--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-04 20:56
---
Can this PR be closed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40839
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-04 21:18
---
Yikes, this slipped in the crack. I am doing triage today and noticed this.
Assigning to myself.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-04 21:25
---
Assigning to myself only to remind me to investigate to see where this stands
now.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-04 21:51
---
Any new information on this issue?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40020
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-05 02:49
---
OK, This got fixed somewhere along the way and the test case provided works
fine.
Closing.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-05 02:54
---
Reopening:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/lto/pr40725 f_lto_pr40725_0.o-f_lto_pr40725_1.o execute -O2
-fwhopr
I think LTO folks already know about this.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-03 15:10
---
There are two unrelated bugs in output rounding. The following patch fixes
both. The smaller hunks were obvious. The larger gets rid of a hack I did to
handle the special case with d=0. The rounding logic
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-03 16:17
---
Correction to comment #13, Shifting bytes right not left. Also, I have
completed testing using memmove instead of the explicit for loop.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35862
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-02 02:32
---
Reply to comment #10: Thanks for the input and references. The perspective of
rounding before conversion to binary representation is interesting. I will
think on that a bit.
Reply to comment #11: Thanks
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-01 01:37
---
Rounding modes are now implemented for formatted WRITE operations. I do not
have a clear enough idea of what the rounding modes really mean for READ
operations. For example:
From Comment #4
Rounding is done
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-29 02:44
---
Subject: Bug 35862
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Sep 29 02:44:38 2009
New Revision: 152262
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152262
Log:
2009-09-28 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-29 02:48
---
Subject: Bug 35862
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Sep 29 02:47:54 2009
New Revision: 152263
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152263
Log:
2009-09-28 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-29 02:51
---
Subject: Bug 35862
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Sep 29 02:50:48 2009
New Revision: 152264
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152264
Log:
2009-09-28 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-27 00:39
---
I can reproduce this on 4.3.3 and 4.5.0 r151904.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-27 00:50
---
gfortran is not considered release critical and so is never given a blocker
status.
Changing to normal.
Regarding the intent(out) issue. I will defer to others.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-27 01:13
---
The problem goes away if the allocatable specification is removed from the
declaration of 'a'
Problem also occurs on gfortran 4.3.0
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41479
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-19 06:15
---
Reduced case:
Expected result:
$ ./a.out
0 ERRORS ENCOUNTERED
Wrong result:
$ ./a.out
1 ERRORS ENCOUNTERED
PROGRAM FM013
I01 = 5
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-19 15:01
---
Lets keep this bug open while you are hunting so we don't forget. Waiting
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-19 17:21
---
Subject: Bug 41328
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Sep 19 17:21:20 2009
New Revision: 151883
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151883
Log:
2009-09-19 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-19 17:24
---
Subject: Bug 41328
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Sep 19 17:23:43 2009
New Revision: 151884
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151884
Log:
2009-09-19 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-19 17:35
---
Fixed on 4.4, closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-18 19:20
---
Here is a new test case, closely related, reported on fortran list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-09/msg00126.html
The read of the last line in a file without the end-of-line marker should be
treated
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.4.2 |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41328
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-19 04:42
---
Subject: Bug 41328
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Sep 19 04:41:38 2009
New Revision: 151877
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151877
Log:
2009-09-18 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-19 04:45
---
Subject: Bug 41328
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Sep 19 04:45:00 2009
New Revision: 151878
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151878
Log:
2009-09-18 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-19 04:50
---
Refixed on trunk.
Patch committed as obvious. Will backport to 4.4 in a day.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-19 05:44
---
Created an attachment (id=18605)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18605action=view)
NIST test case that is failing
I will try to reduce this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-19 05:47
---
Its ugly code so remember to compile with -w and save the attachment as a .f
file so that fixed form is used. This will turn off all of the warnings.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41403
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-17 19:15
---
I agree, this is enhancement only. Code that relies on or expects consistent
behavior when the users has created and symlink is likely not protable. See
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-09/msg00107.html
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-13 14:30
---
I will not have time to work on this one. Un-assigning.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-13 14:31
---
Fixed. I see no point in warning on a comment.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-12 14:48
---
I will do the write.c one.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-13 03:41
---
Subject: Bug 41328
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Sep 13 03:41:41 2009
New Revision: 151665
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151665
Log:
2009-09-12 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-13 03:44
---
Subject: Bug 41328
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Sep 13 03:44:34 2009
New Revision: 151666
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151666
Log:
2009-09-12 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-13 03:46
---
Fixed on trunk. Will commit to 4.4.x in a few days.
(approved by Janne on IRC)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41328
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-11 00:16
---
yes, this is a duplicate of the other PR I am workinmg on (PR41168). The code
snippet in comment #1 is the exact spot I am working on. Two problems here. We
can possiblly accessing memory that has not been
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-11 05:33
---
Patch submitted. See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-09/msg00062.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41328
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-11 05:38
---
PR41328 was submitted which has a little bit easier test case to use while not
requiring mingw environment. So, I am closing this bug as the duplicate even
though it was reported here first.
A patch has been
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-10 01:08
---
Features, features, features, always features... :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41298
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-09 00:58
---
It is not clear whether we have two bugs or one here yet. I am investigating.
One way to possibly reproduce this on linux machines is to define HAVE_CRLF in
libgfortran/io/io.h. This way, all files affected
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-09 02:11
---
I am able to reproduce this now, so I will begin to see if I can pinpoint the
problem.
Using:
Index: io.h
===
--- io.h(revision 151491
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-07 23:58
---
I worked on some of the current large file defines in libgfortran. Show me a
patch of what you want to do. It should be OK. A patch is worth a thousand
words.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-08 00:59
---
Subject: Bug 41219
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Sep 8 00:59:05 2009
New Revision: 151495
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151495
Log:
2009-09-07 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-08 00:59
---
Subject: Bug 41192
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Sep 8 00:59:05 2009
New Revision: 151495
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151495
Log:
2009-09-07 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-08 01:19
---
Subject: Bug 41192
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Sep 8 01:18:48 2009
New Revision: 151496
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151496
Log:
2009-09-07 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-06 18:17
---
Let me fix this.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-06 21:21
---
The following patch gets rid of the two warnings in list_read.c. The two
enumerators have equivalent value. Regression tests fine.
@@ -2377,7 +2377,7 @@
/* GFC_TYPE_UNKNOWN through for nulls
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-07 02:57
---
Regarding comment #6.
In write_a_char4, one has:
const char crlf[] = \r\n;
write_default_char4 (dtp, crlf, 2, 0);
but the second argument should be gfc_char4_t*
Right. So what is \r\n
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-05 14:54
---
ICE confirmed with test case on 4.5
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 20:16
---
Putting the standards discussion aside, this test case actually uncovered a
real bug. In list_read.c, eat_line does nothing for internal units.
If the test had used a real file, the comment would have been
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 20:19
---
A side note: there are several places where we should use eat_line but instead
we now have explicit loops. I will take a scan through and find those while I
am at it. Just code clean-up.
--
http
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 23:09
---
I will add this to my list.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-02 01:03
---
Subject: Bug 39229
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Sep 2 01:03:34 2009
New Revision: 151309
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151309
Log:
2009-09-01 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-02 01:19
---
Closing.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-01 03:02
---
Subject: Bug 39229
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Sep 1 03:02:07 2009
New Revision: 151258
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151258
Log:
2009-08-31 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 18:15
---
Strictly speaking, Steve, I think you are correct.
I have not finished my review of the standard. This is the first time I have
seen namelist used like this for command line input. I suspect because it
allows
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 17:32
---
Thanks for report , I will fix this.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-26 00:39
---
Works for me on latest trunk. 4.5
$ ./a.out
1234567890
end of file detected
Please post the output from gfortran -v and also the exact URL where you got
the download. The binaries from the wiki
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-26 01:03
---
oops, you got it from equation.com. Hmm, I don't know much how they create
their distribution.Suggest you contact them and see what they think.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41168
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-26 03:20
---
No bad news for a day, closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 01:03
---
Patch is simple and obvious. I will commit shortly.
Index: io.c
===
--- io.c(revision 151045)
+++ io.c(working copy)
@@ -694,7
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 01:05
---
Subject: Bug 41154
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Aug 25 01:05:11 2009
New Revision: 151070
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151070
Log:
2009-08-24 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 01:14
---
Subject: Bug 41154
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Aug 25 01:14:13 2009
New Revision: 151071
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151071
Log:
2009-08-24 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 01:21
---
Closing. By all means let me know if anything else crops up. Thanks for
catching this.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 01:22
---
Closing, fixed on trunk.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 01:24
---
Closing, fixed on trunk. Note to self. Have some locus clean-ups to do
relative to 38439. Will pick those off next.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 05:22
---
Subject: Bug 41162
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Aug 25 05:22:14 2009
New Revision: 151074
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151074
Log:
2009-08-24 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 05:24
---
Fixed. I will leave this open for a bit. At the rate I am going I will break
everything by midnight. (zzz)
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 06:25
---
F95 Standard: 10.1.1
Constraint: The comma used to separate format-items in a format-item-list may
be omitted
(1) Between a P edit descriptor and an immediately following F, E, EN, ES, D,
or G edit descriptor
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-24 03:42
---
Subject: Bug 37446
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Aug 24 03:41:56 2009
New Revision: 151043
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151043
Log:
2009-08-23 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-24 04:42
---
Subject: Bug 35754
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Aug 24 04:41:51 2009
New Revision: 151045
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151045
Log:
2009-08-23 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-17 03:51
---
Patch submitted to list.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-08/msg00195.html
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #18 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-14 20:18
---
Patch applied cleanly, building , and will test shortly
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31593
--- Comment #37 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-15 00:50
---
Fixed on 4.5.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-15 02:03
---
I think we have moved past this and close it. 4.3 is regressions only.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-15 02:06
---
Toon, any word on this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39668
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-15 02:17
---
Updating summary to reflect the focus of this PR.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
: fortran
AssignedTo: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41075
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-14 00:29
---
Severity is never considered a blocker with gfortran. Marking as a regression.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-14 02:35
---
Subject: Bug 40955
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Aug 14 02:35:32 2009
New Revision: 150733
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=150733
Log:
2009-08-13 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-07 16:06
---
The problem is that the error locus is at the end of the line rather then the
end of the non-whitespace characters of the related statement.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-05 03:15
---
Subject: Bug 40853
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Aug 5 03:15:18 2009
New Revision: 150476
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=150476
Log:
2009-08-04 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-05 03:18
---
Subject: Bug 40853
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Aug 5 03:17:52 2009
New Revision: 150477
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=150477
Log:
2009-08-04 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-05 03:19
---
Fixed on 4.4 and 4.5, closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-02 18:48
---
Subject: Bug 40853
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Aug 2 18:47:46 2009
New Revision: 150357
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=150357
Log:
2009-08-02 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-01 15:42
---
Patch submitted for approval:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-08/msg1.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40853
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-29 04:40
---
Created an attachment (id=18265)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18265action=view)
A simple patch to resolve the problem
This patch solves the original test case. It does require modification
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-28 02:00
---
I will get started on this.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-28 03:09
---
As a work-around, re-arranging the derived type like this:
type tao_plot_page_struct
real size(2)
real shape_height_max
type (tao_title_struct) title
end type
May help, until I get this sorted
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-25 16:46
---
There are two things going on here. First, because of the continuation, the
scanner actually combines the two lines into one line. Secondly, we have code
that deliberately clears the truncation flag because
--- Comment #35 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-23 00:59
---
Subject: Bug 32784
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jul 23 00:58:46 2009
New Revision: 149970
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=149970
Log:
2009-07-22 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-22 00:02
---
Is there a particular reason why we can not change this to off_t with 4.5.?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39654
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-21 05:04
---
Works OK on i86-64-linux. I also ran the original test programs on Cygwin and
results are also OK all the way through.
I wonder if we can get another mingw attempt
Note: 4 Gb file here.
--
http
--- Comment #34 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-19 13:43
---
Cygwin only patch submitted. MingW next.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32784
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-19 23:10
---
Subject: Bug 40714
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jul 19 23:10:22 2009
New Revision: 149795
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=149795
Log:
2009-07-19 Janne Blomqvist j...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-19 23:22
---
Subject: Bug 40714
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jul 19 23:22:37 2009
New Revision: 149796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=149796
Log:
2009-07-19 Janne Blomqvist j...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-19 23:26
---
Subject: Bug 40714
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jul 19 23:26:20 2009
New Revision: 149797
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=149797
Log:
2009-07-19 Janne Blomqvist j...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-19 23:44
---
Fixed on 4.5.0 and 4.4.1. Thanks for bug report.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-16 01:31
---
I was trying to do it in hit_eof after the return from the error. I have not
figured it out yet. I will keep trying, but hope you find it first.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40714
501 - 600 of 3029 matches
Mail list logo
