[Bug fortran/65766] gFortran Compiler SEGFAULTING on compiling simple program

2015-10-07 Thread louis.krupp at zoho dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65766 --- Comment #11 from louis.krupp at zoho dot com --- Dominique, Vous avez raison; j'en suis désolé. Je viens de le faire. Louis On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:47:39 -0700 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi

[Bug fortran/52332] Internal compiler error in in gfc_get_symbol_decl

2015-10-02 Thread louis.krupp at zoho dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52332 --- Comment #10 from louis.krupp at zoho dot com --- Paul, Fixed in revision 228376. svn must have noticed that the two test files were executable. I'm not 100% sure how they got that way; in at least one bug report, pr 52332, the downloaded

[Bug c/77750] [7 Regression] gcc build not working with -O0

2016-09-27 Thread louis.krupp at zoho dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77750 --- Comment #3 from louis.krupp at zoho dot com --- I agree. But in the interests of reporting the bug and proposing a patch as soon as possible, I decided to minimize the risk of unintended consequences by keeping things as simple as I could

[Bug fortran/50069] FORALL fails on a character array

2016-11-08 Thread louis.krupp at zoho dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50069 --- Comment #11 from louis.krupp at zoho dot com --- You're right. I wasn't paying attention to the third ("function reverse ...") in the bug report. I believe that's fixed with the attached patch to trans-expr.c along with my other

[Bug c/77750] [7 Regression] gcc build not working with -O0

2016-11-09 Thread louis.krupp at zoho dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77750 --- Comment #8 from louis.krupp at zoho dot com --- The patch is no longer necessary, because it looks like the problem with combine.c was fixed on 1 November: === r241744 | foreese | 2016-11-01 09:29:51 -0600 (Tue, 01 Nov 2016) | 5 lines Mark

[Bug fortran/50069] FORALL fails on a character array

2016-11-07 Thread louis.krupp at zoho dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50069 --- Comment #9 from louis.krupp at zoho dot com --- The attached patch adds a slight variation of Tobias Burnus's patch for 50069 to my patch for 55086, and it seems to fix the two tests in 50069. "make check-fortran" runs with no

[Bug c/77750] [7 Regression] gcc build not working with -O0

2016-10-26 Thread louis.krupp at zoho dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77750 --- Comment #6 from louis.krupp at zoho dot com --- It's still there. I'm maintaining the attached changes to my debug tree. (I'm not sure my last message got through.) Louis On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 03:01:42 -0700 Louis Krupp <louis

[Bug c/77750] [7 Regression] gcc build not working with -O0

2016-10-26 Thread louis.krupp at zoho dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77750 --- Comment #5 from louis.krupp at zoho dot com --- It's still there. I'm maintaining these changes to my debug tree: --- gcc/combine.c (revision 241547) +++ gcc/combine.c (working copy) @@ -11371,6 +11371,8 @@ simplify_compare_const (enum