https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52904
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52904
--- Comment #11 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I agree. I will post a patch to add this test-case and let the maintainers
decide if this is necessary.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52904
--- Comment #12 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Mon Aug 18 06:28:35 2014
New Revision: 214084
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214084root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite
2014-08-18 Kugan Vivekanandarajah kug
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
Created attachment 33392
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33392action=edit
testcase
rm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc -O -march=armv3 inffast.i
inffast.i: In function ‘inflate_fast
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62254
--- Comment #1 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Imported from LP https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1307197
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60034
--- Comment #6 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Sun Mar 30 22:41:59 2014
New Revision: 208949
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208949root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/60034
* aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_classify_address): Fix
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
In current trunk, fortran.dg/pr45636.f90 fails for AArch64 as memcpy and memset
are not combined.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64045
--- Comment #1 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Look at gcc/tree-ssa-fwprop.c:1650
/* If the new memcpy wouldn't be emitted by storing the literal
by pieces, this optimization might enlarge .rodata too much,
as commonly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64304
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64537
--- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Is this sort of multiple-use potential candidate for ree pass? Haven't looked
ree in detail yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64537
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64537
--- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
But isn't w1 is passed with 16bit value (short b) here. Am I missing something
here?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64532
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64525
--- Comment #1 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
compiler options:
arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc -O3 -S test.c
arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/home/kugan/work/builds/gcc-fsf-gcc/tools/bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
Created attachment 34395
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34395action=edit
testcase
gcc is generating the same instructions down both paths
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61207
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65375
--- Comment #1 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc -O2 -ffast-math -unsafe-math-optimisations
-mfpu=neon produces just:
hello_vst2:
@ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
@ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
#include arm_neon.h
void hello_vst2(float* fout, float *fin)
{
float32x4x2_t a;
a = vld2q_f32 (fin);
vst2q_f32 (fout, a);
}
with aarch64-none-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -ffast-math -unsafe-math-optimisations
produces
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65375
--- Comment #2 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
aarch64-none-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -ffast-math -unsafe-math-optimisations
-fno-split-wide-types produces :
ld2{v2.4s - v3.4s}, [x1]
orrv0.16b, v2.16b, v2.16b
orrv1.16b, v3.16b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65375
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65375
--- Comment #8 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch is at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-03/msg00857.html and not
approved yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66090
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66066
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65768
--- Comment #2 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Sat May 16 09:35:52 2015
New Revision: 223235
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223235root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-05-16 Kugan Vivekanandarajah kug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018
--- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For aarch64-none-elf it fails during.
01:53:39 checking for dirent.h that defines DIR... no
01:53:39 checking for sys/ndir.h that defines DIR... no
01:53:39 checking for sys/dir.h that defines DIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65768
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |kugan at gcc dot
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
#include stdint.h
void maskdata(int32_t * data, unsigned int len)
{
const int32_t mask = 0x00ff00ff;
for (int i=len; i-- 0 ;) {
data[i] = mask;
}
}
Is producing the following with arm-none
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64263
--- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Wed Apr 8 21:37:47 2015
New Revision: 221936
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221936root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-04-09 Kugan Vivekanandarajah kugan.vivekanandara
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65768
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65768
--- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Tue Jun 2 22:53:15 2015
New Revision: 224048
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224048root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-06-03 Kugan Vivekanandarajah kug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65375
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64130
--- Comment #10 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #6)
(In reply to kugan from comment #5)
I think it should be in from front-end?
?
Sorry for the confusing terminology.
for the case
int fsigned(int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64130
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66554
--- Comment #8 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Starting bisect now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66554
--- Comment #6 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
-fno-tree-forwprop works.
forwprop propagates:
vect__11.22_96 = (vector(4) float) vect_c.21_94;
vect__13.24_98 = (vector(4) signed int) vect__11.22_96;
into:
vect__13.24_98 = (vector(4) signed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66554
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66554
--- Comment #2 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
can_fix_p is returining CODE_FOR_nothing for converting from tomode=V4SImode to
frommode=V4SFmode with branch 4.9. With trunk it is returning
CODE_FOR_fix_truncv4sfv4si2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66554
--- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
correction:
with 4.9 when it ICE we have:
Breakpoint 1, expand_fix (to=to@entry=0x765b5480, from=0x765b2000,
unsignedp=unsignedp@entry=0) at
/home/kugan/work/sources/gcc-fsf/4.9/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
--- Comment #1 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35888
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35888action=edit
untested prototype patch
Hi Jeff,
Here is a patch (without debug dumps and not tesetd fully
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
--- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
(In reply to kugan from comment #3)
really you should handle more
than two arguments to phis.
I am not sure how we can handle phi stmt with more
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66759
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
--- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
really you should handle more
than two arguments to phis.
I am not sure how we can handle phi stmt with more than two arguments here. Any
hints please?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64130
--- Comment #11 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Mon Jun 29 00:15:41 2015
New Revision: 225108
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225108root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-06-29 Kugan Vivekanandarajah kug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66865
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
--- Comment #12 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35976
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35976action=edit
patch for tree-ssa-reassoc
Here is a prototype patch (to fix comment 9) that makes tree-ssa-reassoc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66865
--- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ok, I downloaded wine-1.7.47.tar.bz2 and built it with trunk gcc. What do I
have to do to reproduce this please?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66865
--- Comment #12 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to austinenglish from comment #5)
(In reply to kugan from comment #4)
Ok, I downloaded wine-1.7.47.tar.bz2 and built it with trunk gcc. What do I
have to do to reproduce this please
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
--- Comment #11 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks for reporting. This test case is valid for targets that has branch cost
greater than 1.
One way to handle this is by disabling this for convections involving bool that
are part of branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
--- Comment #8 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Sun Jul 12 11:22:42 2015
New Revision: 225722
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225722root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-07-12 Kugan Vivekanandarajah kug
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
__attribute__ ((noinline))
double direct(int x, ...)
{
return x*x;
}
__attribute__ ((noinline))
double broken(double
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714
--- Comment #2 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It is the same issue and the patch posted in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg00403.html fixes this test-case
too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
--- Comment #14 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry I missed this. I posted patch which was OKed but in further testing I
found an issue. I am testing a modified patch and will post for review soon.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63586
--- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think the intention is to have multiplication by power-of-2?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63586
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63586
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincenzo.innocente at cern dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63586
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36908|0 |1
is obsolete
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68390
--- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed in trunk. We also need to back-port this to branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69077
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68390
--- Comment #1 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Sun Nov 22 23:07:58 2015
New Revision: 230730
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230730=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-11-23 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69194
--- Comment #2 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Tue Jan 12 00:40:54 2016
New Revision: 232251
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232251=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-01-12 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 37271
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37271=edit
testcase
Attached testcase ICE with:
t.C: In funct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71408
--- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted for review at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00330.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71170
--- Comment #15 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #14)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> > Is it still broken?
>
> I think so. Attachment seems to break svn 237286, dated to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71478
--- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71478
--- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Fri Jun 10 21:57:01 2016
New Revision: 237318
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237318=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-06-11 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71478
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71281
--- Comment #9 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Anton Mitrokhin from comment #8)
> Is this fixed?
Yes. Is this still not working for you?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71281
--- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry about the breakage. Looking into it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71281
--- Comment #6 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted for review at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00316.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71281
--- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 38640
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38640=edit
proposed patch
testing this patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71408
--- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looking into it. Looks like zero_one_operation is still broken.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71170
--- Comment #17 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kugan from comment #15)
> (In reply to David Binderman from comment #14)
> > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> > > Is it still broken?
> >
&g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71170
--- Comment #16 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kugan from comment #10)
> Author: kugan
> Date: Tue May 24 00:14:13 2016
> New Revision: 236619
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236619=gcc=rev
> Lo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71281
--- Comment #7 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Mon Jun 6 23:41:26 2016
New Revision: 237157
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237157=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-06-07 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71408
--- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Mon Jun 6 23:46:11 2016
New Revision: 237158
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237158=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-06-07 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
--- Comment #21 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Mon May 30 10:45:19 2016
New Revision: 236875
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236875=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-05-30 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71323
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71292
--- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Mon May 30 10:47:57 2016
New Revision: 236876
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236876=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-05-30 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
--- Comment #22 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Mon May 30 10:47:57 2016
New Revision: 236876
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236876=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-05-30 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71269
--- Comment #16 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Mon May 30 10:47:57 2016
New Revision: 236876
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236876=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-05-30 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
--- Comment #12 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Posted patch at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg02061.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71292
--- Comment #1 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #0)
> An aarch64-none-linux-gnu bootstrap with an in-tree mpfr fails with an ICE:
> exp_2.i: In function ‘fn1’:
> exp_2.i:4:6: internal compi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
--- Comment #14 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Roger Orr from comment #13)
> The patch sadly does not appear to fix the (very similar looking) valgrind
> compilation failure I posted in pr71269.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71269
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71292
--- Comment #2 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kugan from comment #1)
> (In reply to ktkachov from comment #0)
> > An aarch64-none-linux-gnu bootstrap with an in-tree mpfr fails with an ICE:
> > exp_2.i: I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71284
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71292
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71269
--- Comment #10 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #9)
> (In reply to kugan from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Roger Orr from comment #7)
> > > I've got a very similar problem,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71269
--- Comment #12 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #11)
> > Sorry, I missed that.
> >
> > on x86-64-linux-gnu, with the current trunk:
> > ./build/gcc/cc1 -O2 m_mallocfree.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71269
--- Comment #8 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Roger Orr from comment #7)
> I've got a very similar problem, building valgrind with trunk revision
> 236644:
>
> m_mallocfree.c: In function 'sanity_check_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69194
--- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks for the reminder. I will commit the back-port today. I wanted leave few
days in the trunk before doing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69194
--- Comment #6 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Sun Jan 17 02:44:26 2016
New Revision: 232481
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232481=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-01-17 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
Ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
--- Comment #17 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Fri Feb 12 06:40:55 2016
New Revision: 233368
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233368=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-02-12 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
--- Comment #16 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Fri Feb 12 00:24:22 2016
New Revision: 233362
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233362=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-02-12 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.
1 - 100 of 248 matches
Mail list logo
