http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50895
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14 20:21:59
UTC ---
Well, the 4.7 error you get here is due unsupport posix-threading support for
libjava on Windows targets. Not sure if I want to enhance libjava that it
supports
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51688
--- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14 20:24:16
UTC ---
Hmm, canadian cross scenario. It seems libgcc checks here for build instead of
specified host.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14 20:26:01
UTC ---
Hmm, this might be a duplicate of PR52238
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-13 15:18:19
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Feb 13 15:18:14 2012
New Revision: 184155
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184155
Log:
PR libffi/52221
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-13 21:05:45
UTC ---
hmm,
would you mind to provide a patch against current gcc's trunk?
Regards,
Kai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52217
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48514
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 16:30:59
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Fri Feb 10 16:30:47 2012
New Revision: 184100
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184100
Log:
PR boehm-gc/48514
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48514
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 16:32:44
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Fri Feb 10 16:32:36 2012
New Revision: 184101
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184101
Log:
PR boehm-gc/48514
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48514
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 19:19:56
UTC ---
Hmm, I assume issue is related to using of -mms-bitfields for 4.7 for
windows-targets.
Does the following patch fix the issue?
Index: exception.cc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40068
--- Comment #9 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-07 10:46:06
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Feb 7 10:45:59 2012
New Revision: 183962
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183962
Log:
2012-02-07 Kai Tietz kti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40068
--- Comment #10 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-07 10:49:20
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Feb 7 10:49:14 2012
New Revision: 183963
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183963
Log:
2012-02-07 Kai Tietz kti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40068
--- Comment #11 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-07 11:48:41
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Feb 7 11:48:34 2012
New Revision: 183965
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183965
Log:
2012-02-07 Kai Tietz kti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48512
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-03 09:42:46
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Fri Feb 3 09:42:42 2012
New Revision: 183867
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183867
Log:
PR libjava/48512
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48512
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-03 10:35:11
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Fri Feb 3 10:35:06 2012
New Revision: 183868
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183868
Log:
PR libjava/48512
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48512
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48514
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48514
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02 10:51:56
UTC ---
well, the underlying issue is here the wrong assumption of the meaning of _DLL
macro for Windows targets. This macro gets defined, if shared (means DLL)
version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48512
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50044
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40068
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@convergent
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30645
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500
--- Comment #19 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-01 10:46:40
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Feb 1 10:46:36 2012
New Revision: 183794
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183794
Log:
PR target/51500
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500
--- Comment #13 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30 19:20:16
UTC ---
Right the following sequence seems to be better IMHO:
pop %eax
push %ecx
push %eax
mov __ctx, %eax
call fun
pop %ecx
mov %ecx, %(esp)
ret
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500
--- Comment #15 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30 22:21:16
UTC ---
So this should be better then:
#define FFI_INIT_TRAMPOLINE_THISCALL(TRAMP,FUN,CTX,SIZE) \
{ unsigned char *__tramp = (unsigned char*)(TRAMP); \
unsigned int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500
--- Comment #10 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30 07:29:28
UTC ---
Hmm, not sure if you already noticed it, but ffi_call supports by recent patch
thiscall/fastcall convention.
So parts of you patch won't apply mainline.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51900
--- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-23 19:55:40
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Jan 23 19:55:35 2012
New Revision: 183450
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183450
Log:
PR target/51900
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51900
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36216
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19774
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50895
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51907
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51344
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-19 22:15:30
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Jan 19 22:15:26 2012
New Revision: 183313
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183313
Log:
2012-01-19 Kai Tietz kti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51344
--- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-19 22:34:35
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Jan 19 22:34:29 2012
New Revision: 183315
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183315
Log:
Backport from trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51344
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-19 22:57:39
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Jan 19 22:57:31 2012
New Revision: 183318
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183318
Log:
Backmerged from trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51344
--- Comment #9 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-19 23:07:09
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Jan 19 23:07:01 2012
New Revision: 183319
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183319
Log:
Backmerged from trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51344
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50831
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51900
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51344
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40918
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40278
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40708
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37215
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23215
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27043
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47456
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51780
Bug #: 51780
Summary: Missed optimization for ==/!= comparison
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51781
Bug #: 51781
Summary: Missed optimization for ==/!= comparison type-sinking
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51783
Bug #: 51783
Summary: Missed optimization for X ==/!= (signed type)
((unsigned type) Y + Z)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51783
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-07 18:55:05
UTC ---
Well, IMHO it is still valid in the case of argument of ne/eq comparison, as
indeed here sign and wrap-around doesn't matter.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51783
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-07 19:04:13
UTC ---
Hmm, here I disagree. See other ==/!= comparison missed optimization.
Eg for 'x == (signed type)((unsigned type) x + z)' the transformation is
profitable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45397
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-30 17:42:56
UTC ---
Hmm, I am not that sure, if this is at all a bug, as linker can handle
undecorated stdcall-s quite well as import.
I am more curious for what purpose you actual
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51673
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-28 21:24:25
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
please apply following obvious patch:
--- gcc-4.6.0/libstdc++-v3/config/abi/pre/gnu-versioned-namespace.ver.orig
2011-12-28
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48881
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 10:23:51
UTC ---
Well, I wouldn't say that this was rude. The issue here is most likely, that
the runtime DLLs by gcc aren't in search-path when you are trying to execute
your
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9539
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48881
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-17 16:07:24
UTC ---
No idea. I've tested this on my box (for 4.5.x and for 4.6.x) and don't get
this failure at all. Shared version works as good as the static one.
So I assume
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48713
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39107
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51135
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-16 18:43:11
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Fri Dec 16 18:43:06 2011
New Revision: 182410
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182410
Log:
PR libstdc++/51135
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51135
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42768
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47456
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #18 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-13 09:18:55
UTC ---
Hmm, other way to solve this might be to add to structure the optional
attribute gcc_struct. At least I used that to fix libquadmath for 32-bit IA
Windows.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51523
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053
--- Comment #13 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-12 10:40:32
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Dec 12 10:40:27 2011
New Revision: 182225
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182225
Log:
PR libgcj/50053
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51135
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-12 13:29:14
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Dec 12 13:29:10 2011
New Revision: 182238
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182238
Log:
Correct bug-number
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51135
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51135
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51007
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 12:00:49
UTC ---
The issue is caused by bitfield layout. For mingw targets the -mms-bitfields
option is for 4.7 active by default.
So the mixture of different sized types
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51007
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 12:19:09
UTC ---
Suggested patch for this issue
ChangeLog
* quadmath-imp.h (ieee854_float128): Adjust
for ms-bitfield layout.
Index: quadmath-imp.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51007
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 22:04:00
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Nov 7 22:03:51 2011
New Revision: 181125
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181125
Log:
PR target/51007
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51007
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50795
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-19 17:44:39
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Oct 19 17:44:35 2011
New Revision: 180200
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180200
Log:
PR middle-end/50795
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50795
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49990
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-08 18:19:20
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Aug 8 18:19:17 2011
New Revision: 177573
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177573
Log:
2011-08-08 Richard Henderson
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49990
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49990
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-06 11:14:25
UTC ---
I can confirm that suggested patch fixes boolstrap issue.
The testsuite run has also no new regression for alloca related cases.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49990
Summary: Regression: Bootstrap failure for x86_64-*-mingw32 in
libfortran
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49947
--- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-02 19:31:33
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Aug 2 19:31:30 2011
New Revision: 177205
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177205
Log:
2011-08-02 Kai Tietz kti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49947
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49806
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48984
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-13 09:21:51
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Fri May 13 09:21:36 2011
New Revision: 173726
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173726
Log:
2011-05-13 Kai Tietz kti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48984
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48515
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
601 - 700 of 844 matches
Mail list logo