/10 Regression] ICE in generate_finalization_wrapper, at fortran/class.c:2009

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91648 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug d/90065] Unaligned accesses on strict-alignment targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90065 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug rtl-optimization/87871] [9/10 Regression] testcases fail after r265398 on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87871 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #64 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/81392] Improve diagnostics for [[fallthrough]] attribute that is missing a semicolon

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81392 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug rtl-optimization/85412] [8 Regression] ICE in put_TImodes, at sel-sched.c:7191

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85412 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug ipa/80277] ipa-icf overlooking functions with identical assemble and semantics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80277 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug c++/84918] Better handling of "std::cout >> 42;"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84918 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug libfortran/94143] [9/10 Regression] Asynchronous execute_command_line() breaks following synchronous calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94143 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug gcov-profile/85199] [GCOV] A cond-expr with a iterative variable in a for loop is marked as "-" in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85199 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug tree-optimization/84053] [8/9 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds accessing a local array across inlined function boundaries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84053 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/84895] Smarter suggestions for "private" accessor hints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84895 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug ada/89493] [9/10 Regression] Stack smashing on armv7hl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89493 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug go/88406] [9 regression] Many 64-bit Solaris 10/SPARC execution tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88406 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug target/85005] Redesign and cleanup arm.c wrt to flag_stack_clash_protection and flag_stack_check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85005 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug c/94040] [9/10 Regression] ICE on a call to an invalid redeclaration of strftime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94040 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug c/69602] [8/9/10 Regression] over-ambitious logical-op warning on EAGAIN vs EWOULDBLOCK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69602 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/84917] Verbosity when dealing with nested template data structures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84917 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug middle-end/88129] Two blockage insns are emited in the function epilogue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88129 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug gcov-profile/85201] [GCOV] A statement with two && operators and a comma operator in the for loop body is wrongly marked in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85201 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug fortran/91640] [9 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed (contiguous expr)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91640 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug tree-optimization/90387] [9 Regression] __builtin_constant_p and -Warray-bounds warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90387 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug d/90729] libphobos.phobos_shared/std/math.d FAILs on Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90729 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug fortran/93685] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_constructor_append_expr, at fortran/constructor.c:135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93685 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek -

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >