[Bug c++/102995] Template friend class declaration of same class with different template parameters fails to allow private methods access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102995 --- Comment #4 from Jose Dapena Paz --- Definitely the proposed approach fixes the issue in GCC. And it looks to me it makes more sense (it looks to me the code in Chromium is reversing the expected meaning of friend there). I will propose a

[Bug c++/102995] New: Template friend class declaration of same class with different template parameters fails to allow private methods access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102995 Bug ID: 102995 Summary: Template friend class declaration of same class with different template parameters fails to allow private methods access Product: gcc

[Bug libstdc++/112314] Missing index assertions in basic_string_view

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112314 --- Comment #2 from Jose Dapena Paz --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > For the second one, I did start work on a patch that attempts to verify that > the provided length is not more than __builtin_object_size. I can't remember

[Bug libstdc++/112314] Missing index assertions in basic_string_view

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112314 --- Comment #5 from Jose Dapena Paz --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > (In reply to Jose Dapena Paz from comment #2) > > In any case, the failing test is actually passing -1, my understanding is > > that that one should always

[Bug libstdc++/112314] New: Missing index assertions in basic_string_view

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112314 Bug ID: 112314 Summary: Missing index assertions in basic_string_view Product: gcc Version: 12.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/105996] New: reinterpret_cast in constexpr failure creating a pair with a function pointer of class parent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105996 Bug ID: 105996 Summary: reinterpret_cast in constexpr failure creating a pair with a function pointer of class parent Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/109505] Compiler loops forever to OOM while compiling evaluate_prg_hwy.cc in Chromium

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109505 --- Comment #3 from Jose Dapena Paz --- Created attachment 54858 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54858=edit evaluate_prg_hwy.ii (compressed with gzip)

[Bug c++/109505] Compiler loops forever to OOM while compiling evaluate_prg_hwy.cc in Chromium

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109505 --- Comment #2 from Jose Dapena Paz --- Information collected: ### g++ -v aarch64-poky-linux-g++ -v Using built-in specs.

[Bug c++/109505] New: Compiler loops forever to OOM while compiling evaluate_prg_hwy.cc in Chromium

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109505 Bug ID: 109505 Summary: Compiler loops forever to OOM while compiling evaluate_prg_hwy.cc in Chromium Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/64236] [c++11] last alignas overrides stricter on a class definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64236 Jose Dapena Paz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jdapena at igalia dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/113074] New: requires requires should be SFINAE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113074 Bug ID: 113074 Summary: requires requires should be SFINAE Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/114962] New: For each iteration in static assert fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114962 Bug ID: 114962 Summary: For each iteration in static assert fails to compile Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3