http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48618
Summary: Negative unit number in OPEN(...) is sometimes allowed
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48587
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-15 09:13:14
UTC ---
Reading the standard, my simple suggestion in #1 will not actually work. One
reason is that the NEWUNIT value may not be -1; with my approach this is
possible
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48419
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||45715
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48664
Summary: Use autoconf test instead of target blacklist to
determine weak undefined reference support
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
--- Comment #54 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-18
12:07:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #53)
Rainer, all: Is the problem now fixed on 4.7? If so, should it be backported
for 4.6.1? And can then the PR be closed?
FWIW, I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
--- Comment #56 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-18
15:49:23 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Mon Apr 18 15:49:16 2011
New Revision: 172656
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172656
Log:
PR 47571 Fix weakref trickery
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48682
Summary: Incorrect field justification with Gw.d edit
descriptor
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48692
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48682
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
--- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-20 13:09:51
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
Here is some sample code (extreme, I admit) which profits a lot from
inlining:
- Strides
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
--- Comment #11 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-20
18:14:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
But do we actually do this? I did some tests a while ago, and IIRC for
assumed
shape dummy arguments the procedure always
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25830
--- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-25 16:41:26
UTC ---
Some writings arguing that POSIX locking is more or less fundamentally broken:
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/locking.html
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48511
--- Comment #9 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27 18:36:12
UTC ---
I've been thinking about this issue now and then over the past few weeks, and
funnily enough, while I initially thought this would be a nice improvement,
I've
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48511
--- Comment #10 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-28
09:30:10 UTC ---
As an addendum to the above, one thing we could do with modest effort and
without importing Gay's code would be to remove trailing zeros for G0 (and
maybe list
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48488
--- Comment #6 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-29 15:58:23
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Fri Apr 29 15:58:20 2011
New Revision: 173169
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173169
Log:
PR 48488 Fix comments
Modified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48488
--- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-29 16:06:55
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Fri Apr 29 16:06:48 2011
New Revision: 173171
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173171
Log:
PR 48488 Typo
Modified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48488
--- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-29 16:03:57
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Fri Apr 29 16:03:54 2011
New Revision: 173170
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173170
Log:
PR 48488 Fix comments
Modified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48874
Summary: Sign of zeros sometimes lost in literals
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48874
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
--- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 03:33:30
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
We have another PR in place that is related to this, pr31190
Thanks for the reminder.
One thought was to hide this behind an option
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48878
Summary: Default I/O rounding on output should be round to
nearest
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 12:11:02
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
neither 0PFw.d nor 1PEw.dEe allow it). However, AFAICS leading blanks are
still
allowed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
--- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 12:44:42
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
On 05/05/2011 12:04 AM, thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
---snip
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48915
--- Comment #1 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-06 11:31:38
UTC ---
Assigning to myself, I have some ideas to improve error handling and fix this
in the process.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48915
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jb at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48915
Summary: Incorrect process return code with -fdump-core
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48931
Summary: Backtrace functionality not async-signal-safe
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
--- Comment #13 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-10
09:41:08 UTC ---
Here's something for formatted writes; consider the write-many.f (from some
other PR, I'm too lazy to check which now)
program main
open(10,status='SCRATCH
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48972
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48972
--- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-12 21:02:40
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
- Specify that the default character set is UTF-8.
What do you mean by that? I know 1 byte and 4 byte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48915
--- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-14 08:44:12
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sat May 14 08:44:09 2011
New Revision: 173750
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173750
Log:
PR 48915 Abort handling
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48915
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48915
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-14 10:20:59
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sat May 14 10:20:56 2011
New Revision: 173753
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173753
Log:
PR 48915 Update mixed-language
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48915
--- Comment #6 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-14 10:24:20
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sat May 14 10:24:18 2011
New Revision: 173754
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173754
Log:
PR 48915 Update mixed-language
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48931
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jb at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48931
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48915
--- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-15 10:23:56
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun May 15 10:23:53 2011
New Revision: 173770
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173770
Log:
PR 48915 Clarify
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49010
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49010
--- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-17 14:02:07
UTC ---
So does the fallback path actually ever get used? AFAICS the builtins are
always available, and if the builtin results in a call to fmod{f,,l,Q} we have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49010
--- Comment #11 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-17
16:18:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 02:17:22PM +, jb at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
So does the fallback path actually ever get used? AFAICS
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49052
--- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19 09:01:30
UTC ---
Not a GCC bug.
As an aside, CIFS mounts work quite well IF the server supports the CIFS Unix
extensions; Samba supports those, but IIRC the Windows CIFS
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48982
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48977
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48982
--- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-20 13:40:47
UTC ---
Actually, in the version control log for acinclude.m4 we have
commit b00fa2cfbfd81cbdc31d5a44e4ce8140cc153776
Author: fxcoudert fxcoudert@138bc75d-0d04-0410
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48982
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48977
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48977
--- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-20 14:45:53
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Fri May 20 14:45:51 2011
New Revision: 173952
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173952
Log:
PR 48977 Denormal exception
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48931
--- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-22 16:38:08
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun May 22 16:38:05 2011
New Revision: 174030
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174030
Log:
PR 48931 Make backtrace async
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48931
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19155
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19155
--- Comment #28 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-29
08:59:47 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun May 29 08:59:44 2011
New Revision: 174393
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174393
Log:
PR 19155 Check for strtod
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48982
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19155
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49214
--- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-29 13:17:20
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun May 29 13:17:17 2011
New Revision: 174395
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174395
Log:
PR 49214 fd_gets should return
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48931
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-29 20:13:56
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun May 29 20:13:52 2011
New Revision: 174415
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174415
Log:
PR 48931 Use async-signal-safe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49214
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |---
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jb at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
--- Comment #10 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-18
07:53:12 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sat Jun 18 07:53:09 2011
New Revision: 175166
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175166
Log:
PR 49296 List directed read
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48296
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-18 07:53:12
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sat Jun 18 07:53:09 2011
New Revision: 175166
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175166
Log:
PR 49296 List directed read
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48296
--- Comment #6 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-03 15:54:05
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun Jul 3 15:54:02 2011
New Revision: 175787
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175787
Log:
PR 48296 Accept EOF as separator
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
--- Comment #12 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-03
15:54:05 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun Jul 3 15:54:02 2011
New Revision: 175787
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175787
Log:
PR 48296 Accept EOF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
--- Comment #13 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-03
16:00:34 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun Jul 3 16:00:32 2011
New Revision: 175788
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175788
Log:
PR 49296 Fix wrong PR number
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
--- Comment #14 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-03
17:37:33 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun Jul 3 17:37:30 2011
New Revision: 175789
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175789
Log:
PR 49296 Fix wrong PR number
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
--- Comment #15 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-03
17:40:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 24662
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24662
Updated testcase
Updated testcase that checks integer, real, and logical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
--- Comment #16 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-13
18:46:48 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Wed Jul 13 18:46:44 2011
New Revision: 176245
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=176245
Log:
PR 49296 List read, EOF without
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
--- Comment #17 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-13
18:52:43 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Wed Jul 13 18:52:40 2011
New Revision: 176246
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=176246
Log:
PR 49296 List read, EOF before
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46945
--- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-15 11:57:28
UTC ---
The offending patch is most likely
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg02499.html
Wrt. the recent changes in the definition of size_t, there is
http
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28105
--- Comment #11 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-15
17:15:31 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Wed Dec 15 17:15:25 2010
New Revision: 167860
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167860
Log:
PR 28105 Remove size0 checks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47007
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47154
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47296
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47296
--- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-15 19:31:17
UTC ---
I suppose one thing that could be done is to set opp-file and opp-file_len
regardless of whether mkstemp() succeeds or not, that is lines 1987:1093 in
unix.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47296
--- Comment #10 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-16
20:12:55 UTC ---
Well, I was thinking more something like the patch I just posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01086.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46267
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46267
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47375
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46267
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p |http://gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46267
--- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-21 22:42:26
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Fri Jan 21 22:42:17 2011
New Revision: 169110
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169110
Log:
PR 46267 strerror thread safety
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46267
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47431
Summary: ctime() not thread-safe
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47431
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47432
Summary: ttyname() not thread-safe
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47432
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47439
--- Comment #1 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-25 09:28:14
UTC ---
Seems the reason for Windows _mktemp() behavior is due to replicating some
age-old BSD behavior. From the Linux mktemp(3) manpage:
BUGS
Never use mktemp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25071
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47375
--- Comment #6 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-25 16:46:07
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Tue Jan 25 16:46:00 2011
New Revision: 169243
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169243
Log:
PR 47375 getlog thread safety
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47491
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-27 16:10:41
UTC ---
Some git-grepping showed that at least libjava has in configure.ac
AC_DEFINE(_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS, 1, [Required define if using POSIX
threads
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47491
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47491
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-27 17:34:18
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Thu Jan 27 17:34:14 2011
New Revision: 169334
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169334
Log:
PR 47491 getpwuid_r() bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47491
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47375
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47432
--- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-27 20:05:49
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Thu Jan 27 20:05:45 2011
New Revision: 169337
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169337
Log:
PR 47432 Use ttyname_r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47432
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-27 20:08:44
UTC ---
Fixed, closing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47432
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47431
--- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-27 20:22:46
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Thu Jan 27 20:22:37 2011
New Revision: 169338
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169338
Log:
Pr 47431 CTIME/FDATE thread
201 - 300 of 690 matches
Mail list logo
