AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: michele at focuseek dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27280
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: michele at focuseek dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25040
--- Comment #1 from michele at focuseek dot com 2005-11-25 23:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=10341)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10341action=view)
A test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25040
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: michele at focuseek dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #1 from michele at focuseek dot com 2010-03-09 09:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=20053)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20053action=view)
A simple test exhibiting the .dummy resources problem
As I said this works with gcc 4.2.2
--
http
--- Comment #4 from michele at focuseek dot com 2010-03-10 08:05 ---
Yesterday I filed the suspiciously similar bug 42143 with a really simple test
case that fails on gcc 4.4.3 and used to work with gcc 4.2.2. As I wrote in the
description for that bug I suspect it's actually
--- Comment #5 from michele at focuseek dot com 2010-03-10 08:09 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
[...] suspiciously similar bug 42143 [...]
I meant bug 43302...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42143
--- Comment #2 from michele at focuseek dot com 2010-03-10 08:30 ---
Experimenting with -save-temps I noticed that the .dummy resource is in the
.jar generated by ecj which seems to point to it as the main suspect.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43302
