[Bug bootstrap/49584] [4.4 regression] bootstrap failure on m68k-linux: segfault compiling _muldi3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49584 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ada/48835] Porting GNAT to GNU/Linux/m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835 --- Comment #16 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-29 07:40:20 UTC --- 4.2.4 (lightly patched) and 4.3.6 (heavily patched) both bootstrap fine with gnat and rebuild themselves without problems. I'm going to rebuild 4.3.6

[Bug bootstrap/49584] New: [4.4.7 regression] bootstrap failure on m68k-linux: segfault compiling _muldi3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49584 Summary: [4.4.7 regression] bootstrap failure on m68k-linux: segfault compiling _muldi3 Product: gcc Version: 4.4.7 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug bootstrap/49584] [4.4.7 regression] bootstrap failure on m68k-linux: segfault compiling _muldi3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49584 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-29 19:52:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) This is stage 1 though. Hmm, strange. I'll try a new bootstrap with r175603 reverted. How do you build the stage 1 compiler

[Bug ada/49539] New: [4.7 regression] Ada TYPES.UNRECOVERABLE_ERROR in comperr.adb:423 on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49539 Summary: [4.7 regression] Ada TYPES.UNRECOVERABLE_ERROR in comperr.adb:423 on ARM Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug ada/49539] [4.7 regression] ICE building gnattools

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49539 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-27 09:14:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) gcc-4.7-20110625 failed to bootstrap on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi due to an internal error in the Ada frontend: No, most likely

[Bug target/25343] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] [m68k] testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25343 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug ada/49539] [4.7 regression] ICE building gnattools

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49539 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-27 16:51:46 UTC --- 4.7-20110618 failed to bootstrap with the same error.

[Bug c++/49525] [4.4] wrong code and wrong warning for bitfield related operations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49525 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-25 12:23:48 UTC --- I can't reproduce the runtime failure with gcc-4.6-20110621 on x86_64-linux. I see you're using Gentoo's modified gcc-4.4.5. Can you please try again

[Bug c++/49525] [4.4] wrong code and wrong warning for bitfield related operations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49525 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug c++/49525] [4.4] wrong code and wrong warning for bitfield related operations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49525 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-25 16:40:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) I have this problem using the gcc 4.4.5 build in Ubuntu 10.10, which reports itself as gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.4.4-14ubuntu5) 4.4.5

[Bug c++/49525] [4.4] wrong code and wrong warning for bitfield related operations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49525 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC|mikpe at it dot uu.se | --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/48493] [ICE] [ARM] in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48493 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-24 09:59:58 UTC --- I've now bootstrapped and regtested the patch in #c5 on top of gcc-4.6-20110610 on an armv5tel-linux-gnueabi machine. (I couldn't get it to apply to trunk

[Bug ada/48835] Porting GNAT to GNU/Linux/m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835 --- Comment #15 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-23 08:36:33 UTC --- Status update: I have a nice stable gcc-4.1.2 with gnat that has bootstrapped itself through approx 10 generations natively on m68k-linux, and the final

[Bug middle-end/48493] [ICE] [ARM] in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48493 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug gcov-profile/49484] gcov crash if two(or more) forks happen at the same time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49484 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-21 09:24:20 UTC --- gcc-4.1.2 is no longer supported upstream. Please try again with gcc-4.3.5 or newer, preferably gcc-4.6.0 or 4.5.3. Or report this to Red Hat who delivered

[Bug middle-end/48493] [ICE] [ARM] in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48493 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-21 11:24:39 UTC --- I can do a bootstrap and regtest with Richard's patch in #c5 tomorrow, but as my HW is armv5te I can't catch any neon-related runtime regressions. Does

[Bug target/49423] [arm] internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug target/49423] [arm] internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc

[Bug target/49422] [arm] unable to find a register to spill in class 'VFP_LO_REGS'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49422 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-20 18:58:00 UTC --- I've not been able to reproduce this ICE. How exactly was your gcc configured (arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-gcc -v)?

[Bug target/48256] gcc4.4.5 internal compiler error: in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:1954

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48256 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-19 14:02:27 UTC --- Created attachment 24559 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24559 preprocessed test case Several files in gsoc2010-fftw-neon ICE gcc-4.4

[Bug target/48863] A Bug When Assembler Instructions with C Expression Operands in arm-elf-gcc 4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48863 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-19 16:26:25 UTC --- Created attachment 24562 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24562 runtime test case Here's a small runtime test case. cat pr48863.c

[Bug testsuite/49464] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/ext/altivec-17.C (test for errors, line 15)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49464 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-18 23:54:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) (note that it is likely also a 4.6 regression). It is, g++.dg/ext/altivec-17.c fails for me on powerpc64-linux with gcc-4.6

[Bug ada/48835] Porting GNAT to GNU/Linux/m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835 --- Comment #14 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-17 10:02:21 UTC --- Partial success: I've just managed to bootstrap gcc-4.1.2 w/ gnat on m68k-linux. Lots of patches applied though.

[Bug target/49419] [4.6/4.7 regression] gcc -O2 miscompiles gp2c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49419 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug ada/48835] Porting GNAT to GNU/Linux/m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835 --- Comment #10 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-14 08:12:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) - __gnat_malloc is defined in Ada to return Address (integer, so in d0), but it's called from a couple of places via fake extern

[Bug target/49385] Invalid RTL intstruction for ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49385 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-13 11:20:23 UTC --- I get no ICE on this with 4.7 r174986, even with --enable-checking, and the assembler doesn't complain about the generated code. So what is the problem?

[Bug bootstrap/49383] New: [4.7 regression] powerpc64-linux bootstrap failure due to ice in cgraph_only_called_directly_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49383 Summary: [4.7 regression] powerpc64-linux bootstrap failure due to ice in cgraph_only_called_directly_p Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/49030] ICE in get_arm_condition_code, at config/arm/arm.c:17180

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49030 --- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-12 15:23:40 UTC --- Created attachment 24503 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24503 more reduced test case, ICEs at -O1 for armv5te and armv6 Using

[Bug target/49030] ICE in get_arm_condition_code, at config/arm/arm.c:17180

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49030 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-12 21:33:30 UTC --- I have a preliminary patch which creates a clone of *arm_cmpdi_insn that does a reverse comparison, via a new CC mode for must-be-reversed comparisons

[Bug ada/48835] Porting GNAT to GNU/Linux/m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-11 12:33:09 UTC --- Created attachment 24491 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24491 patch fixing m68k function call abi issues in gnat WRT the the m68k

[Bug c++/48660] ARM ICE in expand_expr_real_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48660 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-10 10:04:52 UTC --- Created attachment 24484 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24484 reduced test case With the massively reduced test case and r154736 built

[Bug target/49030] ICE in get_arm_condition_code, at config/arm/arm.c:17180

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49030 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug c++/48660] ARM ICE in expand_expr_real_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48660 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/48988] [4.7 regression] ICE at pred_chain_length_cmp at tree-ssa-uninit.c:1624

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48988 --- Comment #9 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-06 10:21:19 UTC --- Wasn't this fixed in r174077? If so, can this be closed now?

[Bug tree-optimization/49243] attribute((returns_twice)) doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49243 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/47672] math-68881.h does not support C99

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47672 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-06 19:54:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) However, someone reported that all the functionnality of math-68881.h was not reported to -ffast-math: some instructions

[Bug target/49094] ARM aligned(1) attribute is sometimes dropped

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49094 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/49243] attribute((returns_twice)) doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49243 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-02 15:33:40 UTC --- Patch posted: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00145.html

[Bug c/49243] New: attribute((returns_twice)) doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49243 Summary: attribute((returns_twice)) doesn't work Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo:

[Bug c/49243] attribute((returns_twice)) doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49243 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-05-31 16:22:43 UTC --- Created attachment 24404 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24404 test case

[Bug c/49243] attribute((returns_twice)) doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49243 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-05-31 22:49:36 UTC --- Comparing tree dumps from gcc-4.7 on a reduced compile-only test case shows that the code that calls _setjmp (a) and the code that calls my_setjmp (b) start

[Bug tree-optimization/49218] Incorrect optimization of a 'for' loop creates an infinite loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49218 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-05-30 09:00:46 UTC --- Triggered by r163724: Author: rguenth Date: Wed Sep 1 11:39:55 2010 New Revision: 163724 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163724 Log

[Bug tree-optimization/49218] Incorrect optimization of a 'for' loop creates an infinite loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49218 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug bootstrap/48679] [4.7 regression] bootstrap comparison failures on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48679 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/49169] ARM: optimisations strip the Thumb/ARM mode bit off function pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49169 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug tree-optimization/49175] vect/pr48172.c execution failure for ARM GNU/Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49175 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug target/49180] pr45070.c fails for -Os -mthumb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49180 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug tree-optimization/49135] ICE in gcc.c-torture/execute/920302-1.c on arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49135 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug target/48743] -march=native mis-detects AMD K6-2+ / K6-3 as Athlon - compiled C fails with illegal instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48743 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-05-22 14:23:21 UTC --- Created attachment 24326 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24326 untested fix The previous patch doesn't look quite right to me

[Bug bootstrap/49104] bootstrap failure on AMD K6-2 with illegal instruction (cmove) in stage2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49104 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug web/49109] New: bugzilla's patch viewer sometimes hides file headers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49109 Summary: bugzilla's patch viewer sometimes hides file headers Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: web

[Bug c++/49021] [4.6 regression] BOOST_FOREACH over vector segfaults at runtime

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49021 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-05-20 08:27:39 UTC --- I'm trying to reduce the preprocessed test case, but since I'm not a C++ person this might take some time.

[Bug c++/49021] [4.6 regression] BOOST_FOREACH over vector segfaults at runtime

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49021 --- Comment #9 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-05-20 09:05:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) I'm trying to reduce the preprocessed test case, but since I'm not a C++ person this might take some time. Scratch

[Bug c++/49021] [4.6 regression] BOOST_FOREACH over vector segfaults at runtime

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49021 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-05-19 23:37:54 UTC --- The regression started with r170601: Author: jason Date: Tue Mar 1 22:44:35 2011 New Revision: 170601 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev

[Bug c++/49021] [4.6 regression] BOOST_FOREACH over vector segfaults at runtime

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49021 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-05-17 12:37:52 UTC --- Created attachment 24260 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24260 test case, preprocessed on x86_64-linux

[Bug c++/49021] New: [4.6 regression] BOOST_FOREACH over vector segfaults at runtime

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49021 Summary: [4.6 regression] BOOST_FOREACH over vector segfaults at runtime Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/49021] [4.6 regression] BOOST_FOREACH over vector segfaults at runtime

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49021 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-05-17 12:38:38 UTC --- Created attachment 24261 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24261 test case, non-preprocessed

[Bug java/48417] -ffixed-regs option can't work in mips-elf-gcj compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48417 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug c/49016] always_inline causes references below the current stack pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49016 --- Comment #11 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-05-17 16:58:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) And the compile (and the compile in the rc script here) is indeed specifying -mcmodel=kernel in the flags. -mcmodel=kernel isn't

[Bug target/48554] Regression for coldfire platform

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48554 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-05-16 11:52:32 UTC --- gcc-4.6-20110513 still ICEs on this test case, but after backporting the fix for PR47612 (r173393) compilation succeeds.

[Bug bootstrap/48679] [4.7 regression] bootstrap comparison failures on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48679 --- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-05-16 12:17:45 UTC --- The bootstrap comparison failure appears to be gone in a c-only build of gcc-4.7-20110514. I'll run a bisect to identify which rev fixed this bug.

[Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot

[Bug bootstrap/48679] [4.7 regression] bootstrap comparison failures on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48679 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-05-12 22:36:17 UTC --- It's expand_call(), initialize_argument_information(), precompute_register_parameters(), or load_register_parameters() that gets miscompiled in stage2

[Bug bootstrap/48679] [4.7 regression] bootstrap comparison failures on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48679 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-05-07 16:25:34 UTC --- It's calls.c that gets miscompiled. If stage2 cc1 is relinked with calls.o from stage1 then it generates the same code for alloca.c as stage1 does

[Bug bootstrap/48679] [4.7 regression] bootstrap comparison failures on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48679 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-05-06 11:19:10 UTC --- The smallest .o file that fails bootstrap comparison is libiberty/alloca.o, which get 150 bytes of .text with stage1 xgcc but 148 bytes of text with stage2

[Bug target/48863] A Bug When Assembler Instructions with C Expression Operands in arm-elf-gcc 4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48863 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug bootstrap/48679] [4.7 regression] bootstrap comparison failures on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48679 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc

[Bug ada/37109] can't canadian cross ada (if host=target, but host!=build)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37109 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug target/48830] [4.4/4.6 Regression] unrecognized insn storing fp (simd) reg in SImode to stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48830 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug ada/37109] can't canadian cross ada (if host=target, but host!=build)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37109 --- Comment #9 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-04-30 13:49:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) (In reply to comment #7) manually. The more serious problem I found is that the final gnat executables segfault

[Bug ada/37109] can't canadian cross ada (if host=target, but host!=build)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37109 --- Comment #11 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-04-30 15:09:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) At a first glance, there’s a lot of system-linux-*.ads but none for m68k. Should I have a look in that area

[Bug ada/37109] can't canadian cross ada (if host=target, but host!=build)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37109 --- Comment #14 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-04-30 15:40:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) Should we open up another bugreport for _that_ (port GNAT to GNU/Linux/m68k) though, since it doesn’t really belong here? Yes.

[Bug ada/48835] Porting GNAT to GNU/Linux/m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug target/47230] [4.6/4.7 Regression] gcc fails to bootstrap on alpha in stage2 with relocation truncated to fit: GPREL16 against ...

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug target/47230] [4.6/4.7 Regression] gcc fails to bootstrap on alpha in stage2 with relocation truncated to fit: GPREL16 against ...

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-04-29 17:17:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) (In reply to comment #6) FWIW, I've never gotten that linkage failure on my alphaev6-linux machine, and last week's snapshots

[Bug bootstrap/48679] New: [4.7 regression] bootstrap comparison failures on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48679 Summary: [4.7 regression] bootstrap comparison failures on m68k-linux Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/48679] [4.7 regression] bootstrap comparison failures on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48679 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-04-19 09:58:30 UTC --- `size' shows .text size differences, diffing objdump -d outputs shows what looks like register allocation changes. E.g. on libiberty/objalloc.o: size prev

[Bug target/48628] ICE in reload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48628 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug inline-asm/48637] %c in ARM inline asm leads to ICE (in arm_print_operand)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48637 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-04-16 11:50:01 UTC --- Created attachment 24010 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24010 reduced test case Further reduced test case. asm goto is not needed, %c0

[Bug target/48576] wrong code when accessing variables in a large stack frame

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48576 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-04-16 19:28:54 UTC --- It started with r146817: Author: matz Date: Sun Apr 26 19:35:04 2009 New Revision: 146817 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=146817 Log

[Bug target/48576] wrong code when accessing variables in a large stack frame

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48576 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug target/48576] wrong code when accessing variables in a large stack frame

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48576 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-04-12 22:41:14 UTC --- Created attachment 23969 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23969 standalone and reduced test case Succeeds with no output, or segfaults

[Bug target/47908] attribute((optimize(2))) causes ICE in m68k_sched_issue_rate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47908 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-04-11 07:36:17 UTC --- I have fully tested patches to fix this for 4.4.5, 4.5.2, and 4.6.0 (presumably that one will also work for 4.7 but I haven't checked), but I've avoided

[Bug c++/48551] Following source code crashes the c++ compiler on coldfire platform.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48551 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug target/48554] Regression for coldfire platform

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48554 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug middle-end/48470] ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1 at expr.c:6835

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48470 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-04-06 19:48:25 UTC --- Created attachment 23903 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23903 reduced test case The test case reduces to the following: void

[Bug c/48470] ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1 at expr.c:6835

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48470 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug target/48325] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403 with neon optimized code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48325 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-03-29 07:43:35 UTC --- That's a heavily modified compiler by CodeSourcery. Please reproduce with a vanilla FSF GCC, or report the problem to CodeSourcery as their compiler clearly

[Bug bootstrap/48332] New: optabs changes (PR48263 fix) broke m68k-linux bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48332 Summary: optabs changes (PR48263 fix) broke m68k-linux bootstrap Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug bootstrap/48332] optabs changes (PR48263 fix) broke m68k-linux bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48332 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-03-29 13:01:13 UTC --- Created attachment 23799 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23799 preprocessed and reduced test case

[Bug target/48308] crosscompiling to arm fails with assembler: can't resolve '.LC4' {.rodata.str1.1 section} - '.LPIC4' {*UND* section}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-03-28 07:47:41 UTC --- Works for me on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi with gcc-4.6-20110325 (r171529) and binutils-2.20.1 (heavily updated). Please attach the intermediate assembly file.

[Bug target/48308] crosscompiling to arm fails with assembler: can't resolve '.LC4' {.rodata.str1.1 section} - '.LPIC4' {*UND* section}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug target/48308] crosscompiling to arm fails with assembler: can't resolve '.LC4' {.rodata.str1.1 section} - '.LPIC4' {*UND* section}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at gcc dot

[Bug target/48308] crosscompiling to arm fails with assembler: can't resolve '.LC4' {.rodata.str1.1 section} - '.LPIC4' {*UND* section}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-03-28 22:57:21 UTC --- Created attachment 23793 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23793 reduced^2 test case

[Bug target/42949] ICE: reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:396

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42949 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-03-24 15:13:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) For gcc 4.5 r171282, arm-none-linux-gnueabi, I can run this command without error: arm-none-linux-gnueabi-g

[Bug target/46788] unsigned int possible treated as signed in a union/struct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46788 --- Comment #10 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-03-20 16:40:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) Author: ramana Date: Tue Mar 15 19:59:25 2011 New Revision: 171017 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171017

[Bug tree-optimization/48031] [4.4/4.5 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42956.c ICEs gcc on m68k-linux, ivopts related?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031 --- Comment #16 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-03-15 08:44:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) Created attachment 23614 [details] patch testing appreciated Applied to gcc 4.6/4.5/4.4 then bootstrapped and regression

[Bug c/48090] gcc 4.5.2 miscompilation when building on arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48090 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rearnsha at gcc

[Bug c/48090] gcc 4.5.2 miscompilation when building on arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48090 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kazu at gcc dot

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >