https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93621
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Yes, I can confirm it still ICEs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94250
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
|1
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-23
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
I've got it, sparc64 does not define __BIG_ENDIAN__. I'm testing a patch that
does endianess detection based on __BYTE_ORDER__.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92264
--- Comment #35 from Martin Liška ---
The suggested patch helped to reduce compilation to:
2m54s
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: marxin at gcc dot
|1
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-23
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
I'm working on that..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94273
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||stilor at att dot net
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|c++ |debug
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-23
Known to fail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94271
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.0, 8.4.0, 9.3.0
Known to work|
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Following fails:
$ g++ /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94276
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-23
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94276
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I see the following error:
$ cat undef.c
static void f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94277
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.4.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
This one is very old (at least as 4.8.0):
$ gfortran
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Following fails:
$ cat hash.cpp
void fn1() {}
void fn2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94281
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Priority|P3
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: amker at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94283
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: law at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I see following error:
$ cat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94284
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.4.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94276
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94285
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-23
Priority|P3
-gffdc40a90faec54d
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94259
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 48093
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48093&action=edit
Patch candidate
There's a patch candidate. Can you please test it?
||iains at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority|P3 |P1
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-23
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94288
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Reduced test-case:
namespace std {
template struct coroutine_traits {
using promise_type = _Result::promise_type;
};
template struct coroutine_handle;
template <> struct coroutine_handle<> {};
template s
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords||needs-bisection
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
I'm bisecting that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94259
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94291
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
Su
|--- |10.0
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Started with r10-3985-g8b8ab8f473b42933b9c1e292c4b1ab02adf1863a.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94276
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94281
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94296
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
It has something to do with end location of function:
$ cat hash.c
void fn1()
{
}
void fn2()
{
;
}
$ ./xg++ -B. -g hash.c -c -O1 -fno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94299
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94299
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
So I was able to reproduce the problem but I don't see what exactly happens
there. Note that -O2 is needed in order to process inlining and further
optimizations. I bet it's an issue in the code itself.
Feel f
|NEW
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||9.3.0
Priority|P3 |P1
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94259
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94288
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3)
> thanks for the report. The reduced testcase at c#2 doesn't fire for me once
> pending updates are applied. However, the attached case preprocessed code
> does; I th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94288
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3)
> > > thanks for the report. The reduced testcase at c#2 doesn't fire for m
|1
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-25
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Kees Cook from comment #0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94307
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> But isn't the default without -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error already
> calling
> a library routine that the kernel could override?
They don't want to impleme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94271
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] lto1: |[8/9 Regression] lto1:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94259
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||9.3.0
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-25
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Known to fail
||2020-03-25
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94317
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
|NEW
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-25
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2020-03-25
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94318
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94318
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Isn't that dup of PR94072?
Sorry, this one PR94042.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94318
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> > Isn't that dup of PR94072?
>
> Sorry, this one PR94042.
I don't have a good day. This link should be what I'm looki
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94311
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Blocks||86656
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86656
[Bug 86656] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=address
: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94323
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94317
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |srinath.parvathaneni at
arm dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94317
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
This one is very old (at least GCC 4.8.0):
$ cat pack.ii
template class A {
const int &m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94326
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94325
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.0, 9.3.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94329
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Last reconfirmed|
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Fails since GCC 4.9.0:
$ cat use_only.f90
SUBROUTINE r_to_s1b ( s, hinv )
REAL hinv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94325
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Ok, let me take a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92046
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92046
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94322
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-25
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94326
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
|--- |10.0
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Obvious error, sorry.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92264
--- Comment #37 from Martin Liška ---
@Jakub: Can we close it? Or do you plan any other patch for it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94335
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94333
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
I've got patch for it.
@Richi: Is it stage1 material or can we add it for GCC 10?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94334
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94271
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #5)
> Unfortunately, apart from PR testsuite/94334, the patch introduced another
> failure:
>
> +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr81213-2.c (test for excess errors)
>
> Excess er
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94330
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94339
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94339
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94339
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Re
||2020-03-26
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, it started with GCC 4.9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93369
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
I've just run the test-case on aarch64 and it works fine (-O2, -O2 -flto, -O3
-flto -fno-early-inlining). And lto.exp testsuite works fine on aarch64.
@Wilco: Can you please double-check?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93621
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.0, 9.3.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91322
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #2)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> > I've just run the test-case on aarch64 and it works fine (-O2, -O2 -flto,
> > -O3 -flto -fno-early-inlining). And lto.exp te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93621
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|9.2.0 |9.3.0
Known to fail|9.3.0
,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-26
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94350
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94360
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Unfortunately, the mentioned configuration is not tested on LNT periodic
benchmarks.
||10.0
Known to work||9.3.0
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91601
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94369
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
|1
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-29
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, it's a very old issue.
201 - 300 of 15302 matches
Mail list logo
