[Bug target/107270] [10/11/12/13 Regression] return for structure is not as good as before

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107270 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/105832] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs. 12.1.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105832 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/106240] [13 Regression] missed vectorization opportunity (cond move) on mips since r13-707-g68e0063397ba82

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106240 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/106511] [13 Regression] New -Werror=maybe-uninitialized since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c502e

||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/105834] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O2 (trunk vs. 12.1.0)

||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/108358] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -Os since r13-3378-gf6c168f8c06047

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108358 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/108355] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O2 since r13-2772-g9baee6181b4e42

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108355 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/108351] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 since r13-4240-gfeeb0d68f1c708

||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/108197] [12/13 Regression] -Wstringop-overread emitted on simple boost small_vector code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108197 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/109434] [12/13 Regression] std::optional weird -Wmaybe-unitialized and behaviour with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109434 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/109381] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Ambiguous member lookup with this-> accepted when it should be rejected

||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/105715] [13 Regression] missed RTL if-conversion with COND_EXPR change

||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/105628] [12/13 Regression] False positive with -Waddress

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105628 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/109104] [13 Regression] ICE: in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.cc:1171 with -fzero-call-used-regs=all -march=rv64gv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109104 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/108892] [13 Regression] unable to generate reloads for at -Og on riscv64 since r13-4907

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108892 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/109040] [13 Regression] wrong code with v16hi compare & mask on riscv64 at -O2 since r13-4907-g2e886eef7f2b5a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109040 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/108947] [13 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-forward-propagate and vector compare on riscv64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108947 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law --- *** Bug 109040 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/108892] [13 Regression] unable to generate reloads for at -Og on riscv64 since r13-4907

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108892 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Right. The fix is a 1-liner. I had it going through a test on x86 and riscv and lost power. Finally got it re-spun and just need to look at the results.

[Bug analyzer/109027] [13 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV (infinite recursion in ana::constraint_manager::eval_condition / ana::constraint_manager::impossible_derived_conditions_p) with -fanalyzer since r13-

||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug analyzer/107943] [11/12/13 Regression] gcc -fanalyzer hangs in openssl curve25519.c since r11-3840-gaf66094d03779377

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107943 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/109508] [13 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 with -mcpu=sifive-s76 on riscv64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109508 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug analyzer/103602] [11/12/13 regression] Analyzer takes excessive amount of memory and time linking GNU grep with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103602 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/103637] [12/13 Regression] missing warning writing past the end of one of multiple elements of the same array

||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/103829] [10/11/12/13 Regression] missing shrink wrapping for simple/obvious code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103829 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/109508] [13 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 with -mcpu=sifive-s76 on riscv64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109508 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/108723] New: [13 Regression] Recent changes broke risc-v testsuite

Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: law at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This change: commit 3cd08f7168c196d7a481b9ed9f4289fd1f14eea8 (refs/bisect/bad) Author: Andreas Schwab Date: Wed Jan 25 12:00:09 2023 +0100 riscv: Enable

[Bug tree-optimization/109721] New: [14 Regression] predcom-2 fails after recent changes

Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: law at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- arc-elf target. FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/predcom-2.c scan-tree-dump-times pcom "Unrolling 2 times." 2 Bisect

[Bug tree-optimization/110218] sink pass heuristic not working in practice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110218 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So what I think was happening was that we would sink past a bunch of conditionals that were never going to be true thinking that we were moving to a deeper control nest. So the idea was to use the

[Bug target/110559] Bad mask_load/mask_store codegen of RVV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110559 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/105832] [13/14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs. 12.1.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105832 --- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Looks viable to me. Are you thinking match.pd?

[Bug target/110748] RISC-V: optimize store of DF 0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110748 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug rtl-optimization/109592] Failure to recognize shifts as sign/zero extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109592 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Attached is what I cobbled together. It doesn't use magic numbers. But it doesn't yet handle zero extensions in the simplify-rtx code. But I think it shows the overall direction fairly well.

[Bug tree-optimization/108041] ivopts results in extra instruction in simple loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108041 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Created attachment 55185 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55185=edit (Incomplete) Patch

[Bug target/110109] RISC-V: ICE when build the Intrinsic code

||law at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Should be fixed on the trunk.

[Bug rtl-optimization/110163] [14 Regression] Comparing against a constant string is inefficient on some targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110163 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law --- It is a regression for rv64. So probably P4 would be most appropriate.

[Bug rtl-optimization/110163] New: [14 Regression] Comparing against a constant string is inefficient on some targets

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: law at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Comparing against a constant string is expanded by inline_string_cmp and on some targets the generated code

[Bug rtl-optimization/109592] Failure to recognize shifts as sign/zero extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109592 --- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Created attachment 55218 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55218=edit (Incomplete) Patch

[Bug rtl-optimization/109592] Failure to recognize shifts as sign/zero extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109592 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Weird, I don't see the attachment either. I'll extract & upload it again. WRT costing. fwprop and combine will both query the target rtx costs and will reject when the target costing model indicates the

[Bug tree-optimization/108041] ivopts results in extra instruction in simple loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108041 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Patch was for a different problem. Sorry.

[Bug driver/77576] gcc-ar doesn't work if all options are read from file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77576 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/82666] [11/12/13/14 regression]: sum += (x>128 ? x : 0) puts the cmov on the critical path (at -O2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82666 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #14

[Bug target/110264] internal compiler error: riscv_vector::vector_insn_info::get_avl_reg_rtx

||2023-06-17 Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Note that Pan can cherry pick it into gcc-13. Typically folks wait a week or so after the patch

[Bug tree-optimization/110460] New: [14 Regression] ft32 ICE on 931110-1.c with new TYPE_PRECISION checking

: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: law at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- commit fe48f2651334bc4d96b6df6b2bb6b29fcb732a83 Author: Richard Biener Date: Fri Jun 9 09:31:14 2023 +0200

[Bug target/110201] RISC-V: __builtin_riscv_sm4ks and __builtin_riscv_sm4ed produce invalid assembly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110201 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/110201] RISC-V: __builtin_riscv_sm4ks and __builtin_riscv_sm4ed produce invalid assembly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110201 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Yea, the tests aren't great. They'll be better shortly. They'll test non-constant arguments and out-of-range constants, expecting a suitable diagnostic. They'll also test the extrema of valid constants.

[Bug rtl-optimization/110423] Redundant constants not getting eliminated on RISCV.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110423 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug middle-end/79173] add-with-carry and subtract-with-borrow support (x86_64 and others)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79173 --- Comment #23 from Jeffrey A. Law --- risc-v doesn't have any special instructions to implement add-with-carry or subtract-with-borrow. Depending on who you talk do, it's either a feature or a mis-design.

[Bug debug/110308] [14 Regression] ICE on audiofile-0.3.6: RTL: vartrack: Segmentation fault in mode_to_precision(machine_mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110308 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Right. It's fairly common with fold-mem-offsets to end up rewriting the address arithmetic such that we'll have an sp->gpr copy of some sort in the IL. We'd really like to be able to cprop that copy

[Bug testsuite/109776] [14 Regression] pr81192 fails on some targets after recent propagator changes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109776 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Thanks. That took care of the xstormy16 issues.

[Bug tree-optimization/109777] New: [14 regression] Compare-debug failure after recent changes

Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: law at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This change: commit 21e2ef2dc25de318de29ec32d5390350c6717c6a (refs/bisect/bad) Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Tue May 2 00:10:46

[Bug testsuite/109776] New: [14 Regression] pr81192 fails on some targets after recent propagator changes

: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: law at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- pr81192 is failing on some targets (xstormy16-elf for example) after this change: commit

[Bug tree-optimization/109848] New: [14 Regression] Recent change causing testsuite ICE on csky port

Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: law at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This patch: commit cc0e22b3f25d4b2a326322bce711179c02377e6c Author: Richard Biener Date: Fri May 12 13:43:27 2023 +0200

[Bug rtl-optimization/109592] Failure to recognize shifts as sign/zero extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109592 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I would still rather not introduce special cases for SUBREGs if we can avoid it. I think the question remains whether or not patching simplify-rtx's canonicalize_shift is sufficient to fix this problem

[Bug target/109777] [14 regression] Compare-debug failure after recent changes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109777 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law

[Bug tree-optimization/106888] [RISCV] Negative optimization that excess andi instructions are generated in gcc.dg/pr90838.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106888 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/113570] RISC-V: SPEC2017 549 fotonik3d miscompilation in autovec VLS 256 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113570 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 113570, which changed state. Bug 113570 Summary: RISC-V: SPEC2017 549 fotonik3d miscompilation in autovec VLS 256 build https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113570 What|Removed

[Bug target/84201] 549.fotonik3d_r from SPEC2017 fails verification with recent Intel and AMD CPUs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84201 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vineetg at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/113570] RISC-V: SPEC2017 549 fotonik3d miscompilation in autovec VLS 256 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113570 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- See pr84201 for more details as well as https://www.spec.org/cpu2017/Docs/benchmarks/549.fotonik3d_r.html

[Bug c++/113976] [11/12/13/14 Regression] explicit instantiation of const variable template following implicit instantiation is assembled in .rodata instead of .bss since r8-2857-g2ec399d8a6c9c2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113976 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- What does the standard say about changing const objects?

[Bug target/110201] RISC-V: __builtin_riscv_sm4ks and __builtin_riscv_sm4ed produce invalid assembly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110201 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/113167] New: [14 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-26.c started failing many targets after recent change

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: law at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Many targets are now seeing this failure: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-26.c scan-tree-dump

[Bug target/112413] Wrong switch jump table offset

|RESOLVED CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Fixed on the trunk. No plans to backport.

[Bug testsuite/113167] [14 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-26.c started failing many targets after recent change

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113167 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So far that's the only fallout I've seen on the embedded targets. The qemu emulated natives aren't running as I've got some kind of network problem here and the workers are going offline after a few hours

[Bug other/113399] [14 Regression] -ffold-mem-offsets should not be a target option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113399 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Just something that was missed when this option was changed from target dependent to target independent. It definitely should not be a target option.

[Bug middle-end/111378] Missed optimization for comparing with exact_log2 constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111378 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Whether or not this is an optimization or a pessimization is dependent on the target -- some targets can express the constant trivially in a branch conditions, others can not. Some targets have barrel

[Bug rtl-optimization/112398] Suboptimal code generation for xor pattern on subreg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112398 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2023-11-05 00:00:00 |2024-01-13

[Bug rtl-optimization/112398] Suboptimal code generation for xor pattern on subreg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112398 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I don't think we need to do any significant bit tracking to optimize the original neg8 test. I think we can be handled entirely within the simplify-rtx framework.I've got a junior engineer that's

[Bug debug/112674] [14 Regression] Compare-debug failure after recent change on c6x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112674 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law --- And possibly more interesting than the compare-debug failure is this patch seems to be causing Wstringop-overflow-17 to fail on multiple targets, including c6x.

[Bug debug/112674] New: [14 Regression] Compare-debug failure after recent change on c6x

Priority: P3 Component: debug Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: law at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This patch: commit 6bf66276e3e41d5d92f7b7260e98b6a111653805 Author: Richard Biener Date: Wed Nov 22 11:10:41 2023 +0100 tree

[Bug tree-optimization/112848] [14 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-16.c after r14-6114-gde0ab339a79535

||2023-12-04 Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Also seeing on microblaze-linux.

[Bug target/111279] ICE: Segmentation fault with m68k,SJLJ and -malign-int

||law at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |14.0 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Should be fixed on the trunk. No plans to backport.

[Bug target/82420] ICE with -malign-int and -m68000

|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |14.0 CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Fixed on the trunk. No plans to backport.

[Bug rtl-optimization/113533] New: [14 Regression] Code generation regression after change for pr111267

Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: law at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- sh3-linux-gnu or sh3eb-linux-gnu is showing a code generation regression after the changes for pr111267. test_01 with -O1

[Bug target/108640] ICE compiling busybox for m68k in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.cc:2283

||law at gcc dot gnu.org Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Fixed on the trunk. No plans to backport.

[Bug target/110934] m68k: ICE with -fzero-call-used-regs=all compiling openssh 9.3p2

||law at gcc dot gnu.org Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Fixed on the trunk. No plans to backport.

[Bug target/112478] riscv: asm clobbers not honored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112478 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/112481] [14 Regression] RISCV: ICE: Segmentation fault when compiling pr110817-3.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112481 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/112530] New: [14 Regression] New ICE in gimple->rtl expansion after recent change

mal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: law at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This change: commit a5922427c29fad177251d89cc946d1c5bfc135eb Author: Andrew Stubbs Date: Fri Oct 20 16:26:51 2

[Bug tree-optimization/112530] [14 Regression] New ICE in gimple->rtl expansion after recent change

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112530 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/112481] [14 Regression] RISCV: ICE: Segmentation fault when compiling pr110817-3.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112481 --- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law --- *** Bug 112530 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/112415] [14 regression] Python 3.11 miscompiled on HPPA with new RTL fold mem offset pass, since r14-4664-g04c9cf5c786b94

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112415 --- Comment #43 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I would expect allowing larger offsets before reload to be a significant problem. The core issue is integer memory operations allow 14 bits while FP only allows 5. During reloading we don't know if any

[Bug rtl-optimization/112415] [14 regression] Python 3.11 miscompiled on HPPA with new RTL fold mem offset pass, since r14-4664-g04c9cf5c786b94

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112415 --- Comment #41 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I would agree. In fact,the whole point of the f-m-o pass is to bring those immediates into the memory reference. It'd be really useful to know why that isn't happening. The only thing I can think of

[Bug bootstrap/112497] [14 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure: gcc/analyzer/constraint-manager.o differs on loongarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112497 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug bootstrap/112497] [14 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure: gcc/analyzer/constraint-manager.o differs on loongarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112497 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- This failure means the stage1 and stage2 compilers generated different code for the same input. So when I need to debug this I usually start by first getting that source code. Based in the title of this

[Bug target/112462] New: RISC-V zicond cost model enhancements

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: law at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Currently the costing of zicond always returns COSTS_N_INSNS (1) which can be inaccurate. I see two primary issues that need to be fixed. First, for conditions which are not equality

[Bug target/114000] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in force_nonfallthru_and_redirect, at cfgrtl.cc:1556 with -O2 -freorder-blocks-and-partition -fPIC -mexplicit-relocs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114000 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/114000] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in force_nonfallthru_and_redirect, at cfgrtl.cc:1556 with -O2 -freorder-blocks-and-partition -fPIC -mexplicit-relocs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114000 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug target/113790] [14 Regression][riscv64] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.cc:4294 since r14-4944-gf55cdce3f8dd85

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113790 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug target/113790] [14 Regression][riscv64] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.cc:4294 since r14-4944-gf55cdce3f8dd85

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113790 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug other/113575] [14 Regression] memory hog building insn-opinit.o (i686-linux-gnu -> riscv64-linux-gnu)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113575 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/113533] [14 Regression] Code generation regression after change for pr111267

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113533 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/113384] [14 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_reference_1.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113384 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/113346] [14 Regression] epiphany-elf build failure

||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/113179] [11/12/13/14 Regression] MIPS: INS is used for long long, before SLL

||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/113226] [14 Regression] testsuite/std/ranges/iota/max_size_type.cc fails for cris-elf after r14-6888-ga138b99646a555

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113226 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rust/113461] [14 Regression] rust-proc-macro.cc:174:15: error: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'long long unsigned int' [-Werror=format=]

|RESOLVED CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Should be fixed on the trunk now.

[Bug target/112871] [14 Regression] RISCV ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2804 (unrecognizable insn) with -01 rv32gc_zicond

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112871 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/113001] [14 Regression] RISCV Zicond ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 with -O2 rv64gcv_zicond

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113001 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/112301] [12/13/14 regression] Double destruction of returned object when exiting the scope causes an exception which gets rethrown since r12-6333-gb10e031458d541

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112301 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >